Sunday, 13 October 2019

MI6 Boss says Aliens Exist

Well he should know!... A friend of mine captured the image above and commented on the front page of The Sun: "Aliens and tits! Sells every time." Sir John Sawers, the former Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service- MI6, has stated in an interview: "I think it would be extraordinary if in an infinite solar system that planet Earth was unique." Source: I think he means "universe" instead of "solar system". The solar system is not infinite; it consists only of our closest star, the sun, with the earth and our fellow planets orbiting around it. This constitutes a miniscule fragment of the entire universe. He is correct of course, but why has he brought this subject up now? The article also refers to several opinion polls that are encouraging; with a majority of British people believing in extraterrestrial life. A planet has just been discovered that may well have life on it, K2-18b, see here for more information: I'm also pleased to report that, according to this article, 20% of Britons believe, correctly, that the government know about aliens and are covering them up. The reason for a former intelligence official talking publicly about the subject may well be connected to the other recent revelations about UFO's, for example see: Sir John has an interesting background. As well as being head of MI6 he has been a diplomat. During his Foreign Office career he served at the United Nations, Syria, South Africa and the European Union. Perhaps more sinisterly, he is a member of the steering committee of the Bilderberg Conferences. Are his words intended to aid Disclosure or to hinder it? We shall see.

Saturday, 12 October 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on EOTT

I have been interviewed on the EOTT- Everything On The Table programme with Jimmy James, see:
Subjects discussed include: Mind control, UFO news, altered states of consciousness and much much more. See here for Jimmy's channel:

Friday, 11 October 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones at RAWCON-2020

I will be speaking at the Research and Witness Convention 2020. The event will be on the Saturday the 29th of February and Sunday the 1st of March next year. The venue will be the Princes Quay Shopping Centre, Kingston upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, HU1 2PQ. There is an early bird offer on for entire weekend tickets of £34. This will rise to £39 after the New Year. One day tickets are £18. See here for the official website: My lecture will be about the mysterious case of the 1944 "Witchcraft trial".

Thursday, 10 October 2019

Sacha Christie- Woodbridge Presentation

Last month Larry Warren's internet detractors held the conference that they've been boasting about at Woodbridge Community Hall. It is sad to see the traditional hub of Rendlesham Forest UFO Incident events being used for this travesty, but they hired it so what can you do? This event was endorsed by Peter Robbins who could not be there, but sent a written message loaded with his usual flattery. Peter did a radical back-flip and turned against his former co-author a year after Sacha Christie first started posting her supposed evidence against Larry. As a part of this volte-face, Peter launched a vicious attack against my own character, see here for details: The highlight of the Woodbridge troll shindig was a one hour twenty-five minute lecture by Sacha called "The Larry Warren Fraud Presentation". Sacha is another individual who made a 180 degree about-turn very suddenly in June 2016 after her personal friendship with Larry came to a bitter end. The material she then began posting was huge in volume and very detailed. I examined it and quickly discovered it to be a total fabrication. When I went public with my conclusion she insinuated that I had been discharged from NHS Portering because I had been abusing disabled people. As you can see below, my review consists mostly of links because she says nothing that she has not said before in written form. Anything I omit has been covered by other researchers in detail and there are links in my own posts to their publications.

