Saturday 31 August 2019

Another Gatwick Drone

There has been yet another drone incident at Gatwick Airport, possibly the most serious yet... which goes without saying because the others were faked of course. See background links below. The air safety organization Airprox reported that on Wednesday an A320 airliner was on its final approach to land at Gatwick's single runway when it had to take an emergency course correction to avoid colliding with a drone. This happened at 1,700 feet, above the 400 foot limit for private drone operators. It was also in controlled airspace. The flight and operator have not been named and many carriers fly A320's out of Gatwick including British Airways and EasyJet. This aircraft can carry up to 186 passengers. Airprox classified this incident as a "near-miss", the second highest level of seriousness after an actual collision. This is apparently the latest in a run of three reported drone incidents at Gatwick since the big scandal in late 2018 that I reported on in detail below. Source: (Thanks to my Facebook friend Jemma for finding this for me). This time there was no major disruption to the airport and only the flight involved was affected. This leads me to believe this was not a contrived drone threat to cover up a major systems breakdown for which the aviation industry would be liable. It is therefore probably a real drone. Alternatively it could be a UFO. As I said in the background links, the way UFO's are being reported has changed considerably in the last few years. I doubt if the word "drone" is code for a UFO in the same way "UAP" or "fastwalker" is. It might simply be a useful diversion to "prevent public panic" etc.

Wednesday 28 August 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 20

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the useless and destructive nature of HS2, forest fires in the Amazon, the G7 summit and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Tuesday 27 August 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 50

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated and extended YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: Aleister Crowley's house mysteriously burns, the Larry Warren troll crisis, forest fires in the Amazon and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Monday 26 August 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 367

I have been featured on Programme 367 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Public relations departments, holographic reality, Platonic noble myths and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Saturday 24 August 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 19

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the death of Jeffrey Epstein, Barclays head given immunity, the UN migration agenda and much much more. See here for Caroline's channel:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Friday 23 August 2019

What has Happened to Q?

