Yesterday I went to the funeral of my dear friend Ayem. I
first met Ayem in 2004 at a Neil Hague exhibition in London
and we went on to work closely together on Planet X Radio and the Exopolitics
Leeds conferences. For example see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2014/01/ben-emlyn-jones-on-planet-x-radio-12.html.
and: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2011/08/leeds-exopolitics-expo-2011.html.
She died on the 12th of December and I only realized exactly how sad I am about
it when I was on the way home from the funeral in Liverpool
yesterday. This despite the fact that Ayem had been keeping herself to herself
lately, and I'd not spoken to her for over a year. This experience was very
different from David Boyle's funeral. Although I respected David for his work and
I enjoyed his company during the few times I met him, he was not an intimate personal
acquaintance, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/david-boyle-dies.html.
I travelled to Liverpool by train and arrived at the
crematorium several hours early. I passed the time by strolling round the huge
adjoining cemetery. There were many very elaborate tombs with very moving
epitaphs; Liverpudlians are particularly good at that sort of thing. I had my
earphones with me and ended up listening to two radio shows which I found very
comforting. I didn't choose these shows, they just appeared randomly on
shuffle-play; I felt that this was synchronicity, see: https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-419-mark-macnicol
and: https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-420-whitley-strieber.
I then met up with a good friend of Ayem and myself and we had a long
conversation. There were a large number of people at the funeral. Nearly all of
them I knew and many I had not seen for a long time. I wish we had been
reunited under happier circumstances. I joked that it reminded me of this
rather triste German Christmas TV advert: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_B6wQMd2eI.
The ceremony was short and simple. It consisted of some music and then a few
people did some readings about their relationships with Ayem and some poetry
that inspired them. The committal song was Hey
Jude by The Beatles. Afterwards we had a wake in a pub near Penny
Lane , a place made famous by another Beatles song.
Ayem was a bright light in the darkness of the both the blue pilled and red
pilled world. In a Truth movement where the only issue that seems to arouse
anybody's passion these days is who is, or is not, a shill; Ayem was truly
committed to the vision of building a better world. She didn't suffer fools
gladly and she was not afraid to put one of the speakers at the Exopolitics
conference in his place when he overstepped the mark. However, she was extraordinarily
tolerant and easygoing when it came to the human failings and eccentricities of
honest people. During one Planet X show, I got into a heated debate with the
guest, probably more so than I should have. I was not rude or aggressive, but I
still think I exceeded my remit as the interviewer. Ayem didn't mind and the
show continued as normal. The guest did not complain and neither did any
listener. Ayem had a legendary sense of humour as well. I recall an cringe-worthy episode at Exopol when I was in Ayem's hotel room with her and about half a
dozen other people. We all got very drunk and behaved in a manner that I look
back on with embarrassment, as I suspect do the others who were there that
night; but Ayem did not. For her, it was all part of the fun. RIP Ayem. I'll
miss you very much and hope our paths cross again on the other side. This is a
very sad way to end the year.
Tuesday 31 December 2019
Sunday 29 December 2019
Space Force Established
On the 20th of December this year, President Trump signed
the papers officially establishing the United States Space Force, amid much
publicity. The 2020 National Defense Authorization Act creates a brand new
uniformed armed force in the USA .
This is the first time that has happened since the National Security Act of
1947. He has appointed a government official to lead the Space Force; Gen. John
W "Jay" Raymond will henceforth be known as "Chief of Space
Operations" and will be sitting on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He was
present at the signing ceremony in his dress number ones, the first time that
this uniform has been seen in public, although it is worn by a pair of models
on this page: https://taskandpurpose.com/pentagon-silent-space-force-uniforms.
You can see that the official badges are not based on any of the humourous
memes that I enjoyed in the background links below. The US Congress has just
approved a budget for the USSF of forty million US dollars. A website has also
gone online with an official dot-mil domain. It gives a description of what the
US Space Force is about and there is even a careers page; if any HPANWO readers
are job hunting, why not apply? See: https://www.spaceforce.mil.
The functions and duties of the USSF are as follows: "Provide freedom of operation for the United States in, from, and to space. Provide prompt and
sustained space operations. Protect the interests of the United States in space. Deter aggression in, from, and
to space. Conduct space operations." Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50876429.
The most interesting clause of that mission statement is the
second from last. If it is necessary to deter aggression from space then exactly who are the aggressors expected to be?
Obviously this refers to other countries. There are other nations with the
equivalent of a space force. Those of China
and Russia are
particularly advanced and both those states have acted in a hostile manner to
the USA in the
recent past. However there has been an existing governmental body for dealing
with outer space threats from other nations since 1985, the United States Space
Command- "USSPACECOM"; in fact there is an even older one dating back
to 1956, the North American Aerospace Defence Command- "NORAD". These
outfits have kept the American homeland safe against threats from space, in the
form of ballistic missiles, for the entire Cold War. Now suddenly that threat
has changed somehow. I wonder why, because missiles are really the only
dangerous things I can think of that comes from space, whether these are
dropped from a satellite or from a suborbital rocket. The US Space Force itself
says this: "Space has become
essential to our security and prosperity, so much so that we need a branch of
our military dedicated to its defence, just like we have branches of the
military dedicated to protecting and securing the air, land, and sea. Unfettered
access to space is vital to national defence. Space systems are woven into the
fabric of our way of life. Space affects almost every part of our daily lives
and is fundamental to our economic system. For example, satellites not only
power the GPS technology that we use daily, but allow us to surf the web and
call our friends, enable first responders to communicate with each other in
times of crisis, time-stamp transactions in the world financial market, and
even allow us to use credit cards at gas pumps." That's all very well,
but if I were in the older service branches I would feel a bit put out:
"What's wrong with what we've been doing?" etc. Perhaps the USSF is
intended to develop into something beyond that, in which case what will that
involve? What else exists in space, that is made by the hand of man, and is a
threat to the sovereignty and security of the USA ?
