See here for
essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/03/that-photo.html.
The mystery appears to have been solved. On Friday, the spring equinox and the same day as a horrific terrorist attack inRussia
Naturally the backslappers are in hog heaven right now. They
are strutting around social media hanging ten and pelvic thrusting, bleating
their usual rigmarole: "It's a psyop!... It's a distraction!..." You
can never win with a backslapper because whatever you say, at least one of them
will think it is a distraction from something else. I would not wish cancer on
anybody; and if this a true story then I hope Kate makes a fast and complete
recovery. However, I don't think we should assume anything right now. The points
I made about King Charles and his cancer apply just as much to Kate. Is this
just meant to placate or guilt trip the people who complained about her photo?
Was the video of her fake as well? If so then it's a much better one. The best
thing to do is wait and see if more information comes to light.
See here for more information: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2011/03/hunt-for-cm24_10.html.
The mystery appears to have been solved. On Friday, the spring equinox and the same day as a horrific terrorist attack in
See here for more information: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2011/03/hunt-for-cm24_10.html.
2 comments:
Hi Ben, I've noticed you often recently are questioning the authenticity of photographs and film footage with the opinion that such footage can now never be relied upon 100%.
To some extent I agree with your thought process, no single piece evidence can be considered 100% evidence of anything but I disagree that photos or video can be proven as authentic, tampered with or completely fake. All digital footage (the most easy to manipulate with editing software) contains metadata. This is why paranormal investigators now use 'old school' polaroid cameras to catch images rather than digital cameras to help disprove they have tampered with their footage during an investigation.
"Metadata summarizes a photo or video's basic information. For example, the footage's time and location, and the device it was taken with. Metadata is important because it can verify that the footage was taken when and where the photographer says it was". It can also show that the footage has not been tampered with and if edited when and what with in the form of date stamps/location IP etc.
Anybody can view this from the image file and was recently used to prove the editing done in Kate's 'mothers day' photo and when it was done to the original file. This is fairly basic investigative process that anyone can do. It is also incredible easy to use multiple image search software to find the first example of images on the internet for this data and then learn which sites edit and manipulate to deceive their audiences with altered images (hugely prevalent in UFO and paranormal sites to get interaction and visits to make revenue). This is why despite a multitude of 'UFO' images 99.9% are easily cast aside if folks spent a few minutes using the tools at their disposal and being more skeptical.
Hi Anon. Is the original file available? In that case maybe you're right.
As for UFO/Nessie/ghost etc photos, I'm well aware that you should never delete the original file. Always keep it to show to investigators.
Post a Comment