Sarah Everard Killer Revelation

 

Elish Angiolini is a bit of an infamous name in the Conspirasphere because of the government's "independent" child abuse inquiry, but today she is chairing a new inquiry into the murder of Sarah Everard. See the background links below for my own coverage of this crime. I remember at the time a lot of commentators were asking the crucial question about Wayne Couzens; was this the first time he had offended? He was almost fifty years old when he murdered Sarah Everard; it is unusual for this category of murderer to start their spree at such an advanced age. Now the Angiolini Inquiry has revealed that there were what they describe as "warning signs", specifically five incidents that went unreported; however there were dozens more in which he was a suspect. These included numerous incidents of indecent exposure and even a violent sexual assault against a child. He was known to be in possession of criminally obscene pornography involving violence and children. The Inquiry has suggested reforms to police recruitment and training, along with the inevitable feminist beachheads; I refer fully to that angle in the background links. There have been a cascade of apologies from the Met commissioner and of the three other police forces who employed Couzens. Of course, this whole inquiry is just a charade. Leaving aside the possibility that Couzens did not operate alone, again that I detail in the background links, and assuming the official story is true, that he was just an average thrill killer; the authorities probably already knew that very well and there is no way they would do anything to stop somebody like Couzens. I've explained recently that the reason the government are so selective in who they prosecute and which crimes they investigate is because some criminals are "clients of power", see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/02/the-phantom-postbox-monster-of-old.html, and this includes the most violent kind. I've been wondering lately about the death penalty. Not whether it's right or wrong, that's a separate issue; but why was it abolished during the 20th century in most Western countries that had it? I think it is because the government are planning for the future. The kinds of people who commit the most heinous crimes play an important role in a totalitarian society. Who will the government get to run the torture chambers and death camps if all the psychopaths are dead? One of the first things many dictators do when they get into power is open the gates of the prisons and offer jobs to the "right types". It is a form of bioleninism. So don't expect the government to do anything about the institutions in which Wayne Couzens roamed. They created those institutions the way they are deliberately and now this inquiry is over all reforms will be forgotten, apart from the feminist ones of course.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/03/sarah-everard-whats-truth.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2021/07/sarah-everard-update.html.