Monday, 6 December 2021

Silent Night

 
There are over two hundred Christmas films listed on movie databases and generally they tend to be light-hearted, happy, humorous, sentimental and uplifting. Silent Night (Camille Griffin 2021) is a massive exception to that rule. It is definitely seasonal in theme, but it is an extremely dark and grim production. It is supposed to be a black comedy; but, although it has a few droll moments, I didn't find it all that funny. It is actually very tragic. It seems to me to be loosely based the book On the Beach by Nevil Shute, a novel written in the 1950's and inspired by the Bikini Atoll nuclear tests which poisoned the local area with radioactive fallout. The story is about a group of old friends meeting up to spend Christmas together in the country house of one of them, Nell, where she lives with her husband and three sons. At first everything seems normal, but then slowly a sinister anomaly emerges. For instance, one of the characters has a black eye and they talk about having to fight and steal Christmas presents. The Queen's speech took place in a bunker surrounded by canned food. The characters are trying to act cheerfully, but they do so in a very forced and bittersweet way. Something is obviously very wrong. Many thanks to my YouTube friend"Jamnoise72" for letting me know about this film on a recent livestream, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2021/12/germany-livestream.html. (Warning- spoilers below!) It turns out that the earth has been struck down by a catastrophic global environmental disaster in which a cloud of toxic gas is filling the atmosphere causing most or all of life on earth to die. "Greta warned us!" shouts Art, one of the boys. As it happens there is no complete explanation of what this gas cloud is and certainly no explicit link to climate change. It is however implied that this is definitely a disaster caused by human abuse of the earth's biosphere. Death from inhaling the gas is very painful. It causes asphyxia and haemorrhaging. Like in On the Beach, the government has issued poisoned tablets to every citizen so that they have the option of a merciful suicide before the end. The Christmas party is therefore these people's last day on earth. They get drunk and dance and sing. They launch fireworks. Like the band playing on the Titanic, they are trying to maintain normality and enjoy what little time they have left. They speak frankly to each other, confessing things they would never say if they knew they had a future. They speculate about the afterlife. However, there is a strange twist in the final scene and the story is left very unresolved and open to interpretation. Art, the oldest boy, refuses to take the poisoned tablet and so collapses when he breathes the poisoned gas. His family all assume he is dead. They subsequently all take their tablets and die. During the night, the toxic cloud engulfs the house; yet in the morning everything looks normal. All that has happened is that snow has fallen and the sun rises on a white Boxing Day. In the very last shot, we see Art's eyes open. I'm not sure what this means. Was the cloud not really toxic and the government just said it was so that people would kill themselves, reducing the population? Is Art now a zombie, converted to the undead by the evil fumes? Are they all dead and we are seeing them arrive in Heaven or the Spiritworld? Who knows? The acting is very good, especially seeing as many of the central characters are young children. In the credit roll there is a "Covid safety expert"; never seen one of those before. I've noticed that dystopian fiction tends to emerge in times of hardship. The book and film The Road, which is referred to in the script, was published after the War on Terror and 2008 stock market crash. Silent Night well worth seeing though, but don't watch if you want to inject a bit of Christmas goodwill into your family get together! Better to stick to The Muppets Christmas Carol. See here for the trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ras0H9GEz5I.
See here for background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/11/climate-change-portal.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/08/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-truth-seekers.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/12/its-wonderful-life-film-review.html.

Sunday, 5 December 2021

Zulu Cancelled

 
Considered one of the greatest British films of all time, Cy Enfield's 1964 epic Zulu relates the Battle of Rorke's Drift during the Anglo-Zulu war of 1879. A mere hundred and fifty British soldiers, many of whom where sick in a field hospital, held back a Zulu army of many thousands. This engagement came just hours after Zulus destroyed the British base at Isandlwana, as told in the 1979 prequel Zulu Dawn. The film is renowned for its smooth acting and expert chorography. It is also the big screen debut for Michael Caine who went on to become one of the world's most iconic actors; and also Mangosuthu Gatsha Buthelezi who went on to become a successful politician. In the film he plays his own great-grandfather, King Cetshwayo kaMpande. I was astonished and disgusted, but then again maybe I shouldn't have been astonished, when I saw that this classic movie had been listed for disposal by the wokeist movement. Their objections are the kind that these days almost write themselves. They claim it has "racist overtones" which could have a "negative effect on relationships" within Britain's "changing and richly diverse communities". Source: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/979715/zulu-snowflakes-campaigners-michael-caine-racist-politicial-correctness-gone-mad. Firstly, I couldn't give a damn even if that were true. People should still be allowed to watch it. Secondly, it's not true. The film portrays the Zulu warriors in a very respectful manner. They are brave, honourable and cunning tacticians. In the dramatic final scene of the battle, the Zulus line up to sing and dance. The British think this is a prelude to another attack, but in fact the Zulus have given up; and they are saluting their enemies for being great warriors. Zulu is a unique war film with no good guys and bad guys; just good guys. I don't care if it is historically inaccurate. The message of the story is that you can get into conflict with others, even very violent conflict; and yet not lose your humanity. It's a wonderfully positive theme. However wokeists are so anti-intellectual that they can only think in one dimension. They just see white people fighting black people and yell "racism!" almost as a reflex. Of all the excesses of wokeism, this is surely the most ridiculous. I'm pleased to say that the screening of the film in Folkestone was not cancelled. The local people and the charity stood up to those idiotic snowflakes. We need to see more of that kind of resistance.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/05/rhodes-will-stay.html.
And: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/08/political-correctness-portal.html.