Sacha begins by describing how she first met Larry in 2007 and how he was a frequent visitor to her family home. For four months, so she reckons, she gave him a place to stay and at the end of this period she then began her blogging campaign against Larry. It begs the question when and how she came across the information she posted and if she kept it to herself beforehand; why? The core thesis she presents is that Larry is a Walter Mitty figure who inserted himself into a false narrative of the UFO encounters in Rendlesham Forest in December 1980. The testimony of another witness, Adrian Bustinza, she regards as genuine and that Larry purloined it for his own use. She points to similarities in Larry's and Bustinza's story. However there are distinct differences too. In my view the two stories are both sincere accounts. They are exactly what you would expect from two witnesses of the same events. The differences are mostly during the aftermath in which their experiences diverge considerably. This could be because of their roles at the RAF Woodbridge-Bentwaters base. Bustinza was an old hand at the rank of staff sergeant, a senior non-commissioned officer. Larry was a new recruit. The evidence is supposedly in Georgina Bruni's book You Can't Tell the People, but when I read it I discovered that was not the case. What's more, Sacha cites that book and also Sky Crash, the original RFI book, to suggest Larry lied about seeing aliens and even faked his hypnotic regression sessions. Even if it is possible to fake a hypnotic trance I still interpreted the texts differently. Details:
Sacha claims that Bustinza gives an inadvertent alibi by being with Col. Halt when the deputy commander was recording his famous tape. However this assumes that Halt and Larry's experiences happened on the same night, which has never been established. Bustinza made a short public appearance a few years ago and did some interviews in which he supported Larry. Then he started making some very cryptic statements and went completely quiet again. Larry supposedly confessed to Linda Moulton Howe in 1986 that his story was a copy of Bustinza's, but Linda has never published the tape of their interview, if indeed she did the interview at all. Only a transcript of it is available and who knows who wrote that. Details: and:
Larry is apparently guilty of grand larceny when it comes to trading fake rock-and-roll memorabilia; however he has never been prosecuted for this very obvious crime. He has not even been arrested and questioned. (I have additional information on this matter that I'm not able to share right now). Details:
For some reason Sacha resuscitates the dead case of the A10 photo. It has become a moot point which nobody is discussing any more. In fact unless the original negative can be unearthed there is no point. Details: and:
There is apparently a discrepancy over Larry's whereabouts during the Christmas period of 1980 immediately before his close encounter. Sacha plays a clip of an interview he did with Tino on the matter, but it is only a brief one. I advise people listen to the whole programme. Details:
Larry apparently faked his handwriting on official documents. No he didn't. Details:
Sacha and her supporters were eventually forced to admit that they had no hard evidence for Larry faking his handwriting and eventually cancelled their own analysis project. Details:
Sacha says that Larry cannot have been seen by Dr Echols after his experience became the UFO caused him to have eye problems and Dr Echols' current speciality is orthopaedics. That doesn't necessarily follow seeing as Dr Echols was a USAF medic at the time and would therefore probably have been qualified in combat medicine which involves multiple specialities, rather like an A&E house officer in the NHS. He may well have been standing in as a locum during Larry's consultation. Details:
There is a tape that Kevin Randle recently published which is supposedly incriminating. (This is not to be confused with Linda Moulton Howe's transcript which emerged at the same time and from the same source). In it Larry discusses his VSA test which he passed. There is a letter from MUFON to Philip Klass of all people, denying this. So is this proof? I think not. Details: and:
Larry allegedly defaced the "lemon squeezer", the Forestry Commission UFO monument in Rendlesham. No he didn't. Details:
Larry supposedly issued threats of violence. No he didn't. In fact if one word of this allegation, or the allegations concerning fake memorabilia, were true, Larry would have been jailed years ago. Sacha virtually admits this at 1:06:52. Details:
Larry claims that Sacha was a close acquaintance of some of the men who have been named as the 7/7 bombers. Actually it was she herself who said this in a TV documentary. (I was asked to take part in this series myself... I declined!) Details:
Sacha incites feminist outrage by claiming Gary Heseltine hates women. No he doesn't; and it is very serious matter to make such an allegation about man who has a wife and daughters whom he loves. His exact words were:  "Somebody... asked me a very good question, why are there no women (at the upcoming UFO Truth Magazine Conference)? It's not done deliberately. We've had four women speak in the past. There aren't many women, in my opinion, who can stand up in front of two hundred people and talk about evidential things. There are lots of women out there talking about abductions and things like that, but not many on evidential-based things... Unfortunately there aren't many and there certainly aren't many in the UK that would fall into that category. While we've had women in the past and I certainly encourage women to come forward, there just aren't that many about. Although I'm sure we'll have women in the future." Not quite the same, is it? Sacha is once again twisting and distorting people's words to produce a false context. It would be fair to say that Gary is making an observation, one which I agree with; but he is not advocating the removal of female speakers from bookings due to any fundamental flaws of their sex. There are many women who have contributed to evidential UFOlogy; they are simply smaller in quantity, not quality, than the men. I expand on that very issue here, see: Details:

At the end of Sacha Christie's lecture she is presented with a cut glass ornament with text engraved on it by David Young, the conference organizer. This is an obvious parody of Gary's "Courage in UFOlogy" awards. I doubt if anybody failed to see through Young's pale imitation. The conference ended with a long and very complimentary message from none other than Nick Pope. Surely I am not the only one who is suspicious of Nick Pope's interest in this matter. You would think such frivolities would be way beneath "the man from the Ministry", "Britain's Fox Mulder", the official international media pop UFOlogist whom every journalist has on speed-dial whenever a UFO story comes in. Clearly Sacha Christie is not a government disinformer. She is simply motivated by a personal grudge. However she may have inadvertently hit the right note, the one that the government want to amplify. I think this explains the involvement of Nick Pope. Details:
All in all this was a very boring and unoriginal presentation by Sacha in which she brings up no new information at all. According to David Young we "Warrenites" were not banned and could have turned up if we wished. I know a few people who went along. However, I had more interesting and enjoyable activities booked for that day; like having a tooth out at the dentist after watching the paint dry on the walls of the waiting room...

Tuesday, 8 October 2019

Twin Towers- The Missing Evidence

A few weeks ago it was the eighteenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. This terrible atrocity has come of age. There are now adults walking the earth who have lived their entire life in the post-9/11 world. To mark the occasion a TV documentary was screened. This was not a premiere; the programme was originally shown in 2015. After eighteen years of telling people that they were simply deluded for thinking fuel and office fires combined with impact damage from the two airliners caused the two giant skyscrapers to collapse; the "experts" are now saying their critics were right all along. The official story does not make sense... What!?... The alternative view of what happened in the forty-five minute programme is provided exclusively by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group of people who have spread false information about "what else happened?". This centres on supposed forensic evidence that conventional explosives and thermite charges were used to destroy the buildings. The programme then focuses on the work of Dr Frank Greening and Dr Christian Simensen, two scientists who have supposedly cleared up the remaining questions raised over the destruction of the World Trade Centre (Only towers One and Two of course. We don't talk about Building 7) and successfully debunks the "EEEEEvil conspiracy theorists!" What they claim is that a vital piece of evidence has been ignored through an astonishing oversight. With grand fanfare the truth is revealed. The presence of the aircraft wreckage itself was the principle cause of the burning that caused the structure to weaken; not the fuel, but the airframe. Airliners are constructed primarily of aluminium, a light strong metal. However when it is molten and heated above a certain temperature, and then mixed with water, a chemical reaction takes place in which the metal and water become aluminium oxide and hydrogen. This mixture generates intense fire and explosions. It is these explosions that the fire-fighters supposedly heard. It also is the alleged source of the glowing molten metal seen pouring from the building. Source:

This entire documentary is a distraction and is designed to confuse the viewer, especially those who are allowing their curiosity to lead them into alternative explanations for 9/11. I don't know personally whether this inadvertent watery and aluminium forge could have occurred in the shattered and smouldering segment of the two towers; but really it doesn't matter. It's a moot question and it is meant to be. The work of Dr Judy Wood proves that the atrocity in New York City on September the 11th 2001 was of a fundamentally different nature, see: Everything in the Channel 5 documentary above, including the counterproposition presented by Dr Richard Gage, is irrelevant and it is intended to misdirect and obfuscate; therefore maintaining the official story.

Saturday, 5 October 2019

David Boyle Dies

David Boyle
1948 - 2019
I'm very sorry to report that David Boyle, the great alternative thinker from the north of England, has passed away. David was famous for the exhibitions he ran in Blackpool, Llandudno in Wales and other places. His Doctor Who exhibitions were world famous. When he died, Sylvester McCoy, the third best Doctor after Tom Baker and Christopher Eccleston, Tweeted: "I’m so sad to hear David Boyle is no longer with us. He brought myself and many Dr Who fans great fun at the Llandudno and Blackpool cons he ran. His enthusiasm and love for all his projects were infectious! He will be much missed by us all. Sylvester x". David was seventy-one years old. Source: I know David best from his UFO/paranormal/conspiracy theory-themed exhibition in Blackpool known as "Alien Base" and several other names. He was a good friend of the Probe community. In 2010 he gave me and Sue Ustane, my partner at the time, a personal tour of that amazing place, see: I didn't understand everything he told us, but found it impossible not to be captured by his enthusiasm. Last week I attended David's funeral in Lytham St Annes, Lancashire; see here in the first hour of the film: It was a moving and respectful service attended by his family and friends. As a devoted Whovian, the casket was designed to look like the Tardis. Rest in peace, David. Wherever you are now, I wish you all the best and hope to meet you again one day.

