Friday, 22 February 2019

David Icke Banned from Australia

For several weeks now the government of Australia have considered banning David Icke from the country, but no decision was made. It looked like David was safe and the people planning to go and see his shows on his four-stop tour through Australia's major cities must have been relieved. And then, just hours before David was due to board a flight to Melbourne, the immigration minister David Coleman revoked his visa. Perhaps this was deliberate to disappoint David and the lecture-goers at the last minute, as well as cause David to spend money on a now useless air fare. Apparently David is a risk to the "health, safety and good order of the Australian people or a segment of the Australian people." God knows what that means. Here is the report from that filthy rag The Guardian. It repeats barefaced lies, like David saying that Hitler was funded by Jewish people, see: See here for David's report on the matter: It is a predictable pattern. The Canberra authorities were influenced by so-called "Jewish welfare" organizations; in other words they cucked out to them. In this case the shots were called by the Anti-Defamation Commission and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. Their spokesman, Dvir Abramovich, congratulated Mr Coleman on his decision. He said that "anti-Semites and Holocaust deniers will never find a home in Australia". How many times are we going to have to run through this tedious routine? David Icke is not... repeat not... an anti-Semite. He explains very clearly that Jews are not the perpetrators of the New World Order. This stupidity has been going on now since the early 1990's. Will it ever end? I'm really sorry David's tour has been cancelled at the eleventh hour like this. I wish David all the best for his future endeavours. I'm going to the premiere of his new documentary, but I'll say more about that in a future post. Ironically today is the birthday of Steve Irwin who would have been fifty-seven if he had lived. He was a real Aussie bloke who used to wrestle crocodiles and play with poisonous snakes. Where has that traditional Australian vigour and resilience gone?

Thursday, 21 February 2019

Peter Robbins on Paranormal Mysteries

In this article,, I made Peter Robbins a promise. I shall continue to keep it now. Peter has appeared on the show Paranormal Mysteries on Access North West radio presented by Sacha Christie, see: where he once again runs through his dispute with his former co-author Larry Warren. It is a response to this interview with Larry: Much of what is discussed are points Peter and Sacha have both made before and I have addressed before, see the background links below. Others have also been addressed in Larry's interview with Tino Megaro, see: I will focus on the new information and, as I expected, that accounts for only a small proportion of the two-hour interview. Peter describes the origins of the book he co-wrote and now denounces, Left at East Gate. His description can be summed up as: Peter good- Larry bad. Obviously there is another side to that story. He accuses Gary Heseltine and me of "drinking the Kool Aid" and he quotes Stanton Friedman's favourite phrase when parodying the skeptics: "Don't bother me with the facts, my mind's made up". However, in my view this applies to Peter and the others who have believed the trolls. I explain why in the background links. Then Peter says something very strange indeed. He claims that the anti-Semitic attack that I describe in the background links above and below took place on November the 9th last year; this is the day before his father passed away. However, in the "Robbinsic 12" document he states quite clearly that he was alerted to the attack on October the 13th. This was at least two days after it was posted because, as I explain in the background, the trolls wanted the anti-Semitic comment visible on my Facebook feed for as long as possible. Where does this discrepancy come from? Another mistake Peter and Sacha make is at around the 1 hour 18 minute mark where they address Larry's foreign school exchange and claim that the English children he stayed with would have been too young. Actually there often is an age difference in these kinds of exchanges. I went on two when I was aged fourteen and fifteen; and I was placed with two boys aged eighteen and twenty years old respectively. Apart from the above points the rest of the show was the same-old same-old.

Wednesday, 20 February 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 7

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the Lisbon Treaty, Swindon car factory closure, secret military activity in the USA and much much more. My fellow panellist was Pattie Brassard. Seeking the Truth is part of the Wake Up UK alternative social network, see:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Tuesday, 19 February 2019