Saturday, 4 December 2021

Strange New Prisons

 
All human societies with a dense population have prisons. Prisons serve two purposes; firstly to act as punishment for wrongdoings. They provide the basics necessities of life, but no more, and the inmate can never leave until their sentence is complete; or their death, whichever comes first. A prison's second function is isolation, to keep the inmates separated from the rest of the population so that they can do no harm to others. This is especially important for violent crimes. For this reason I was surprised and worried to learn that the UK government is currently on a massive building spree of new prisons that appear to serve only one of those purposes. Four new multi-million pound gaols are currently under construction and are due to open between 2022 and 2026; HMP Five Wells in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, HMP Full Sutton in the East Riding of Yorkshire, HMP Glen Parva in Leicestershire and a fourth one in Chorley as yet unnamed. These so-called "mega-prisons" are very different to what you probably would expect a prison to be. There are no bars on the windows and the locations are selected to provide a nice view. The cell blocks have a cross-shaped plan instead of the traditional Victorian K-block. When complete, Five Wells will be able to house up to 1,650 inmates, making it the biggest gaol in Britain. Its cells have been described as "light and airy double rooms and single rooms, with brightly coloured walls and unobstructed views over the beautiful River Nene and fishing lake." There will also be a "central hub" area for "education, vocational training and social facilities". The yards will be landscaped and have lots of green spaces. Since when did a description of a clink sound like an entry on Trip Adviser? The prisons are being built under a public-private partnership by the Keir group and will be owned and run by G4S; yes, the same security contractor that messed up the 2012 Olympics and led to the total military lockdown of the whole of London, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2012/05/london-olympic-security-measures.html. Source: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/inside-uks-new-privately-run-24207907. If a prison is designed to be as comfortable as possible then it is designed to fulfil only one of a prisons' two purposes, isolation; in other words, internment.
 
Internment is the incarceration of citizens or visitors by a government for reasons other than criminal. It was first practiced in the Second Boer War in 1899 and has since then been employed multiple times. During World War II, 120,000 Americans with Japanese roots were locked up in internment camps, mostly in California where Japanese-Americans tend to live. This was supposedly for their "own safety" because of public anger over the attack on Pearl Harbour. These camps were not prisons; hardly any of the detainees were under suspicion of espionage or guerrilla activities. As a result they were intended to be as pleasant a location to live in as possible. Inside there were parks and sports grounds, post offices and schools, hospitals and theatres. However, nobody inside it could leave. There was a barbed wire fence, guard dogs and armed warders patrolling the perimeter. Reading the descriptions of these detention centres reminds me very much of the new British mega-prisons. Could it be that these new prisons are for internment? Why not? Australia has already started putting away "unruly" people, mostly aborigines, who are suspected of being infected with Covid 19 and refuse testing or the vaccines, see: https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1466651206244257792. The Australian government calls these internment camps "quarantine facilities". Why would the UK government need such measures and who would be put in them. The answer is anybody who refuses to cooperate with the changes in our country currently underway. People who refuse to be vaccinated, refuse to carry an ID card, refuse to shop without cash, refuse to use politically correct language; refuse to comply with any of the myriad Orwellian reforms the state wants to introduce. It could be that I will end up in one of these places. I hope not, but it can't be ruled out.
See here for more information: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/02/coronavirus-portal.html.
And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/12/ben-emlyn-jones-and-thomas-baden-riess-4.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/08/im-learning-russian.html.

