Tuesday 25 October 2016

The American Jo Cox

During the summer's EU referendum I covered the desperate mass political manipulation that attempted to subvert the will of the people, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/programme-193-podcast-eu-referendum.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/vote-leave.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/vote-leave-2-count.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/brexit-reality.html. By far the most suspicious incident in this dirty campaign was the murder of the pro-EU Rt. Hon. Jo Cox MP. Its perfect timing and emotional overkill probably knocked two or three percent off the Leave vote total. There are two main strands of theory for those, like me, who question the official story; I call them "hard" and "soft". The soft theory is the one I find more probable and it says that the murder of Jo Cox was a planned psychological operation carried out by a trained assassin and that a fabricated story was implanted into the media when reporting on it; with Thomas Mair playing the role of the Lee Harvey Oswald-style patsy. The hard theory states that Jo Cox is still alive and the entire event never happened. She's presumably living under a false identity a long way from her previous home. Mark Devlin subscribes to this in my recent interview on his show, see at 6.26: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/ben-emlyn-jones-on-mark-devlins-good.html. To be honest, I can't rule it out. A very similar situation to Brexit has emerged in the United States of America that has caused me to disagree with the bulk of the conspirasphere. The prevailing view among the conspiratorial media is that the current US presidential election is no different to any other, in that we see two establishment puppets being put up against each other in a charade so we can vote for one or the other; and we have another strike chalked up for the fraud of democracy. I don't think that's the case this time. There was certainly an agenda to propose two controlled clones, but this failed. Some spanner or other has been thrown into the works of their schemes and an unintended candidate reached the final match, one Donald J Trump. In the background links below I charted Trump's progression through the primaries and caucuses; and at every stage I predicted the engineered downfall of Trump... but it never happened. There are many reasons to suspect that the current success of Donald Trump is an aberration. His campaign is mostly self-financed, as opposed to the massive donations Hillary Clinton has received from various high level interested parties such as George Soros, the Rothschilds and the Saudi royal family. This is of course because Trump is very rich through private means. His propaganda machine is also mostly independent and decentralized. It relies a lot on internet social media and word-of-mouth. Clinton, on the other hand, has the entire mainstream press behind her with such obvious bias that it is palpable. Hillary is the new darling of the neoconservative movement and the Israel lobby... if those are not merely synonyms, whereas Trump has been angrily rejected by all of them, from heads of Zionist think tanks to bloggers. This has put me at odds with many other NWO researchers who have cried out that everything I've just said is just another deeper layer of the mind control operation to convince me that Trump is our saviour; and that I'm a "shill" and/or a "sheeple" for swallowing it. Firstly, I'd like to ask those people: what would an anti-establishment candidate look like if the existing evidence for Trump being one is not enough? Secondly I don't believe that Trump is our saviour. I'm not saying he's a "good guy" or any kind of "white hat". Nothing he has said indicates that he is planning to expose the real New World Order agenda in full. I'm not telling anybody to go out and vote for him. I'm just saying that he is not owned by the globalists and has still become a presidential candidate; and this indicates that something has gone badly wrong with their machinations. That is encouraging no matter who that candidate is and no matter what he stands for. In a fair election there's no doubt Trump would wipe the floor with the Wicked Witch of the White House. The mainstream polls blare continuously about how Hillary is ahead, but as Stefan Molyneux and Bill Mitchell point out here, all the real-world signs are there that Trump will win a fair election, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCb_lmE1SJ0... but the American people are not going to have a fair election. The powers-that-shouldn't-be are going to commit electoral fraud. The polls will be rigged, and I'll be saying more about that in a future article. However before the scales are unbalanced in that more brazen and direct way, there's going to be a massive amount of the most ruthless and daring propaganda; and this will become more and more frenzied as the date of the election draws closer. This, I believe, will include the American equivalent of the Jo Cox murder. It might take the form of a Trump supporter, complete with a Pepe the frog T-shirt, Confederate flag tattoos and crew-cut hair, running into a school full of black children and shooting them all dead yelling "Trump for president!" over and over again as he is arrested and dragged away by the police. Alternatively a low-level politician might get assassinated by a similar character; probably the victim will be female and from an ethnic minority; some backwater state assemblywoman or senator. Then again, more extreme measures might be in order.

