I have been
interviewed on the EOTT- Everything On The Table programme with Jimmy James,
see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3Zzm-yYmS8.
Subjects discussed include: Mind control, UFO news, altered
states of consciousness and much much more. See here for Jimmy's channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiJl-pyX79sFdTN9hRPwvlQ.
6 comments:
Hey Ben, back to origins of Q, this is more than breadcrumbs, this is half the loaf, look at the dates of the docs, months before Q came out: https://youtu.be/kgyJn7GUyms?t=2738
Goodness me! There are more QAnon origin stories than versions of the bible. Either some of them are false or all of them are false. I wonder what Bernard Grover makes of it LOL
Well, I thought it was pertinent to the previous conversation. Defango showing more evidence, how the back story developed, he now realises how he was primed to bring it all up originally, by the same CICADA 3301 crowd into monitization.
But if you're not interested and you'd rather nut it off than look at the evidence, fine. peace out.
That's got to be the quickest jump into ICSTTDBYC poser mode that I've come across! Usually it takes three or more attempts at a presenting a RATIONAL case before people do that. Now don't be a hypocrite! You LIKE the fact that people believe in Q because it makes you feel superior. Remember that, you NEED me! If I changed my mind, you would be pissed off because that would be one less person in the world to give your life meaning. Peace out! (Are you Styxhexxenhammer?)
nice bit of projection there Ben LOL (as in projecting who you think I am onto me), your first reply seemed the equivilant of saying 'LOL I wonder what Nick Pope would say' if the subject had been about UFO's and you'd disagreed with the evidence without looking at it. You never seemed to follow up on the last Q 'breadcrumbs' stuff I brought up, it looked like you'd made a decision on it from the first link without due consideration of the rest, not sure if you even looked at the rest of the links or did any research in that direction, which makes it look like you're not interested in anything contradicting the version of truth you prefer.
I was the chap who brought up the Defango stuff on a previous Q post, I've also commented on some Brexit stuff specifically commenting on Neil Sanders stuff (which you also seemed to neglected to follow up on). I remember commenting on those wierd celler swimming pool noises that I figured were coming from the local swimming pool via drains or something. I've also commented on a few Judy Woods/911 posts now and again. I don't recall commenting on anything else tho I may have forgot something. I've only been following your stuff since you highlighted a wierd UFO type meeting with .mil elites in London in 2014. No idea who you are confusing me with, you don't know me, I don't comment on 'alt subjects' in public anywhere else but here anymore tho I do take part in an email group that originally started from Mike Ruperts blog FTW ~ 2002 I've not posted in public on these subjects since MCR blog closed down when he started the ill fated 'collapsenet' I was using the handle 'GameDog' or GD back then, tho a lot of my opinions have changed a lot since then. I realised the whole Peak Oil thing was part of a psy-op linked to Club of Rome/Agenda 21 and MCR was effectively handled by Jenna Orkin about the time collapsenet started.
I disagree with a few of your stances on various subjects, it may be just how it comes across but I read 'confirmation bias' into some of your stances, tho I do enjoy reading your stuff, especially UFO stuff, not so keen on the long podcasts etc. so tend to skip those as too time consuming.
I like you, you seem a decent chap, even tho we might disagree on a few things it's always good to see another pov. I was trying to help since you seem unaware of any of this, I'm sure we would enjoy each others company putting the world to rights over a pint or two, but if my posts trigger similar outbursts to your last post I'll just crawl back under my rock. Peace out.
Hi Anon. Sorry if I confused you with somebody else, but to be fair, you ARE anon. I see you are not the Styxxer. I had a debate on QAnon a few weeks ago and thought you were them. Nevertheless, you do seem to be taking the same stance as most anti-Q-ers. Emotional rather than logical. I don't have a problem with 2016-deniers. I'm good friends with Kev Baker and he is one. It's just when it all comes down to who's the best at seeing through alleged disnfo and in that case it just becomes a pissing contest and people will pretend there is disinfo when there is none just to be COOL MAN! I've looked at the theory that Defango and Dreamcatcher are Q. As I said, will anybody else confess?
Post a Comment