Friday, 3 December 2021

Ben Emlyn-Jones and Thomas Baden-Riess 4

 
I have been featured on another livestream with Thomas Baden-Riess, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YauWpFuQs0w.
And: https://odysee.com/@ThomasBadenRiess:7/australian-camps,-fans-collapse,-seth:3.
Subjects discussed include: Australian concentration camps, anti-Semitic entrapment, forced jabs or masks, and much much more. We were joined on this programme by "Unwashed", see: https://odysee.com/@UNWAShED:8.
See here for my previous appearance on Thomas' channel: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/11/ben-emlyn-jones-and-thomas-baden-riess-3.html.

Wednesday, 1 December 2021

Richplanet TV on AATIP

 
When the AATIP and TTSA revelations dropped in December 2017, it didn't take long for Richard D Hall to get on the case and his assessment was very predictable. No doubt his hypersensitive shill detector lit up like a Las Vegas casino almost the moment Luis Elizondo's name was first mentioned. In his latest programme, number 293 entitled Who Controls The Planet?, he denounces the former AATIP director, inevitably, as a disinformation agent. The answer to the question in the title is: whoever controls space. At the moment there is a "space rush" across the world with nations setting up space forces and launching military satellites. Like the oceans a few centuries ago, the enpire that rules space will have as much power as the empire that once ruled the waves. Richard brings on Andrew Johnson... again, and together they analyze the post-2017 change in the media's depiction of UFO's. They claim that what has happened with AATIP and the TTSA is fundamentally no different to previous UFO revealations over the years, such as the Condon Report of 1969. They are totally wrong. After December 2017, the media underwent a transformation in the way it addressed the UFO issue that decisively broke away from the "official ridicule and denial" strategy that they had been operating under continuously, across the globe, since the Cutler-Twining memo of 1947. Why this radical shift took place is an important question for which I do not have a complete answer, but in no way can anybody successfully state that it has "all been done in the past hasn't it?" No. What we see now is totally unprecedented. See here for details: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/05/bryce-zabels-white-pill.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/05/ufo-disclosure-2020-big-d.html. I was astonished and dismayed to see that when it came to the AATIP videos, Richard and Andrew simply accept the skeptic debunking of Mick West and Philip Mason (Thunderf00t). This has been comprehensively discredited by so many people, including myself, that I don't know where to start. Richard and Andrew could have read my article in issue 47 of UFO Truth Magazine and spared themselves some embarrassment, but they haven't. Why? Because Gary Heseltine is yet another name on their enormously long blacklist, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/03/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-47.html. I'll come back to that point later. Richard and Andrew didn't even look at the primary source material. Their dismissal of the "Go fast" and "Gimbal" footage comes from what Richard calls "good analysis". It is not analysis; it is a video by the science vlogger Anton Petrov who does little more than repeat the original nonsense, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McVqKmUaaok. Richard also calls Tucker Carlson's very courageous coverage of the UAP "crap!"
 
