US President Donald Trump has had one of his Tweets flagged
by Twitter's fact-checker. Trump is the first US
president to make full use of modern social media; indeed many claim, probably
correctly, that it was a major factor in his successful election. Twitter is
his chosen favourite platform and his account has become very widely followed.
This has caused the managers of Twitter a terrible dilemma. He is one of their
most famous users and they've given him their stamp of approval in the form of
the "blue checkmark"; this gives them a lot of prestige. However,
Twitter's prevailing political stance is very leftwing, about the same general position
as The Guardian. This inevitably
means they clash violently with Trump's populist conservatism. All mainstream
social media platforms commit acts of censorship against users on the political
right or those, like me, who express views, as YouTube puts it, "running contrary
to the scientific consensus". Twitter has definitely the worst record when
it comes to deletions, shadowbannings and exclusions. If Trump were not the US
president then he would have been history long ago. As it is Twitter have been
tolerating him with firmly gritted teeth. Despite this, Trump does not have
immunity. When he double-Tweeted the following: "There is no way (ZERO!) that mail-in ballots will be anything
less than substantially fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed; ballots will be
forged and even illegally printed out and fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending ballots to millions of people,
anyone... living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there,
will get one. That will be followed up with professionals telling all of these
people, many of whom have never even thought of voting before, how and for whom
to vote. This will be a rigged election. No way!" He was referring to
the upcoming US Presidential Election in November which some people have
suggested should be by postal ballot only because of the lingering threat of
COVID 19. This Tweet was swiftly struck with a fact-checker tag. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52815552.
The flag takes you to a page that gives media reports contradicting his statement.
I've noticed this is happening to many of my own social media
posts, especially HPANWO TV videos. On YouTube the fact-checking function embeds
pages from Wikipedia in the description boxes. The coronavirus and Area 51 are
the most commonly flagged topics, probably because of their high profile in the
news over the past year, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/04/coronavirus-on-st-helena.html
and: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/09/storm-area-51-state-of-emergency.html.
I don't object in principle to some kind of application that pops up material
that is critical towards the internet posts of an opinion. This is what the
R-but-R plug-in does. It was devised by the skeptics to give anybody looking at
a UFO/paranormal/conspiracy theory page an automatic one-click path to the
alternative skeptical view, see: http://rbutr.com.
I'm all in favour of free speech for those who disagree with me as much as I am
for those who don't. The only things I oppose are any algorithm that reduces
the visibility of information under dispute; and what it's called. The very name
"fact-checker" implies intellectual supremacy over what it is checking.
What it is really doing is merely delivering the user easy access to an
alternative opinion that may or may not be a fact. What is or is not a fact
cannot be decided by giving something a name with the word "fact" in
it. If that were the case then I could say, in the best of Orwellian tradition:
"two plus two equals five and that's a fact";
and thenceforth all across the universe two plus two would cease to equal four.
No, facts are decided by logical analysis, research and honest discussion; not
by some social media corporation proclaiming that something they say is true
because they say it. As it happens, I believe Twitter is wrong about Trump's
Tweet. Election rigging is actually very common in the western world, including
the USA and
postal voting really does make such corruption far easier, see: https://www.projectveritas.com. The
election in November will be a desperate time for what Niall Murphy calls "the
powers-that-were". They will not want to repeat the same mistake again.
This time round, their Hillary Clinton 2.0 is a sleazy and brainless old man
called Joe Biden. Biden is completely unelectable and in a fair ballot Trump
will thrash him hands down. Therefore the state is taking steps to stop this
election being a fair ballot. Well done, Mr President! Hopefully you've
derailed their subversion of democracy.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/05/ive-been-zucked.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment