Tuesday 1 November 2016

US Presidential Election- One Week to Go

A lot has been happening since I last reported on the US presidential election 2016, see background links at the bottom. The latest news has made me reassess the entire situation. When I was a child at school a teacher told us about a country, I think it was in South America, that had been ruled by an oppressive military junta for a long time and then bowed to international pressure and announced that it was going to become a democracy. It held free elections for the first time, yet when the voters got to the polling booths there was only one name on the ballot slip, that of the dictatorial ruler. Sounds like a nightmare? Unfortunately it's real and not the only example for such a fraud; in fact an election is due to take place in just seven days that may well be exactly the same, only far more covert. It's not taking place in South America, but in North America, and the nation going to the polls is the United States of America. I've covered the process of the 2016 US Presidential Election in the background links below, and I must confess it has not worked out as I thought it would. I assumed Donald Trump would go the same way as Bernie Sanders and be manoeuvred out, using various tricks, to make room for a controlled opposition to Hillary Clinton. This hasn't happened... not yet at any rate, and time is running out. My thoughts on this election have put me at odds with much of the rest of the conspirasphere. The prevailing view among the conspiratorial media is that the current US presidential election is no different to any other, in that we see two establishment puppets being put up against each other in a charade so we can vote for one or the other. I don't think that's the case this time. There was certainly an agenda to propose two controlled clones, but this failed. In the background links I explain why I think Trump is simply not meant to be where he is. At the most fundamental level he is not controlled by the powers-that-be. For this to happen in any Illuminati-occupied nation is unusual, but for it to happen in what is still the primary centre of operations for globalist world control is unthinkable. No matter what happens within the next week, there is no doubt something has truly messed up badly in their plans. That can only be good news for us.

I've never seen such a vast chasm between how the mainstream media is covering this election run-up and what is actually happening in people's everyday lives. In terms of energy, activity, public proselytizing through bumper stickers and window signs etc, Trump is clearly way ahead. During the recent vice-presidential tours Mike Pence, Donald Trump's prospective vice-president, spoke to a crowd of two thousand five hundred; many more were waiting outside when the venue was at full capacity. Hillary Clinton's running-mate Tim Kaine cancelled his Florida rally when only thirty-six people turned up... That's a poor turnout for my own zombie lecture! He couldn't let the press reveal that the local electorate were so unenthusiastic, but of course social media these days is substituting the press, see: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/10/28/tim-kaine-cant-draw-crowd-cancels-florida-rally-meanwhile-mike-pence-reportedly-packing-house-405569. Yet whatever happens, the mainstream media polling service reports that Hillary has a narrow but decisive lead over her rival. They have said this continuously ever since the two nominees were selected. I've noticed that all major elections in the last few years have been almost always declared 50-50 by the pollsters. Brexit was, as was the last UK general election, the Scottish independence referendum, the previous few presidential ones and some in Austria and other countries. Why is this? Perhaps because it makes it appear more credible if an unpopular outcome suddenly emerges. Imagine if the polls had said 70% of Scots had wanted a YES vote and it still came back NO? There would be a lot of suspicion. I took seriously the possibility of electoral fraud during the UK's EU referendum, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/vote-leave-2-count.html. In Britain the electorate still votes by marking a slip of paper and these slips are counted by hand. Despite this, fraud is still possible. One of the reasons I went to Oxford town hall that night was to see if any "last minute extra ballot boxes" were being dropped off. American federal elections have been modernized. They are now paperless and voters make their choice by pressing buttons on an electronic voting machine. These machines are made by various companies and are designed to be compatible with each other on a national network. The problem with electronic voting is that it is less secure and fraud is far easier. Even Hillary Clinton herself has admitted that the voting machines can be hacked and is worried the Russians might do that to get Trump in, but I think any electronic skulduggery is far more likely to benefit her than her rival. The UK-based company Systematic has designed and built some machines for the American election and they're planned to be used in a number of states that are called "battlegrounds" because there are equal numbers of supporters for both candidates and so their elector could go either way. Systematic's CEO is Mark Malloch-Brown, a former Labour government minister and also holder of senior positions at the World Bank and Commonwealth Office. He was appointed Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations in 2006 and sits on the board of George Soros' Open Society Foundation. George Soros is a long-time political manipulator and a close friend and supporter of Hillary Clinton. He has funded a lot of her campaign. I am not alone in being suspicious of this conflict of interests. There is even a petition to stop Systematic voting machines being used, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3IsUu4gjTI. Several independent programmers have written malware to show that fiddling the ballot by sabotaging the voting machines is not only possible; it's easy.

