Conspiracy Theorist Conversion Therapy

 

I have undergone a course of conspiracy theorists' deprogramming. Now, before anybody starts worrying, I'm not about to hang up my tin foil hat; I was simply curious what it would be like. I also like to test my own beliefs against dissent. The course is not an A Clockwork Orange eyelid holding torture session; it is actually just a six-part series of videos by a YouTuber called "Skeptic of the North", probably because he comes from Northern Ireland.
Here is where to watch the course... if you dare!
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iugn-2qw3mU.
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U3quU1ODKk.
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moOOM-n6dgA.
Part 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpn-pegFKUY.
Part 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5zEgIzZI-Y.
Part 6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op4uVTooDYk.
 
There is actually very little factual information in this series that I'm not already familiar with because it has been circling the skeptisphere for a number of years; the studies on JFK and 9/11 etc. However, the presentation is far better than what you get from an average skepper. This could be because the YouTuber is a former conspiracy theorist. He knows how we think and so how to try and persuade us. Despite this, he does fall short on an evidential basis and he has not convinced me at all. The part which I think was the most penetrating was the segment where he asks: "How do you know what you know?" This is a valid question. How do I know I'm not caught in what Stephen Law calls an intellectual black hole, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvkbiElAOqU? Really, I can't prove I'm not, but I doubt it simply because I have always made such an effort to examine the skeptic side of every story. On his channel there is also an interview with another ex-conspiracy theorist, Brent Lee. This is somebody I remember from the original David Icke forum. He was radicalized soon after 9/11, but in the 20-teens began to have doubts. In the last couple of years he has rejected all his previous views, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D3dBrkuf8E. Will I one day follow in his footsteps? I have to admit that I cannot rule it out. I might indeed possibly one day become a skeptic. However, I think with me it's unlikely because I know the skeptic worldview; I'm familiar with their arguments. In the interview at one point Brent says: "When I was a conspiracy theorist I hated the debunkers!" Ironically, and paradoxically from a superficial perspective, it is the biggest zealot who is least tolerant of those who disagree who is by far the most likely to cross the aisle and join them. This point was made by Richard Seymour in his biography of Christopher Hitchens, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS1AKW0Tt5o. Seymour thinks this is because they so easily feel betrayed. I feel no hostility to skeptics, even those who are former woo-woos like me; except those I've spoken of before who are rude and antisocial towards me. At one point Skeptic of the North asks another very well thought out question: Why do we conspiracists feel such distrust for mainstream experts and yet champion every word alternative experts say as gospel truth? Are alternative experts not capable of lying? He shows a series of pie charts illustrating the proportion of climate scientists and architects and engineers who believe the official stories of climate change and 9/11 compared to those who don't. It is true that the mainstream side vastly outnumbers us. But is this really just a simple election? I had to think for a while how to answer this point and I still am mulling it over. I'm well aware that human beings are very varied and people of all kinds have weaknesses and vices. However, I must say that there is something inherently and especially dishonest about Illuminati occupied institutions; or to be more precise, the way people behave when they are under the influence of those institutions. I have the perfect example, my own discharge from the NHS. Not one single person within the management system deviated in the tiniest way from the objective of removing me, even though all of them must have known that the case against me was a false one and that they valued me as a porter, see: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2022/01/ten-years-on.html. Naturally there are liars, charlatans and fools inside the conspirasphere and I have been targeted by them myself, for example see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/03/fake-defamation.html. However, at no time during these troll drama outrages was there the unity of purpose that you see in the mainstream world, the robotic mindlessness, the conformist copycat behaviour. Skeptic of the North started out from a similar position to myself, like Brent Lee did; but for whatever reason, he has moved on to a very different place and now sees the world in another way. I think he's made a mistake, but I bear him no ill will for it. We do not choose our beliefs. I wish him all the best for the future, wherever it takes him.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/08/skeptics-portal.html.

Andrew Bridgen Fired

Andrew Bridgen MP has been expelled from the Conservative Party. He had had the whip removed in January so was out of the parliamentary party anyway, but now is out of the whole party. The news was meant to be kept private for a while, but the party have leaked it. This came just a few weeks after the entire House of Commons walked out while Bridgen was speaking. What is very creepy indeed is that the Opposition does so too, but only after somebody on the government front bench (is it BoJo) walked over and tells them to, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvSHD_n3Lyg. This expulsion news comes just after Bridgen spoke out again on a select committee about the WHO, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh30cThhVm0. His "crime"? Spreading C**** 19 "misinformation and conspiracy theories"... Based! I'm pleased to say he is unrepentant. He said: "If it saves one child's life it is worth it." He is, of course, still an elected member of the Commons and is sitting as an independent and plans to stand again, and I hope in the next election his constituents stick by him and return him to Parliament. Readers will guess that I totally support Mr Bridgen and he has my deepest respect. I wish all politicians were like him. Sadly, only a few are. The establishment are desperately suppressing anybody who speaks out against the official narrative of the V-word being "Safe and effective!" Here's another example, Russell Brand was on Real Time with Bill Maher and starts talking honestly; see how the Maher responds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WheAaqMBUM4. I have no doubt Andrew Bridgen's defiance will continue and he has won the loyalty of a new community. In fact he is appeared on Project Camelot with Kerry Cassidy, see: https://odysee.com/@FwapUK:1/Full-Andrew-Bridgen-Interview:6.
See here for background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/02/coronavirus-portal.html.