Gang of Seven

The British Labour Party has split. Oddly enough this is not primarily due to Brexit, at least not overtly. Seven Labour members of the House of Commons have resigned from the party, three men and four women; or as they say in the Labour Party, "Women!" They are: Luciana Berger, Ann Coffey, Mike Gapes, Chris Leslie, Gavin Shuker, Angela Smith and Chuka Umunna. Only two of those names are of any distinction. Chuka Umunna was once tipped to be party leader before the election of Jeremy Corbyn; which might explain why he now has an axe to grind with Corbyn. Luciana Berger has always opposed Corbyn's leadership and vigorously supported both attempts to unseat him. She is herself a Jewess and has been subjected to online anti-Semitic abuse. She claims that Labour is now "institutionally anti-Semitic". A member of Corbyn's campaign management team denounced Ms Berger because she supposedly was backing the Israeli state "whose Nazi masters taught them well!" Ironically Ms Berger has also been accused by Zionists within the Jewish community of not doing enough to support Israel. Obviously these attacks from both sides are going to unnerve her, to say the least; but that does not excuse her pronouncements that brought her to the attention of HPANWO. Last year she launched an attack against Corbyn for his comments regarding a mural by the artist "Mear One" that she claimed was anti-Semitic. I thought that this was ridiculous and was as bad as the silly accusations that David Icke is anti-Semitic; therefore I said so in no uncertain terms, see: How can anybody accuse Jeremy Corbyn of being anti-Semitic when he has been active in left-wing causes his whole life? He is dedicated to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign; but, as I've said many times before, opposition to Israel does not equal hated of Jews. Also how fair is it to say that Labour is institutionally anti-Semitic? See the background links below for more details. If there is any anti-Semitism in Labour then it probably comes only from the radical Islamists. The seven MP's are calling themselves "the independent group", but this is just a temporary title. They have ruled out joining the Liberal Democrats and their objective is to form a brand new party. For the time being though they will probably have to tender their resignations and call by-elections in their constituencies. Their electorate might not like the idea of being governed by an independent Member of Parliament without any manifesto. No doubt Labour will put up official candidates in all their seats to challenge them. It was only a short time ago they were voted for as part of a Corbyn-ruled party and all of them increased their majorities. Source:

This is not the first time this has happened. In 1981 four Labour MP's, Roy Jenkins, David Owen, Bill Rodgers and Shirley Williams, quit the party and formed a new one, the Social Democratic Party. Known as the "gang of four", they quickly formed a left-of-centre alliance with the Liberal Party and stood in the election under a coalition banner. This arrangement soon became permanent when they merged together to become the Liberal Democrats which exists to this day. However the Lib-Dems almost totally crashed out of government in 2015 following their crooked coalition with the Tories. Those five years as a junior partner to power destroyed them. As is often the case, there was more than one motive for that split. The gang of four opposed the infiltration of Labour by the Marxist-Trotskyist group Militant which was famous for their handheld newspaper sellers who made a point of attending every Labour event (Ironically, one of their principle figures, Derek Hatton, has just been allowed back into Labour by Corbyn after his expulsion in 1986 by the man who is now the UK's EU commissioner, Lord Kinnock. How strange these twists of fate can be). However, the four were also "euroskeptics", a nostalgic term that meant a Brexiteer before Britain was completely in the European Union and so the aim was the easier one of keeping us out instead of getting us out, which is the task we have now. We are faced with an opposite situation with this new split because the "independent group" are all Remainers and are dedicated to a second EU referendum. I'm not sure what effect this eventuality will have, if any. As I've said before, Parliament and the mainstream political arena is now a virtual establishment monopoly when it comes to Brexit. There is literally nobody within its walls who is committed to the process at all. UKIP have revealed themselves to be grossly incompetent as best and totally controlled opposition at worst, see: At some point very soon Theresa May's nine lives will finally run out and there will be a general election. In my view, its outcome will matter little when it comes to increasing the possibility of Brexit. The only hope now lies with grassroots pressure from the great British public and independence movements in other EU member states. I am also still hopeful that political transformation in the United States of America and elsewhere will be a positive influence, see:

Monday, 18 February 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 341

I have been featured on Programme 341 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: new documentary about David Icke, Pope tackles church abusers, Instagram witches and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Sunday, 17 February 2019

Trash Bag in Space

Astronomers who have the job of detecting natural objects which come close enough to the earth possibly to collide with it usually detect asteroids and comets, but they have been baffled recently by something that they have given the catchy little name A10bMLz. What makes A10bMLz unusual is that it is moving very near to the earth indeed, in fact within the orbit of the moon. Its own orbit is highly elliptical and its perigee, it closest point of approach to the earth is just 372 miles. It could be natural, which would make it earth's second natural satellite, but its consistency makes this unlikely. It has a high area-to-mass ratio which means that it is very tenuous like a rubbish bag, which is why it has been nicknamed the "trash bag in space". It is about ten feet across. It is probably part of an old spacecraft or satellite. This has reignited the debate about "space junk". The earth is surrounded by a cloud of fragments that are the debris of space exploration. Some are large, such as rocket stages or broken satellites, but some are tiny and undetectable like nuts or bolts. Some of this junk is in stable orbit and will remain circling the earth for a long time, possible for centuries, until the miniscule drag of the exosphere finally brings them down. Space junk is a major hazard for spacecraft. In fact the Space Shuttle's window was once cracked when it was struck by a tiny fleck of paint. At astronomical speeds of many miles per second, the fleck had the kinetic energy of a rifle bullet. Some people are even suggesting that space missions will have to be suspended until a solution to space junk is found. Source: Regular readers will probably guess what I'm going to suggest now; could the "trash bag in space" be artificial but not man-made? In other words, is it an artefact of an extraterrestrial intelligence? This is certainly possible and it is probably more likely seeing as we have been visited already recently by 'Oumuamua which I am sure is some kind of interstellar spacecraft, see: Prof. Avi Loeb has recently restated his courageous position that 'Oumuamua is artificial, see: We also have the strange case of the "black knight", see: If anything happens that reveals that any of these objects are truly made by aliens then it will be impossible for the authorities to cover it up, as I explain in the background links below. There can be no cover-ups in astronomy.