The Wikileaks emails and the hacker "Guccifer 2.0"also revealed that there was a subversive plot to remove Bernie Sanders from the race, which makes it even more galling that the old fool then went on to endorse Hillary, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/bernie-sanders-turncoat.html. Since then an independent journalist called James O'Keefe has gained even more revelations that the election next week will not be free or fair. He has launched his "Project Veritas Action" to try and raise the public's awareness to the danger. He secretly filmed private conversations with Hillary Clinton campaign contractor officials where they admit that they rig ballots by allowing registered Democratic Party supporters to vote twice and even by stealing the identities of dead people. They organize rented vehicles for these many-time voters to move them from one polling station to another in case anybody recognizes them. They also pay the homeless and psychiatric patients to stir up violent trouble at Trump rallies, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptg19PmIbIk and: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEE8w-v6Gg4j3ze3oX-urEw/feed. Based on all this evidence, this is the only option for those who insist on Hillary Clinton being the new president. They can't win fairly, so they're going to cheat. This makes an even bigger joke out of democracy than it already is anyway. If the American public tolerate this they have to tolerate the fact that USA is a one-party state; and their country is no freer than the junta I learned about at school.

The Wikileaks scandal, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/ufo-disclosure-2016-wikileaks.html, and recent announcement by the FBI that they're continuing their investigation into Hillary Clinton has been another blow to her campaign. Its timing and severity makes it likely that it will be a complete knockout. We don't know the full extent of the FBI's suspicions, but based on the Wikileaks data it may be as severe as a scandal connected to her personal aide Anthony Weiner. Weiner (which is the American name for a Vienna Wurst sausage) and his wife Huma Abedin are close personal friends of the Clintons. Bill Clinton was even best man at their wedding. Weiner is alleged to have been "sexting" (sending erotic mobile phone texts) to an underage girl. There are also clauses in the Wikileaks emails that say in as many words that the Islamic State is being bankrolled by the United States via their clients in Saudi Arabia. An ideal situation would be that this mess-up will be so bad that the establishment candidate fails to get elected. If you'd asked me a month ago I'd have told you it would be impossible. Now I'm not so sure. We have to consider seriously the possibility that Donald Trump might become the forty-fifth President of the United States. Even if he doesn't, Hillary's victory will be so anticlimactic and controversial that her grip on the Oval Office will be feeble and unsustainable. This is an even bigger blow than Brexit and the manipulators are going to pull out all the stops to get Hillary over the finish line. There are far fewer options open to them now then there were in the primaries. If Trump were to have a heart attack or plane crash now, who would believe it? They've already tried various smear campaigns against him that didn't work; if anything they only added to his popularity. One thing they could do is stage some horrific public spectacle and link it to Trump supporters. I've addressed this before, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/the-american-jo-cox.html. In that link I also suggest that the election could be delayed, or even cancelled, by some national emergency; in my view this is another likely outcome. This radio show by former CIA operative Susan Lindauer is essential listening on this subject: http://truthfrequencyradio.com/the-covert-report-with-susan-lindauer-68429/. They could allow the election to go ahead using that straight forward electoral fraud I talked about. However, thanks to O'Keefe and others, this is becoming such a widespread public notion that would even that work? Donald Trump is not an anti-New World Order activist. I'm not saying he's a "good guy" or "on our side". If anything, the best I can say about him is that he's a rather blinkered American nationalist. However it doesn't matter what he stands for of what kind of leader he is. All the matters is that we will have a non-establishment leader of the world's principle Illuminati front. That cannot happen when all is well at the mill. This means I have to raise a question I never dared to dream of before... Is this springtime in Narnia? Not quite the end of the New World Order, but perhaps the beginning of the end? It's far too soon to know. By next week we might have a better idea. Then again we might have to wait a while longer. I'll be writing again about this in the future. Also I discuss more details in this HPANWO Radio show: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/programme-210-us-presidential-election.html.


Laurence said...

Excellent political piece Ben (one of your literary strengths, it is fair to say). If this is indeed, "springtime in Narnia?" then you should, if I may say, get a medal during one of the darkest chapters in the history of human dignity, a dignity that has been systematically degraded by the NWO. I hope you are correct in your assessment of the US election.

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

Thanks, Laurence. Much appreciated :-) I hope so too. Glad you understood my reference to the book The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by CS Lewis. It is surprisingly complex and emotionally tumultuous for a children's story.

Laurence said...

Well done Ben. Your assessment was correct: the NWO is falling, it is Springtime in Narnia, decency being restored. In their arrogance, they underestimated the dignity of humanity and they are going the way of all dictatorships. Well done Sir. Well done.