Police Embrace Common Purpose

Common Purpose is a very sinister organization. Here is their website: http://www.commonpurpose.org.uk/home.aspx . They're not overtly political, have no published agenda or goal and do not stand for elections, but they are playing a crucial role in the drowning of Britain in the Internationalist dictatorships of the EU and then the proposed global government, the New World Order; and they aim to do it so slowly and stealthily that the masses do not even notice it's happening! Just take a look at their "About Us" page. Does it make any sense to you? If not then this is a warning sign. Underhand organizations invariably have official statements of purpose and mission that make no sense. You read them and you still don't know what they're about! This is the same with the Tavistock Institute which I've written about before. See here: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/02/tavistock-founder-dies.html

It has come to my attention from a fellow freedom-fighter in The United People's Community (http://www.tpuc.org/) that Thames Valley Police, the force which covers the Oxfordshire area, is involved with Common Purpose and what's more their involvement has increased over the last few years. Check out these figures that he obtained from the Freedom of Information Act (You'll need the Adobe Acrobat reader):http://cpexposed.com/documents/CP_Police_Expenditure_ThamesValley.pdf

Now take a look at this; it's a brilliant lecture by Brian Gerrish, a man who is currently working very hard to stop Common Purpose: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3664960863576873594&ei=2u3FSarsJMPB-Ab756TTAQ&q=common+purpose+by+brian+gerrish

"Hate for Heroes"

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/campaigns/our_boys/article2312015.ece

As a student and researcher of media propaganda this is one of the most interesting articles The Currant Bun has ever published. Even by the newspaper’s usual extreme standards, it’s almost unbelievably biased. I’m not even going to draw your attention to the type of language used, the employment of the words “brave”, “fanatics” etc.

Actually I completely agree that some of the protesters’ slogans and banners were reprehensible. It is unfair to brand a complete stranger as a “baby-killer” just because they’re in the Army, These men and women have just returned from a long deployment during which the majority will have committed no harm at all. And what’s more any military action in the War on Terror may be carried out by the Forces, but those Forces are paid for by our taxes. I find it unlikely that these protesters are all tax-rebels; therefore they are hypocrites. Everyone involved in the war has to share in the blame, whether you fight it or fund it.

But the truth is: war crimes involving British troops have taken place. These protesters have a legitimate gripe, if only they’d pursue their gripe in a more productive way, not giving so much smearing ammunition to their opponents.

What disturbs me most about this article is that it never even considers that the allegations made by the protesters could be true. The whole idea is beyond the acceptability of the author’s paradigm. This is what I mean I talk about how respect for the military has become its own brand of fanaticism, a kind of religion. See these articles for background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/07/our-brave-boys.html and http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/11/remembrance-poppies.html

Fox Network Admits to Brainwashing

New Prison Planet article: http://www.prisonplanet.com/fox-admits-to-planting-political-brainwashing-in-popular-tv-shows.html

I bet this is just the tip of the iceberg! I can say that with some confidence based on my own research. See these articles I've written myself:
http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-doctor.html
http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/08/spooks-code-9.html
http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/07/grimlys.html
http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2007/11/reality-tv.html
http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2007/10/ive-recently-written-here-about-fake.html

Green Party Man Backs Nuclear Power in Oxon

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/4151683.Pro_nuclear_Green_could_be_deselected/

See the comments. I'm "Free Oxford".

Mark Lynas, an environmental activist and author of the book Six Degrees (Just look at the cover!) is backing the establishment of nuclear power; this comes not long after proposals to build a nuclear power plant on the Didcot coal-fired Power Station site in Oxfordshire.

Atlantis Found?

I never usually read The Sun, in fact I'd hesitate to wipe my arse with it! But yesterday I did because of this extraordinary headline: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2255989.ece

It shows an image of something that looks artificial on the seabed off the Canary Islands. This is in the very location Plato said Atlantis was in his famous book. It certainly resembles a street plan; and it's huge, as big as Wales. This also matches Plato's description, of Atlantis being a massive city. Was Atlantis just a made-up story? The scientific establishment says yes, but I disagree. The myth of Atlantis exists in one form or another in nearly all cultures across the globe; including many who are supposed never to have had contact. It's the same basic story as Noah's Ark from the Book of Genesis, Manu in the Rig Veda from India, the Welsh legend of Cantref Y Gwaelod, and the Zulu folk tale of Zaralelli.

Sunken cities have been found before, most famously by Graham Hancock off the coast on India; see his brilliant book Underworld (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Underworld-Mysterious-Civilization-Graham-Hancock/dp/1400049512/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1235218407&sr=1-3). But so far all these ruins have been in shallow littoral waters off the continental shelf, on seabeds that are known to have been above the sea level in the past. This new discovery is different; if it is real then it shows the presence of a city in the intercontinental ocean depths, the Madeira Abyssal Plain. There is no process known in conventional geology that can ever account for this part of the ocean bed ever being on land.

Another WT7 No-Show!

(Source article: http://www.prisonplanet.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-does-not-collapse.html
Building 7 at the World Trade Centre collapsed during the 9/11 attacks, yet it was not hit by a plane. We're told it was collapsed by "fire damage". Here we see a similar-sized skyscaper burning much more fiercely than WTC7 did... yet it doesn't collapse.

This also happened in Madrid to the Windsor Tower. This calls into question yet again the official story of 9/11 and begs the question that I'm always posing: 9/11 was a black-budget military operation.

Chinese Spacewalk Faked!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us8xLsQ1MIE

Many thanks to Izzy Smart for finding this. Izzy's channel is linked on the HPANWO TV blog.

Background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/01/i-went-to-godamn-moon.html

and: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/02/new-apollohoax-book.html

and: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/01/moon.html

It baffles me that people still insist that other space misions are real despite this! "Yes I know they lie and cheat and fake, but the moon landings are real. It was different then, they were being honest!"