See here for
essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/01/rdh-in-court-day-one.html.
There has now been a judgement in the case of Hibbert vs Hall. The court released a document which includes a summary of the hearing's proceedings and ends with: "I find that the defendant has not discharged the evidential burden which rests on him. He has no real prospect, indeed no prospect at all, of success on the Issues and I will resolve them in the claimants' favour. The defendant's applications for third party disclosure are also dismissed." Source: https://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/KB-2023-002102_Hibbert%20v%20Richard%20Hall.pdf. At the main trial, at a later date, Richard will now be barred from tabling his evidence about the Manchester Arena incident. I realize now why this legal attack on Richard involved the charge of harassment instead of libel, which is the industry standard. If the claimants, or whoever is ultimately behind this music hall farce, had sued Richard for libel they would be forced to let him present his evidence and plead fair comment. Now they don't have to. This is obviously a totally delusional and deceitful verdict, but hardly unexpected. I had nursed a forlorn hope that things might have beeen different, but that is a vice of mine. Dr Nick Kollerstrom has written is own report here: https://terroronthetube.co.uk/2024/02/09/judgement-aqainst-richard-hall/. UK Column have done a piece about Richard including an interview outside court; which is all very well, but why didn't they take an interest in his work beforehand? Source: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-9th-february-2024. I think Richard has done the right thing by standing his ground. If you compare his strategy to Alex Jones you'll see the marked difference. Alex backtracked, took the knee and apologized over and over again, but where did it get him? He still lost monumentally; all that grovelling gained him absolutely nothing, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/08/alex-jones-in-court.html. Richard has done the opposite and run at 'em! What happens next? I don't know, but I am confident that fortune favours the bold.
See here for a HPANWO Radio interview with Nick Kollerstrom about this subject: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2024/02/hpanwo-show-538-podcast-nick-kollerstrom.html.
See here for more background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/05/free-merthyr-tydfil-one.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-bbc-on-rdh.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/04/rdh-vs-bbc-update.html.
There has now been a judgement in the case of Hibbert vs Hall. The court released a document which includes a summary of the hearing's proceedings and ends with: "I find that the defendant has not discharged the evidential burden which rests on him. He has no real prospect, indeed no prospect at all, of success on the Issues and I will resolve them in the claimants' favour. The defendant's applications for third party disclosure are also dismissed." Source: https://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/KB-2023-002102_Hibbert%20v%20Richard%20Hall.pdf. At the main trial, at a later date, Richard will now be barred from tabling his evidence about the Manchester Arena incident. I realize now why this legal attack on Richard involved the charge of harassment instead of libel, which is the industry standard. If the claimants, or whoever is ultimately behind this music hall farce, had sued Richard for libel they would be forced to let him present his evidence and plead fair comment. Now they don't have to. This is obviously a totally delusional and deceitful verdict, but hardly unexpected. I had nursed a forlorn hope that things might have beeen different, but that is a vice of mine. Dr Nick Kollerstrom has written is own report here: https://terroronthetube.co.uk/2024/02/09/judgement-aqainst-richard-hall/. UK Column have done a piece about Richard including an interview outside court; which is all very well, but why didn't they take an interest in his work beforehand? Source: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-9th-february-2024. I think Richard has done the right thing by standing his ground. If you compare his strategy to Alex Jones you'll see the marked difference. Alex backtracked, took the knee and apologized over and over again, but where did it get him? He still lost monumentally; all that grovelling gained him absolutely nothing, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/08/alex-jones-in-court.html. Richard has done the opposite and run at 'em! What happens next? I don't know, but I am confident that fortune favours the bold.
See here for a HPANWO Radio interview with Nick Kollerstrom about this subject: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2024/02/hpanwo-show-538-podcast-nick-kollerstrom.html.
See here for more background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/05/free-merthyr-tydfil-one.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-bbc-on-rdh.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/04/rdh-vs-bbc-update.html.
6 comments:
Richard needs to appeal the summary judgement. Likely futile and costly but an important step to muddy the hands of more judges beyond the Admirality Registrar judge who has put their name to this farcical judgement.
Hi Jackie. That may well be Richard's next step. I do hope it works, despite the monolithic establishment. He will never give up; I'm sure of that.
Corruption at its best , as expected. He’s essentially been gagged so he can’t present evidence that they couldn’t ignore.
That is their dastardlier plan. However, it could well backfire; I hope it does.
Good on Richard, such determination against the odds.
Yes, respect to him!
Post a Comment