Friday, 15 February 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones live at the Swansea UFO Network 4

I will be speaking again at a meeting of the Swansea UFO Network on Tuesday the 30th of July 2019. The event starts at 8 PM and the venue is The New Lodge, Alexandra Road, Gorseinon, Swansea, SA4-4PE, Wales. See here for more details:
My lecture will be entitled: SETI and UFO's. "SETI", the "Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence", is a scientific project to find intelligent life beyond the earth. So is UFOlogy. Then why are the two so divided from each other? See here for details of my previous appearance at SUFON:

Thursday, 14 February 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 6

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: Donald Tusk's hell comment, the Lisbon Treaty, Natural law and much much more. My fellow panellists were Julian Brock, Karen Macdonald, Nathan Kirkden and Pattie Brassard. Seeking the Truth is part of the Wake Up UK alternative social network, see:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Tuesday, 12 February 2019

Larry Warren and Gary Heseltine

Larry Warren has been interviewed again by Gary Heseltine, see:
In this interview Larry redresses the balance following statements made about him by many of his detractors and, most recently, his former co-author Peter Robbins. (I will have a few words to say about Mr Robbins myself in the near future.)

Sunday, 10 February 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones at UFO Denmark

The official recording of my talk UFO Denmark is available here:
See here for background: Many thanks to Pia, Karsten and everybody else at UFO Denmark for a brilliant event. See:
See here for the HPANWO TV reportage of my trip to Denmark:

Saturday, 9 February 2019


I was sad to hear about the death of the actor Albert Finney yesterday at the age of eighty-two, see: He is best known for playing Hercule Poirot and the main character in the famous drama Saturday Night and Sunday Morning. However my favourite of his films is a rather obscure and less critically acclaimed one called Looker, see: It is directed by Michael Creighton of Jurassic Park fame. Albert Finney stars in it as a Hollywood cosmetic surgeon called Dr Larry Roberts who does a lot of operations on young actresses, giving them conventionally perfect features for the television advert industry. A murder mystery ensues when these young women are all eliminated one after the other. As a prime suspect himself, Dr Roberts decides to investigate for himself and his inquiries quickly lead to a local electronics firm that is producing computer generated imagery. CGI is something we take for granted today, but this film was made in 1981 when the technology was experimental, even science fiction. In the film, the company plan to make real thespians obsolete by replacing them with CGI figures that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from conventionally recorded humans. This possibility now exists for real, see: The firm is killing these girls to remove the competition and trying to frame Dr Roberts. Now that the company has digitally cloned them, the real people are no longer needed, and indeed are a liability because they might start demanding commissions or the reform of copyright law. However, Dr Roberts uncovers another and even more sinister conspiracy. The company have developed a way of hypnotizing people simply by shining a special light into their eyes. This can be used as a weapon to render people temporarily unconscious and catatonic or to make somebody else appear invisible to them. The murderer who killed these young actresses uses this weapon to carry out the crimes. A sinister industrialist called John Reston, played by James Coburn, has contracted the company to mesmerize the viewing public into voting for a certain politician by including this luminous mind control weapon into TV broadcasts. The film might be science fiction, but one half of its plot has come true. Has the other half? Looker can be watched on YouTube for a small fee:

Thursday, 7 February 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 43

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: a new giant collider at CERN, men in black, black-eyed children and much much more. This is the first time I've been featured on Kev's show in which he uses special video graphics.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Tuesday, 5 February 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 5

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the earth's geomagnetic pole shift, hidden objects in space, European travel health insurance much much more. My fellow panellists were Karen Macdonald and Pattie Brassard. Seeking the Truth is part of the Wake Up UK alternative social network, see:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Wednesday, 30 January 2019

