Recently I sent an interview request to somebody to appear
on HPANWO Radio on an unrelated matter and he replied to say: "Thank you for inviting me to be on
your radio show. However, I am hoping to convince you to change your mind about
one of your recent posts concerning the Confederate flag issue in the USA . The Confederate flag had only one true
purpose in our nation, to divide and conquer based on the evil of slavery. The
flag stands for treason and destruction of the nation. The flag was used to
oppress the African Americans well into the 1960's regarding segregation and white
supremacy. It has no real cultural significance other than insensitivity to the
horrors experienced by ancestors of the freed slaves. This country has big race problems right now, and these
symbols, flags, statues, monuments etc are symbols of oppression to a great
portion of our society. The removal of the flag issue is concerned with banning
the flag from public property, government property and grounds. Those who
oppose it should not have to pay for its maintenance with their hard earned
money. It is insensitive for government bodies to fly it. Private persons have
the right, but having the flag on tax payer maintained public property is
wrong. If I can convince you of this being the more enlightened position, I
would be happy to appear on your show. Otherwise, I'm afraid I will have to decline.
If you remove your support for the confederate flag, I will be happy to appear
on your show. I think from what I have seen of your work, you are trying to
enlighten as well. I hope we can get on the same page on this issue. Warm
Regards." This man is one of those calling for the removal of statues
of Albert Pike, a southern Civil War general and freemason. It's true Albert
Pike was a deeply unpleasant person who was a racist... a real racist for a change, and who clearly knew about the New World
Order, so I can genuinely understand his discomfort with the statues of Pike;
but once you start erasing the past, where do you stop? There are no sunset
clauses on any of these policies; no specific goals or intentions. Could I soon
be called "racist!" for drinking a glass of Southern Comfort? Is that
really all there is to the South? Was the Confederacy really just a massive
concentration camp full of wailing black slaves lying chained up on the ground,
while heterosexual white males carrying whips strutted among their prostrate and
defenceless bodies cackling demonically? There is something very pernicious
about this campaign; although I think my contact means well and truly believes
it is the right thing to do. I had a civil and respectful email conversation
with my contact, but he did not persuade me to change my mind over the flag, so
the interview will not be taking place; that's a shame, but I'm not going to lie;
I'm not going to use hypocrisy to get a scoop. As I've said many times, I'm
tired of white straight males being constantly regarded as evil. Even though
the Klan used to fly the Confederate flag, this doesn't make it invariably a
symbol of white supremacy and hatred of black people. It is seen by many,
including me, as a symbol of white identity,
but what's wrong with that? Every other group is allowed an identity; why are
white straight male people not? Also, as I say in my article on the flag, it is
a cultural icon of the Deep South , everything to do with
that region of the world, from iced tea to river boats. I think this is all
cultural Marxism, an Orwellian mind control attack intended to psychologically
imprison all people, not just WSM, but of every ethnic group, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/jason-wilson-on-cultural-marxism.html.
As I say in my article linked above about the Confederate flag, this new
political movement to eliminate the vestiges of the Confederacy is hypocritical,
defamatory and deceitful. I am seriously concerned that before long it will
indeed turn its malicious eye on the beautiful work of art that is the Stone
Mountain sculpture. Forewarned is forearmed; hopefully I will not
one day have to write a follow-up article to this one entitled Save Stone Mountain.
Thursday, 3 September 2015
Protect Stone Mountain
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Dear Ben, I applaud your article and support you in you stance in regards to the issue of the confederate Flag. This is just more Cultural Marxism and in my opinion just attempting to nullify and negativitize any history of rebellion and desire to separate oneself from a system that one does not wish to belong to which the confederate flag means to me.
I am of mixed heritage having Caribbean, Irish, 'White British' (Which probably comprimises of an archaic mix of various 'light' skinned influences on this fair isle) Jewish and Eastern European so even if I wanted to pick a peice of cloth that 'identified' me as a being then i'd have a hard time - not that any arbitrary, temporary, genetic determinates or outward temporary cosmologies can ever define my essential nature anyway (or anybody else's self nature whether they accept this fact or not).
That being said, if those that wish to identify themselves under a nationalistic and/or genetically constrained empirical determinates then they should be able to, as you say many other tribes can validate their identity without any a-priori revolt (except if you hold arbitrary prejudices that most certainly exist). I never have subscribed to 'Black Power', 'Feminism', 'White Power' or any other arbitrary dualistic mentalities.
The issue as you correctly raise is that for some reason a deliberate tension is being engineered which is a classic problem reaction solution, perhaps social-civil-war (which the flag stems from itself.
Whatever the case it is clear that identity and it's parameters (as constraining as they can be when burdoned into all-determining shackles) must not be biased and must be free flowing.
Of coarse, when they are not it is a great way to further divide and pick off the masses who's identities are sullied by false information, history and knowledge.
2015, what a pity, what a pity and we think we are ready for Contact with extraterrestrial life!.
Thanks Ben,
Although it seems overly simplistic of me to state that the Confederacy took an anti-government and, therefore, an anti-establishment stance, it seems to me that all of the latest posturings are pointing towards the same, social-engineering, conclusions.
There are many millions amongst the British people who would put their hats to their hearts in praise to their own slave masters (Royalty) and are indeed encouraged to do so by the MSM. Those that choose not to, are cast as pariahs.
If the programme-du-jour is that the whole history of the slave trade is to be eliminated in the name of political correctness, it seems appropriate that we start at the top and work our way down, rather than start with flag-burning and monument-smashing. I would begin with Royalty...or am I just whistling Dixie?
Sausages
Sausages
Hi Neil and Xylomet. Thanks for your comments. I certainly don't regard the Confederacy as anti-NWO. Far from it. I would not have liked to live there. They also fought a dirty war against the "Yankees" and if they had won I expect border states would have suffered a similar reconstruction. The issue here is one of false history and how it is being used to shape the future. As Orwell said: "He who controls..."
Hey Ben. Indeed my friend. I am of the opinion that 'history' as we understand it is not a definitive thing, not just in view of victors always writing the history but of fragments of baggage we carry into the 'future' that are unpacked and re-packed, or like a National Express waiting area completely lost!...............
Post a Comment