Whose Street? MY Street!

 

I had a bit of a disagreeable experience at work today. I was walking a dog, one who belongs to a man who is very old and disabled. This dog likes to walk a particular route and a part of it is along a cul-de-sac. We walk up it and then back down it, which is of course all you can do in a cul-de-sac. We have done this numerous times over the past couple of years. Today a white van pulled over beside us, the driver stuck his head out and he said: "Oi, stop letting your dog piss in my garden!" I said: "I never have." He said: "Yes you have! You let your dog piss on my hedge! You do it every day!" Dogs have a habit of stopping every so often to deposit a few drops of urine at various locations, usually on a spot above the ground. This is to leave a scent trail. It's an instinct left over from pre-domestication. The patches of urine function as a pathway through woods or fields where there are no landmarks. It can also come from a desire to mark a location as their territory. When walking dogs I am always very careful not to let them urine mark in anybody's property. I again denied that I had done it this time. The man pointed to a hedge which was badly overgrown. It jutted out a good ten inches to a foot from the wall at the front of his home. I replied: "That's not your garden, it's a public highway." He answered in a raised voice: "It's my fuckin' hedge, you fuckin' idiot!" I shouted: "Don't swear at me! And it's not your property beyond your wall; it's a public highway!" He drove off, screeching his tyres. The "white van man" is a bit of a cliche. It means an independent skilled tradesman like a builder, electrician or plumber, usually self-employed, who has a tendency to be arrogant and a road hog. They drive in unmarked medium-sized windowless white vans. I think he hurled abuse at me because he knew I had just proven him wrong; which is what most people do in that situation. I think he simply objected to me walking the dog up and down his road, which is a cul-de-sac and so is normally only used for access. However there is no law preventing anybody walking up and down a cul-de-sac if they choose, so long as they do not stray onto any of the private gardens. That man regards the road as the residents' private property even though it isn't, just because it's a cul-de-sac. If the government passed a law restricting a citizen's freedom on the public highways, he would probably support it. This is the most common method for introducing state authoritarianism; present it to the people in wrapping paper that appeals to their petty irrational whims.
 
On the whole, today has been a major New World Order day. After work I went grocery shopping at a local supermarket. This supermarket has the usual auto-tills, which are all card only; when the old ones used to have slots for putting in cash. There are some human tills next to them, two card only and two cash or card; but none of them were manned. I put my shopping on one of them and waited; nothing happened. I then went over to one of the staff, a tall African youth, and told him: "Could somebody come and serve me at this till please? I need to pay with cash." He looked at me nonplussed, as if he didn't understand me; and then he turned away and began talking to his colleague in their own vernacular. I shrugged and returned to where I'd left my shopping, but after one more minute of being ignored I said: "To hell with this!" and walked out of the store, leaving my basket of shopping where I'd left it. I've also noticed that margarine now has the words "plant based" on all the packets. Why? Isn't that obvious? Everybody knows marge is made from plants. Welcome to the proposed future, right in the heart of the fifteen minute paradise of Oxford! You vil drive ze white van und pay with ze card und you vil be happy.

The Fall of Diane Abbott

 

Gather round, dear readers, and hear the news! They say karma is a bitch, but sometimes she's a darling. It looks like she is about to deliver some thoroughly deserved comeuppance to the most obnoxious person in British politics. Diane Abbott was elected to the House of Commons in 1987 and was the "First! Black! Woman!" MP, and she has never let anybody forget it. Every time she is interviewed she simply has to say: "I'm a black woman!", as if we're all blind amnesiacs! Did you know Diane Abbott was not a skinny bearded Chinese man? Yup, it surprised me too. Actually, she has not done an interview for a long time. Corbyn and Starmer wouldn't let her because every time she opens her mouth she costs Labour a hundred thousand votes. Unfortunately she is not somebody you can just sack; partly for the obvious reason, but also because she has a lot of dirt on many of her colleagues, including Jeremy Corbyn whom she had an affair with in the early 80's. (I'd have credited him with better taste.) Despite the fact she is grossly unqualified, Abbott has achieved the high offices of Shadow Health Secretary, Home Secretary, Public Health Minister and International Development Secretary. The last one worries me the most; at least before, her incompetence and narcissism was limited to one country. Anyway, she has finally got herself into enough trouble that it might ruin her. I actually think much of the shadow cabinet have been longing for an opportunity to get rid of her, but this was previously impossible because she used to save her abuse solely for white people; and, as you know, blonde blue-eyed Finnish nurses are fair game. Not any more. She recently wrote a letter about racism... yes, another one... in which she stated that Jews do not experience racism as much as black people. She immediately had the whip removed and now faces a party board of inquiry. A few pundits have suggested the sixty-nine year old should retire. Believe me, millions of people across the land have been begging her to do so for years. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65365978.
 
The irony is so sweet it is almost unbearable. Diane Abbott has made racism the cornerstone of a very long and lucrative career. She has suckled and gorged on it for her whole adult life; and now it has suddenly turned sour on her own lips. Of course, I know why she did it; the Victimhood Olympics. She is used to getting the biggest slice of that lovely cheesecake every single day and resents some upstart Red Sea pedestrian pushing in front of her and snatching it from her plate. This was bound to happen eventually. Abbott has all the social awareness and self-discipline of a hermit princess. She just blurts out whatever she is thinking, or trying to think. She has withdrawn the comment and apologized, but that will not be enough. Keir Starmer and has condemned her, as have all the senior figures in the Jewish community. I don't know if this will be the complete end for her career, but we can live in hope. She may be able to survive as an independent back-bench MP. Personally, I'd like her to remain in politics just long enough to see Kemi Badenoch become prime minister, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/07/kemi-for-pm.html. After that she can live out her retirement reflecting on her failures for which she only has herself to blame.
See here for more information: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/08/political-correctness-portal.html.

St George's Day Alert

 

Tomorrow, Sunday the 23rd of April, an alarm will ring on every mobile phone in Britain, except for very old ones. This is supposedly not a big deal. It is just a test for Emergency Alerts, a new nationwide citizens' warning system that is designed to go off whenever danger threatens your area, such as a flood, toxic gas leak or anything similar. A loud siren sound will emerge from your phone and a text box will open with these words: "This is a test of Emergency Alerts, a new UK government service that will warn you if there's a life-threatening emergency nearby. In a real emergency, follow the instructions in the alert to keep yourself and others safe. Visit gov.uk/alerts for more information. This is a test. You do not need to take any action." They also reassure us that such alerts are already in use in most countries and they're nothing to worry about. The alarm will ring for about ten seconds then will end. You can acknowledge the alert before then. Source: https://www.gov.uk/alerts. There is a lot of concern in conspiraspherical circles about what this all means. Some people are concerned that the alarm will contain subliminal messages. Some worry that it will include a signal that will activate something inside people's bodies, deposited there by the recent medical treatment most people have been given. Personally, I've seen no reason to think that is true, although I can't rule it out. Let us not forget the nightmare recently suffered by the people of Hawaii, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/01/was-hawaiian-missile-alert-real.html and: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/01/hawaiian-missile-alert-livestream.html. However, as Niall Murphy recently said in a video, don't live in fear, see: https://odysee.com/@MrOpaquelens:c/don't-live-in-fear:3. My objection to this alert is that I consider it an invasion of my privacy, a hijacking of my personal communication system without my permission. The good news is you can disable Emergency Alerts even though it doesn't involve any installed app. Check your settings and you'll see emergency alerts; turn off severe alerts and extreme alerts. If you don't do this, I suspect turning off your phone will make no difference. As with Vault 7, they can switch your phone on secretly and remotely, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/03/vault-7.html. To be sure, you could always drain the battery beforehand.
 
Tomorrow when the alert happens is of course St George's Day. The legend of St George is that he killed a dragon. I wonder if there is something symbolic in that. St George, a human, killed a reptilian; is this the reptilians getting their revenge on humanity? Lisa of the Cry Freedom Show does a good analysis in this HPANWO Radio programme, starting forty-three minutes in: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2023/04/hpanwo-show-504-podcast-dave-hodrien.html. As I say, I'm not deeply concerned by the Emergency Alerts test, but my general suspicion of the government leads me to distrust their motives for the test, whatever they claim they are. I will be taking steps to exclude myself.
See here for more background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/02/coronavirus-portal.html.

