Wednesday 30 May 2018

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 34

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: Tommy Robinson imprisoned, Harry and Meghan tie the knot, UFO's around nuclear power stations and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Monday 28 May 2018

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Shamanic Freedom Radio 4

I have been interviewed by "Opaque Lens", aka Niall Murphy, on Shamanic Freedom Radio, see:
We discuss the burgeoning problem of endemic internal paranoia, infighting and "shill fever" that is ruining both the UFO/Paranormal/Conspirasphere and also the psychedelic community.
See here for my previous appearance on Shamanic Freedom Radio:
Niall has also been a guest on the HPANWO Show, see here for his most recent appearance:

Saturday 26 May 2018

Irish Pro-Abortion Victory

The so-called "pro-choice" faction of Irish society has won by a landslide in the referendum to repeal the Eighth Amendment to the Irish Constitution. Essential and hard-won civil rights will now be withdrawn from all human beings in Ireland for the first nine months of their lives. Below that age, the people of Ireland will no longer even have the right to exist. "Their choice!" of whether they wish to live or die will be taken out of their hands. "Their body!" can now be ripped from their mother's womb and discarded with all the ceremony and sentimentality of a rotten tooth. As researchers like John Scarry have discovered, there has been massive globalist intervention over this referendum. He has issued the following statement: "Many of us spoke up for the unborn, the embryonic humans who do not have a voice, let alone a vote, to preserve their very existence. Despite a very active countrywide campaign by the Pro-Life movement, a majority of voters decided to remove the equal life of the unborn from the Irish Constitution. Although the Pro-Life spokeswomen were generally felt to have won the public media debates on the issue, the repeal slogans of 'her body, her choice' and 'for health care' held a greater sway with many people. The concentration by the 'Yes!' side on the hard cases of rape, incest and fatal foetal anomaly were driven home and we all know the expression 'hard cases make bad laws' but neither that nor the possibility of amendments to the Constitution were ever considered by the political party leaders, who all spoke with one voice (So much for proportional representation). While voting myself I was struck by the many mothers and daughters that were at the polling centre. It was well known that most teenage girls were supporting a "Yes!" vote and I suspect that many of them, even those too young to vote themselves may have persuaded their mothers, who may have, in turn told their husbands that it was for women to decide. Any talk then of 'the right to life' for the unborn becomes somewhat academic in such a scenario.  I hope some time in the future that human societies will find a better way. The full story of how the call for the referendum came about has yet to be written, but I hope that the part played by the world-wide abortion industry and their undoubted lobbing of Irish politicians and certain medics will come to light." What John means in the last sentence is that the likes of George Soros have supported the "Yes!" campaign with funding and propaganda. The only reason Peter Sutherland did not get involved this time is because he is dead... and I'm glad! However, I have no doubt he was cheering on his living counterpart from whichever depth of hell he currently resides. It seems to me that Irish politics and culture, generally speaking, is disarmed by the same delusion as Welsh politics and culture, which I know from the inside; I've also detected the same problem with Scotland. After the victory of the Irish republicans and the creation of the Free State a century ago there is a general feeling that now they've "beaten the Brits!" all Ireland's troubles are over, for ever and ever and ever; and that it is physically impossible for the country to have any other foreign enemy. How false that is. It's time for another Easter Rising, Ireland, and this time finish the job!

