Yesterday afternoon a friend sent me some shocking material
via my Facebook feed, a series of short videos filmed in the streets of Carlton ,
Nottingham . They showed that the police had cordoned off
an entire street to allow bailiffs in to repossess Tom Crawford's house. A
group of protesters were trying to stop them again, like they had successfully twice
before. Sadly this time there was very little prior notice and so there wasn't
time to rally up as many people. There were far fewer than the seven hundred
plus supporters who packed Fearn Chase Close a few months ago, see background
links at the bottom. I'm very sorry I couldn't get to the protest myself. Tom's
well-wishers were kettled in a pub carpark while bailiffs moved in. Tom was
arrested and denied medical care. They were followed by a removal van from
Cookson & Son Movers and Storers Ltd of Lytham St Annes, Lancashire
who took away all Tom's belongings from inside the house. You know not to give
them any business now, see: http://cooksonmoving.co.uk/.
It's sad that Lytham St Annes is the home of the Probe conferences, yet none of
these local events have influenced this company, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/probe-autumn-2014.html.
Tom Crawford has been fighting a battle with his mortgage lenders for eight
years because of the unlawful terms and conditions they imposed on him after
the initial agreement; see background links. He has been ill, having also to
deal with cancer and haemophilia, and has a large family who have lived in that
house all their lives and worked hard for it. Tom's daughter Amanda Pike has
once again made a statement:
"Not actually
been to sleep so excuse the state of this, but we don't actually know what's
gone on, why they did it or why they refused us any paperwork to see which in
itself is against the law. What I witnessed yesterday was terrorism, pure and
simple. My Nan not yet in her grave, our family pet with
maybe only hours to live now. We were threatened, attacked, assaulted,
insulted, laughed by 'bailiffs' court staff, 'security staff' and most shocking
of all the police, all day long. Even while I was sobbing I was told we were
boring by a police man; God the list is endless. But the crooks of the matter
are. We read out to them verbatim the actual laws being broken. Which I've lost
count of. They'd cover many pages. The people there to protect us and be
impartial were totally ONLY on side with the bank... However, with all this
said its only the beginning. Now it's a criminal matter, we have plans. Things
will get going again. At the end of the day we have every bank docket to prove
that we paid over 130k-ish on a 41k mortgage along with all our other evidence.
If that in itself, apart from the rest of the matter, isn't enough evidence for
you I don't know what is. It was proven in court we did not change the mortgage
it was proven the judge could NOT find the figure the bank were claiming we
owed, it was also proven that we did not agree for it to be changed, and that
the bank did not change it back to its original agreement. Two parties HAVE to
agree to change a contract that is FACT and was agreed upon in court. However
this is all a side matter though, as NO PROCESS was followed. Literally none.
Grater issues and laws have been broken. So once we get it further they are
going to have to prove what they are saying. Considering they brought zero
evidence to the previous hearing well that will be very interesting won't it?
They can't and they know it. Anyway life's a fucking ball bag of a bitch
sometimes. I feel so so sorry for my mum, dad, sister and brother, but you know
what I couldn't be bloody prouder. One day all will see. The criminals may have
won yesterday but not for long. THANK YOU SO SO MUCH for the messages of
support. You'll never EVER understand what it means to us. Love you all and
THANK YOU for sticking with us xx."
I'm also still not entirely sure why this has happened. The
last thing I heard was what Amanda just said, Tom had a hearing two months ago
and it went very well. His alleged creditors, Bradford and Bingley, never even dared
turn up to court. There was even talk of him having "won!", see
background links. I'm sure the answers are coming and I'll keep you posted. The
saddest part was how this act of legalized robbery was carried out through
robotic human compliance. Not only the heartless and gutless bailiffs were
responsible, but they were aided and abetted by the state in the form of police
protection. A couple of dozen officers held back the protesters so the
house-thieves could do their sordid work. By rights those officers should be
arresting the bailiffs! How much did this crooked operation cost the taxpayer? Police
constables are servants of the people; their job is to protect them from criminal danger. The police were never
intended to interfere in civil disputes and escort corporate money-grabbers. Every
one of them betrayed their oath of office yesterday, just like they did over
Carla Buckle, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/programme-131-podcast-carla-buckle.html.
The New World Order would be completely impossible if it wasn't for this
tendency towards groupthink and conformity, either learned or innate. "I'm
just doing my job, mate!" is the overused phrase and universal cop-out. I
could of course list any number of abominable acts carried out by individuals
who were just "doing their job!" You've probably thought of several
while reading that sentence. George Orwell understood this well when he wrote
his novel Animal Farm. What happens in
the plot is that a farm is taken over by the animals and the human farmer is
kicked out, but the pigs quickly rise to positions of authority and become
rulers who are just as bad as the old human farmer. The story is an allegory of
the Bolshevik revolution in Russia
and the subsequent rise of Stalin, seen from Orwell's Trotskyite or democratic
socialist perspective; but some of its themes are more widespread. One of the
most interesting and poignant scenes in the book is when Boxer, an elderly cart
horse and the hardest working animal on the farm, falls ill. Instead of
recognizing his dedication, arranging veterinary treatment for him, and looking
after him for the rest of his life, the pigs sell him to a butcher and he is
taken away to the abattoir. In the scene where the horse is driven out of the
farm, the vehicle the butcher uses is a horse-drawn one. I found this curious
because the book was written in the early 1940's when modern motorized lorries
were in common use. However there's a distinct reason why Orwell chose to make Boxer's
death-wagon a horse-drawn van. The other animals see the butcher's signboard on
the van and realize what's happening, and they call after the vehicle warning
Boxer and urging him to escape. But they also appeal to the two horses pulling
the vehicle: "Comrades, comrades! Don't take your own brother to his
death!" But the two horses pulling the van just keep on trotting along,
obediently doing their jobs, even though a day might come when they themselves
could be sold off to the butcher just like their victim was. This is what I see
now with these policemen. It's also been reported that some of the police were
glorifying in what they'd done and took selfies while guarding Tom's home. We
also heard that Tom's dog died as a result too.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/tom-crawford-wins-in-court.html.
3 comments:
Absolutely Gobsmacked!!!..
Why the hell, would they do, such a heartless n' pointless thing??..
Makes no sense at all?..
Couldn't they have come up with an, agreed amount? For Tom & his family??..
Heartless, "Fecking" heartless!!!!..
My thoughts n' respects, are with Mr.Tom Crawford & his family..
May you turn this decision around, n' get your home back!!..
Yours Most Sincerely & Respectfully.. Mr.VinnyM vox
It's an utter disgrace. One of the worst things I've ever witnessed.
Tom made this mess for himself, and ignored numerous chances to make a reasonable deal with the lender. Tom and Sue had an Endowment mortgage, but surrendered the endowment policy after a couple of years (which breached the terms they had agreed with the bank!). This effectively meant they changed their own mortgage to Interest Only, with no repayment vehicle.
Subsequently the bank discussed this with them and asked them to change to a repayment basis, which was refused by the Crawford's and so not done by the bank.
Everything the Crawfords have paid so far has been interest, with the original debt left outstanding, exactly as per their original agreement with the lender. Tom then stopped paying because the original 25 year mortgage term was up, and forced the lenders hand to this.
If he had acted sensibly he could have remained in the house at a lower cost than renting somewhere similar, or probably walked away with ~£100k in equity.
Post a Comment