With this false conclusion taken as read, Richard and Andrew move onto the roles played by Senator Harry Reid and Bob Bigelow. Here they find a more secure footing in reality. It was actually Bigelow's influence on the US Senate Majority Leader that caused AATIP to be established in the first place. Reid might have been the brainchild behind it, but it was his friend's idea originally. Bigelow, as we know, was directly involved with AATIP as a contractor to examine physical evidence gathered from supposed UFO's. Reid wrote a letter in 2009 to the Deputy Secretaty of Defence, William Lynn, that did not refer to UAP investigation at all; but instead the development of advanced military technology. How strange. It appears Harry Reid and Bob Bigelow have an unterior motive for creating AATIP. John Greenewald of The Black Vault has noticed more suspicious elements, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tVvN6RcyI4. The fact that Bigelow's specialized role in AATIP was physical debris science means a picture starts to emerge. Even before the study was complete, the US government was considering practical applications for back-engineering unknown salvaged material with unusual properties. Another piece of that jigsaw is Anthony Bragalia's Freedom of Information Act request, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/02/pentagon-foia-on-debris.html. It could be that this project is already well advanced; which is what might be in the 143 pages too hot for FOIA. When the subject of Luis Elizondo comes up, Richard falls back once again on statement analysis. As I've said before, for example: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/06/bob-lazar-on-richplanet-virtual-tour.html, statement analyisis should never be ignored, yet at the same time it should not be used as a substitute for other methods. Even though Richard controlled the analysis with two separate tests, I still question its objectivity. At one point Andrew says: "Anybody that gets promoted like that is promoted for a reason and it's not for good reasons." Richard agrees. This exposes both men's attitudes to a fallacy I have identifed before, that everything which seems to reduce a conspiracy or be against it has to be automatically rejected on the grounds that it is just another level of the cover-up. By this reasoning the conspiracy can never be seen to end. See here for more information: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/01/denying-2016.html and: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/03/why-2016-matters.html. At the moment neither Richard nor Andrew are open to any other possibility. Funnily enough, apart from that, Richard and Andrew have no evidence at all the Elizondo is a shill. It is simply their assumption based on the other information they think they have. On the subject of the "five observables", Richard and Andrew state that all of them are also within the capabilities of secret government technology. They bring up Mark McCandlish, who died in mysterious circumstances a few months ago, just before he was about to brief the US Sente. That should be a solid ribbon on our corkboard leading to Bigelow and Reid's activties in the 2000's. That is all true, so why should we assume that the UAP's are extertrrestrial? I do not assume that all of them are, but at the same time I don't believe none of them are. This is partly due to the antiquity of the phenomenon. The images and descriptions of the AATIP footage have been reported by pilots since aeroplanes were invented; in fact there are some very convincing studies from World War II. I also doubt the secret space programme hypothesis for most cases because of the behaviour of the phenomena. There is one avenue of inquiry we should keep open though, the problem of the threat narrative. This is a legitimate sticking point and it might be a motive for government to use antigravity and free energy vehicles to impersonate alien invaders. I have covered that in detail many times, for example see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/08/space-force-reply-to-steve-mumbling.html. Some UFOlogists have adopted the paradigm of prevention and planted their flag on the 100% man made hypothesis; mostly, unlike Richard and Andrew, for political instead of intellectual reasons. After all if they're proven wrong, what do they lose? Actually, quite a lot. If there is information about real ET's being slowly released then it could be a prelude to willing Disclosure. That is an opportunity to important to miss. It's a narrow path we have to tread between the two sides of this dilemma, but tread it we must. Source: https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=294&part=1.
On a personal note, people have often asked me why I am so critical of Richard. I have to think before replying; I am not so critical, I am merely critical. Should people not be critical of Richard D Hall? Is he above criticism? Why should he be; not least seeing as he himself does not hesitate to criticize others, sometiems very harshly, and usually unfairly? He once described Miles Johnston as a "clown!". Miles is a good friend and comrade of mine who I consider a dedicated workhorse in this movement. He was running an Irish UFO group in the early 1970's when Richard was still in primary school. The thing is, very few people do criticze Richard because he has a reputation for being very abrasive and intimidating; and, frankly, most people are scared of him. Well, I am not. I must admit I have a score to settle because I myself have been on Richard's hitlist. Many years ago on a public Facebook group he once called me a "fucking servant of the mainstream media!" I didn't react and maybe I should have. I have a habit of bearing grudges like this and reacting can often save me from endless brooding. I should have instantly replied to Richard and proposed an "Abingdon town centre" solution, like I did with Slaxxxer, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/05/im-watching-slaxxxer-again.html. If Richard is ever as rude to me like that again, believe me, I shall. It is telling that one of the few people in the entire conspirasphere to remain in Richard's good books is Andrew Johnson, who himself is capable of deeply antisocial behaviour, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2021/03/ian-r-crane-memorial-livestream.html. This doesn't reduce my respect for both men professionally. I have found I can keep those two worlds separate. I think Richard D Hall's current failures come from the contempt and distrust he feels for almost all other Truthers. Why is that? Are we not all on the same side here? We differ in conclusions and methodology, but that does not make us all disinformation agents or dupes or shills. It doesn't mean we are deserving of the condemnation Richard so thoughtlessly heaps upon us. I've said it before and I'll say it again, we need some kind of tribunal system to sort things like this out, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/11/shill-tribunal-update-personnel.html and: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2021/05/there-must-be-more-than-this.html.This is not the first time Richard has made such a monumental blunder. In the case of Rendlesham Forest it came from the fact that he did not consult with other researchers, because of his low opinion of us, and relied entirely on his magic wand, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/richplanet-on-rendlesham.html. He is capable of doing better. He has done better. I hope he will lean a lesson from his errors and not, as The Who sung, get fooled again.

Monday, 29 November 2021

Video from the Moon?

 
Some livestreams on YouTube can be very long. Since the platform lifted restrictions on the duration, live broadcasts of days and even weeks in length have been posted. One of the most unusual began on May the 11th 2021. It was posted from a channel created six days earlier. It's a channel that is almost blank in design. There is no banner, no avatar, no subs, no faves. It has a strange name: "使命langrenus2021-14". Langrenus is a large impact crater on the moon. No spacecraft has ever visited that location... or so we're told. The numbers after the word probably refer to the current year, 2021; although the meaning of "14" is unknown. The Chinese sigils at the begining, mean "mission" or "errand". China has recently carried out some highly successful landings on the moon, but not in the Langrenus crater, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/01/china-lands-on-dark-side.html. However, the livestream appears to show a location on the lunar surface. The shot comes from a static camera and the quality is of fairly low resolution, similar to the performance of early Apollo footage. The channel livestreamed continuously for a week and then stopped. The vista occasionally changes, but the images are mostly very monotonous. The camera hardly moves and almost no other objects can be seen. There is a soundtrack in some sections, but it is very indisticnt and full of static. Occasionally voices can be vaguely heard and even music. At present the livestream recording is not available on the channel and only one short clip is public, see: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMHy8aXzfDDRJynbUrLH-mQ/featured.
 