Friday 25 May 2018

Peter Robbins on Podcast UFO- May 2018

Peter Robbins is a regular guest on the UFOlogical radio programme Podcast UFO. In the latest show in which he is featured he describes his split from his Left at East Gate co-author Larry Warren from about thirty-six minutes in to the fifty-five minute mark, see: Peter explains how his doubts began "a little over two years ago." This is about the time Larry's friendship with Sacha Christie broke down; shortly before the Scottish UFO and Paranormal Conference 2016, see: Peter refers to this conference soon afterwards and says that people began to "do their own investigations" and wrote to him with "increasing frustration until I began to look at this material". However other people, including myself, were examining the same material and finding serious flaws in it. I also contacted Peter and discussed this with him; I published my conclusions in a detailed series of articles, see: I've called this series The Larry Warren Controversy and it is almost finished; I have just one more instalment to write. I originally entitled it Is Larry Warren a Fraud?, but soon changed it when it became obvious to me after a thorough and dispassionate examination of the facts, that the answer to that question is an unequivocal "no". However Peter Robbins has bought into the hype completely. He wrote a very extensive statement describing his position which, in the minority of its content that is factual, is virtually a transcription of Sacha Christie's assertions. He has never been a writer renowned for brevity, and this was no exception; in fact it has been nicknamed the "War and Peace" document. However I believe I have successfully deconstructed all the points Peter made in it, see: Since then Peter has done a U-turn that a Turkish taxi driver would have trouble carrying out. He has withdrawn his two response books to Nick Pope and Col. Halt as well as unilaterally ceasing the publication of Left at East Gate. He has publicly apologized to most of the people he previously criticized. He now uses the word "defaming" to describe his actions. His mea culpa has been generously received by his former enemies and they have warmly embraced him back into the fold. Peter repeats the falsehood he wrote in his statement that Larry had threatened a member of the audience at the Scottish conference. As I explain in my review, Larry did nothing of the sort. Peter also tables the accusations that Larry purloined and hawked counterfeit rock-and-roll memorabilia. We are still waiting for Larry to be arrested and questioned over that very serious alleged offence. Tino has made another video with Larry countering the smears regarding Larry's relationship with the music industry, see:

Despite all this I detect some inner conflict with Peter. It's impossible to know for sure because he has broken his friendship with me as well. Interestingly this only happened when the polygraph results were published. Before that he was perfectly happy to tolerate me on an agree-to-disagree basis. We communicated regularly in a civil manner during this period, see: Why then? Why not before? Why not after? I also found it very odd that Peter had a stall for LAEG at the Roswell festival last year; this is the book he was in the process of disowning, see: Now in this latest interview the host Martin Willis asks Peter what he believes Larry Warren's true role was in the Rendlesham Forest Incident. Peter replies: "At this point I don't know what to think, about so much... I feel I have lost the right to continue participating is research into this particular event." That's a strange response considering what he said earlier about Larry. Just a few minutes before he gave some pretty stark denouncements of his co-author's character, as you'll hear if you go to the source link above. Isn't certitude the first thing Peter should be looking for in the face of all this doubt? Doesn't he wish to confirm or deny, to use that famous Popeism, whether Larry was involved or not? If Peter doesn't know what to think, how can he be so sure Larry is a liar? This calls into question his entire thesis, in my view. Why should we therefore take his change of mind seriously? The good news is that this show was a YouTube livestream and the platform now preserves and plays the live chat log on recordings, and so we can see when Peter brings up Larry Warren many listeners leap to Larry's defence. The film Capel Green will soon be released which will completely exonerate Larry Warren. Peter Robbins can continue to say what he likes about Larry, but it will save him a far greater amount of embarrassment if he admits his error now rather than when the film hits the screen.

Thursday 24 May 2018

Save the 8th!

I have been planning to write another post about tomorrow's referendum in Ireland tomorrow on whether to keep the Eighth Amendment to the Irish Constitution, the one protecting the human rights of people before their birth. However I can't really add anything to what I wrote last year, see: I'm not Irish so I don't have a vote; it's out of my hands. All I can do is urge the people of Ireland to assert their right to choose NO! Save the Eighth! This page has a lot of good information: Also, inevitably, globalist powerbrokers have poked their nose into the process. This article exposes one of them and it's a name you're probably very familiar with: No doubt Peter Sutherland will have his grubby fingers in their somewhere too.

Tuesday 22 May 2018

Livingstone Quits Labour

Ken Livingstone, the firebrand cornerstone of the traditional Labour left for decades, has resigned from the party. This is not the first time he has resigned, it is the second; but this time it is probably permanent. The reason for this is the war of attrition that he has been subjected to since his offhand comments about a historical controversy related to Nazi Germany (No, not THAT one!). His membership has since been suspended, see here for details: I would be truly afraid if I were a Jew living in modern Britain. I would have to pray to Jehovah every day that He deliver me from the real anti-Semites because when they turn up none of my gentile countrymen will recognize them for what they are. The labels "anti-Semite!", along with "racist!" and "sexist!" etc, have been tossed around like sweeties to the point that they have lost their original meaning. Apparently David Icke is anti-Semitic, Anthony J Hilder is anti-Semitic, even I am anti-Semitic. This is despite the fact that I have made a feature-length video specifically explaining why the New World Order is not the work of Jews, see background links below.