For those who follow QAnon updates, this month has been very bleak because the mysterious online entity known as "QAnon" has gone silent. This is not unusual; Q has been known to vanish for several weeks at a time since its posts began in 2017, however this time his/her/their silence might be more significant because it was caused directly by 8-Chan closing down. The host has dropped the board after several of its regular contributors were involved in the horrific crimes. Brenton Tarrant, the mosque shooter in New Zealand and others in the United States of America all used 8-Chan. However, Q has not returned to their old stomping ground on 4-Chan even though that site is currently active and it was where they made their debut. The QAnon aggregators like this one:, remain frozen. Why has this happened? There are many theories. My good friend and fellow radio broadcaster Kev Baker is absolutely convinced that QAnon is a massive hoax. He has made several programmes about it, for example see: I've watched this, but I've also watched debates between the two sides, for example: and I think the Q-supporters get the upper hand. I've also discussed the issue with Duncan Campbell and Mark Cocking on HPANWO Radio, see: and:, and I think there is some reality to Q. Now, a new document has appeared with a brand new take on the issue. It claims Q is indeed real, but that it is in fact not a liberator and beacon of hope that we've been told it is; but that it is really a sinister psychological warfare operation conducted by the very globalist government it claims to oppose. The article is by somebody called Bernard Grover who is quite well-known and sometimes appears on Jeff Rense's current radio show. He has written a whole series of posts about QAnon on his blog and his latest is called "The Quiller Q". He begins with the statement: "My father, who was both an historian and a politician, taught me one important lesson that has followed me for life: Never trust a government anytime, anywhere, for any reason. To that, I would add: most especially when the military gets involved in civilian affairs." It is quite a fashionable idea at the moment to believe that absolutely everything is fixed, everything is bent; and whenever anything happens that makes you think some truth is coming out; then it is not really truth, it is just a deeper level of the deception. On the surface, and before 2016, that makes sense seeing as we have lived in what George Orwell called "an age of universal deceit". The problem with this worldview is that it means the age of deceit can never be seen to end short of some overt and obvious revolution that itself is generally regarded as impossible. This means that the lying government would have to be eternal and invincible. Well, I don't believe that is the case; and I give more details in the background links at the bottom. The problem is that the "everything is fixed!" mentality has literally become part of the identity of certain people in the Truth movement, and even in a strange way their sense of self-esteem. When I read Grover's article I suspect that he is one of them. For instance he has invented some new words such as: Qnuverse, Qvians and Qult. This indicates that he has a very low personal opinion of anybody who disagrees with him over QAnon. This is confirmed by some of the derogatory remarks he makes such as: "... Qvians may be able to dismiss this interpretation because it does not fit with their myopic loyalty to an invisible entity..." and: "...hundreds of thousands of people not only trust Q, but spread its pronouncements like a surreal gospel..." and: "...Just what the Deep State means in the Qnuverse is undefined by Q, though Qvians all 'know' what it is when they see it..." He also calls Q commentators "Acolytes". This all too frequent writing style indicates that Mr Grover is not being entirely rational. He is giving away clues that he might be a bit of a typical "I can see through the disinfo but you can't!" poser. However, we should still examine his logical points.
Bernard Grover claims that the multiple mass-shootings that are occurring across the world, especially in the United States, are not isolated events, but are in fact being perpetrated deliberately in sequence by an organized conspiracy for the objective of generating a mass psychosis of fear. Those responsible are also controlling the QAnon phenomenon. Q's final post before going to ground was: "The month of AUGUST is traditionally very HOT". "Hot" in military parlance means a high possibility of violence. Within four days there had been two mass-shootings in the USA; in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. Thirty-two people were killed and dozens more injured. Two days before the last drop, on the 30th of July, Q posted this: "_Hot8_Hot9_Red_Red_y__FREEDOM_mark1-99_yPc_sigDConf_net[w1]" This makes no sense at all in normal language. To me it resembles a line from a computer program; but it could be some kind of code. Grover thinks that it might be a form of mind control activation for a targeted individual or a secret signal to an agent, like the old numbers stations, see: As I said, it is known that some of the gunmen over the last couple of years regularly contributed to the Chans. Q also posted: "[24hr Warning] Be vigilant. See something. Say something. Know your surroundings at all times." which Grover interprets as a certainty that they had full knowledge of what was to come. He cites a previous situation in which QAnon seemed to know exactly when Senator John McCain would die, even though McCain supposedly died of natural causes. The long silences of a few weeks every so often are apparently the Q entity going into "listening mode" to gauge what internet users are seeing the material they already have and how they are sharing it. The current deletion of 8-Chan is a useful excuse for the latest of these periods. Source: The problem with QAnon analysis is that it is open to all kinds of interpretations. Q usually writes in a very abstract manner, specifically to encourage discussion and education among their readers. Drawing exact meaning from Q-drops is similar to doing so from Nostradamus who also used symbolic and sometimes surreal dialogue to deliver messages. Q also sometimes admittedly disseminates false information for strategic purposes; all to further the Plan. I don't think Bernard Grover's theory about Q is conclusive at all. Perhaps if more actions happen in this "HOT" month of August, or none at all, before it ends in just over a week, at the time of writing, it will add or subtract credibility to his idea. QAnon is a highly complex subject and I've had to think long and hard about where I stand on it, but I do maintain, without apology, Q is both real and benevolent. People have accused me of wishful thinking, and of course I am guilty as charged. Who wouldn't want Q's vision of an end to the New World Order to be true? However, nobody is without bias. I get very suspicious of those who claim that they are totally unbiased; they tend to be some of the most biased people imaginable. Just because an idea is one we would desire does not automatically make it is false. As I said, the "I can see through the disinfo but you can't!" poser is a familiar type. The atmosphere of pessimism in the Truth movement has partly been cultivated by those whose pessimism for them is a back-slapping badge of bravery. I once had a long conversation with somebody at paranormal event about who was a shill or wasn't a shill, what was disinfo and what wasn't disinfo. I grew tired of their attitude because for them the latter factors in both subjects were a tiny minority... with themselves in the heroic vanguard of course, and it was pretty clear that they were revelling in their self-superiority over others. I am perfectly aware that disinformation exists, and I also know that we have to be on the lookout for it. However, this does not mean that we should automatically dismiss absolutely everything as disinformation a priori, unless it immediately proves itself to be one hundred percent legitimate, especially if our motives are just personal and not part of the Truth movement's mission. Yes, if we switched on the Ten O'Clock News and saw Dr Judy Wood being interviewed, we could be pretty confident that the New World Order was on shaky ground, but I don't believe such an occasion would happen spontaneously; it would have to have a cause. I think it would be the end result of a process. Perhaps we are seeing the beginning of that process now. If so, then it behoves us to give it a chance. We should proceed warily, but hopefully. I think QAnon might well be a sign of that very beginning.