Strange Phone Call

On Friday evening at about 6.20 I was sitting at home minding my own business when my landline phone rang. As usual I had the handset with me in my room so I answered it. "Hello." I said.
"Is that Ben Emlyn-Jones?" asked a gruff male voice with an upper class accent.
"I think you should have nothing more to do with Caz Clarke. She is a liar and a con... (He either said "con artist" or "con-woman". I missed the last part of the word because I interrupted him.)
"Who are you?" I butted in.
"It doesn't matter who I am. This is just some friendly advice. Stay away from Caz Clarke."
"Who are you?" I repeated, but he ended the call.
I dialed call-back, but it was a withheld number. I contacted my telecommunications service and the polite Filipino operator explained to me that there was no way he could trace that call, but he gave me some advice on nuisance or scam calls. A few minutes later the service sent me an email with an information package. It is very unusual that I would receive any unsolicited calls because the landline number at my home is ex-directory. Only about twenty people have that number and they are people I know and trust. The only exceptions are the relatives and friends of my two housemates who are mostly in Sudan and are not acquainted in any way with me. I certainly didn't recognize the mysterious posh voice on the other end.

Regular readers will know that Caz Clarke is a UFO sighting witness from south Wales whom I have been working closely with recently along with the field researcher Gari Jones, see background links below. I do not think she is a con-woman for the reasons I explain in those links. I've thought over what happened on Friday and I suspect somebody is concerned about my upcoming talk in Denmark, see: The call came the day after I sent my slides package to the organizers UFO Danmark. Did my email unknowingly reach... other recipients? Caz has reported how she herself has been harassed in a similar way by weird people making contact with her. Not that the phone call I had was threatening or even particularly intimidating. However, it has made me aware of some possible interest behind the scenes in the Pentyrch UFO incident, the people who were there when it happened and researchers like me who take an interest in it. The thing is, I am planning to mention this case in my talk in Copenhagen on Saturday. Perhaps somebody doesn't want this subject going international. Well, I am certainly not altering my lecture because of an anonymous caller. I have checked all travel and entry requirements for Denmark and have made sure I comply with them to the letter. I will make sure my luggage contains no contraband at all. Therefore if on some trumped up excuse I am turned back at customs you should be suspicious. I consider this very unlikely, but just in case it happens, I want it on the record.

Sunday, 27 January 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Bases Christmas 2018

I have been interviewed on the Bases Christmas 2018 series, in association with Stepping Stones to Awareness, see:
Caroline Stephens and I discuss the Brexit issue in detail together with related subjects. See here for my Brexit HPANWO Radio interview with Caroline:
See here for more Stepping Stones to Awareness videos:
See here for the Bases Project:

Saturday, 26 January 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Kim Drops

I have been interviewed by Kim Tate on his Kim Drops show. You will need to log into your Facebook account to watch it, see:
Subjects discussed include: Freemasonry, 9/11, the hundredth monkey effect and much much more.

Friday, 25 January 2019

LHC Plus

CERN- the European Organization for Nuclear Research (Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire) has published a proposal to build a new particle accelerator. It already is home to the world's biggest particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider, and the new one will be considerably bigger. Called the FCC- Future Circular Collider, it will have a circumference of sixty-two miles in comparison to the LHC's seventeen. The reason for this new project is that the LHC has not solved as many of the mysteries of cosmology it was hoped that it would. It did succeed in finding the Higgs Boson, the final element of the Standard Model of Particle Physics, seventeen fundamental particles that explain almost everything in the universe. There are six quarks, these are minute elements that join together to create hadrons, the pieces of an atomic nucleus. There are six leptons that account for the weak nuclear force, neutrinos and electromagnetism. There are four gauge bosons that are force carriers in quantum mechanics, such as electromagnetic radiation. The Higgs was the last piece of the jigsaw. It was proposed by Dr Peter Higgs in 1964, but not located observationally until the LHC did it in 2012; but it's not enough. There are still strange phenomena in the cosmos such as dark matter and dark energy to be explained. The fact that the universe is not only expanding, but the speed of expansion is increasing. What is gravity? There are many others. The physicists' long quest for the Theory of Everything is far from complete. Building the Future Circular Collider will be a huge engineering project, presumably it will change its name once it is in the present. It will involve digging a circular tunnel sixty-two miles long, twice the length of the Channel Tunnel. Huge pieces of machinery will need to be designed and installed. It will cost an estimated twenty billion pounds and will not be running until the middle of the century, about twenty to thirty years from the time of writing. Some experts are asking whether it's worth it. There is no guarantee that the FCC will answer any of the questions that LHC has failed to. If so, will the Prof. Brian Coxes of this world simply demand another even bigger collider? We can't keep building bigger and bigger ones forever. Source:

If the Large Hadron Collider is, as I suspect, something intended to manipulate the nature of reality for a nefarious purpose by the Illuminati, then does this mean it hasn't worked? It hasn't been completely ineffectual from their point of view. It clearly has done something, such as the Mandela Effect, see:, and the "Unidentified Lying Object", see:, but are these merely side effects? If a new bigger version of the LHC is necessary then does this mean that the supposedly covert and satanic mission of the original Collider has failed? See the background links below for more details about my concerns about the LHC. If this is the case then we should firstly rejoice. Our planet is safe, or it has at least been granted a temporary reprieve. However, it seems that the plotters behind this Götterdämmerung manoeuvre have not yet given up. They are going to try again with a more powerful doomsday device. Luckily this will take a very long time to build and start up and so we have a breathing space to take action before then. I wonder if there's a connection between the proposal for the Future Circular Collider and the 2016 Effect, see:

Thursday, 24 January 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 4

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the Jack Walker injustice, sabotage of the British economy, the secret space programme much much more. My fellow panelists were Karen MacDonald, Hollie Walker, John Hurst and Pattie Brassard. Seeking the Truth is part of the Wake Up UK alternative social network, see:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Tuesday, 22 January 2019

Denying 2016

Back in last August I wrote an article called Right-Wing Conspiracy, see:; and this one is something of a follow-up. Since then Neil Sanders has published two more instalments of his article series about Cambridge Analytica. I have lurked on Facebook while he has got into several arguments with his detractors... like that ever happens on Facebook! In Right-Wing Conspiracy I left the conclusion very open-ended because I was uncertain. Since then I have continued to read and assimilate the additional information Neil has tabled, although this task is not yet complete. In his latest two posts Neil talks about the very disturbing psychological research by Philip Zimbardo who, along with Stanley Milgram, has discovered a side to human nature that is uncomfortable to contemplate. Also he explains the way we are absorbed into positions where our rational mind breaks down and we act as if we are members of a cult. However Neil reveals evidence that it is not accidental, but rather a product of psychological manipulation by experts in the field working for the authorities. In his latest publication, he addresses the most recent political upheavals around the world, especially in South America and India. He has found that the same culprits, Cambridge Analytica and the Mercer network, are behind those too. Source: and: An interesting additional piece of information about Steve Bannon is that he used to be involved with space exploration. He ran a project to design a life-support system for long duration space missions called "Biosphere 2", see: I don't know if that's relevant. It might be in some way considering the UFO cover-up and Roswell etc.

Quite a few people have asked me to say more on this subject, especially since Neil's most recent blog post, because they know I am an enthusiastic proponent of the 2016 Effect. I'm still not sure how to respond though. Neil Sanders has generated a huge amount of material with a lot of detail and I can't see how he is incorrect about any of these individual facts. However, what has he actually discovered in essence? He has proven that there are wealthy people who will use their financial clout to influence politics, often employing questionable means. So be it. I have no doubt that is the case; it always has been. Maybe that is indeed ethically problematic, but it will probably not stop. I am not a utopian and don't believe the end of the globalist agenda would automatically transform the entire world's population into priests of High Atlantis. I wouldn't be surprised if outfits like the Mercer network will continue to operate in the post-Illuminati era. My latest book is fundamentally an exploration of that very conundrum, see: This is one of the reasons I still use terms like "deep state", even if it is an invention of Steve Bannon's JTRIG efforts. We also have to look at the proportions in what we have learned. What Neil has exposed is not in any way the equivalent of the New World Order agenda. For instance, would Cambridge Analytica theoretically be able to remove Margaret Thatcher from power? Could they carry out 9/11? Could they shoot President John F Kennedy? Could they cover up free energy, aliens or ghosts? Obviously the crimes I have just listed are real and are aided and abetted by people who do use the same methods Neil has talked about and he correctly compares Cambridge Analytica to MI6 or the CIA; but what about the difference in scale? I am often challenged by people who desperately implore me: "Can't you see it, Ben? Trump is just another insider! Brexit is just a deeper part of the conspiracy!" In the background links above and below I explain why I do not think that is the case. 2016 is real. In fact if it is not real and Neil is completely right about everything, than why was the New World Order not done and dusted ages ago? It should have taken five minutes if the elite were so truly all powerful and everything that happens in the world is something they intended and anything that appears to be against them is just controlled opposition in more and more devious disguises. No, the Illuminati do not have everything their way. They have always faced genuine forces of opposition throughout history and those forces have never been more powerful than they are today. Eventually their opponents will reach a level where the Illuminati can no longer oppose them which is when they will fall. I think I am on the winning team, even if it doesn't always feel like it... I hope so anyway.

