See here for
essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/07/rdh-lawsuit-mini-portal.html.
The claimants have made a public statement following their victory in the lawsuit against Richard D Hall. It has been covered in the mainstream media with the usual bias and denial of facts; I have described all that before in detail. However, they don't intend to leave it there. They have also announced future plans: "I do want this to open the door for change and to help protect others from what we have been put through in the future. I will be discussing this with my legal team... with the aim of establishing a new law in Eve's name." Source: https://news.sky.com/story/manchester-arena-attack-survivors-win-harassment-case-against-conspiracy-theorist-richard-hall-who-claimed-it-was-hoax-13239402. When a new law comes along and it is given a sentimental nickname, that means trouble. Effective propaganda attacks the heart not the head. It does not try to persuade rationally; instead it engenders strong emotions in the minds of its target population. It delivers eloquent rhetoric in place of fake facts. In this case we have a Common Law precedent named after a disabled young woman, the ultimate portrait of vulnerability. The news is not reporting the reality of the case; instead the public is shown a sadistic and heartless man "sharpening a spike" outside the house of a brave and unfortunate girl cared for by her dedicated and loving parents. I've come across other examples of this trickery, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2013/11/clares-law-feminist-snoopers-charter.html. The mainstream media coverage of the trial reminds me of the episode "Homer Badman" from The Simpsons, see here for a clip that illustrates exactly how such hit-pieces work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-vuVjiF8Jk.
The claimants have made a public statement following their victory in the lawsuit against Richard D Hall. It has been covered in the mainstream media with the usual bias and denial of facts; I have described all that before in detail. However, they don't intend to leave it there. They have also announced future plans: "I do want this to open the door for change and to help protect others from what we have been put through in the future. I will be discussing this with my legal team... with the aim of establishing a new law in Eve's name." Source: https://news.sky.com/story/manchester-arena-attack-survivors-win-harassment-case-against-conspiracy-theorist-richard-hall-who-claimed-it-was-hoax-13239402. When a new law comes along and it is given a sentimental nickname, that means trouble. Effective propaganda attacks the heart not the head. It does not try to persuade rationally; instead it engenders strong emotions in the minds of its target population. It delivers eloquent rhetoric in place of fake facts. In this case we have a Common Law precedent named after a disabled young woman, the ultimate portrait of vulnerability. The news is not reporting the reality of the case; instead the public is shown a sadistic and heartless man "sharpening a spike" outside the house of a brave and unfortunate girl cared for by her dedicated and loving parents. I've come across other examples of this trickery, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2013/11/clares-law-feminist-snoopers-charter.html. The mainstream media coverage of the trial reminds me of the episode "Homer Badman" from The Simpsons, see here for a clip that illustrates exactly how such hit-pieces work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-vuVjiF8Jk.
3 comments:
Ben mate, you may know already but there you feature prominently in a photo on the BBC today: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86q0ypq7q0o
Ben mate, you may know already but you feature prominently in a photo on the BBC today: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86q0ypq7q0o
Oh bugger! I look awful! I should have tucked my shirt in.
Post a Comment