Wednesday 21 August 2019

Empathy Spam

All the HPANWO blogs are set for comments to be hidden until they are approved by the admin, which is me. This is to stop the trolls infesting the comments boxes. I also receive a lot of spam, that is comments posted for the purposes of advertizing. Many of them look normal with words like "Interesting blog. Thanks.", but the words are actually hyperlinks to promotions for everything from furniture superstores to cheap rail fares. I broke a rule the other day because somebody posted a spam link on this HPANWO Voice article, which I recommend reading for background: The comment is in the illustration and I felt it was worth the HPANWO readers seeing. The webpage it links to appears to be a cache, which is odd because it was only created in May. You will notice that the comments box on it doesn't work. The page gives an overview of what empathy is which is fairly accurate. Not all empaths are shy and quiet. I myself return as "ENFJ- the protagonist" on the Myers-Briggs personality inventory (Maybe I'll cover that in more detail in a future article). There are links highlighted on the article for more information. It then goes on to discuss what the author sees as the different types of empaths: cognitive empaths, affective empaths and compassionate empaths. The three sound quite similar really and I expect I am a mixture of them all. Then the article continues with: "Empathy can take over someone's mind quite easily, so it's important to practice setting healthy boundaries." This is similar to the point made in the background link above about the dark side of empathy. We empaths have learned to limit ourselves in order to avoid becoming completely overwhelmed by the characteristic passions of our disorder. Then the article asks whether empaths are rare. The answer it gives is a simple "yes", but it then describes empathy as a skill. This is strange because most pop psychology is geared towards teaching empaths the skills of suppressing their nature as a survival mechanism in mainstream society. The article then goes on to contradict itself when it says: "Even worse, many empaths get taken advantage of so they might try to conceal their empathic side once they reach a critical burnout point." Empathy burnout is a personality breakdown caused by the all too familiar trauma of conformist exploitation, but that's a subject for another time. However, the gist of the statement is that getting taken advantage of is inevitable and normal. Conventional ethics sometimes even calls it good. Those who take advantage are doing nothing wrong, are they? So are we to conceal or nurture this "skill"? The article is not clear on that. The final paragraph is straight out of a cheap mass-market self-help paperback: "As you can see, there are many ways to express empathy. Work to nurture your own innate sense of empathy to strengthen and deepen your relationships." Source: However, empathy rarely does strengthen and deepen relationships. If anything, it makes them more unstable and difficult, on the rare occasions they get off the ground at all. This is for a variety of reasons, one of which is that empaths are generally hated and shunned in this EastEnders world we live in. It is a disorder that this soap opera urges us to shake off. I still thought the comment linked to an interesting article and so I'm glad I approved it.

Tuesday 20 August 2019

Troll Gossip Backlash

Trolls react with excessive ferocity to the tiniest of stimulus, sucking as much sham-outrage as they can muster from what little attention they receive. I try to minimize that stimulus as much as possible, but sometimes it is necessary to correct factual errors which might mislead other people, especially when they are seriously defamatory, as this one is. The anti-Larry Warren trolls are experts at sensationalism and some individuals are unfortunately very susceptible to it. I've made several such moves in the last few months, right up until yesterday; see: Another occasion has emerged with the publication of the latest blog post by Sacha Christie, see: I will not address every single item in this feverish scribble because much of it is just a mindless stream of rhetorical adjectives. There is no rational reply possible to that; all one can do is hurl abuse back and that's not my style. What's more, some of the points made are ones I've debunked before, see my Larry Warren research project in the background links below. Sacha begins with the long title of her article, which is really the first line: "Gary Heseltine says he does not book women to speak at his conferences because they can't stand up in front of 200 people and present evidence". She then goes on to drag the reader down into a very unoriginal auto-immune hate-inducing purgatory of feminist victimhood that she could have lifted verbatim from any university gender studies pamphlet. However she posts a source link to what triggered her and it contradicts the very thrust of her narrative. It is a clip from an interview with Gary Heseltine on the Kev Baker Show, see: Let's listen to Gary's exact words: "Somebody... asked me a very good question, why are there no women (at the upcoming UFO Truth Magazine Conference)? It's not done deliberately. We've had four women speak in the past. There aren't many women, in my opinion, who can stand up in front of two hundred people and talk about evidential things. There are lots of women out there talking about abductions and things like that, but not many on evidential-based things... Unfortunately there aren't many and there certainly aren't many in the UK that would fall into that category. While we've had women in the past and I certainly encourage women to come forward, there just aren't that many about. Although I'm sure we'll have women in the future." Not quite the same, is it? Sacha is once again twisting and distorting people's words to produce a false context. It would be fair to say that Gary is making an observation, one which I agree with; but he is not advocating the removal of female speakers from bookings due to any fundamental flaws of their sex. Both he and I know very well that there are many women who have contributed to evidential UFOlogy; they are simply smaller in quantity, not quality, than the men. I also believe abduction research is as vital as any other field of UFOlogy. Gary and I bring this controversy up on a recent HPANWO Show, which Sacha also references. She claims that the question was "obviously staged". No it wasn't, and I include a monologue after the interview where I expand on that very issue, see:

Sacha Christie then moves on to target your humble servant, obviously looking for revenge for my Larry Warren gossip exposes, with a reminder of the "Jay Deavin" incident. She also accuses me of being a "Holocaust denier!". The true story can be found here: and: and: If anybody chooses to take Sacha's word for it without wanting to hear my side of the story, then I don't care about your condemnation. Sacha also makes a big deal out of the fact that I once swore on the HPANWO Forum. That was almost two years ago; can't she find anything more recent? No doubt she was helped by Team Droike like last time. She includes no link to the thread, just a screen-grab. If she had provided a source then some of her readers might realize that I had a strong case for pleading extreme provocation. Never mind, I will provide one, see: (The person who extremely provoked me has since died, so I intend to say no more about this matter, see: Sacha calls me a racist and anti-Semite based on the title of an old video I made; again, no source link. Once more, look through my publications, for example see:, and ask people who know me; is that fair? She alleges that I think that the murder of Lee Rigby was faked. However I am one hundred percent sure that Lee Rigby was murdered and I think he deserves justice. I do question the means by which he was killed and who the real perpetrators were; and I make no apologies for that, see: Just look at how insane Sacha's position is. She ends her blog post with: "Today I got a 7 day ban on one of my Facebook accounts for sharing a screen shot of Ben Emlyn Jones being his true authentic self, in his own environment on his forum. So in a nut shell, I got a ban for one of Gary's main supporters swearing!!!" So it is my fault that she got banned even though she chose to share the grab of me swearing? Like I helped her or even knew she had done it? I've had her blocked for over three years! You couldn't make it up! The trolls are clearly panicking because they know Capel Green is coming and it's going to reveal them all for the fools that they are. It's as simple as that. There will be far more of this internet venom directed our way in the next few months. As always, I will only comment on it when applicable.

Monday 19 August 2019

Peter Robbins gossips about Larry Warren

I have been made aware of a recording of a private discussion involving Peter Robbins. I have listened to it and can positively identify Peter's voice in it. The recording was made after the broadcast or recording of a programme on the KGRA Radio network, see:, and it was never intended to be published. Peter launches into yet another tirade against his former co-author Larry Warren. As usual, Peter laments about how difficult it is for him to have "this dragging along behind my life" when he himself is the one who is perpetuating it. He chastises Larry for being abusive and slanderous when all the aggression and deception is coming from Peter and the trolls beside whom he has raised his standard. As always with Peter Robbins, most of his dialogue is not worth a reference because it is his customary waterfall of rhetoric, slushiness and self-pity. Along with the lies and defamation we have heard before, Peter claims that Larry is denying he made the statements he did when he spoke of how he had visited Ground Zero. The truth is that Larry did visit Ground Zero, but he never said that he was part of the professional first responder team. This is a typical example of the trolls twisting people's words. Peter talks about a "small team of investigators in the UK" which of course means Sacha Christie and her collection of beta-orbiters. He calls Larry a "coke head" and I don't think can be interpreted as Larry being fond of a popular brown coloured soft drink. Bear in mind that Col. Charles Halt also made groundless allegations of Larry's supposed drug addiction and Larry had to seek advice from a solicitor, see: Peter also says Larry is an alcoholic. Well, I've spent several days at a time in Larry's company and he has not touched a drop. I've known real alcoholics in my life and I know that they can hardly get out of bed without gulping down several cans of beer. What Peter said is absurd and insulting. He also accuses Larry of manipulating his ex-wife Sue. I know Sue as well and can assure you this is totally false. Sue is the mother of Larry's son Dennis and the two parents are raising their child together. As a single parent myself I know exactly what is involved with that and I'm close to my ex-partner, my daughter's mother, too. Sue despises the hate campaign against her ex-husband as much as his other friends do. Peter requests that the show's hosts share on their social media pages his various statements about Larry and the one about me which Peter calls "this anti-Semitic attack!" He adds that this was instigated by Larry; how can even he tell a lie like that? In fact Sue's family has a Jewish line which would make Dennis partly Jewish. How can Larry possibly instigate an anti-Semitic attack? I have made a full response to that sordid episode here: and: Along with his vitriol, Peter reveals an interesting piece of information that I had not heard before. There is a "downloadable book" coming soon in which the trolls' assertions will be listed. I don't know if this is the long (un)awaited book Sacha Christie boasts that she's writing called The Warren Decommission (Groan!). She has been promoting this title since 2015 but I don't see it on the shelves yet. Maybe it is something Peter has compiled himself instead. Either way, expect to read a review of it from me. However, seeing as I have categorically exposed everything Sacha, Peter and their motley crew have said as a total fabrication already, see background links, I don't expect my critique to be very lengthy. Peter moans that he wants Larry and his supporters to go away and leave him alone; well, as long as he maintains his deceitful activities, we're not going anywhere!

