See here for
essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2026/06/kid-starmer.html
and: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2025/03/online-safety-act-goes-live.html.
Back in July, shortly after he first took office, I wrote about how I believed we should not be reassured when Andy Burnham said he was going to scrap Digital ID: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2026/07/burnham-scraps-digital-id.html. A recent news story proves me right. The Culture Secretary, Lisa Nandy, has announced at the Labour Party conference that she is going to bring in a comprehensive social media ban for children effective from March next year. Anybody under sixteen will no longer be able to use TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. This is just the start, what Nandy calls a "staging post". She is planning far more robust legislation including device-level filters and giving OfCom the same authority over the online world as it currently has over TV and radio. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/articles/cqn8md79j420o. You might think this is a good idea; after all, we all care about the safety of children, don't we? If you think in those terms then you miss the point entirely. The government don't give a damn about children's welfare. If they did then they'd have shut down the BBC, their own broadcaster, years ago. That is the bait in the trap and a way to moral blackmail detractors, as I explain in the background links. In order to stop children using websites it will be necessary to check that the adults using them are who they say they are. This means you can only post under your own real identity. So, no more burner accounts, no more anonymous posting, no more freedom to express opinions that you know might lose you your job or get you arrested under the ridiculous charges of "causing offence" and "hate". There will also be an explosion in data leakage leading to fraud and identity theft. The damage this will do to whistleblowers is almost incalculable. Wikileaks and similar outfits will be unable to guarantee the safety of agents and informants. It all fits into place, doesn't it? That's why the government are doing it. The internet has been a millstone around their necks ever since it was invented and they have always searched for ways to get the online genie back into the bottle. There are always ways round all these regulations as we've seen inChina
and Australia ,
but you need to be quite tech-savvy to do it. The good thing to come out of
this is that the Burnhamista regime has exposed itself as being nothing more
than the previous one 2.0, Starmer with a smile.
Back in July, shortly after he first took office, I wrote about how I believed we should not be reassured when Andy Burnham said he was going to scrap Digital ID: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2026/07/burnham-scraps-digital-id.html. A recent news story proves me right. The Culture Secretary, Lisa Nandy, has announced at the Labour Party conference that she is going to bring in a comprehensive social media ban for children effective from March next year. Anybody under sixteen will no longer be able to use TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. This is just the start, what Nandy calls a "staging post". She is planning far more robust legislation including device-level filters and giving OfCom the same authority over the online world as it currently has over TV and radio. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/articles/cqn8md79j420o. You might think this is a good idea; after all, we all care about the safety of children, don't we? If you think in those terms then you miss the point entirely. The government don't give a damn about children's welfare. If they did then they'd have shut down the BBC, their own broadcaster, years ago. That is the bait in the trap and a way to moral blackmail detractors, as I explain in the background links. In order to stop children using websites it will be necessary to check that the adults using them are who they say they are. This means you can only post under your own real identity. So, no more burner accounts, no more anonymous posting, no more freedom to express opinions that you know might lose you your job or get you arrested under the ridiculous charges of "causing offence" and "hate". There will also be an explosion in data leakage leading to fraud and identity theft. The damage this will do to whistleblowers is almost incalculable. Wikileaks and similar outfits will be unable to guarantee the safety of agents and informants. It all fits into place, doesn't it? That's why the government are doing it. The internet has been a millstone around their necks ever since it was invented and they have always searched for ways to get the online genie back into the bottle. There are always ways round all these regulations as we've seen in






