The government has given the go-ahead for the construction
of a new nuclear power station to be built at the Hinkley Point site on the Somerset
coast. The facility already contains two older power plants; one of them now
closed. The new power station will consist of two reactors of Franco-Chinese
design built by the French company EDF and their partners in China .
Given the unimaginative name of Hinkley
Point C ,
the new power station will generate 3,200 megawatts of power and, along with
the new Sizewell C reactors, will contribute to thirteen percent of Britain 's
electricity supply. Since 2008 the government has been working to phase out the
country's aging coal-fired power stations and replace them with renewables like
solar and wind farms, gas-fired plants and nuclear power. Didcot B in
Oxfordshire, near where I live, has recently been transformed into just such a
gas-fired plant. Constructions like these justify increases in fracking and
that's just one of the pitfalls of the UK
authorities' new energy policy. Wind farms harm wildlife. Bats are particularly
at risk, being blown into the blades of the turbines at night. The turbines spoil
the natural look of wilderness areas, especially in Scotland .
The risks of nuclear power are obvious; radioactive pollution, what to do with
the waste and the catastrophic results of major accidents like Fukushima
and Chernobyl . To be fair, the
latest nuclear reactors are far more advanced and much safer than the older
plants that have done the most harm, but nothing is a hundred percent safe, and
the consequences of a disaster are so terrible that I think the risk is not justified,
however tiny the odds.
The construction of Hinkley
Point C
will be one of the biggest civil engineering projects in British history. It
will generate 24,000 jobs, but the cost of the programme has not yet been
assessed. It will be at least eighteen billion pounds and could be as high as
twenty-nine billion. This makes it even more expensive than replacing Trident,
see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/britain-renews-trident.html.
At the moment there has been no final plan for the funding of Hinkley Point C.
The government are reassuring us that the French and Chinese consortium will
probably end up covering the costs, but I've a feeling Mr and Mrs Taxpayer are
going to have to dip into their pockets at some point. Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37369786.
This gloomy and incompetent projection for energy generation is the only one
we've got; and it stretches away into the foreseeable future. There are a few
exceptions though; the new "ITER" research station is gradually
taking shape in the south of France, but the development of hot nuclear fusion
power is achingly slow, see: https://www.iter.org/
and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/return-to-culham.html.
A few years ago Nexus magazine warned
about the dirty tricks being employed by the nuclear power lobby, see: https://www.nexusmagazine.com/products/nexus-magazines/volume-14/nexus-vol-14-no-2-detail.
The driving force behind the justification for nuclear power and even, occasionally
and unbelievably, fracking, is the fear of man-made climate change.
Environmentalists have become split over this question with "new greens"
like George Monbiot and Mark Lynas coming out in support of nuclear power,
despite all its dangers and disadvantages, simply because it is Carbon Neutral™,
see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsjzyIszUHI.
Lynas has gone on to produce a pro-nuclear environmentalist propaganda film
called Pandora's Promise. As regular
readers know, I think that man-made climate change is not real, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/merchants-of-doubt-review.html.
However even if it were real, there would still be no justification for today's
energy policy. When we take into account the suppression of free energy
technology these questions are exposed as a phoney bone of contention; see the
background links below for more detail. There are methods of generating power
that are safe, infinite, simple and cost almost nothing. They were first developed
successfully over a century ago and inventors are coming up with new
discoveries all the time. The authorities suppress these discoveries as soon as
they appear at the same time that they force us to use dirty, expensive and
damaging fossil fuels; either that or dangerous nuclear power. We need to
expose this agenda as soon as possible before it's too late. We can at least save
ourselves a lot of bother by revealing the truth before we invest a massive
amount of time, resources and effort building the new nuclear power station at
Hinkley Point.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/energy-politics-and-ufos-2015.html.
2 comments:
Joi Scientific has a much better technology than nuclear.
Infinitely better!
Post a Comment