Sunday 18 August 2019

Bernie Sanders on UFO's

I've noticed a link between bad hairstyles and political success, for example see: and: Bernie Sanders has hair that makes me think somebody dropped an electric fire in his bath. Does this mean he will be the next US President? There is a personal link between Sanders and myself because I vaguely know his brother Larry. He is a Green Party councillor in Oxford. He attended several meetings with me when I was a young trade unionist and I went to school with his daughter, Bernie's niece, who I remember as being a very aloof and arrogant girl. Bernie Sanders stood as a presidential candidate in the 2016 election and was enormously successful seeing as he is very leftwing, even by British standards. By American standards he is literally Fidel Castro. However his run was scuppered by the dirty tricks of Hillary Clinton. It was therefore very frustrating when the old fool then went and endorsed her, see background links below. However Bernie has since done something that might possibly make amends for all of that. He was a guest on the Joe Rogan Experience a few weeks ago and Joe asked him: "If you got into office and you found out something about aliens and UFO's, would you let us know?" The Vermont senator replied: "I tell you, my wife would demand that I let you know.... She's not a UFO nut... but I don't have access to the records." Joe then said: "Will you let us know though?" and Bernie replies: "I'll announce it on this show!" The media have, as per usual, made this into a novelty story, however some of the presenters presented good serious exopolitical points, see: See here for the full interview with Bernie Sanders on the Joe Rogan Experience: However, this entire statement is an empty gesture. From what we know about the personal, professional and political background of Bernie Sanders, it is highly unlikely that the keepers of extraterrestrial secrecy would ever brief him into even the smallest detail of the true nature of the Truth Embargo. If he somehow became US President in 2020, which is virtually impossible, he would be tolerated, manipulated and controlled. He would end his term knowing considerably less about the UFO phenomenon than myself and most HPANWO readers. I'm sure he is sincere in what he said to Joe, as is his wife, but his sentiments are doomed to failure. My hope for the 2020 election is that Donald Trump will be re-elected, but that is something I will cover in future posts.

Saturday 17 August 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 365

I have been featured on Programme 365 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Jeffrey Epstein dies, the reality or non-reality of QAnon, the Alien Autopsy surfaces again and much much more. I was joined on the air by a special guest panellist, the Alien Autopsy pundit Colin Woolford, see here for background:
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Friday 16 August 2019

Exorcise Boleskine House

I've started a Facebook group called "Exorcise Boleskine House". The idea was inspired by a friend of mine on the platform called Jana. She suggested it following last night's HPANWO Show where I talk about Boleskine House in the News segment after the feature, see: Boleskine House is a single storey Scottish mansion which stands on the shores of Loch Ness. In 2016 it was partly gutted by a fire and a second fire in 2019 completed the destruction, see: The house was bought by the famous occultist Aleister Crowley in 1899 so he could perform a magick spell called "the Abramelin Working". He was halfway through the spell, which takes several months to cast, when he received an urgent message from his solicitor announcing that some of his former fellow members from the Order of the Golden Dawn were going to sue him. The "Beast 666" therefore abandoned the spell half-finished and hot-tailed it to Paris in order to sort out this legal mess. The spell was never continued which means there is an open portal to otherworlds at Boleskine House and has been for a hundred and twenty years. This I believe is the cause of much of its ghoulish reputation, including the two fires. The area needs to be cleansed spiritually by people who know properly how to do it. Hopefully this Facebook group will gather publicity and begin the project. See here for a link to the page; please like it: The current owners of the property hope to restore the house; however it's not so much a repair as a rebuild now. The brickwork and foundations are still intact so it could be done given enough money. There will have to be completely new plumbing, wiring, roof, windows and plastering etc. In my view, there is no point beginning such a job until the exorcism project is carried out because the destructive spirits inhabiting the ruins must first be given license to depart.

Friday 9 August 2019

Tardigrades... In... Space!...

