Some
regular HPANWO-readers will be aware that I've been on the receiving end of a
very intense troll campaign for about five years. Trolls are basically Internet
bullies who travel round cyberspace harassing and insulting other Net users. They
are some of the worst people imaginable; in my view they encapsulate the most
despicable and depraved mentalities in existence. I feel more contempt for them
than almost anybody else. They're not only sadists, they're cowards who could
never summon the gumption to confront anybody face-to-face; they just attack
from behind the impunity of a keyboard and monitor. My antagonists are an
infamous group of trolls calls "Team Droike"; who are still a regular
and recurring problem on the HPANWO Forum. At first I thought they were just
one person, they posted from a single user account; but then I noticed that
their spelling and grammar varied in accuracy for different posts. They also
seemed to be constantly online and I never had to wait more than an hour or two
for replies at any time of the day or night, as if they were working shifts. Of
course I'm a big, tough, ugly ex-Hospital Porter and so I'm not vulnerable in
any way; but there are others who have been hounded to depression and even suicide
by trolls. Team Droike are Skeptics and have obviously targeted me because I'm
a "Woo-woo"; some trolls are non-Skeptics who hunt for Skeptics to
abuse. I personally find both equally
abhorrent. But a disturbing new development has emerged that has come to my attention
via a friend of mine in Australia ,
Steve Trueblue, whom recently I interviewed on HPANWO Radio, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/programme-21-podcast-steve-trueblue.html
Skeptics have started trolling their own. The victim in this case is a lady
called Rebecca Watson, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nloor6dfwoY
Rebecca Watson is a Skeptic blogger and radio show host who founded and runs Skepchick, a website primarily for women who are Skeptics, see: http://skepchick.org/ It combines general Skepticism with associated feminist and women's interest issues. For example it has campaigned against misogyny in the Christian Right and witchcraft persecution in rural parts ofAfrica .
Like every prominent Internet personality, she received her fair share of
trolling, but one day these attacks suddenly escalated. Because of her
disbelief in the paranormal and related subjects she felt she had found a group
of like-minded comrades when she got involved with the Skeptic Movement. However
she soon discovered that some of the male Skeptics she worked with were capable
of even worse vicious behaviour than their non-Skeptic counterparts. During one
conference a man politely, but rather clumsily, attempted to seduce her and she
mentioned this incident on stage at the conference in a light-hearted way. The
response was that she was immediately inundated with violent tirades ranging
from spiteful jokes, sexist slurs and criticism of her looks and character, to
threats of violence, torture, rape, mutilation, and even murder. Photographs of
dismembered bodies were sent to her (and this makes me wonder if these are the same
Skeptic trolls who tormented Meryl Dorey, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEMPf_DRMg
) She managed to obtain information on the profiles of some of her abusers and
discovered that they were often adults active in the Atheo-Skeptic Movement.
That grand Maharishi of Atheo-Skeptics, Richard Dawkins, was not one of her
abusers, but he was extremely unsympathetic; in fact he wrote a sarcastic false
letter about it. To be honest I'd say that Rebecca Watson's failed-seduction
experience alone does not justify any complaint, but when it is combined with
the backdrop of her existing issues with male Skeptics I can understand why it
would upset her; and Dawkins' response is highly insensitive, especially if what Watson
says is true, that she had already told
him about the existing threats she was receiving, see: http://skepchick.org/2011/07/the-privilege-delusion/
Watson's ordeal intensified as this very highly organized trolling campaign took
shape. Other members of Skepchick were struck at too, frightening one so much she
left her home. Entire forums and blogs were set up by male Skeptics disparaging
female Skeptics. The Skeptopaths have shown their true colours.
Rebecca Watson is a Skeptic blogger and radio show host who founded and runs Skepchick, a website primarily for women who are Skeptics, see: http://skepchick.org/ It combines general Skepticism with associated feminist and women's interest issues. For example it has campaigned against misogyny in the Christian Right and witchcraft persecution in rural parts of
I'm not an advocate of feminism, in fact I'm a very harsh and vocal critic of it, but when I look at the conduct of some Conformist males I can sympathize with women who feel drawn into it. Watson is not a "man-hater"; in fact she got married to Sid Rodrigues, a male Skeptic who helps run London Skeptics in the Pub who has always been very welcoming to me, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/london-skeptics-in-pub-141111.html So one cannot generalize, but Steve thinks that the problem lies with the mentality of those attracted to the Skeptic Movement, something we talk more about in the radio interview linked above. Rebecca Watson has stood her ground in the Skeptisphere and continues to do her work. This is very courageous of her, but Steve thinks it's naive and foolhardy. As you can see in the linked video, Watson still believes that the Skeptic Movement is a good thing which has the power to change the world for the better. Steve thinks she's better off out of it, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jnp_Cmlwq3o Steve calls the Skeptic Movement a hate group comparable to the Ku Klux Klan. I think that's slightly too severe... just slightly. But I think it's certainly wise to treat the Skeptic Movement as an emergent hate group, because it has the symptoms of a proto-tyranny, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/richard-wiseman-skeptocrat.html Also see the list Steve quotes from the FBI here from 0.45: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEMPf_DRMg As for Rebecca Watson, I agree totally with Steve's advice; get the hell out, Rebecca! She should get out and do her own thing beyond the umbrella of the Skeptisphere completely. She doesn't have to change any of her opinions or change anything else about herself; all she has to do is reject the institution that has created the "head-kicking" culture as Steve calls it. Team Droike are Skeptics, just like James Randi and Richard Dawkins are Skeptics, and Team Droike have decided to attack me. I wonder if Team Droike are among those who have decided to brutalize Rebecca. It's different for me, being a big 'ard feller, but for a young woman like Rebecca Watson it's far worse. I must say that if a pro-conspiracy/paranormal organization treated me like the Skeptics have treated her, you wouldn't see me for dust!
4 comments:
Lovely article, Ben. It needs to be said. Needs to be proclaimed. Its a step toward preventing innocents from mistakenly stepping into the den of vipers.
Very true, Steve. With our words of warning innocent newcomers will hopefully be on their guard. Hope Rebecca escapes from these scumbags one day. Thanks for letting me know about all this. :-)
I'm not sure I understand. You say a team of trolls have targeted your forum, but they all post from a single account?
What exactly would be the point of that? Surely if there were a team of them, it would make far more sense on their part, and be more productive to their purpose, to register several accounts in order to cause as much disruption as possible? Is that not the entire purpose of trolling?
ben jones, ex useless incompetant hospital skivvy, a paranoid hypocrite, professional programmed woo-woo, a false personality with a history of being one of the biggest idiots on the planet.
Post a Comment