See here for
essential background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2024/06/assange-freedom-livestream.html.
Following the almost unbelievable release from prison of Julian Assange, I'm pleased to say that the whistleblower and journalist has arrived back in his homeland ofAustralia .
He has not set foot there for at least twelve years, having spent all that time
in England, incarcerated at the embassy of Ecuador and then later at HMP
Belmarsh. After landing on Saipan island he was taken
straight to the courthouse where he confirmed his name. The hearing lasted until
midday during which his legal
situation was described to him in detail and he pleaded guilty to one count of violating
the Espionage Act Section 793. He must have been assured by his lawyers that
this would work and the hearing was only a formality because the celebrations began
as soon as he left Belmarsh jail; but it must have been a relief to have it in
black and white. He was sentenced to five years in prison, but that is more
than he has already spent on remand so he was released immediately without
bond. He then immediately returned to the airport and flew to Canberra ,
Australia where there was
an emotional reunion with his family. There was later a press conference where
his legal team spoke. Julian didn't; he wasn't able to emotionally, apparently,
see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XATYVc6upMY.
It's understandable. He has not seen his wife, children or father outside a
prison visiting room or in his flat at the embassy for so long; in the case of Stella
and his children, ever. He has never taken his five and seven year old sons for
a walk on the beach, or two the school sports day, or to a funfair. I do hope he
and his loved ones can now rebuild their lives and that no other journalist
will be punished in such a way. I don't judge Julian for doing this plea
bargain with the government that has been hounding him. What would I have done
in his situation?
Obviously I don't share the viewpoints of many others in the
Conspirasphere that Julian Assange is a total psyop. The most extreme of these
must be "Tupacabra" whom I discussed in the livestream last night. You'll
be relieved to know I definitely don't think Julian is a clone! There are other
more reasonable voices who still maintain suspicious minds when it comes to the
Assange phenomenon. Thomas Sheridan, somebody I know well and like, has written
a short article asking if Assange is the real Emanuel Goldstein. This refers to
an unseen character in George Orwell's 1984
who fought in the revolution alongside Big Brother and then became a traitor.
It is suggested throughout the novel that Goldstein is a political phantom, a
fake person invented to focus the hatred of the people and therefore encourage
their love of Big Brother. Thomas asks why Assange has not been eliminated by
the state if he is their real enemy; after all, they have so many ways and
means of killing people from a distance or up close. They had no problem with
Alexander Litvinenko did they? A valid question. Maybe it's because the state
no longer consists of antagonists unified behind a single purpose; the white
hats might be powerful enough to protect Assange. Also possibly they didn't
want the fallout from a possible "dead man's trigger". If Assange had
died who knows what his supporters might have released. I wouldn't blame him
for doing that in his position. Thomas' second point is to ask: what good has
Wikileaks been? They've released a lot about bad things being done in wartime,
but that's not surprising really. How about 9/11? The UFO's? And "fake
lockdowns, human organ harvesting, politicians trafficking children, secret
space programs... genetic experiments on everyone?" Another good point.
Other researchers have uncovered such information; surely Wikileaks knows
something about it too. Why have they not published anything? That could be because
Thomas is right, but it might also be part of Julian's little insurance policy.
If so then I hope now he is free his organization will say more. If it doesn't
then it does beg the question. What kind of relationship do they have with the
government they are supposedly trying to expose? Source: https://thomassheridan.substack.com/p/julian-assange-the-real-life-emmanuel.
I address those questions in more detail in the background links below. The war
against reporters goes on. Other people have been targeted for persecution,
like Richard D Hall, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/06/rdh-in-court-appeal-rejected.html.
If we are all talking nonsense and should just be laughed at, why don't they
simply laugh at us and leave us alone? These actions against independent
journalists are as good as a confession, in my view. Julian Assange was meant
to be a warning to others, a slave crucified along the road to Rome
like Spartacus. I only hope Julian's freedom will lead to more people in his
position being left alone as well.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/04/assange-arrest-and-brexit-extension.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/10/assange-and-snowden-latest-bombshells.html.
Following the almost unbelievable release from prison of Julian Assange, I'm pleased to say that the whistleblower and journalist has arrived back in his homeland of
See here for background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/04/assange-arrest-and-brexit-extension.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/10/assange-and-snowden-latest-bombshells.html.
4 comments:
There doesn't seem to be any possibility you haven't considered!
I reckon Assange is sincere if only because of the duration and extent of the suffering he has had to endure. I don't think that is something that could have been faked, especially the time he spent in the Ecuadorian embassy. State actors are sometimes locked up, but never for that length of time.
It does seem unlikely that Wikileaks had uncovered information about war crimes and mass surveillance but not about other things like UFOs but I suppose it is possible, especially if they set out to look for the former and not the latter.
I believe your statement "What kind of relationship do they have with the government they are supposedly trying to expose?" can be explained by one of the earlier documents leaked showing the US government was trying to destroy WikiLeaks as a threat.
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/U.S._Intelligence_planned_to_destroy_WikiLeaks,_18_Mar_2008
This amongst other leaked documents show wikileaks should be viewed as an asset to free speech and not a government controlled (as proven by Assange's treatment and persecution). Given his release was under a Biden administration (Trump advocated the death penalty for Assange) this seems to indicate a more Authoritarian regime under 'MAGA' somewhat going against the perceived Assange conspiracies.
https://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/kfile-trump-wikileaks/index.html
You also have to appreciate that the leaks are from individual whistle-blower sources that have access to these 'secrets' and many have been incarcerated for doing so when discovered, not just Assange (Chelsea manning). The list of leaked documents is not only confirmed as real and authentic before publication it is vast so if none appear to be of a topic you 'want' to see it is either because they don't exist or nobody is prepared to risk leaking them (unsurprising considering the treatment of those caught to date). It's not some government controlled tap of information being as most are incredibly harmful to the publics perception to what is going on in Government regimes, militaries, research etc etc. It doesn't fit into a 'Q' like fantasy narrative you might think of or believe.
Interestingly many documents on the topics of UFO's child trafficking etc that you mention have been proven as faked on further investigation so maybe wikileaks is doing some stringent due diligence before publishing to ensure it's ongoing credibility as a trusted source.
Current files released. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Leaked_Files
Hi GM. I'm trying to consider all the possibilities short of any certain information. It is possible what you say, that Wikileaks really have simply not had access to the 9/11 and children stuff. Or they ignored it because they lack the nerve or imagination. Maybe they just thought: "But that can't be true! It's TOO crazy! It must be bait they're feeding us to smoke out our agents."
Hi Anon. I am also disappointed with Trump not acting sooner and harder to free JA. The death penalty statemen was made early in his campaign and was not repeated so I hope he didn't mean it.
"...either because they don't exist or nobody is prepared to risk leaking them" The latter definitely. People wonder why Grusch's contacts are still silent? I don't! However, as I said to Gravity Mirror, it is possible Wikileaks just ignored certain material or lacked the nerve and imagination to publish it, think it was a hoax designed to discredit them.
"... many documents on the topics of UFO's child trafficking etc that you mention have been proven as faked." Not as many as I think you're suggesting. It's worth reading Bill Wood's book "Majic- Eyes Only". I suspect you are using Wikileaks publications as a reason why some "far out" conspiracy theories are not true. As I've explained, that is a mistake.
Post a Comment