The former Home Secretary Leon Lord Brittan has died at the
age of seventy-five. The Conservative peer served in Margaret Thatcher's
cabinet from her election in 1979 until 1986 when he resigned over a scandal related
to the defence contractor Westland .
However I believe that the Westland Affair was a triviality compared to other
matters that have come to light in more recent years. As I detail in the
background links below, Geoffrey Dickens MP, now also dead, handed Brittan a
dossier containing the names of MP's allegedly involved in the organized sexual
abuse of children. He naturally trusted the Home Secretary to take action
because he is the minister responsible for law and order, but Brittan never
did. In fact it wasn't until 2013 that the British government made any formal statement
on the issue. Brittan's death comes shortly after a story announcing that the
supposed "independent inquiry" into Dickens' accusations will once
again be delayed due to a public statement made by the former chair of the
investigation... the second former
chair that is... Baroness Butler-Sloss, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30640879.
The principle witness to the investigation... should it ever happen... would naturally
be Lord Brittan. Now of course that will not be an option. He has taken
whatever secrets he knew to his grave. So is there anything suspicious about
Leon Brittan's death? Was he killed because, to coin a phrase, he knew too
much? It's impossible to prove. People do just
die, in fact everybody does at some point. Brittan was in his mid seventies
and had been suffering from cancer. It's similar with Robin Cook, Tony Blair's
Foreign Secretary who resigned in protest over the 2003 invasion of Iraq .
Shortly afterwards he went out for a walk and died of a heart attack. Should
that worry us? After all he was almost sixty and heart disease is the most
common cause of death for men of his age group? There is no direct evidence of
foul play in either Cook's case of Brittan's. However the timing of their
demise was very opportune in both instances. There are people breathing a huge sigh
of relief right now because Leon Brittan is dead. They've been extremely
fortunate; if these really are powerful and influential people, would they
really be satisfied to leave such serendipity to Lady Luck? What do you think would
hold them back from assassinating Brittan? Morals? There was also a curious
turn of events in which Brittan was recently questioned by the police over an
incident that took place in 1967. A woman came forward and accused Brittan of
raping her at an address in London ,
see the background links below. Again, is that just pure coincidence? There is
no answer at this point; we only have speculation based on the convenient
nature of this turn of events. However it's perfectly possible that Leon Lord
Brittan was murdered; there are plenty of people with the means, motive and
opportunity.
See here for
important background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/still-no-mr-fixit-for-child-abuse.html.
2 comments:
Hi Ben,
There is of course the distinct possibility that Brittan is not dead but has been given an escape route (?Israel) by his establishment connections or friends, and this in my opinion, is far more likely.
When Brittan left his position at UBS in October 2014, there was no mention of illness, merely the pressure being brought to bare by Labour MP Simon Danczuk
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5385/leon-brittan-leaves-vice-chairman-job-at-ubs-investment-bank
I suspect he is currently playing bar skittles with Lord Mcalpine, or possibly boules with the cast and crew of Charlie Hebdo, high fives all round and p**sing themselves laughing.
Hi Neil. That's perfectly possible. I'm in touch with Brian Clare. He's not heard from Danczuk for a bit, but I know he's still on the case. People can earn favours, including public "deaths" when it suits them.
Post a Comment