The issue of the burka has once again entered the news because a suspected Muslim terrorist has fled custody by disguising himself in a burka. Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed (now there's a sinister name for you!) was under a TPIM-Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measure in which he was allowed to walk freely under certain conditions, such as wearing an electronic tag, reporting his whereabouts every day and being accompanied by police minders. Mohammed managed to abscond from his TPIM by cutting off his tag and leaving the mosque dressed in a burka, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24799675. How he evaded CCTV in Acton,
after that has not been explained. This case actually sounds really funny to me;
it reminds me of Billy Wilder's classic comedy film Some Like it Hot, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbQqnJw7xL0.
Personally I doubt very much if Mohammed Evil al-Turban, or whatever his name
is, even exists. If the British Intelligence services can fake the murder of a
man on the streets of Woolwich, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/programme-52-podcast-nick-kollerstrom.html
then they can certainly fake a terrorist-on-the-loose scare. However, whether the story is true or false, the call
has gone out again for the burka to be banned as a result, and that this has
caused another upsurge of anti-Muslim and anti-immigration hysteria, for
example see: http://bnptv.org.uk/2013/11/bnp-say-ban-the-burqa-now/.
The burka, niqab, or burqa, is a long dress with full sleeves, a hood and veil that completely covers the body of the wearer except for their hands and eyes. It is traditionally worn by women in some Middle Eastern cultures and has become more popular in the
in recent years, mostly among recent immigrants. Contrary to popular belief,
it’s not a part of traditional Islam. It is not mentioned in the Holy Quran at
all and was not worn by any Muslims for the first thousand years after
Mohammed’s life. The anti-Muslim lobby should ask themselves how bellydance
could have emerged in a part of the world in which women were forced to wear
burkas since the 7th Century. The Quran talks about how God wants us all to
dress modestly, but this probably means just something like long trousers,
sleeves or skirts, not a whole body covering. What’s more this commandment
applies equally to both genders and there are no exceptional provisions for
women. The burka was actually invented in the 16th Century by the
Caliphs of Baghdad and was designed to shield the bodies of his family from the
envious and resentful eyes of their “social inferiors” on the city streets.
Therefore, far from being a stigma, a brand of submission and humiliation, the
burka is really a status-symbol of nobility. And also, believe it or not, it
was intended to be worn by both men and women! The Caliph and his sons wore it
as well as his wives and daughters. Therefore technically I could wear one if I
wanted to. Do you think it would suit me?
A recent poll claimed that 80% of British people would like to see the burka banned in public places, what's more they're already banned in
Women wearing burkas have reported being shouted at and sometimes even
assaulted on the streets in Britain;
news stories like the one above will no doubt contribute to these crimes. The
justification for the ban is not only one of security; it's also the notion that
the burka represents a form of imprisonment, like a shackle or pillory,
designed to oppress women and keep them in their “proper place” as inferiors to
men. In several countries ruled by Muslim theocracies, Saudi
Arabia for instance, women are forced by law
to wear them and can be publicly birched for flouting that law. I wonder
therefore why the UK
is so keen to assert women's rights here at home while treating Saudi
Arabia as an ally and business partner when abroad.
Most women outside Muslim theocracies wear the burka out of their own free
choice and they took to the streets to protest when the ban was introduced in France.
They didn’t take kindly to the government patronizing them; nor do I. Imposing
any kind of dress code or uniform on a public highway is a very serious matter
indeed, and I said this too during the attempt to restrict the wearing of
hoodies in 2005. It's the thin end of a very dangerous wedge, as I describe in
this HPANWO TV film, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/ben-silver-leggings.html.
The right to wear whatever you like on public streets is a fundamental human
right I think; I would even repeal the law against public nudity, although the
British climate tends to make any enforcement academic anyway. Is the
Government planning to make all us wear colour-coded uniforms like the people
in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World?
It wouldn't surprise me, but how would they manage to get public support for
such an agenda?... Clearly if it could be promoted as necessary for security or
protecting women's rights; Problem-Reaction-Solution. You might think that a
ban on just one particular kind of dress is a long way from Alphas in red-
Gammas in green etc, but the burka ban sets a legal precedent that could be
built upon by those who do want Brave New
World uniforms and that's worrying. It is important that we don't let
ourselves be fooled into forging our own shackles.