Wednesday 19 April 2023

RDH vs the BBC Update

 
See here for essential background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-bbc-on-rdh.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/11/rdh-panorama-livestream.html.
Marianna Spring, the self-styled "online conspiracy agony aunt", has just published some updates about her spiteful campaign against Richard D Hall. Her new article has been published on the BBC website and is filled with the usual manipulative rhetoric. It includes a police mug-shot like image of Richard's face and talks about the progress being made against Richard for alleged defamation and harassment. Obviously I assert that he is innocent of both, but the BBC's audience will, as usual, not be provided with a fair hearing. She has also released a follow-on episode in her Disaster Trolls series on Radio 4. Sources: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65201949.amp and: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001jmsl. The article directly distorts a quote by Neil Sanders from the earlier episodes and the Panorama TV show: "Hall had admitted to him several years ago that he didn't believe theories about staged attacks, saying 'this is all nonsense'." No, Neil said that this had been Richard's initial belief years before the Manchester incident when he was focusing exclusively on UFO's. If Neil does not regret his decision to be on the BBC after this, then he never will. There is a sinister addition to the motley crew assisting Spring, Andy Burham; who is the mayor of Manchester, former cabinet minister and candidate for Labour leader. He is calling for specific changes to the law as a result of this BBC project. He waters it down with platitudes about "the need to balance free speech..." etc, but it is obvious that his proposal is begging to be abused, and that is intentional. The objective is to make it legally impossible for us to disagree publicly with the official narrative about anything. However, as I said yesterday, this is just a symptom of their desperation, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/04/elon-vs-beeb.html. At the same time there has been some drama on the unofficial Richplanet Facebook group because somebody was spreading a rumour that Richard has been arrested. Andrew Johnson has countered with a video which makes it clear that is not the case. What's more, according to Andrew's legal source, Martin Hibbert has not yet filed his case against Richard. This does not mean he does not intend to, but that the BBC are once again being dishonest to say that the lawsuit is already underway and Richard has been "served papers!" I wonder what move the deceivers will make next... those who are not standing next to the Twitter censors in the dole queue that is. Source:  https://odysee.com/@checktheevidence:0/Rumours-about-Richard-D-Hall:0.
See here for more information: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-bbc-and-mind-control.html.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

You state Martin Hibbert has not yet filed his case against Richard. This does not mean he does not intend to, but that the BBC are once again being dishonest to say that the lawsuit is already underway and Richard has been "served papers!"

This is factually incorrect as it is a class action by multiple survivors/victims being represented by Neill Hudgell against Hall and this has been underway for some time and this legal action can take many forms ( e.g gagging orders, cease and desist etc) under the banner 'papers being served'

https://www.ladbible.com/news/survivors-manchester-arena-bombing-sue-conspiracy-theory-20221101

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/manchester-bombing-victims-sue-over-hoax-claims-vdcfcpsfs

I would expect at this stage Hall is well, aware and would be seeking legal counsel himself to defend his actions.

Anonymous said...


Hibbets separate case has been filed (nb this is public record and papers will be served does not mean any factual error on behalf of the BBC)

On Monday, the Hibberts’ lawyers, Hudgell Solicitors, said: “We can confirm that proceedings were issued in the high court on Friday on behalf of Martin and his daughter Eve.

“Those proceedings are for protection from harassment and misuse of private information and include an application for a restraining injunction and damages. Mr Richard Hall will shortly be served with papers and will then have an opportunity to formally respond.

On Monday, the Hibberts’ lawyers, Hudgell Solicitors, said: “We can confirm that proceedings were issued in the high court on Friday on behalf of Martin and his daughter Eve.

“Those proceedings are for protection from harassment and misuse of private information and include an application for a restraining injunction and damages. Mr Richard Hall will shortly be served with papers and will then have an opportunity to formally respond.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/03/manchester-arena-bombing-survivors-file-legal-action-against-conspiracy-theorist

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

Hi Anon. Very well. We have two sides of the story now; Andrew Johnson's and the mainstream media's. One says the case has been filed and the other doesn't. So be it either way. I did specify "according to Andrew's legal source..."

Anonymous said...

No we have one fact and a lie. Every single UK media outlet reported this fact from all political spectrum AND bias left or right leaning. It was also confirmed by the legal team filing the case and also is now in the public records. papers not being served does not mean the case hasn't been filed. Either you are misrepresenting the facts or Andrew Johnson lied.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-arena-bomb-survivors-file-26618154

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/03/manchester-arena-bombing-survivors-file-legal-action-against-conspiracy-theorist

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/manchester-bombing-victims-sue-over-hoax-claims-vdcfcpsfs

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11932473/Manchester-Arena-bomb-survivors-sue-conspiracy-theorist-Richard-D-Hall.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/04/03/manchester-arena-terror-attack-survivors-sue-conspiracy/

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/manchester-arena-survivors-sue-conspiracy-theorist-1234708935/

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/manchester-arena-survivors-suing-disaster-29614374

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1754280/Manchester-Arena-attack-survivors-sue-Richard-D-Hall

Considering this case is about victims being lied about claiming damages for harassment and defamation I would helpfully advise you heed the warning and avoid becoming the target of legal action also yourself from their solicitors if you claim they are lying about taking said legal action. Alan would do well to heed the same warning with his actions.

As an aside it staggers me why people believe RDH's nonsense conspiracy regarding this when it would be easier to have claimed a conspiracy on the Manchester Arndale bombing (where nobody was ever convicted) but suspect it's not as headline grabbing and has less of an audience for RDH's grift. Ironic given the title for a track written about said bombing is 'One man's fool' by Genesis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Manchester_bombing







Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

No, we NOT have one fact and one lie. We have information from different sources that is contradictory. This is a technicality that may be resolved soon one way or another. (I don't get the relevance of posting copies of the Genesis lyrics.)
Your warning is duly noted and rejected. I shall NOT be intimidated into ceasing to think and speak as I choose to! DO YOU UNDERSTAND!? If you feel comfortable with the trend in society towards intellectual dictatorship, then shame on you! I do not believe I am defaming or harassing anybody, in the same way I assert RDH is not.