The Beresheet moon lander was a spacecraft that came to within a few hundred feet of carrying out the third soft landing on the moon this century when it sadly and mysteriously broke down. Its instruments and communication suddenly failed and by the time they were restarted the craft could not be stopped crashing onto the lunar surface. (Unmanned missions to the moon are far less reliable than manned missions. The lunar excursions of all six Apollo landings thankfully went without any major hitch, see here for details: Beresheet, named after the first line in the Torah, translated in the Book of Genesis as "In the beginning", was the first ever moon mission to originate from a unique public-private partnership that evolved out of the Google X Prize and was based in Israel, see: It was designed as a very simple mission. The lander was intended to carry out a few basic actions for just a few hours. It had onboard a time capsule with items of Jewish and Israeli culture and history. It had an Israeli flag on it and the words of the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel. However, at the last minute somebody decided to add to the capsule some human DNA samples and a collection of tardigrades. Taking living beings into space is not new, in fact the first earth being to enter earth orbit was a dog called Laika on Sputnik 2 in 1957. In 2019 the Chang'e lander took seeds to the moon to try and grow them in an experiment, see: Tardigrades, often called "water bears", are very small and sometimes mistaken for insects when they are in fact their own phylum. A phylum is a basic category of animals that incorporates many classes; such as vertebrates, which includes mammals, reptiles and fish etc; or arthropods, which includes insects, scorpions and spiders etc. Tardigrades are famous for being some of the hardiest animals on earth. They can survive extremes of heat, cold, dryness and radiation that no other animal can. They are therefore very common and have been found all over the planet from deserts to icecaps to the depths of the oceans. They are very ancient and predate the dinosaurs by almost four hundred million years; and, at the risk of sounding morbid, they will definitely be on the scene long after humans have bowed out. Most interestingly, they can endure a vacuum and have persisted in deep space for up to ten days. This leads to the worrying question; when Beresheet crashed, what happened to its tardigrade passengers? The time capsule may well have broken apart by the impact and the thousands of tardigrades would have then scattered onto the moon's surface where they would have crawled around like a swarm of ants. Source: Israel Aerospace Industries has already started work on a "Beresheet 2" mission which will hopefully be more successful than the first one. Will it have time to check on the tardigrades?

It is likely that they are still alive now because whenever tardigrades finally hit the ceiling of their endurance abilities they allow themselves to dry up and enter a dormant state, similar to hibernation. They can survive in this existence of suspended animation for an indefinite period of time; although it has been measured in laboratory conditions as ten years maximum. When the conditions become more favourable the tardigrades then wake up and continue as normal. Therefore it might be possible in the future to revive the little water bears if a future moon mission can locate them. The worst case scenario is a few of them might mutate as a result of the radiation and then evolve into something else entirely. This could be very hazardous for future lunar explorers if the new life forms are hostile. This mock-advert for baked beans is a very extreme example of possibilities, see: It would be more realistic to wonder if we might see the emergence of some kind of toxic parasite. Or perhaps we needn't be concerned because space is already abundant with life. This is the notion of panspermia, literally "seeds everywhere" which states that outer space is not a dead, cold empty void, but is in fact packed with life and life-giving material, see here for details: Some UFO sightings could also be categorized more as possible living creatures themselves, not just inorganic vehicles for living creatures. The phenomenon of "space critters" has always interested me, as reported by several astronauts such as Story Musgrave, see: The work of the UFOlogist Nik Hayes also indicates that he is attracting living beings, not just artificial objects, see: I've always said that earth is not this tiny blue-green speck in blackness, a minute oasis of life in an infinite cosmic desert. It is really just one polyp in a universal coral reef, a lush pond in a celestial rainforest billions of light-years across.

Wednesday 7 August 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 18

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: Europhile by-election, gold rises in price, Rockall island threatens Brexit and much much more. See here for Caroline's channel:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Monday 5 August 2019

Rockall and Brexit

The tiny island of Rockall has been commandeered by Project Fear. Despite being very remote at over 230 miles from nearest land, the Western Isles of Scotland; and being miniscule, just a hundred feet across and fifty feet high, that little outcrop poking above the ocean waves has been nominated as yet another stumbling block in the path of Brexit. As regular readers will know, I have written a novel about Rockall, see:, but I could never have made up this real life story. This latest spanner in the works has been thrown in by a very predictable saboteur, globalist-occupied Ireland. The concern has been raised by the opposition islands affairs spokesman Éamon Ó Cuív. He is worried that the UK might obstruct Irish fishing boats from operating in the sea around Rockall. This is because the UK would no longer be a part of the European Union Common Fisheries Policy (Although this has no stopped French trawlers harvesting fish as far away as the Gulf of Guinea). Apparently this problem will be "very difficult to solve"... Well, we'd better cancel Brexit then! Source: This is just another backstop, a pointless and completely unnecessary commotion over a baseless and probably even non-existent problem; all to make people scared of Brexit. British sovereignty over Rockall was claimed in 1955 and ratified in 2014 with both contesting nations, Ireland and Denmark, conceding. The UK's territorial waters extend a mere twelve nautical miles from low water mark of the coast of the United Kingdom and all Crown colonies and overseas territories in all directions, in accordance with Articles 16, 74 and 84 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The fishing grounds the Irish are bothered about are international waters. Seeing as Rockall is so minute, that is a mere 452 square nautical miles, a speck in the vastness of the Atlantic Ocean. It is true that the British Fisheries Limit of 1976 will have to go, but new bilateral deals should not be hard to negotiate. Why are they suddenly "very difficult to solve"? Nobody wants another "Cod War" in which British ships were rammed by the Icelandic Navy. We are not barbarians. We have been adjusting fishing policy for decades following fears of fish stock depletion. In fact freedom from a continental regulator might be beneficial to all fishing nations in negotiating a new and improved code of practice, as well as healthier environmental strategies for preserving the fish. It was actually fishermen themselves who protested against the Fishery Limits Act in 2016. They sailed their trawlers up the Thames and were intercepted by Bob Geldof on his millionaire's yacht manned by his flat-chested teeny-bopping fans all sipping champagne, at least the few who were old enough; see: I wish one of the fishermen had a particularly rotten kipper with flies buzzing round it to throw at him. Please do not let the government scare you with this phantom menace. It belongs with the other Brexit portents of horror like running out of cheese or the army having to deliver medicine.

