Kid Starmer

 

Our fearful non-leader has just released his most ridiculous speech to date. When you get over the hilarity of it, it's also one of his most sinister. Dressed in a tracksuit like a teenager himself, Keir Starmer announces that he intends to wield his new powers under the Online Safety Act. Saying "hand on heart", pronouncing the last word with a glottal stop to show how down-to-earth he is, that he all he wants is for children "to be safe and happy". He then explains how using social media "harms" them. Interesting that the previous attempt to bring in this legislation was called the "online harms bill". So he's going to ban all under-sixteens from using social media. He knows how difficult this is and how much resistance he will get from Silicon Valley... meaning Elon Musk, but he says he will "take them on!" Like Elon couldn't beat down Starmer with the back of his knee. YouTube does not publish dislikes on its thumb display anymore and videos like this will tell you why. The upload has 26,000 views and only 414 likes... Did everybody else just not thumb it at all? Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS07X1HvPEc. Amazingly, for a change, Britain is not the first country to try out this new Big Brother law. Canada and Australia have... trust the colonies to try and up us in any game! In both nations it is failing badly. It does not protect children at all, in fact it increases risk because the platforms in those states drop their house child protection protocols because they don't think they need them anymore. As I explain in the background links below, the government have no intention of doing anything to make children safe online. If they did then they would be working with a pair of Ukrainian parents whose sons have been sucked into prostitution; as one Facebook user pithily put it: "How can you be a child protector and a nonce at the same time?" Zoomers are the most tech-savvy of all generations and can easily find ways to bypass the filters anyway.

The system will involve all social media users proving their identity, in other words "encouraging" people to adopt digital ID via the backdoor. Once the infrastructure is in place it can be ratcheted into any role the controllers want. These user databases will not be secure, by the way. The existing ones in Australia were hacked and a number of young women were doxed on 4Chan. These sentiments about child safety are meaningless except as an excuse to introduce full internet control; I've predicted this so many times. The result of this mean that, assuming Starmer gets away with his dastardly plan, you will no longer be able to post anonymously. Until now if you held private political opinions that you knew your employer could justify sacking you for, you could still express them by setting up an account without your real name. You can no longer do that. That is the whole point. The government are scared of people doing that, as I've said before. Maybe this is hopeful sign because it is most definitely an act of desperation. They are truly going for double-or-quits. The good news is that there are many ways to resist this tyranny using VPN's and supporting the lawsuits etc. It won't just be Elon either. Even the less principled social media giants will be tempted to challenge the government simply because of revenue loss. The current regime is not all-powerful; in fact they remind me of the East German administration a week before the fall of the Berlin Wall. They are acting tough and in control, but they are not. Fear not, readers; freedom is an irresistible force and the government are not the immovable object they want us to think they are.
See here for more background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2026/04/digital-id-mp-reply.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2025/04/osa-woes.html.