Monday, 21 January 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Paranormal Peep Show 5

I have been interviewed again on the Paranormal Peep Show by Neil Geddes Ward and Andrew Chaplin. We discuss the nationwide tour by David Icke and much much more. Mark Devlin appears later in the programme.
See here for my previous appearance on the Paranormal Peep Show:

Sunday, 20 January 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 337

I have been featured on Programme 337 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: political correctness, NPC's vs psychopaths, Prince Philip's car crash and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Friday, 18 January 2019

Prince Philip's Car Crash

It has been reported in the news that Prince Philip has been involved in a road traffic accident. The incident happened on the A419 in Norfolk, in an accident black spot not far from Sandringham House, one of the Queen's official residences. The estate has a dark reputation. King George VI and the V both died there, her father and grandfather. There have been alien abductions and mysterious disappearances in the vicinity. In 1915 an entire battalion of the British army who were based on the estate vanished; not in the area admittedly, but during the Dardanelles campaign in Turkey. The ninety-seven year old consort to Queen Elizabeth II was driving a black Land Rover. According to a witness he collided with a Kia hatchback as he was joining the A419 from a junction. His car "tumbled" and "careened" across the carriageway and ended up in the ditch on its side. There were two women in the hatchback and a nine month old baby. The baby was unhurt, but one of the women broke her wrist. Amazingly Prince Philip was completely unharmed despite his advanced years and, as you can see from the news photos, his car definitely came off worst. He saw his doctor "as a precaution" and then went straight home to Sandringham. Source:

Of course it's possible that he was just lucky. The royal family of today do have a reputation for charming the goddess Fortuna. It is also possible that Philip spontaneously shape-shifted in alarm. The reptoid physical form is far more robust than the human. I state the above in all seriousness; see here for more information: It is also possible that archonic forces intervened to save him. This is a big subject that I'll cover in more detail in the future, but I do suspect that, as a Facebook correspondent of mine put it: "the devil looks after his own!" Again, I take this possibility completely seriously. The same correspondent asked me if this could be some kind of distraction from Brexit. Was it a murder attempt? Maybe. I've wondered lately if Prince Philip is already dead. My guess in that case is that he died in late 2017 because it was then that the media reported that he was "retiring from public duties". If so then the images we've seen of him since then are Photoshopped or simply earlier pictures with false dates on them. His few public appearances could be handled by look-alike actors. There is distinct reason to believe that Fidel Castro, the long-term leader of Cuba, did not die in November 2016 as officially reported, but some time in 2013, see: His death was kept secret until it was the right political climate to announce it. We know that Philip's health has been deteriorating for the last five years or so. He has suffered numerous water infections; a sign that his aging immune system is breaking down. If he is already dead then why did they not just announce it when he died? Possibly they do not want him to be declared dead too close to the death of Prof. Stephen Hawking. When the famous paralyzed physicist passed away in March 2018 there was an outpouring of mass public grief. It included a musical requiem by the famous Greek composer Vangelis, see: There were memes all over the internet and thousands of people lined the streets for his funeral in Cambridge. People who never knew him personally were crying. The fact of the matter is, when Prince Philip finally kicks the bucket nobody will give a shit. The palace knows this and so don't want the two mourning periods too close to each other in case people start comparing them. My guess is they have chosen a one year minimum period; so don't be surprised if Philip "passes away peacefully in his sleep" in March 2019, about two months from the time of writing. If I'm right about this then it means the reports about the car crash are fake. If so then why? Philip survived and was not even injured, so this is hardly a distraction from Brexit or anything else for that matter. I have no answers at this juncture.

Wednesday, 16 January 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 3

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include the fracking agenda, geoengineering, controlled opposition and much much more. My fellow panellists were Karen MacDonald, John Hurst and Julian Brock. Seeking the Truth is part of the Wake Up UK alternative social network, see:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Tuesday, 15 January 2019

Brexit Decision

Today the House of Commons will finally vote on Prime Minister Theresa May's Brexit deal. The forecast is that the MP's will reject it, and they will be right to reject it. It is an act of national self-flagellation, even suicide. It would make Britain a vassal province of the European Union, independent in name only, with even less self-determination and security than the meagre rations of both doled out from Brussels to its "member states" as it is. The deal must count as one of the most unpalatable bills ever presented to Parliament... and it's meant to be! The whole purpose of the deal is for it to fail and therefore derail the entire Brexit process. If by some miracle Parliament passes it, nobody will be more disappointed than Theresa May. If... when... the deal is thrown out, what will happen? There are a few options. May could try to amend the deal and submit it to the Commons again. She could return to the European Commission and renegotiate Article 50. Either of these two options will take a long time and will probably lead to an extension of the Article 50 period so Brexit is delayed. She could proceed to declare independence on the original Brexit Day, March the 29th, without a deal; in which case we would all be eaten up by Godzilla, see: In the midst of all this process there will probably be pressure on May to resign and a new Prime Minister might take over the Brexit reins. There could well be a general election too which would probably result in a hung parliament, the third since 2000. Either that or a Labour government which will need an article of its own even to outline. Source:

The spanners in the works will continue unabated in all the above situations. My guess is that the process will grind to a complete halt, probably before the end of spring, and the cancel Brexit option will be tabled... Game, set and match! A second referendum will definitely result in a Remain victory. The government will tighten up their manipulation of the vote. There may even be another Jo Cox-like event. Sadly even that might be redundant because I can feel the public's energy waning. I've heard many people say: "Look, this is just too much hassle. Can't we just forget the whole thing?" However, none of the above is inevitable if the British public refuse to tolerate such contemptuous treatment by our so-called "leaders" who are really just treacherous agents of a covert global power. The truth shall set us free! The House of Commons will be voting on the deal at about 7 PM this evening. The result will be announced at 8PM and this will be followed immediately by an announcement by the Prime Minister. It really doesn't matter what the outcome of the vote is. The only alternative position that has ever existed in government has revealed itself to be controlled opposition, see: There will be a livestream on HPANWO TV tomorrow evening at 9 PM to discuss the issue, the first of more than one, see: (coming soon)

Monday, 14 January 2019

The HuffPo on Max Spiers

The Huffington Post has reported on the death of Max Spiers. I often like the HuffPo because it is willing to discuss more esoteric subjects than most other media outlets; however I am deeply disappointed in their coverage of this tragic matter. The research is very sloppy. Several factual details are incorrect, for instance the date when Max died. They also misquoted several of the people interviewed, just as the BBC would have done. They consulted Prof. Karen Douglas whom I have made a HPANWO TV video about, see:  Nevertheless the nadir of this screed is the comment by Nick Pope. He calls people like me "enablers" without explaining exactly what that means, but it's obviously something deprecating. He continues: "I utterly condemn the lack of critical thinking here, not least because it can only add to the family's distress." This is odd considering that the "conspiracy theory community" was actually alerted to this situation specifically because of concerns raised by Max' family and close friends. The article quotes an earlier interview with his former partner Sarah in which she describes a very different scenario to that Monika Duval did at the inquest. Why was this not taken seriously? It's especially worrying when you consider Max' text message to his mother. If you were a detective looking into this, what would you suspect? What Nick Pope is dishing out is the same moral blackmail played against us whenever something like this happens. They did it on 9/11, 7/7 and many other events. This ploy states that the only way to show respect for the victims of a tragedy and sensitivity towards their loved ones is to repeat the official story of what happened to them regardless of whether it is true or not. I satirize this dirty little trick in a poem I wrote, see: In the background links below I explain why I think the official story about what happened to Max Spiers deserves to be doubted. So, how dare you, Nick Pope! Shame on you! Source:

Sunday, 13 January 2019

More Signals from Space

A new series of fast radio bursts have been discovered by CHIME- the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment. These transient radio pulses coming from space were first discovered in the 1960's and since then many others have been detected. They can be detected from a great distance, sometimes billions of light-years, meaning that they must be extremely powerful; see the background links below. Astronomers are not entirely sure what causes them, although some sources have been identified, such as pulsars. There are other possibilities, such as rotating neutron stars, two or more neutron stars colliding, a neutron star turning into a black hole, a black hole itself... and finally aliens; cue the Giorgio Tsoukalos memes! However Dr Ingrid Stairs, an astrophysicist at the University of British Columbia, says that this is unlikely because the FRB's come from many different parts of the sky. "It just seems completely inconceivable that there could be that many different alien civilisations all deciding to produce the same kind of signal in the same way. That just seems highly improbable." she said. Source: However this assumes that the extraterrestrials have not travelled great distances through the cosmos and possibility even have an intergalactic empire. If they are millions of years in advance of humans technologically then why shouldn't this be considered? It is neither inconceivable nor improbable.

