As I discovered a month ago, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/05/is-project-blue-book-ending.html,
moves are afoot to produce season three of Project
Blue Book. This groundbreaking and fascinating UFO-themed historical drama
is far too good to fail, especially now when season two ended on such a
nail-biting moment of suspense. The reason History axed the show is apparently
not because they didn't like it or that it was unsuccessful; no, it was the
exact opposite. Each episode averaged two and a half million viewers in the United
States UK UK
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/04/project-blue-book-season-two-livestream.html.
4 comments:
Thank you so much for writing about it. I hope we can save the series.
You're welcome, ST. Fingers crossed.
Hi, did you watch Richard D Hall's recent upload of his Virtual Show where he talked about Peter Hyatt's statement analysis on Bob Lazar?. It appears that Lazar was making up his story all along. Richard believes that Lazar did work for Navel intelligence, but his story about being at the base and witnessing the saucer shaped disc was a concocted story put out there to discredit the idea of aliens being at the base, and that Lazar was hired to participate in the story. Pretty damning stuff for many in the Area 51 research field. Equally damning is Richard's beliefs (which I agree with) that the Rendlesham UFO incident was a fabricated story in order to cover up the illegal movement of a nuclear device that personnel on the base where trying to move to the adjacent base at night.
Hi Anon. Thanks for the interesting comment. I've not seen that show yet, but I appreciate you reminding me to watch it. I can't answer completely until I watch the programme, naturrally, but I do think Richard is focusing too much on statement analysis lately. Sure, Hyatt and his colleagues contribute a lot, but they should not do so as a substitute for other kinds of evidence. The notion that UFO's involve some kind of neo-mythology about ET's in order to launder more down-to-earth is not very original and it is in fact somewhat fashionable at the moment. It is actually not very plausible when you consider how easily and badly it could backfire. Drawing somebody's attention towards something with the ultimate objective of deflecting it away is a very risky gambit, so much so that we can reject it on theoretical grounds. But, as I say, I've not seen Richard's input and maybe he HAS come up with something new. I cover Richard's position on Rendlesham here: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/richplanet-on-rendlesham.html
Post a Comment