Recently Wikileaks has published a huge number of emails belonging to John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign manager; I discuss some of them here: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/ufo-disclosure-2016-wikileaks.html. One of the haul, which emerged after that video was made, includes a PDF of a highly confidential report of a survey carried out for the Clinton Foundation by the Benenson Strategy Group. This appears to be some kind of psychological think tank, a bit like the Tavistock Institute. Michael Salla thinks it's possibly a hoax, but if so then it's incredibly elaborate and done by somebody on the inside. A read-through of its mission statement reveals a lot: "The Benenson Strategy Group is a strategic research consultancy that marries language expertise with innovative research to frame choices so that your brand is the only answer. We advise global corporations, political leaders, and institutions in dynamic, competitive scenarios. We understand the rhythm and nuances of language and words. We give you the right words to use and much more. We map the competitive landscape so you know where to play and how to win. We give you the messaging framework and strategic roadmap so that everyone in your organization knows 'why' the messaging is powerful and how it will help you achieve the outcomes you want." No, that doesn't make any sense to me either. The most sinister organizations always have about-pages that are as meaningless as that. Anyway the report is entitled Salvage Problem and every page is footnoted with: "Do not distribute- Do not copy". It admits that the official polls published on TV and in the newspapers are inaccurate and are misleading the electorate; also that they are intended to do so as a mass psychological weapon. The true situation is that Trump is well ahead. More sinisterly, the document laments that so many people have become aware of the Democratic Party's vote-rigging operations that I'll discuss in the future article. Even the minority of voters who support Hillary do not admire her as an inspiring leader and are only doing so out of a distrust of Trump or sheer habit. The survey also indicates that the possibility of electoral fraud being carried out has broken through the glass ceiling of the alternative community and that the general public are aware of it. Over a quarter of people said that the election rules should be changed to take account of the risk. 22% even said that officials from Russia should monitor the process! On the next page comes the really creepy stuff; the document hints that the election itself should be interfered with to discourage the Trump-supporting demographic from voting at all. They asked the people they surveyed what would stop them going out and voting, and the answers were everything from long queues to a Biblical apocalypse. The most likely scenario that would keep them at home and away from the polling stations would be an attack by extraterrestrials at 38 %. Therefore the Benenson Strategy Group recommends a solution they call "FIRESIGN" which is something I've never heard before, but it looks similar to Project Bluebeam. It creates holographic images in the sky. It has been developed by NASA and the US Department of Defence and has apparently been tested "in the Levant" (Iraq) by displaying 3D religious icons on a layer of sodium vapour in the upper atmosphere and its imaging can cover hundreds, or even thousands, of square miles. The recommended use in this case is for a fake alien invasion to be staged in order to scupper the election and allow President Obama to "hand over the torch to Clinton, providing a basic continuity of state."; meaning a state of emergency... temporary of course. The article then discusses the aftermath of the fake invasion stating the need for "the psychological subjugation of areas where uprisings are most likely to occur. The induced trauma of FIRESIGN will provide ample cover to government and NGOs who will be 'providing aid' (psychotropic to induce docility) and counselling services which will ensure further domestication." I can guess what these "counselling services" involve. (Source: http://media.wix.com/ugd/0cf371_514bfe6a2dec4871ab7da7d50b9be410.pdf) In 2012 I believe there was a plan to stage a fake alien invasion during the London Olympics, either at the opening or closing ceremonies, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/programme-9-podcast-ian-r-crane.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/2012-london-olympic-stadium.html. This attack was aborted because too many people were expecting it. False flag terrorism has to come out of the blue and "shock and awe" the populous. I hope that by getting the word out about this new conspiracy I can help put a stop to it again.


Anonymous said...

Hi Ben

Check out what veteranstoday.com have to say about Trump, it may well change your line of thought about the guy. I'm not a Clinton fan nor a Trump hater, I am not even sure that Duff's work is accurate but with anything in the conspiracy sphere we take it all with a pinch of salt.

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

Will do, Anon.,