There aren't many things I can think of, at least things that we know exist
through unclassified publications. Or rather is the USSF designed to defend the
realm from classified threats, that
is the more sophisticated hardware of the secret space programme? In which
case, how is the Trump administration going achieve that; by bringing back the
Space Shuttle? No, of course not. The USSF will have to be similarly armed as
the secret space programme. If that is the case then how can it remain secret, especially
as the USSF itself is not classified? Then again, we must pose the question of
whether all the threats are going to come from earth, whether conventional
rockets or antigravity/free energy technology. Is there a risk of an alien
invasion? If the answer is yes, then will it be a real alien invasion? It could be that the incredible change that
came about in the way UFO's are portrayed in the media two years ago are a part
of that agenda, see here for background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/09/ufo-disclsoure-2019-attip-videos-real.html.
Alternatively the TTSA and AATIP revelations could be a genuine leak from
inside the secret government. Dr Michael Salla has written what could prove to
be a highly significant article with the brazen title of Trump
signs Space Force Act, Stage Set for Secret Space Programme Disclosure. The
reason Salla believes this is because several people involved in the process of
the force's founding have made interesting statements, Lt. Gen. Steven L Kwast
who was head of US Air Force training, Secretary of the Air Force Barbara
Barrett and Alabama congressman
Mike Rogers. I agree that these are not the kind of people who could say such
things unless it was a serious business, see: https://www.exopolitics.org/trump-signs-space-force-act/.
Whatever the solutions are to any of these conundrums, it is clear that the
USSF is opening the door to a situation where secret information is going to
have to be divulged, one way or another, and this might include secret science
and the presence of an extraterrestrial civilisation. This could lead to
literally Disclosure with a capital D. The flip side will mean fake Disclosure
and possibly a fake alien threat leading to the New World Order. Either way,
the USSF places this old dilemma on a knife-edge.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/06/space-force-livestream.html.
Saturday 28 December 2019
Stephen Bassett with a Difference
Stephen Bassett regularly speaks at conferences around the
world and each time gives us his rundown of the UFO Disclosure situation, as he
sees it. He actually objects to the term "UFO" and believes it was
created by the keepers of the "Truth Embargo" to keep the
extraterrestrial presence secret. After all, if what you're looking at is
unidentified then how can you ever decide positively what it is? I personally
don't object to the term UFO because over the years it has taken on a meaning
in human minds and culture that goes beyond the literal words which the acronym
stands for. I don't think I could replace it with another word in my own
consciousness now. However I share Steve's concerns about disinformation. I
first saw Steve live at the Beyond Knowledge 2 conference in Liverpool
in 2009, and since then have avidly followed his work. I have also interviewed
him on HPANWO Radio many times, for example see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2019/10/programme-340-podcast-stephen-bassett.html.
The things Steve says, more than anybody else, represent a wedge within myself,
the question that I keep coming back to that I can neither endorse nor dismiss:
Is willing Disclosure possible? See the background links for details about my
musings on that. The question even inspired me to write a trilogy of novels,
see: https://hpanwo-bb.blogspot.com/2018/12/roswell-redeemed-is-here.html.
There is a massive amount of material online by Steve; lectures, interviews and
even a very respectful and affectionate short documentary, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YmOsGBR51o.
However, a new video has just emerged which is highly unusual and stands out
from the rest. What makes it different is that in the first twenty to thirty minutes
Steve talks earnestly and candidly about his background. He gives information
that he never has before. He mentions his father, a World War II veteran and
how he came to have a son in 1946 who would go on to become the Steve Bassett
we all know today. Steve talks about how he suffered from Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder and how he has battled with depression and his fear of
nuclear war. He also was once very keen on playing tennis and could have made a
career out of it. The recording is called Unpresidented
Events Are Coming Up, Will UFO Disclosure Be One of Them? (I don't know if
the first word of the title is a spelling mistake or a pun), see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNAdH4ZZrg4.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/01/ufo-disclosure-2019-maybe-this-year.html.
Thursday 26 December 2019
Richplanet on Rendlesham
For quite a while now Richard D Hall, the presenter of
Richplanet TV, has been hinting that he has some breaking new information on
the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident of December 1980. He has now published this
information in a video series that he uploaded on Christmas Day. I don't know
if there was a specific reason why he chose Christmas Day to do that, or maybe
it is just where it happened to fit into his schedule; but the effect of that
is there has been a delay in response from his viewers because obviously on
Christmas Day most of us have been celebrating with our families and watching
Christmas movies on TV etc. Maybe it's because it was the thirty-ninth anniversary. It was Boxing Day lunchtime when I first noticed
that the programme was available, plus several tags and inboxes from people who
had seen it and were asking me for a comment. The programme is called Rendlesham UFO, Forty Years of Lies. The
RFI is one of the best researched UFO events in history, but it is also
probably the most controversial. Richard intends to shed some light on some of
the doubts by bringing in the statement analyst Peter Hyatt, an expert in forensic
psychology whose speciality is detecting deception in language; an essential
part of police and intelligence work, see: https://www.hyattanalysis.com. Hyatt
has already provided very revealing and suspicious information for Richplanet from
studying the words of Kate and Gerry McCann, see: https://www.richplanet.net/store/series-dvds/DF018
and Neil Armstrong, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKJOcUFIvFw.
Now Peter Hyatt has done the same to three of the witnesses to the RFI, Jim
Penniston, Charles Halt and Larry Warren. He has also done the same with Peter
Robbins; Larry's co-author and former supporter. Seeing as all four of these
men have been accused of deceit, Richard hopes Hyatt will clear up the
confusion and work out what the truth is. This is a far more difficult
assignment because, unlike Neil Armstrong, the three nominated RFI witnesses
have spoken extensively to the media. Their statements are therefore
"contaminated by time and repeated re-telling"; the recordings may
have been edited and the witnesses are not necessarily speaking in the
"free editing process". The samples chosen for analysis are all very
old, possibly to reduce the contamination as much as possible. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSVfPDkiwrs.