The gibbering lynch mob of anti-Livingstone Labourists have been gloating all over social media about the resignation of their hate-figure. The repellent Luciana Berger MP, who previously spat her dummy out over the beautiful Mear One New World Order mural, see:, Tweeted: "Glad to hear it. Should have happened two years ago." Wes Streeting MP added: "We must now make it clear that he will never be welcome to return." Ruth Smeeth MP said that Livingstone's resignation was welcome and that he should have expelled long ago for his "toxic views". This vainglorious hysteria has driven to the excess of the so-called Campaign Against Anti-Semitism criticizing Jeremy Corbyn simply for saying that Livingstone's decision to resign was "sad" and demanding that he apologize. Source: This is the same political party that not only tolerates the most excretable racist and sexist remarks made by Diane Abbott, but exalts her into one of their superstars for it. I once voted Labour but really wish I hadn't. Honestly, I would not feel safe in this country if these people are ever in government. Wikipedia defines Anti-Semitism as: "Hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews." However Labour MP's seem to define is as: "Anything said by anybody about anything, ever." Is it possible to get Britain's political train back on the track of logic and justice when it has been derailed to this extent? I truly doubt it.

Friday 18 May 2018

Dreaming Saucers T-Shirts

Tino's official limited edition Dreaming Saucers T-shirt is still available. At the time of writing they are on sale in all sizes. If you would like one, please email Tino at: and I'll arrange payment and shipment for you. They are £12.50 plus postage and packing. After they are sold out no more will be produced; so grab them while you can!

Wednesday 16 May 2018

9/11 Truth Event- London May 2018

Richard Gage and Barbara Honegger are touring the world at the moment and so I was keen to go and see their live show in London. I travelled there with my good friend and comrade Colin Woolford. It was a hot and sticky evening as we made our way to the venue, the Seven Dials Club. We had a quick pint at a pub called, amazingly, The Freemason's Arms, beforehand. The venue was a large stuffy chamber with a bar. There were about a hundred people there and, as I hoped, I met up with a few more friends who had chosen to attend as well. I picked up some merchandise, including a bootleg recording of a lecture by a 9/11 official story believer, Prof Colin Bailey. Ian Henshall opened the event and then Richard Gage spoke first. He described how he founded Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in 2006, see:; and gave a list of facts that explain how the third building, World Trade Centre 7, could not possibly have been destroyed in the way the official story said it was: structural damage caused by falling debris from the Twin Towers and the subsequent fire damage. In his view, WTC 7 collapsed by controlled demolition. He talked about the Twin Towers and how pieces of the structure flew out sideways over fourteen hundred feet away. He also believes thermite was used to cut the steel girders. As I have said before, for instance in the background links below, I don't believe explosives or thermite was used at the World Trade Centre. The destruction of the skyscrapers was not a conventional demolition. Instead a directed energy weapon was used based on the Hutchison Effect. Dr Judy Wood's book, videos and website give details: Richard Gage pointed out the pieces of the Twin Towers that fell off the main edifice and left behind a trail of dust; and he claimed this is evidence of the thermite reaction, but I think it is instead the material "dustifying" from the Hutchison Effect. In fact some of these fragments dissolved before hitting the ground. He claims there are hot spots in the rubble where molten steel lingered; however we see this glowing molten and, supposedly, hot material being moved around by bulldozers powered by hydraulic rams. If this was molten steel then the radiated heat would cause that kind of machinery to malfunction. Gage also points to other pieces of data: steel beams full of holes like Swiss cheese and iron microspheres, but these are just more evidence of the Hutchison Effect and have nothing to do with thermite or demolition charges. The principle piece of data that has been tabled to support the possibility that thermite was used in the attack are red-grey chips found in the fragments of the buildings that look like partly-ignited thermite, according to Dr. Neils Harrit. However this has been identified by 9/11 official story-believers as a product of the gypsum wall panelling and the steel supporting columns. As I've said before, the effect of this falsehood will be that people starting out along the path towards questioning the official story, that it was just nineteen hijackers and planes hitting the buildings to start fires, will see this strawman explanation easily debunked and so may then begin reconsidering if the official story is true after all... Perhaps that's the idea.