Obviously, this could be a fake, a clever charade put together as a prank to draw attention from YouTube viewers. It might have been inspired as a parody of NASA's rolling livestreams from Mars and the International Space Station. There are many reasons to be suspicious. The frame darkens and lightens through a regular twenty-four hour period like the earth's night and day; yet the moon has no night or daytime, only phases that cycle over the course of twenty-nine and a half days. However, some of the shots show the earth in the exact place you would expect to see it from the Langrenus crater, at about ten degrees elevation. It is also in it own correct phase (From an observer on the moon, the earth appears to have phases in the exact way the moon does from the earth, only they are opposite. A crescent moon from earth looks like a "gibbous earth" from the moon). It is the proper size too, based on its relative size and distance. This would be diffiuclt to reproduce and no open-souce software or application, such as Google Moon, can do that. Fabricating such a panorama aurthentically would be a massive and sophisticated task. Luckily a few people recorded some of the livestream and, despite its samey nature, the last few minutes are extraordinary. What looks like a human hand moves in front of the lens. Then the camera is moved from whatever mount it is on and wheeled around; we see the black sky and the sunlit ground. After that the feed is cut and never resumes, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZW5QmtdC34. The 使命Langrenus2021-14 channel is totally anonymous. Nobody knows who set it up and no further information has come from the uploader. Since the end, on May the 18th, there has only been the solitary aforementinoed clip posted. Could this video really be a real livestream from the moon? If so then who is doing it? How did they get to that spot when no known mission has ever landed there? It has to be a manned mission because of the hand we see at the end. According to researchers into the secret space programme, there is indeed a covert human presence on the moon not acknowleged by the public space agencies; for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNVshdAj6ko. Interestingly this twenty year old BBC article discusses the discovery of anomalous phenomena in the Langrenus crater that could be caused by some kind of artificial facility; either human, extraterrestrial or both, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/789095.stm. If this is a real video from a secret lunar base, how did it end up on YouTube? This must be some kind of leak from a whistleblower. I wonder if we will hear anything else from them. If so you can be sure you will read about it first on HPANWO Voice.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/01/space-force-and-deep-state.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/02/secret-nazi-laboratory-discovered.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/11/official-antigravity.html.
And: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2016/03/programme-181-podcast-andrew-johnson.html.

Saturday, 27 November 2021

Q Shaman Jailed

 
One of the most colourful characters in the conspirasphere has been locked in prison. The man known as "the Q Shaman" and "Jake Angeli", real name Jacob Chansley, was sentenced to forty-one months by a US federal judge for his part in the so-called Capitol Hill riot. Chansley was an unforgettable sight at activism events during the four years of the Trump rebellion with his elaborate tattoos and makeup, topped by an Amerindian fur hat with bison horns. He was among those who were goaded into the Capitol Building in Washington DC during the January the 6th protest. Everything was set up to misrepresent those patriots as thugs and looters, when all they wanted was to overthrow the illegal occupation of the United States and restore the real president, Donald Trump, to office. See here for more details: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2021/01/sixth-of-january-alt-tech-exclusive.html. Originally from Arizona USA, the Q Shaman experienced a spiritual and conspiratorial awakening. He wrote two books: Will and Power- Inside the Living Library and One Mind at a Time- a Deep State of Illusion. He performed street lectures about ley lines, electromagnetic weapons, the Bilderberg Group and occult symbolism in the architecture of government buildings. Here is an interview he did with Alex Jones, see: https://www.bitchute.com/video/1xaQqGJ7Vl3T/. As you'll gather, he has very similar interests and concerns to me. I'm very sorry and angry that Chansley has been incarcerated. Hopefully his sentence will be shortened by the fact that he has already spent many months on remand. I don't know what the rules are in the United States, but in the UK, a remand prisoner has their sentence reduced at a rate of twice the length of time they were imprisoned before conviction. According to news reports, Chansley has renounced all his professed viewpoints. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that is a ruse to help his legal defence. We'll find out after his release. I wish him luck.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/11/is-qanon-game.html.
And: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/01/donald-trump-portal.html.