At the end of the analysis session it turns out that, in Peter Hyatt's view,
all four of the people interviewed were lying. They all employed
"distancing language" like overuse of the passive voice instead of
the active voice; for example: "the craft was touched by me" instead of
"I touched the craft". They sometimes used the wrong verb tenses and
even mixed them up in a single sentence, a grammatical error, such as: "I
enter the office and spoke to the staff sergeant". They use collective instead
of singular pronouns; "we" when it would be more proper to say
"I". They also mix up the proximal pronouns, saying "this"
when they should say "that" and vice versa. Jim Penniston was doing
an investigation rather than being a direct witness in the way he claims. Hyatt
also reckons that the interviewer of Penniston, George Noory, knows more than
he is saying and is leading the witness on (Another name for the list!) Col.
Halt is probably hiding information as a result of his secrecy oaths. Larry
Warren was on the periphery of the incident rather than being actively involved
himself. Peter Robbins does not have a good relationship with his co-author. Of
course, he certainly doesn't now. In fact he has publicly denounced Larry in
the strongest possible terms (He has also done the same to me, see: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-robbinsic-12-document.html),
but according to Hyatt, when he was interviewed in the 1993 TV show used, he
was even back then antagonistic towards Larry and was a reluctant participant
in their project.
Of course, it is no surprise to me that some witnesses to
the Rendlesham Forest
incident are lying. In fact there has been an active disinformation project to
discredit the event, operating continuously in one form or another, ever since the RFI
happened. I don't think I am qualified to comment on the veracity of three of
those witnesses; but I think I am with one of them, Larry Warren. The reason is
because he is a close personal friend of mine and I have been carrying out my
own much focused investigation into his case. There are background links to my extensive
publications on the matter at the bottom. There is also a new professionally
produced documentary film shortly to be released called Capel Green which provides a huge amount of new information, as
well as strongly supporting Larry Warren's account of the story, see: https://www.capelgreen.co.uk. It has
already been revealed that Larry passes a top level polygraph test with flying
colours and this is covered in detail in the movie. The already nebulous
history of the RFI has been further thrown into turmoil by a more recent spate
of attacks against Larry from Sacha Christie. She is not a disinformation agent
working for the government, but merely a former friend of his who has fabricated
a completely bogus exposé of Larry in order to avenge herself over a purely
personal dispute with him, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/sacha-christie-woodbridge-presentation.html.
Peter Hyatt's work on the RFI witnesses is relevant to
researchers, but his conclusions directly contradict my own findings about one
of the four subjects. Not just my own, but also Gary Heseltine of UFO Truth Magazine and researcher for Capel Green, see: https://www.ufotruthmagazine.co.uk.
Either we are wrong or Hyatt is wrong and I honestly don't believe we are
wrong. I'm keen to find out what is the status of Peter Hyatt's testimony under
law. Is his word alone enough to convict somebody in court? Have any control studies
been done with truthful people? Richard D Hall then gives us his own commentary
about what he has learned. He does think Jim Penniston was involved with
something unusual that December night, possibly as part of a military exercise.
Col. Halt also
was involved with something significant in the woods during this period, but it
was something to do with radiation and the risk that it might cause a public
relations disaster. Larry Warren does not believe his own account about seeing
a UFO and alien beings and people should ignore everything he says, but he does
believe the government is lying to the people and this alone concerns him. He
feels a lot of patriotic sentiments towards his nation of origin, the United
States of America . Seeing as Larry Warren
was the original whistleblower, Richard suspects that he had some kind of link
to US
intelligence. It is highly unoriginal of Richard to make this assertion. He is
certainly correct in several cases of psyops that he has covered, but in most
he is not; and I have no doubt that he is incorrect in this case for reasons I
detail in the background links below. Peter Robbins also disbelieves Larry's
account and regrets being an accomplice to it from the very beginning. Richard
believes this might mean that Peter is party to whatever plot Larry was sucked
into. I don't know Peter as well as I do Larry, but I have met him a few times
and spent some time with him. I have fallen out with Peter and consider him a
deeply distasteful person, but I doubt if he is connected to any covert
government cover-up. Of course I can't prove that, but neither can Richard; it
doesn't stop him saying it though and it also won't stop me. What's more I am
privy to some confidential information on this matter as well that will
hopefully be freely available soon that also discounts Richard's notion of a Halt-Robbins-Warren
spy ring. The public reasons that I think Peter did a sudden about-face with
Larry are detailed in the background links below. Obviously, as I have
explained, I think Richard is wrong about Larry; as for the others, I'm not
sure. Richard believes something strange happened in the forest outside the
bases that night. He doesn't know exactly what it was and simply calls it
"the sensitive thing". He thinks that it is likely that officials at
the base had some idea of what the sensitive thing was otherwise there would
have been a far more intense government response. That is possible, but
alternatively it might have been an eventuality for which the local commanding
officers had no contingency plan. Richard thinks Penniston had a need-to-know,
but Halt didn't. Despite his status as a senior officer, Halt was kept out of
the loop and more junior staff were employed operating through a separate chain
of command. This is a familiar situation, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-wilson-notes.html.