The second speaker of this double feature was Barbara Honegger, a lawyer involved in a 9/11 justice Grand Jury petition that she plans to use to make the United States Supreme Court prosecute the Bush and subsequent administrations for the 9/11 attacks. This right emxists in the US Constitution, a Federal Grand Jury, "people's fourth branch of government" as it's called. She is supported by some of the 2997 9/11 victims' families, individuals such as Bob McIlvaine and Matt Campbell, see: and: Ms Honegger was very moved and wept as she spoke about these relatives. Some interesting people are helping her such as Judge Ferdinando Iposimato, who is a former head of the Supreme Court of Italy and was instrumental in exposing Operation Gladio, a massive false flag terrorism project in Europe during the Cold War, see: Danny Sheehan is also on their side. He has been involved in several high-profile cases to do with UFO's and spoke at the Citizen Hearing on ET Disclosure in 2013, see: He also defended Dr John Mack at his disciplinary hearing when Harvard University endeavoured to sack him for daring to conclude that UFO abductions were... real. Another character assisting Ms Honegger is Senator Mike Gravel, who also took part in the Citizen Hearing. It turns out that Senator Gravel was a lynchpin in the downfall of President Nixon; the "Watergate" scandal. That's something new I learned. Ms Honegger has managed to pass many productive laws through the US Congress preventing future foreign wars and also the repeal of the Authorization for the Use of Military Force act of 2001, a piece of emergency legislation, that was only supposed to be temporary, that allowed the mindless destruction of the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions. I wish Ms Honegger and her colleagues luck; I really hope they can achieve their legal outcomes. However, could there some landmines buried in the foundations of their lawsuit? I don't know if Ms Honegger is aware, but hers is not the first legal case to be filed against the government. In 2009 Dr Judy Wood sued the National Institute of Standards and Technology for their flawed and deceptive report to the 9/11 Commission. Her case was based on the evidence she had discovered, see: If Ms Honegger and her team do not take the details of Dr Wood's Qui Tam case into consideration, and instead rely on the bogus evidence from A&E 9/11, then the entire process could fall apart. This would waste a huge amount of time and money; and, as I've said before, this is exactly what the promoters of the official story of 9/11 want. I enjoyed the May 2018 9/11 Truth event, and it was good to catch up with a few friends, old and new, but the ideas of this tendency are built upon a bogus revelation of what really happened on 9/11; what's more a lot of these people are very hostile to Dr Judy Wood and her own study. The principle slogan for this 9/11 Truth group is "Reinvestigate 9/11!" Well 9/11 has already been reinvestigated, by Dr Wood, and these people refuse to accept her findings.

Monday 14 May 2018

Dreaming Saucers Livestreams

Thanks to Tino Megaro, some of the Dreaming Saucers conference in Oxford was livestreamed on YouTube. Here are the recordings.
Thanks to everybody who made Dreaming Saucers such a wonderful event. Official HPANWO TV videos coming soon and also to Neil Geddes Ward's channel, see: See here for background:

Friday 11 May 2018

Coup Against Corbyn

In 1982 Chris Mullin wrote a fictional thriller called A Very British Coup; it was then adapted twice into TV movies, see: The title unfortunately gives away the ending, but don't let that put you off. The story is a vivid account of the frailties and limits of democracy, and therefore its fraud; and it was written by a government insider. Chris Mullin was the Member of Parliament for the Sunderland South consistency from 1987 to 2010. It follows the career of a left wing, "Old Labour" politician who through some terrible oversight on the part of the "Men in Grey Suits" ends up getting elected Prime Minister. Harry Perkins is a working class Yorkshireman from a long line of steelworkers and the story contains numerous anecdotes portraying him as a down-to-Earth man-of-the-people; for example he uses a Sheffield Wednesday football bag instead of a suitcase to carry his paperwork and he walks between Buckingham Palace and Downing Street when he meets with the Queen. He immediately begins implementing policies that during the early 1980's, when the story was conceived, were indeed the manifesto of the real British opposition Labour Party: improvements to the Welfare State, complete re-vitalization of the National Health Service and the nationalization all service industries. An end to nuclear power, unilateral nuclear disarmament, a departure from NATO and the abolition of all Anglo-American Cold War treaties. Between the scenes of Harry Perkins at work are interspersed shots of darkly lit rooms in the headquarters of MI5 where sinister-looking men watch him on TV in malevolent silence. When Perkins announces to the American ambassador that he has two years to remove all US bases from British shores the CIA get involved too. Perkins then holds a ceremony on TV where the first nuclear warhead from Britain's independent nuclear deterrent is dismantled; the first of every single one of them. With the help of a CIA agent in the US embassy a smear campaign is initiated by the security services, aided and abetted by top military officers and a media mogul who is thinly-disguised parody of Rupert Murdoch. In the end the conspirators resort to forging documents that apparently prove that Perkins is in the pay of the Soviet Union. Perkins apparently gives in and books a TV announcement to resign as Prime Minister, but as soon as he's on the air he dumps his script and instead speaks out about the plot against him. He calls a general election which he is about to win decisively and the final scene of the film is of an empty polling station and the sound of helicopters and military radio chatter. The ending may be slightly ambiguous, but I think there’s no doubt that the implication is that, having failed using every other method, the conspirators decide to take over the country in a military coup. You might think such practices are normal for a Third World dictatorship, but a far-fetched concept for a Western democracy; however such things are not unprecedented. There have indeed been coups d'etat in developed world powers. In 1975 Gough Whitlam, the Prime Minister of Australia, was dismissed by the Queen and there is good reason to think that there was an attempt to do the same to Harold Wilson, the UK's Prime Minister around the same period, see: The removal of Margaret Thatcher was a type of coup, see: There was also an attempted coup during the last days of the Soviet Union in 1991, see: In his famous controversial autobiography Spycatcher, MI5 officer Peter Wright reports attending a meeting in about 1980 in which some mysterious individuals say they have an agenda to prevent a Labour victory at the next election, at all costs! (Ironically this book became a bestseller due to the Government's attempts to ban it and it remains in print to this day; the Government should have just kept their mouth shut, in which case it would have remained an obscure back-shelf title.)

Now a rumour has emerged that something similar might happen in Britain if Jeremy Corbyn wins the next general election. A week after he ascended to Labour leadership, an unnamed serving army general told a reporter from the The Telegraph that if Jeremy Corbyn becomes Prime Minister the armed forces would not stand for it. There would be a direct and public challenge if Corbyn was considered to be jeopardising the country's security. "The army wouldn't stand for it... people would use whatever means possible, fair or foul to prevent that." Source: Interestingly the latest edition of A Very British Coup has a subtitle: "The novel that foretold the rise of Corbyn". I know some of you might be thinking: "Good! Corbyn is a lefty pinko and we're best rid of him!" However, the point here is not whether you agree or not with Corbyn politically; it's whether you support the normal mechanism of politics being switched off so that one group of the population can have their way. I am unconditionally opposed to that regardless of my opinions of the person being forcibly ousted. In a way, what the remoaners are calling for is a coup d'etat. They want the EU referendum declared void because they "don't like it!" Interestingly the phrase "by any means, fair or foul" was uttered by a remoaner I know.

Tuesday 8 May 2018

Kim's Perestroika

Kim Jong Un, the "great leader" or "dear leader"... or "something else leader" of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, also known as North Korea, one of the last hard-line Marxist states in the world, has been the subject of much geopolitical controversy in the last few years; see background links for more information. This centres around his country's sophisticated nuclear weapons programme. He has detonated many A-bombs and even a few hydrogen bombs in tests; and he is also developing long range ballistic missiles to deliver them. From his own point of view this makes perfect sense. His nation is isolated and loathed by almost the entire world. China is the closest thing it has to an ally, but in truth China barely tolerates the upstart little state on its Manchurian border. Kim feared invasion from all sides, yet his nuclear deterrent has made his country far more secure. A military invasion and forced regime change in the DPRK is no longer an option because the consequences would be so horrific. In such a situation Kim would definitely launch his missiles against the big cities of Seoul and Tokyo killing millions. He might even be able to hit a target in the western United States of America. A few months ago there was possibly and attempt to frame North Korea with a false flag nuclear attack, see: Since then the state of affairs calmed considerably; but now, in an unprecedented and totally unexpected development, Kim Jong Un has suggested a plan to denuclearize the whole of Korea that would involve a cessation to his entire nuclear development programme. Source:

Kim has met with his opposite number in South Korea, Moon Jae-In. Kim is the first of the three DPRK leaders ever to set foot in its southern capitalist neighbour's territory. The meeting has led to a proposed further summit with the US President Donald Trump, the man who previously called Kim "rocket boy". Trump has accepted the invitation. So far the prospects look rosy. The positive US response is already showing effects. Every year the USA and South Korea carry out a joint exercise designed to intimidate North Korea called "Foul Eagle". It has gone ahead this year, but it was very much scaled down. We don't yet know the outcome of this upcoming Korean peace summit, but the situation is remarkably similar to the one engineered by Mikhail Gorbachev, the premier of the Soviet Union, in the 1980's. Gorbachev had multiple meetings with Western leaders, especially US President Ronald Reagan, and negotiated a vast reduction in the nuclear arms race that had been the centrepiece of the Cold War for forty years. He also sought to change the Soviet Union's relationship with the global community; he called his new policies Glasnost- "openness" and Perestroika- "restructuring". His hope was to transform the USSR into a different kind of country. It didn't work... or worked too well, depending on your point of view; and the entire Soviet socialist system imploded. In December of 1991 it was disbanded and the modern Russian Federation was founded. Is Kim Jong Un about to try the same thing? It must be tempting. His little socialist state has suffered terribly since its beginnings in 1945. It has experienced economic stagnation, dysfunctional government and constant bickering with the international community. Millions of people have died in a string of famines. As the Korea expert Michael Malice says, Kim has had enough of the stick; now he wants to try the carrot, see: (This programme is also interesting: We'll have to wait and see. The summit with North Korea and the USA will take place within a few weeks, probably in China. I will report on it further when it happens.

Saturday 5 May 2018

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 30

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 30 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see:
Issue 30 includes an article in my column entitled Pre-Roswell Crash-Retrievals.

Also you will find in Issue 30: an obituary of Art Bell by Gary Heseltine, new witnesses to a 1974 sighting by Dave Hodrien, Abduction beginnings by Bill Chalker and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine:
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 29:

Friday 4 May 2018

Tower Fire in Brazil

A large block of flats has collapsed due to fire in Brazil. The twenty-six storey Wilton Paes de Almeida Building in Sao Paulo caught fire on Tuesday night. The residents were evacuated, however sadly not everybody could escape and at least one person perished. The death toll will probably, sadly, rise seeing as many of the residents were squatters. A hundred and seventy firemen tackled the blaze, but could not prevent the tower, put up in 1961, from totally falling apart. The fire was caused by a gas explosion and spread quickly through the makeshift wooden partitions installed to turn the former police station into residential units. It only took an hour and a half for the fire to consume the entire building to the point where the structure failed. The Wilton Paes de Almeida Building was a steel-framed oblong tower with four large internal support columns. The rubble fell into the building's own footprint and some moderate damage was done to a church next door and several more nearby buildings. Source: For believers in the official story of 9/11, this event sounds like a vindication. Indeed have said as much, see: After a whole parade of no-shows, see background links, it seems we finally have a long-awaited repeat of the WTC disaster.

Does this then mean that because the Brazilian tower was destroyed in this way then it proves that the WTC could have been destroyed the same way? No. In fact there are a number of important differences. Firstly it is clear from the video recording of the collapse that the fire was far more extensive in the Brazilian tower than in WTC 1, 2 and 7. The WTC towers were far bigger than the Wilton Paes de Almeida Building. Building Seven was almost twice as tall, at forty-seven floors. The Twin Towers had a hundred and ten floors each. What's more the pile of rubble for the WTC buildings was far smaller than it should have been. Ironically, it was actually about the same height as the remains of the far smaller Brazilian tower; this should make people think. The Wilton Paes de Almeida Building clearly fell to the ground in flaming pieces; it did not turn into a cloud of dust. So this latest disaster is not evidence to support the official story of 9/11 at all.