Calvine Photographer Doxed

 

See here for essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/10/calvine-clowns-day-off.html.
Hotel kitchens are a bit infamous in the conspirasphere, thanks to whoever really killed Robert F Kennedy Sr, and their reputation appears well deserved considering the latest developments in the strange case of the Calvine UFO photograph. A good detective always looks on the back of every photo and in this case Craig Lindsay's print has on its reverse the words: Copyright Kevin Russell c/o Daily Record. Glasgow. Therefore it is almost certain this is the name of the enigmatic Cameraèd One. The good news is we know where he worked, the Pitlochry Hotel, what his job was, a chef, and when, 1990. The bad news is that Kevin Russell is a common name and there are over two hundred people called that currently alive in the UK today, let alone other countries. However, Dr David "Marlowe" Clarke has donned his trilby and raincoat and is on the case. He says "I think we are as close as it is possible for anyone to be." Clarke cites an unnamed contact who claims to be a former UK defence intelligence officer; I suspect the same one my own contact revealed to me at the conference I mentioned before. He told Clarke that the mysterious object was a "target designation companion" for the F117 Nighthawk stealth bomber, although he didn't give any further details about what that means. There are no images for target designation companions that resemble what we see in that photo. He said it was a "one-in-a-million chance" that Kevin Russell and his companion were at that location and time to witness the passage of the object and it caused a "stink" in Washington. The object was deployed from RAF Machrihanish which, as I've explained before, is in Argyll, a long way from where the sighting took place. Machrihanish is believed to have been used in the 1990's to test the secret American spyplane, Aurora. The officer also said the Belgian UFO flap that the same year was connected to the Calvine sighting. Clarke has found a connection in the Condign report which is where the term "UAP" comes from. He is convinced that the object in the photograph represents some kind of secret American aviation technology and indeed patents have been filed for projects with a distinct resemblence. Source: https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/secret-behind-best-ever-ufo-sighting-revealed/news-story/105a08c1a7caf70f6f41c477a563fd3a. However, this outcome would be dependent on part of Kevin Russell's testimony being untrue, the bit about the object ascending vertically and silently; aeroplanes just can't do that, no matter how sophisticated. Clarke casually dismisses this element as a "second hand anecdote", but I don't think that is reason to reject it as worthless, and it is only second hand for as long as the originator remains mute. If you, reading this, are the Kevin Russell in question, then could you please contact me? Any information you give me will be held in the strictest of confidence until you decide otherwise. Dr Clarke has totally ruled out a possibility that I still consider quite likely, that the object is in fact an artefact of non-human construction. He is unclear about his reasons for this, but he is known to be a skeptic and also it's connected to what my friend at the conference showed me. I'll write another update as soon as more information is available. I've a feeling it will be soon.
See here for more background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.

RDH vs the BBC Update

 

See here for essential background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-bbc-on-rdh.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/11/rdh-panorama-livestream.html.
Marianna Spring, the self-styled "online conspiracy agony aunt", has just published some updates about her spiteful campaign against Richard D Hall. Her new article has been published on the BBC website and is filled with the usual manipulative rhetoric. It includes a police mug-shot like image of Richard's face and talks about the progress being made against Richard for alleged defamation and harassment. Obviously I assert that he is innocent of both, but the BBC's audience will, as usual, not be provided with a fair hearing. She has also released a follow-on episode in her Disaster Trolls series on Radio 4. Sources: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65201949.amp and: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001jmsl. The article directly distorts a quote by Neil Sanders from the earlier episodes and the Panorama TV show: "Hall had admitted to him several years ago that he didn't believe theories about staged attacks, saying 'this is all nonsense'." No, Neil said that this had been Richard's initial belief years before the Manchester incident when he was focusing exclusively on UFO's. If Neil does not regret his decision to be on the BBC after this, then he never will. There is a sinister addition to the motley crew assisting Spring, Andy Burham; who is the mayor of Manchester, former cabinet minister and candidate for Labour leader. He is calling for specific changes to the law as a result of this BBC project. He waters it down with platitudes about "the need to balance free speech..." etc, but it is obvious that his proposal is begging to be abused, and that is intentional. The objective is to make it legally impossible for us to disagree publicly with the official narrative about anything. However, as I said yesterday, this is just a symptom of their desperation, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/04/elon-vs-beeb.html. At the same time there has been some drama on the unofficial Richplanet Facebook group because somebody was spreading a rumour that Richard has been arrested. Andrew Johnson has countered with a video which makes it clear that is not the case. What's more, according to Andrew's legal source, Martin Hibbert has not yet filed his case against Richard. This does not mean he does not intend to, but that the BBC are once again being dishonest to say that the lawsuit is already underway and Richard has been "served papers!" I wonder what move the deceivers will make next... those who are not standing next to the Twitter censors in the dole queue that is. Source:  https://odysee.com/@checktheevidence:0/Rumours-about-Richard-D-Hall:0.
See here for more information: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-bbc-and-mind-control.html.

And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/07/rdh-lawsuit-mini-portal.html.