Richard than brings up the possibility that the extraterrestrial explanation we're
all familiar with, thanks to the Halt memo, was staged deliberately as
disinformation to protect the secrecy of the sensitive thing. Halt and Larry
were encouraged to spread the story of aliens in the woods far and wide in the
hope that this would bury the true nature of the sensitive thing under a layer
of confusion. As I've said in the past, the idea that the UFO phenomenon itself
is, in whole or in part, a piece of engineered modern mythology designed by the
intelligence services to launder their more down-to-earth secret operations is
quite a fashionable one. However in most instances it doesn't make sense. It's
a very risky gambit to draw somebody's attention towards something with the
ultimate objective of deflecting it away. It could backfire in any number of
ways, see here for details: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/mirage-men-by-mark-pilkington.html.
I can't see how dazzling the public with exotic stories about little green men
landing in the middle of a forest in Suffolk could contribute to maintaining the secrecy of the sensitive thing, whatever it
might be. It would actually turn people's attention towards the sensitive
thing, and sooner or later somebody would work out what it really was.
Richard doesn't state in this broadcast what exactly the
sensitive thing is and only lists a few possibilities, but he has voiced his suspicions
on a previous programme that it was some kind of highly secretive experimental
aircraft using an esoteric propulsion system and/or power-plant, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAMSYlergYc.
Richard invited into the studio his regular collaborator Andrew Johnson and
they entered into the subject of Rendlesham
Forest through the secret space
programme. This is an unusual but not entirely unique gateway. A lot of the
information they subsequently raised is also addressed by Andrew Pike in his
doorstep of a volume, The Rendlesham
File- Britain 's Roswell ? which I reviewed for UFO Truth
Magazine in Issue 28, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/01/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-28.html.
They bring up Mark McCandlish, a very interesting military contractor who has
spoken publicly about sophisticated aircraft designs based on back-engineered
extraterrestrial vehicles. He took part in Dr Steven Greer's Disclosure
Project. Richard and Andrew then state that they have changed their position
somewhat and now think that there are some UFO cases that they previously
called as extraterrestrial in nature that are more likely to be the result of
man-made classified technological projects, even if they are based on captured
ET designs. For instance a lot of the UFO's that are triangular in shape are
likely to be the TR3B, an antigravity spacecraft developed by a covert
engineering project by the USA
in Area 51, see here for details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKcIO_Qmr9I.
There is good reason to believe that this craft exists and it might explain the
Belgium flap of
1990 and the Sheffield incident of 1997. In my view it
does not explain all flying triangle encounters; for example the Pentyrch
incident is probably ET, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/11/pentyrch-ufo.html.
Also at Sheffield an RAF jet was lost. If this was
secret Government Issue then was the crash a result of an accident, or war
between the overt and covert state? Another fascinating piece of information
refers to an aviation device known as "the Dart". It looks like an
aeroplane with a blister cockpit, but it has no wings and is much smaller than
a normal single or double-seater jet. It is shaped like an arrowhead with a
hull of flat panels rather like the F117 stealth fighter, possibly for the same
reason. It is powered by three spherical antigravity generators embedded into
the underside at each corner like ball-casters. According to the story from
McCandlish, the Dart crashed in Germany
in 1989. This was in old East Germany
just before the Berlin Wall came down. The spheres that produced the propulsion
were about the size of a beach ball. One popped out and started flying around
randomly and had to be caught in a rather comical scene. It's interesting to
consider the observations of many flying triangle craft reported that they have
glowing lights near the corners. Richard suggests that the Berwyn
Mountains UFO, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxW7HnLfnxE,
might by a detached gravity generator too. If that is the case then the sphere
is thirty feet across so it must come from a vehicle of some considerable size.
The Dart bears a resemblance to the UFO that landed in Rendlesham
Forest in Christmas 1980, according
to the first night's witnesses. Could the object seen by Penniston and
Burroughs actually be an unmanned version of one of these craft; an antigravity
drone? Also Col. Halt took a plaster-cast of the indentations left by the
object and their shape makes them appear to be made by a section of a sphere or
ovoid. Then again it could be a shallow cone; it's hard to tell for sure based
on the cast. The witnesses describe feeling static electricity in the air
surrounding the object; their hair standing on end etc. This could be caused by
the electrogravitic drive of the craft... Then again, maybe real aliens landed
and everything Richard has described is an elaborate double-bluff. Rendlesham UFO, Forty Years of Lies is
worth your time to watch, like all Richplanet shows are, but it has totally failed
to clear up the uncertainty that Richard riles against at the start of the
programme. It actually contributes little or nothing to research into this, the
greatest of British UFO cases. In forming his opinion of Larry Warren, Richard
has relied entirely on Peter Hyatt's analysis and his own cogitation. He has
not consulted with either of the two principle investigators into Larry's case,
Gary Heseltine and myself. We are not shy people and we have no problem
corresponding with total strangers when we're on the trail of a good story, but
in this case Richard doesn't need to. He already knows us. He meets with us
regularly at conferences and his own tours. At any time he could have asked for
our input into his investigation, but he did not. Of course he is not obliged
to do that, but if he had done so then this episode of Richplanet would probably
have been a far better one.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/12/is-larry-warren-fraud.html.
Wednesday 25 December 2019
The Mind Set Podcast Programme 381
I have been featured
on Programme 381 of the Mind Set Podcast.
See here for the
show: https://soundcloud.com/mindsetcentral/msp381.
Subjects discussed on this special Christmas show include:
the pagan origins of Christmas, the Trump impeachment, Trump ratifies the US
Space Force and much much more. A very merry Christmas to all HPANWO readers!
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:
https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-378.html.
Tuesday 24 December 2019
Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 5
See here for the
programme: https://www.facebook.com/peter.croft.3766/videos/1420581528110598/.
(You might need to log into Facebook to
watch it.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We
discuss the strange case of Helen Duncan and the witchcraft trial, the
scientific evidence for life-after-death and consciousness studies.
See here for my
previous interview with Peter Croft: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/peter-croft-and-ben-emlyn-jones-4.html.