Sunday 4 August 2019

Boris and Nigel

A few days ago there was a by-election that has changed British politics forever. The turmoil that the nation was thrown into in 2016 has finally come of age. The Brecon and Radnorshire constituency is a rural one in mid-east Wales and after the last general election, in 2017, the Conservative Party held it fairly safely with a majority of 18%. However, the incumbent MP, Chris Davies, was convicted of political fraud as a part of the expenses scandal and was recalled from his seat. The Liberal Democrats have now snatched the constituency from the Tories with a massive 12% swing. How did this happen? Obviously Mr Davies has discredited himself by his criminal deception and many might suspect that his constituency party collaborated with him in some way, but the real difference can be seen the candidates list; it is very short. The Green Party and Plaid Cymru specifically chose not to field candidates in that seat so that their usual electorate would back the Lib Dems. Why? Because of Brexit. The Greens and Plaid are two of the parties favoured by Remainers and the Lib Dems take the hardest pro-EU line of all, so it is obvious Plaid and Green voters will switch to the Lib Dems as a second choice. (As I've said before, I used to support Plaid; and their federalist stance makes their original mandate a sick joke. Their original name was Plaid Genedlaethol Cymru which means "Nationalist Party of Wales", see: The result reduces the Tory majority in the House of Commons to just one. This means the government are going to find it far harder to push their own bills through and will make an early general election, before the scheduled one in 2022, more likely. The Conservatives have accused the Lib Dems of "playing dirty"; however there is no rule prohibiting in what they did. Source: The good news is that there is not time, realistically, to call a general election before the Halloween Brexit Day. The bad news is that with this new unofficial anti-Brexit alliance, it will be harder for the new Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, to have his way with the Brexit process and many more opportunities will emerge to add another delay or even scupper the Brexit timeline completely. All is not lost though; there is a solution, and it was one US President Donald Trump suggested in his congratulation speech to Johnson, see: He is informally suggesting a pro-Brexit coalition between the Conservatives and Nigel Farage's Brexit Party to challenge the anti-Brexit one. So what kind of man is Boris Johnson really? Is he the "Britain Trump"? This is the question I asked on this HPANWO TV livestream: How Boris responds is going to be a test of his sincerity. Will he be willing to affiliate himself to Farage, even if only temporarily? If he doesn't then he is handing the country back to the centrist Remainers; that is in no doubt at all. They will wangle a general election as soon as they can and you will probably see a Labour- Liberal Democrat alliance with a manifesto of cancelling Brexit, for which they will have already engineered a delay. Without Farage's help Boris cannot defeat them. If he resists any collaboration with Farage then it can only be because Boris is either a fool or a fraud, a fake Brexiteer whose job it is to inspire false confidence and distract people away from any genuine solution.