Friday, 4 October 2019

Bernie Sanders Heart Attack

Bernie Sanders announced in February that he would definitely be running in the 2020 United States Presidential Election. He ran in the 2016 election and had his application wrongfully terminated as the result of a conspiracy by Hillary Clinton and other members of the Democratic National Convention. This made it utterly galling when the old fool then went and endorsed her, see: Mind you, it probably helped with Donald Trump's campaign because many ex-Bernie supporters switched to Trump afterwards, in understandable outrage after Bernie's betrayal; not to mention the 255 million dollars his campaign had cost them. Believe it or not, Sanders is definitely the major American political figure most similar to Trump. Many people will be astonished at what I just wrote, seeing that Trump is, to use the terminology of American politics, a radical conservative and Sanders is an ultra-liberal. However, both are non-establishment upstarts who have gate-crashed a political world they are not licensed to be involved in. Sanders is a leftwing populist and Trump is a rightwing populist. Bernie Sanders is destined never to US President. It has nothing to do with his comments on UFO's, see: He is simply not wanted to represent the Deep State in the USA. They couldn't stop Trump getting into the White House, but they will not make the same mistake again. Therefore you'll understand that I was immediately suspicious when I heard that Bernie experienced angina. Angina is a very serious medical symptom. It can be the first sign of potentially fatal heart disease. The 78 year-old senator and candidate was admitted to hospital and was treated with a "stent". This is a device inserted into the coronary arteries, the blood vessels that feed blood to the heart, that clear away any embolism and restore circulation. I hope this procedure was successful. As regular readers will know, Trump is my man; but despite my political disagreements with Sanders, I do not wish him dead. He Tweeted on Tuesday after the operation that he was "feeling good." Source: He intends to continue with his campaign; and indeed his polling figures are on the rise whereas those of Joe Bidon, his principle rival, are falling.

I do wonder whether Bernie Sanders will live to see the end of the 2020 US Presidential campaigns. There are already memes circulating of gravestones with "Sanders 2020" on the epitaph. The DNC will once again attempt to thwart his grasp for the Democratic ticket. They cannot use the same trick again; everybody will be expecting it and they will not get away with it twice. Therefore they will try something else; and the most obvious option is to arrange for him to "conk out" before the final hurdle, and allow the Bidons and Warrens of this world to do their dirty work for the establishment. After all, he is a pretty elderly man and nobody lives forever, do they? Between 1992 and 1994 the UK Labour Party was led by John Smith. He was almost certain to become Prime Minister in the 1997 General Election, but then on the 11th of May 1994 he "suffered a heart attack" which killed him. He had had a heart attack six years earlier, making this a plausible modus operandi to disguise his assassination, as it sadly will be for Bernie. Labour's official social media has a tribute to Smith, but it's odd that comments are disabled, see: John Smith's convenient death left the opposition leadership wide open for The Chosen One, elected on Mayday 1997; one Tony Blair... and the rest is history (I voted for him. I know; I'm not proud of myself). I'm in two minds whether I should pay Larry Sanders, Bernie's brother, a visit. I know him fairly well, having worked with him during my misspent youth as a trade unionist. He is a Green Party councillor here in Oxford and I was briefly reunited with him a few years ago during a local anti-fracking protest, see: (In the bottom pic, I am to the left of the Green banner while Larry is to the right of it, looking sideways behind the man with the grey jacket). I want to warn him that his brother is in danger. Mind you, would it do any good? I've changed so much since Larry and I were close and he probably thinks I am now an "evil fascist Nazi conspiracy crackpot!" I will continue to hope and pray for the safety of Bernie Sanders. As much as I would dislike seeing him become US President, I would not want the Deep State to claim his life.