Friday 20 December 2019
Brexit Bill Passed
Boris Johnson has wasted no time since the general election
last week, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/12/post-general-election-livestream.html.
He has presented his EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill for a second reading in
Parliament and it was comfortably approved of by the new set of MP's. This
means Brexit on January the 31st is now far more likely. Not only that, but the
bill sets a maximum duration for the post-Brexit transitional period of just
eleven months. This may well be the spur it needs after the endless dithering
under Theresa May's direction. This breakthrough comes after a few days of
negotiating with Brussels in a way
that makes it clear that the rules have now changed. You can see it in the way Guy
Verhofstadt looks and talks. The European Parliament's Brexit Coordinator now
knows very well that Boris means business! The Leader of the Opposition, Jeremy
Corbyn, of course opposed the bill, saying: "there is a better and fairer way for this country to leave the
EU.". This is odd seeing as he has never proposed one that doesn't
involve Britain
not leaving the EU. He also said
something else that took my breath away with its audacity: "The government's mishandling of Brexit had paralysed the
political system, divided communities and was a national embarrassment." The
link below means I don't have to repeat myself over what I think of that and
have commented on many times, but suffice to say he is projecting somewhat! It
is incredible that in just three days with Boris there has been more progress
towards Brexit than in the previous three and a half years. Boris' deal is not
perfect by any means, but it is a way of moving forward. I am very confident
now that we will be a free country on January the 31st and that now we don't
have the Yvette Coopers and Oliver Letwins of this world being able to block
no-deal, there is an alternative option. The door to Brexit is finally open!
See here for my
Brexit portal containing all my Brexit publications: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/10/brexit-portal.html.
Thursday 19 December 2019
Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 54
I have been
interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth
Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast: https://tfrlive.com/the-kev-baker-show-88867/.
And here for the
illustrated YouTube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaCqUoWp1sM.
Subjects discussed include: fake alien invasion via TTSA,
bird massacres, parallel universes in Hollywood
and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/11/ben-emlyn-jones-on-kev-baker-show-53.html.
Monday 16 December 2019
Bird Deaths Explained?
The UFO/Para/Con internet was abuzz a few days ago over a
story from north Wales .
On a small country lane on the isle of Anglesey , a
multitude of birds were found lying dead on the road. Almost three hundred of
them, all of the same species, were covered in blood; apart from which there
was no obvious case of their deaths. The Royal Society for the Protection of
Birds is concerned they were poisoned. It's also odd that a very similar event
happened on the same spot twelve years ago. The police claim that they have a
"rational explanation" for what happened, but are not revealing it at
this point. The rural crime investigations officer complained that the force
had been contacted by people with "all sorts of weird and wonderful theories."
Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-50763597.
I assume he means the kinds of things you would read about on HPANWO. If so
then perhaps they should not be dismissed for being "weird and
wonderful". Actually this is not the first story I have heard along these
lines. There was a very similar case reported a few years ago in Arkansas USA.
Again a large number of birds dropped dead out of the sky for no apparent
reason. Again they were all the same species; in that case red-bellied
starlings. There were no birds of other species mixed in with them. Source: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/1/110106-birds-falling-from-sky-bird-deaths-arkansas-science/.
These sudden bird deaths are sometimes associated with what have been called
"skyquakes", loud sounds being heard from an unidentifiable origin up
in the sky. These sounds often resemble prolonged thunder, aircraft engines or
even trumpets blowing. They have been explained as space rockets, meteors
striking the earth, solar wind and several other natural phenomena. Nevertheless
I also wonder if there is some link with UFO's, HAARP, chemtrails or even the
mysterious phenomenon of unusual objects dropping out of the sky, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2013/09/out-of-blue.html.
I'll post an update when the police publish their investigation... if they ever
do.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/01/eyes-in-outer-space.html.
Sunday 15 December 2019
It's a Wonderful Life Censored
Christmas is coming and television is getting fat with
Christmas movies. One of the most popular and distinct releases of that entire
genre is Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful
Life, see: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038650/.
It is one of my personal favourites and I can enjoy it at any time of the year.
The director considered it his finest achievement and screened it to his family and friends every Christmas for the rest of his life. It is based on an unpublished
novella by Philip van Doren Stern. It was released in 1946 and has never been
free from controversy; in fact I've had to refer to it on HPANWO Voice before,
see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/12/ayn-rand-denounced-its-wonderful-life.html.
The storyline follows the life of a man called George Bailey, played by James
Stewart, who lives in a town called Bedford
Falls . It begins in his childhood
and ends with him as an adult family man just before the film concludes. As George
grows up he falls in love with a woman called Mary, played by Donna Reed. His
courtship with Mary is one of the sweetest and most romantic I have ever seen. At
the same time, George Bailey is not a typical Hollywood invulnerable
alpha male. He is very flawed and has weaknesses that any viewer could identify
with; in other words, he is you and me. The couple have four children. George dedicates
his professional life to his family's business, a credit union called the Bailey
Building and Loan that allows the
people of Bedford Falls
to buy homes at affordable prices. Yet George feels unfulfilled. He has longed
to travel the world and come back to get an education and then become a
mega-rich businessman. He once boasts to his lover: "You want the moon? I'll
throw a lasso around it and pull it down!" Yet he never leaves Bedford
Falls . He spends his life fighting
a notoriously greedy property developer called Henry Potter who is determined
to take over the entire town and force all the people into poverty and
degradation to line his pockets, meaning the Bailey Building and Loan is his
bitter enemy. In the end Potter steals some money from George's uncle and
business partner, threatening the firm with bankruptcy. George responds by
attempting to commit suicide. But the moment he is on the brink, he is visited
by an angel who transports him to a parallel universe, the earliest example of
this concept I know of that is explored in cinema; a universe in which George
Bailey was never born. It is a living hell. Bedford
Falls is called
"Pottersville" because George was not there to stop Potter's evil
plan. George's brother is dead because George was not there to save his life
when they were children. All the people's lives George's brother saved are also
dead. It is eerily reminiscent of A Christmas
Carol by Charles Dickens. George then realizes that he has actually had a wonderful
life. He begs the angel to return him to his original universe. His wish is
granted and he runs home to celebrate with his loved ones. His family and
friends turn up with as much spare cash as they have to pay the debts of the
firm off. They do it because they love George so much because he has loved them
so much and given so much to them. In my view, it is one of the most moving and
uplifting moments in the history of fiction.