Friday 2 August 2019

Boleskine House Burns Again

In December 2015 Boleskine House in Scotland was consumed by a massive fire, see: The large house on the shores of Loch Ness was formerly the home of the famous occultist Aleister Crowley. Because of some magick spells he cast there in 1899 the building has a dark and frightening reputation. It was this very reputation that attracted the rock star and Crowley fan Jimmy Page to the location. The guitarist and songwriter for the band Led Zeppelin bought the property in 1970 and used it mostly as a storehouse for his collection of occult books, many of which were written by Crowley. Page sold it in 1992 and it was turned into a hotel; although many guests only stayed there once after they experienced things going bump in the night. Some ghost enthusiasts booked rooms because of the house's supernatural mystique. Following the 2015 fire, a new owner purchased the ruins and planned to restore the house. However this second fire appears to have sadly destroyed what was left of the house's interior and roof. I'm not sure if this time the damage is beyond repair. The fire also spread to the neighbouring Coach House, but it was quickly extinguished. The police suspect this was an arson attack and are appealing for witnesses. The part of the house that ignited was the side that had been spared by the 2015 fire. Source: If it was arson, who would do that? Does anybody have a motive to torch a derelict house miles from any town? Somebody suggested religious fundamentalists could have done it. The Highlands does have a tradition in radical Christianity, being home to the "Wee Free" Free Church of Scotland. There may well be people nearby who are uncomfortable with Crowley's den of superstition in their neighbourhood. Another of Crowley's homes in Cefalu, Sicily has the same problem. However the locals there are too scared to demolish the old Abbey of Thelema in case they get curses, so conversely to Boleskine, it is fairly well preserved, see: Either way, such torch-and-pitchfork pogroms tend to be things of the past, such as during the Scottish Reformation in the fifteenth century. Religious violence in Europe today comes mostly from Islam. Could the arsonists have a very different background, possibly one that is not even of this world? Nexus magazine recently published an article, in its June-July 2019 issue, about fire and the paranormal; its connection to poltergeist activity and spontaneous human combustion. See: The Scottish paranormal radio show host Kev Baker visited the ruins of Boleskine after the 2015 fire and he and I discussed it on his show, see: We noted the similarities to the fire damage in the house to that following many spontaneous human combustion cases. The conflagration left the targeted area totally charred, but nearby areas were completely undamaged, not even scorched or melted. For the last hundred and twenty years there has been an open portal in Boleskine House to alternate realms where God knows what lurks; whatever Crowley was trying to conjure up. We know that he was utterly fearless in his pursuit of ghostly denizens. If Boleskine House is restored again then I recommend somebody who knows what they are doing, maybe Jimmy Page, performs a ritual there that can close the portal and give the ghosts infesting it licence to depart.

Thursday 1 August 2019

Larry Warren Gossip Update

There have been some major developments since I posted the background article above. One of the two interviews Kevin Randle refers to has been published. This is a tape recording of a conversation in 1995 between Larry Warren, Peter Robbins and Kevin Randle. Outer Limits Magazine have published a digitized version of the recording on their YouTube channel, see: Larry and Kevin do most of the talking and Larry describes his UFO experience. He also shows Kevin some of his documentary evidence. Kevin asks Larry many questions, about his US Air Force service and discharge; and about the timeline of events. I have listened to all forty-seven minutes of the tape and personally I can't find anything in its content that is incriminating. In fact it contains very little information that I have not come across before. This may be a newly published audio record, but it includes no major original information. Kevin makes a big deal about how Larry only had direct contact with the UFO on one night during the flap. However, this is what Larry reports in Left At East Gate. Why is this news? Not just any news but some kind of earth-shattering scoop that will prove Larry's duplicity once and for all!? There is also something strange I've noticed about the video on the technical side. When I started watching the video last night it had nine thumbs up and seven thumbs down; I added an eighth. When I looked at it today it had ten up and one down; the one down was mine. Since then, about six hours later at the time of writing, that record has not changed. YouTube users cannot alter the like-dislike bar on their uploads. Only the person who made a preference can remove their thumb. So, how did this happen? If a video receives a ratio of dislikes too far in excess of likes then the video is lowered in terms of visibility. So, does somebody in the offices of YouTube want this video to have as high a profile as possible and is fiddling with the like-dislike bar to boost it up? The implications of that are astounding and very sinister. Outer Limits claim to be strictly impartial when it comes to the Larry Warren controversy; and indeed the editor, Chris Evers, even offered Larry the chance to put his own side of the story across in the magazine, see: However I found myself doubting those professed sentiments when I was banned from their 2017 conference, see here for details: and: Those doubts are now redoubled when I look at the cover of the latest issue and see that it says: "Including a special report and link on the Larry Warren fraud!" That doesn't sound like the words of a neutral arbiter to me. (The cover was changed later to remove that text, but luckily I have screen-grabs of the original.) Despite this original blurb, Evers has written: "...we examine statements from Larry Warren re: his involvement in the RFI, and the fact that Kevin Randle recently presented documentation suggesting Warren had admitted he wasn't involved, needless to say Warren denied this and demanded that Kevin Randle prove this statement with evidence. Kevin Randle kindly supplied a copy of a recorded conversation with Col. Charles Halt, Peter Robbins and Larry Warren and others. Make of this what you will..." Source: Obviously there is no way to know what conversations are going on in the offices of Google, but I strongly suspect that some operation is underway that certain individuals in UFOlogy know about and are not telling the public. When we combine this with the bizarre irregular editing of the like-dislike bar on Randle's tape recording, it is likely there are covert forces involved in this case, and that's never something I assert lightly... Cue the article by Nick Pope!