Well,
it's that time of year again! That day when we're all expected to fall on the
ground in a frenzy of religious worship, not of God but of... other people.
Why? Because... they do a particular job. (It's usually two days, but
this year the 11th of November falls on a Sunday) Yes, this is Military
Religion high season! I've written and spoken about this subject so many times
before, but every year I feel compelled to come back to it because it's so
important.
See
these articles and films for background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/11/remembrance-poppies.html
Does
the Military Religion exist? Is there any justification for it? Why is it
promoted so vigourously in our culture, society and media? Well there's no
doubt it exists. Anybody who is in the armed forces, or has been in the armed
forces, is forever marked out as a superior class, almost a separate species. I
remember during the firemen's strike a few years ago, which the army filled in
for, there was a debate in the media about the army's aging “Green Goddess”
fire engines, a design that has changed little since the 1930’s, and whether
the forces should be allowed to use modern fire appliances. Both myself and all
my friends agreed that they should, but I pointed out that the army are not
trained to use modern fire-fighting equipment; in fact the Fire Brigade have to
train for a long time to become proficient enough to use it properly. Who was
going to give the army that training? “But, Ben,” said one of my mates, “these
are soldiers!” These are soldiers, he thought, superhuman Man-Gods who
know everything and can do anything; only we mere mortals need training!
There's even this ridiculous word: "civilian" (I know I use that word
too, but I only do so facetiously and ironically) which implies that there is
some kind of fundamental difference between somebody in the military, or has
been in the military, and somebody who is, or has, not. I don't see it
personally. The effect all this propaganda has on the soldiers themselves is
remarkable. If I’m talking to somebody who is in the forces or used to be, they
will find some way to slip it into the conversation within two or three
sentences. They then always expect me to immediately change the subject and
talk about it. I’ve found that some of them can become quite peeved with me
when I don’t. They see themselves as separate and superior from
everybody else and feel uncomfortable in the presence of somebody else who does
not. They need recognition of their status from non-military people they meet
in social situations; better still, envy! This is why they like it when they
get trouble from others, because they know it's based on envy. What they cannot
abide is indifference. I was once challenged by a group of uniformed soldiers
in a London pub... because I wasn’t looking at them! The way they acted towards
me you'd think I'd just dumped rubbish in their garden! If a soldier is in the
news for a non-military reason then their status as a soldier will always be
alluded to, even if it is irrelevant to the story? For example: no article or
interview about the singer James Blunt has so far failed to address the fact
that he used to be an army officer. Why is it that very little journalistic
literature about another singer, Marc Almond, refers to his former life as a
Hospital Porter? In the same vein, a man recently rescued a group of pensioners
from a burning building in Oxfordshire and every news report about the incident
declared the information that he was an army sergeant. But how often do you see
the headline: Insurance Broker Chases off Mugger or Painter and
Decorator Saves Child From Flood? As if this Remembrance Poppy-Cult holy
day wasn't enough we now even have Armed Forces Day too! See: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2009/06/armed-forces-day.html
Is
there any justification for it? Let's look at it logically. To join the army or
other forces is to do a job that inevitably carries some risk. We see this
today in Afghanistan where, sadly, young men and women are currently being
killed or injured fighting there. In fact I think it is correct to feel respect
towards somebody who does a difficult and dangerous job, like a solider. But is
fighting in Afghanistan the only dangerous job in the world? No. There are many
other jobs in which those doing it have to face equal danger, or even more,
than a solider in Afghanistan: Miner, oil rig worker, fireman, deep sea diver;
according to The American and Canadian Almanac of 2008 the most
dangerous job you can do is to be a fisherman. So why is there not a
Fishermen's Memorial Day? Why are there no trawler disaster monuments in the
centre of London? Why do we never open up a copy of The Sun and see the
word "HERO" jump out at us concerning a young man who got killed or
maimed so that we can enjoy eating something with our chips? Why is his body
not paraded through Wootten Bassett with people on the street doffing their
hats? It's true that there are non-military memorials, in fact I've been on a
search for them, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/non-military-memorials.html,
but you'll only find them tucked away in smaller local areas. They are also
invariably far less ostentatious in nature. They're often only erected on a
very low budget, sometimes after a long campaign by their beneficiaries. Conversely
it’s impossible to walk through any city centre without seeing the military
memorials. In London there is a gargantuan mausoleum, covering the entire area
around Buckingham Palace and Parliament, featuring enormous structures standing
in pride of place like sacred temples, a separate one for each war and each
branch of the Services. It's so difficult to study this subject, to ask these
questions, because to do so one has to strip away such an enormous amount of
cultural baggage. One inevitably encounters those who will react angrily to the
questions one asks. There are many people in the Truth Movement who still don't
get this!
So
why has the Military Religion been created and why is it maintained? I think
this is best summed up by Dr Lawence Britt in his Fourteen Signs of Fascism:
"Soldiers and military service are glamourized and glorified." The
Military and war are so important to the Illuminati-occupied
governments; that's why they do it. To make sure people keep signing up and to
keep everybody else supporting them they make it a career in which you become a
social God. Who could turn down such an opportunity? Would anybody do the job
otherwise? It's made worse by the disgraceful treatment of "conshies"
and "peaceniks" in conventional society. This improved after the
horrors of World War I, but you'll still get accusations of cowardice and
"chicken!" to this day. As if it takes a real man to blow
somebody up so that an oil company can build a pipeline through their village!
The Military Religion has always had a place in Illuminati-controlled societies
throughout history, but in the last few years it's got far stronger, being
spread more and more thickly by the methods I describe above, and in the linked
articles and films. I do think it is right to show respect and hold memorials
for those killed in wars, and for those who fight in them, but for me it is a
tragedy; it's not something to sanctify and revel in. "Lest We
Remember" to keep our eyes clear of religiously-tinted spectacles and keep
our heads clear of media propaganda. The words on the side of the Cenotaph are:
"THE GLORIOUS DEAD". Well, I've seen the victims of the
Afghanistan war who come back to my hospital! There's nothing glorious about
dying in war at all.