According to a recent video, It's a Wonderful Life has suffered censorship. Why? Its script contains no
swearing or explicit references to sex. It has a few scenes of mild violence,
but nothing that would be too strong for any contemporary children's programme.
It is pretty typical therefore of the cinematic standards of its era. It was a
box office flop when it was released, but slowly grew in popularity over time.
It was booked for re-screenings more and more often, and was shown all the time
on television. Eventually it became a big hit in the home entertainment market
of VHS, DVD and ITunes etc. Many people around the world find It's a Wonderful Life enormously inspiring.
The famous Greek-American actor Telly Savalas first saw the film during its
initial release in 1946. He was something of a wide boy in those days and so sneaked
into the cinema through the fire exit before anybody spotted him. When the film
was over he voluntarily went to the box office, confessed and paid the cinema
what would have been his ticket fee. There was no need for him to do that; he had
got away with an illicit entry and could have easily just left the cinema with
the crowds afterwards, but the film affected him so much it piqued his
conscience. As the source video explains, It's
a Wonderful Life brings out the integrity in people. There are many
"feel-good" films on the market; sometimes they are called
"blues busters". These are films made with an optimistic theme and
happy content intended to make the viewer feel better in themselves. It's a Wonderful Life is probably the
most extreme feel-good film of all time, but in truth it is far more than that.
Its powerful message of hope and inspiration plunges deep into the most
fundamental levels of humanity and spirituality. Despite that... no, because of that, attempts have been made
to restrict the film's distribution. The film was released into the public
domain in 1974 by the original producers, Republic Pictures, but a lawsuit was
filed against that release, not by the writers, director, any actor or
photographer, but by representatives for the score composers. This courtroom
tussle has been picked up and run with by NBC, the eventual people who won the
rights to show the film on television. The film has still been distributed
since then by NBC, but only very rarely, and it has been torn apart by edits
for commercial breaks that many fans consider spoils the movie. It was even
snubbed at the 1946 Oscars. Its only award was a technical one; how they
created a realitic snowy winter scene while filming in the summer through a
record-breaking heatwave. The truth is, the globalist rulers of this world do
not want us feeling inspired and uplifted. They don't want us to be exposed to
profound spiritual concepts that enrich our lives and bond us to each other;
man and woman, father, mother and child. It's
a Wonderful Life has an almost magical power of positive influence over
people. As I say in the background link above, it promotes traditional values
and relationships. On the Cold War level this was seen as very pro-American,
but the true message of the film is far more profound. It is about human value,
self-esteem and universal love. These things are the ultimate antidote to the
hatred of the Illuminati and their plan for a New World Order. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySatDqciDpA.
Thanks to my friend Viv for bringing this to my attention. If any readers want
to watch It's a Wonderful Life, it
can be seen on many platforms, despite the censorship, including Amazon, see: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Its-Wonderful-LIfe-Lionel-Barrymore/dp/B00FZ32V3G.
See here for more
information: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/the-empath-test_11.html.
Wednesday 11 December 2019
The Empath Test
Jon Ronson famously wrote a book a few years ago called The Psychopath Test, see: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12391521-the-psychopath-test.
Now somebody has developed a test for another personality type: the empath.
It's on a blog by a woman called "Willemijn". I don't know if that's
her real name. It is a Dutch or South African name, but I don't know where she
comes from. She says she used to work in the financial industry, one notorious
for its attraction to psychopaths, see background link below. Then she had a
spiritual awakening and started her website which also offers psychic services
such as healing and divination. Her article is called: Are you an Empath? 13 Surefire Signs with a Personal Empath Test.
As with the other examples in the background links below, it really strikes a
chord with me, perhaps the most out of all of them. It uses the term
"energy vampires" which sounds as if it means something similar to
the one I coined: "emotional vampires", see here for details: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/03/a-message-to-steve.html.
Willemijn's article's description of relationships and interaction with
narcissists is particularly perceptive. Source: https://www.alittlesparkofjoy.com/empath/.
Here are my test
results:
Do you feel different
or as if you don't fit in with others? Yes
Are you able to feel
the pain of people or animals? Yes
Do these feelings
tend to manifest physically? Yes
Do you know what
others are feeling, even if they are trying to hide it? Yes
Are there times when
you (or others) feel you are too emotional or sensitive? Yes
Do you struggle with
chronic anxiety or depression that isn't situational? Yes
Does noise, lots of
movement, or certain smells make you feel anxious? No
Do you avoid public
places because they make you feel overwhelmed? No
Do you feel drained
after being around large groups? No
Is your mood affected
by the emotional state of others? Yes
Are interpersonal
relationships with others hard for you to manage? Yes
Do art, literature,
and music move you emotionally? Yes
Do you avoid conflict
with others because of the way it makes you feel? No
Are there times when
you mimic the accents or mannerisms of others without meaning to? Yes
Does multitasking
seem overly difficult for you? Yes
Are you more
connected with nature and animals than the average person? Yes
Do people tend to
come to you for help with their problems? Yes
Are you affected
physically or emotionally by violent images or videos? Yes
Do you overeat,
drink, smoke, or engage in other unhealthy habits to deal with strong emotions?
No
Do certain
medications or caffeine have a strong effect on your physical or mental state?
Yes
My score is fifteen yes answers. Anything above eight yeses means you are above average on the empathy scale. Fifteen yeses puts me very high, what the author calls "hyper-empathic". The article concludes with some advice for empaths on how to survive in this world, protect oneself and make the most out of life through spiritual practices and mental discipline.
My score is fifteen yes answers. Anything above eight yeses means you are above average on the empathy scale. Fifteen yeses puts me very high, what the author calls "hyper-empathic". The article concludes with some advice for empaths on how to survive in this world, protect oneself and make the most out of life through spiritual practices and mental discipline.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/03/being-empath.html.
Tuesday 10 December 2019
Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 4
See here for the
programme: https://www.facebook.com/peter.croft.3766/videos/1400696973432387/. (You
might need to log into Facebook to watch it.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We
discuss extraterrestrials living among us, the real fate of Adolf Hitler,
mysteries of the Pyramids.
See here for my
previous interview with Peter Croft: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/peter-croft-and-ben-emlyn-jones-3.html.
Monday 9 December 2019
Ben Emlyn-Jones on KCOR's Exploring the Bizarre 5
I have been
interviewed again on the Exploring the Bizarre show on the KCOR Digital Radio
Network with Tim Beckley and Tim Swartz. See (left click to play, right click
and select "save as" to download as MP3): https://kcorradio.com/KCOR/Podcasts/Exploring-The-Bizarre/2019/december/ben-emlyn-jones.mp3.
Also see here for an
illustrated YouTube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N292OLgoYxw.
See here for the show's page: https://kcorradio.com/KCOR/Exploring-The-Bizarre-Timothy-Beckley-Tim-Swartz-KCOR-Digital-Radio-Network.php.
Subjects discussed include: the Tims' books, Nazi UFO's,
Prince Andrew being a reptilian shape-shifter and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Exploring the
Bizarre: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/04/ben-emlyn-jones-on-kcors-exploring.html.
Friday 6 December 2019
Edward Snowden with Joe Rogan
Edward Snowden has appeared on the controversial talk radio
show The Joe Rogan Experience. In
2013 the former intelligence officer and contractor to the National Security
Agency revealed a huge number of classified documents relating to electronic
surveillance of innocent citizens, not only in the United
States of America , but across the world; see
background links below. He contacted the journalist Glenn Greenwald (Not to be
confused with John Greenewald of The Black Vault) and the two worked secretly
at first. Then the information from Snowden was published by Wikileaks and in
several newspapers. In May 2013 Snowden did a Kim Philby and defected to avoid
facing prosecution as a spy. He first travelled to Hong Kong
China where he
remained until his possible extradition to the United
States was tabled, then he moved on to Russia .
His original destination was Ecuador ,
the same country that was harbouring Julian Assange, but the Americans put
pressure on other countries on the route of his journey to prevent Snowden
travelling through their airspace, so the fugitive was stuck in Russia
where he was eventually granted political asylum. His actions have made him a
popular hero with civil rights campaigners in the same league as Julian Assange
and Chelsea Manning. However, does he deserve this accolade? The interview with
Joe Rogan is as interesting and entertaining as all of Rogan's programmes, but
the testimony of his guest raises some concerns for me. At the nine-minute mark
he makes reference to a counterterrorism operation called Stellar Wind which was designed to look for Al-Qaeda sleeper cells
in the USA "in the wake of 9/11". However Al-Qaeda had nothing to do
with 9/11, as I and many others have demonstrated, for example see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/01/free-energy-and-911-reply-to-steve.html.
At about twenty-three minutes into the interview Snowden recalls his own memories
of 9/11 when he was a new intelligence recruit. He says: "I'm at Fort Meade (the NSA headquarters) when 9/11 happens...
What people forget is: who knew what was going on before anybody else on
September 11th? The intelligence community, right? What did they do? Did they
get out a public warning? Did they tell you guys to evacuate? Did they say do
this, that, or the other? No, no, not for everybody, not for a long time; but
at the NSA the Director ordered the entire campus evacuated of thousands, tens
of thousands of people actually. He just said, 'Go home.' The CIA did the same
thing." So Snowden explains how the intelligence community had
foreknowledge of 9/11, but how? Surely NORAD and the US Air Force must have
been the first, wouldn't they? The obvious answer is because the intelligence
organizations were directly involved. If somebody knows a crime is about to be committed,
then doesn't this make them the prime suspect? Not according to Edward. He
explains it as: "They (The NSA and
CIA) were running on skeleton crews at the moment the country needed them more
than they ever had... I'm like, 'This is crazy! It never closes down.' We don't
know what's happening. Then we start checking the news, which is through
websites because we're doing all this stuff and, suddenly, it's the big story
everywhere. You know, nobody understands how big it is yet." This is a
ridiculous excuse. The nation's major intelligence agencies with an annual
budget of two-figure billions just happen to be looking the other way? Pull the
other one! How can Snowden possibly be that naive?... He can't be; he must be
lying at this point. He then moves onto other matters: "In the book (Snowden's upcoming autobiography), I talk about
aliens and chemtrails and things like that and the fact that there's no
evidence for that... I know, Joe, you want there to be aliens. I know Neil
deGrasse Tyson badly wants there to be aliens, and there probably are; but the
idea that we're hiding them… If we are hiding them, I had ridiculous access to
the networks at the NSA, the CIA, the military; all these groups. I couldn't
find anything so, if it's hidden, and it could be hidden, it's hidden really
damn well, even from people who are on the inside. The main thing is conspiracy
theories, right? Everybody wants to believe in conspiracy theories because it
helps life make sense. It helps us believe that somebody is in control, that
somebody is called the shots, that these things all happen for a reason; this,
that, and the other. There are real conspiracies, but they're not typically
that they've got tens of thousands of people working on them... I think there's
four million people in the United States who hold security clearances, and you
can get all of these people to not talk ever to journalists or this, that, or
the other." It's difficult to know what Edward Snowden's thrust is
here. He makes several points. The first is that he saw no evidence at all for
anything relating to extraterrestrials or chemtrails etc. He does go on to
admit that such matters might be outside his sphere of access due to
compartmentalization; however he then states what appears to be a series of
classic skeptics' lines about deep-seated psychological needs and how large
numbers of initiated people would be necessary to keep secrets of that
magnitude, and that it would be impossible to make them all collude. Not true
at all. As I said to Dr David Grimes, there are other factors involved
connected to psychology such as tacit agreement and the Milgram Experiment; see
here for detail: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/11/conspiracy-theories-mathematically.html.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efs3QRr8LWw.
What is really going on here? Snowden could be controlled
opposition. Richard D Hall is utterly convinced of this, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2WSI_M15-k
and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sndPG6Hw01U.
In the past I have criticized Richard for being much too hasty to slap the
shill sticker onto people, and I still do; but this does not mean Richard is
automatically wrong. Could Edward Snowden be a disinformer? In which case, what
is the purpose of his disinformation? What thoughts and feelings is his
deception implanting in the collective human mind? This is a crucial question
everybody should consider when wondering if anything is disinformation or not. In
this case the answer is: perhaps that the official story of 9/11 is true, that
there are no aliens or geoengineering because if there were, then a top ranking
CIA insider would definitely know about it, wouldn't he? Richard points to the
fact that Snowden, Assange and Manning have been given essentially an unobstructed
platform in the mainstream media, as opposed to people like Dr Judy Wood etc;
and this can only be because the media want their information spread around; ergo it can only be false information.
This is a distinct possibility. However, as I have explained before, the
mainstream media doesn't always have everything it wants. Not everything goes
the government's way; especially in the last three years, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/03/why-2016-matters.html.
The whistle blowing trio's rise to stardom might be a "post-2016 cock-up",
something the government really did not want to happen, but were unable to
prevent. I'm pretty convinced that Snowden is lying in his interview with Joe
Rogan, but his deceit could be of a different nature to the obvious one, that
of simple factual disinformation. It is no secret that he has not published all
the classified files he has extracted from the NSA and CIA database. Is he
keeping some of them back in order to stay alive? Maybe he has to make a coded phone
call to somebody every two hours and if he doesn't then these files hit the
Net. In which case, I wonder what is in them? Possibly information about the
very topics he ridicules in the interview; aliens, chemtrails, 9/11
conspiracies. Maybe something else that the government can't risk being
published. If that it the situation then who would dare assassinate him? In
Snowden's position it is understandable that he would do something like this
and I sympathize with his plight; but at some point he has to find a way to disseminate
these files to the people because the world needs to know.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/10/assange-and-snowden-latest-bombshells.html.
Tuesday 3 December 2019
The Mind Set Podcast Programme 378
I have been featured
on Programme 378 of the Mind Set Podcast.
See here for the
show: https://soundcloud.com/mindsetcentral/msp378.
Subjects discussed include: Mind Set meet-up debrief, the
lies of Prince Andrew, terrorist knife attack in London
and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:
http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-375.html.
Monday 2 December 2019
Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 3
See here for the
programme: https://www.facebook.com/peter.croft.3766/videos/1391837680984983/. (You
might need to log into Facebook to watch it. It is a better quality recording.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We
discuss the UFO's and their presence in places like Los
Angeles and Warminster.
See here for my
previous interview with Peter Croft: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/11/peter-croft-and-ben-emlyn-jones-2.html.
Sunday 1 December 2019
Another RAF Scramble
At about half past four
this morning many people across London
and southern England
were woken by what sounded like a loud explosion. This was actually a sonic
boom caused by high speed aircraft breaking the sound barrier. The aircraft
were a pair of Royal Air Force Typhoon fighter interceptors that had just been
hastily deployed from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire .
They accelerated to supersonic speeds, something RAF planes are only allowed to
do during serious operations and never during an exercise. The deployment was
done as a precaution because a commercial aircraft had become unresponsive.
This is a standard procedure, understandable since 9/11. The RAF located the
plane and reconnected it to air traffic control. An RAF press officer said: "Typhoon aircraft from RAF Coningsby
were scrambled this morning as part of the UK 's Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) procedures
after an aircraft lost communications in UK airspace. The aircraft was intercepted and
its communications were subsequently re-established." The Metropolitan
Police Tweeted: "The loud bang
heard throughout north London
and surrounding areas was the result of a sonic boom from RAF planes. There is
no cause for concern." Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50618956.
The identity of the muted commercial aircraft has not been
published. It was intercepted by the RAF over southeast England .
It was en route to the USA
and developed radio problems while flying over Germany .
The pilot commented: "It took us
about ten minutes to realize that the radio wasn't working and then about ten
minutes to resolve that problem... I looked left and about had a heart attack
when I saw (the RAF fighters) so close, strobes on and with bluish glow strips
along the side of his fuselage." I've watched a few in-cockpit videos
of planes in flight, for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWqwzCTIW3Q,
and that story lacks the feel of authenticity. Did they not have a spare radio
or other contingencies to cope with a broken radio? Why did it take ten minutes
to work out the radio was broken when pilots and air traffic control
communicate all the time, especially over southern England, which is the
world's busiest airspace? As with the other cases in the background links
below, I suspect that the "lost plane" is a cover story. So what
really happened? It could have been activity by the Russians or other hostile
powers that the government wants to keep quiet. Alternatively it might have
been invaders who were a little more exotic. I'm interested to find out if
there were any UFO sightings in the area. Interceptions like these are becoming
more common. Is this because we are receiving more attention from outsiders,
however you define that word?
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/12/ufo-over-hull.html.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)