Friday, 11 January 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 42

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: Capel Green disinformation. China lands on the moon, the Tasmanian tiger photographed and much much more. TFR is now a subscription only service, but I think the station is worth the modest fee.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Tuesday, 8 January 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 2

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include the yellow vest protests in France, common law rebellion against the globalist state, human spiritual history and much much more. My fellow panellists were Karen MacDonald, John Hurst and Roman Light. Seeking the Truth is part of the Wake Up UK alternative social network, see:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Monday, 7 January 2019

Max Spiers Inquest

The full coroner's inquest into the death of Max Spiers has begun in Kent. It is scheduled to last for three days, but already the media has published a story about it with an effective conclusion. Max, whom they call by his full name "Maxwell Bates-Spiers", had apparently been suffering from pneumonia and had taken a form of alprazolam that he had bought in Turkey while on holiday with his friend Monika Duval. It was supposedly the illness and complications from drug intoxication that had caused his death. The witnesses who testified about this were a pathologist and toxicologist. They said Max had taken twice the recommended dose of alprazolam plus oxycodone, another medication. The inquest continues, but it is not looking hopeful that the coroner will address the suspicious elements that other people have mentioned, especially Max' family and friends. See background links below for details. If the case is turned around I will post and update, but so far it looks like a whitewash. Source:

Thursday, 3 January 2019

China lands on the Dark Side

A Chinese space probe has been reported to have landed on the moon. The unmanned Chang'e 4 mission is unique in that it has landed on the dark side of the moon, the first time this has been done. Up until now all claimed achievements in lunar exploration have been on the near side, facing the earth. The moon is tidally locked, which means its orbit matches its rotation relative to the earth exactly, so it only ever presents one side towards its primary. The other side is called the "dark side", but in this case "dark" means "unseen" instead of literally dark because it receives just as much sunlight as the near side, albeit at different times. It even has phases, but these are the opposite of the ones we see from the earth. The Chang'e 4 lander has a rover, similar to the ones NASA says it has put on Mars. This will travel across the lunar surface to study the moon with radar and chemical analysis. It is also going to try and grow a plant in a sealed capsule. Because it is out of direct line of sight from the earth the spacecraft has to communicate with mission control via a relay satellite that is resting at a "Lagrange" point where gravitational forces are balanced. Source:

Scientists prefer the term "far side" to "dark side" to describe the side of the moon facing away from the earth. Whatever you call it, it is a highly unusual place because it is one of the few places in the universe that is completely invisible from the earth for another reason that sheer distance; and on by cosmic scale it's very close indeed, just next door. It is also very large, 7.3 million square miles. This makes it the ideal place to operate from space onto the earth without being seen. It would be the best place to locate a secret space programme operation. Alternatively, if the earth is being visited by extraterrestrials, and I believe it is, then they would probably have some sort of facility nearby; and the moon's dark side is perfect. Flying saucers and other UFO's average in size at about the same as human aircraft. This means it is likely that most are too small for interstellar journeys and therefore the aliens probably travel from their home worlds in larger craft which land on the far side of the moon and it is from there that smaller craft visit the earth. Unless they are using wormhole technology which is a possibility. However, there is more than just supposition behind this. There is much evidence from witness testimony. NASA contractors Donna Hare and Sgt. Karl Wolfe describe how photographs taken by spacecraft near the moon had to have the secret bases edited out before they were published in the media, see: and: In this case, wouldn't the keepers of the Truth Embargo be worried that the Chinese space agency might expose them? After all China's space programme is independent, is it not? In fact a newspaper has already jumped on board with this eventuality, see: So far nothing earth-shattering has been said. China has released a few photographs to the media that show the same kind of lunar landscape we've seen on other alleged moon landings. I think it is highly unlikely that we'll enjoy any kind of great revelation from China over this. The same questions about international collusion over secrets in space date back to the beginning of public space exploration. There are many political, economic, cultural and psychological reasons why China would aid and abet the USA in keeping lunar secrets, just like the Soviet Union did during the space race, and I explore those in the background links below... but I could be wrong. Needless to say, if I am wrong then you should stand by for an emergency update. I don't know if this is connected, but Karl Wolfe sadly died a few weeks ago, see: According to the news report he was killed in a cycling accident. The same supposedly happened to Peter Fisher, see:

Wednesday, 2 January 2019

New 2019 Trailer for Capel Green

There is a new trailer for Capel Green, launched for the New Year, four months before the film's premier, see: It is different from the others because it portrays the Rendlesham Forest Incident in a larger context, part of the general UFO phenomenon. It also includes clips from news stories from late 1980, showing how turbulent and uncertain the world was then. The Solidarity trade union had come to power in Poland and there was the threat of a Soviet invasion. For a while war was imminent. I think this may have been why UFO's appeared at nuclear weapons bases. The release date for Capel Green is May Day and it now has an IMDB page, see:

Tuesday, 1 January 2019

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 34

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 34 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see:
Issue 34 includes an article in my column entitled 'Oumuamua - A Message from the Stars.

Also you will find in Issue 34: Brazilian doctor speaks out about "Operation Saucer", the story of General Tomas Silva from Portugal, the origins of the Starchild and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine:
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 33: