Everybody likes to be in the know. All the others are
gullible, but we've got it sussed! In whatever way the UFO story eventually ends, most
people want to be remembered as the one to say: "I was the one who was
never taken in by any hoax!" This is to do with ego and there's nothing
wrong with that. A little bit of ego is necessary and without it we have an
incomplete personality. Ego is only a hindrance when we let it take over our
minds, as in the case of a certain country doctor from North
Carolina . It's about machismo, again something
natural and not always bad if you keep it in control. Over eighty percent of
UFOlogists are male, after all; and there's nothing wrong with that either, but
this can generate a problem. Whenever the word goes out that something might be
faked, there is a natural instinct to drop it and run like crazy, as if the
mere mention of the possibility of fraud transforms it instantly into a ticking
bomb. On top of this, you can always depend on the skeptics to laud
automatically the "conveniently told confession story", see: https://youtu.be/phNzRKe85Ac?t=6800.
For these reasons, hoax allegations are questioned far less rigorously than
positive UFOlogical assertions.
I saw this very example play out again with the recent
resurgence of attacks against Travis Walton. Such attacks are nothing new; in
fact they've been going on in one form or another ever since the event
happened. Travis' encounter and abduction is considered one of the most
evidentially strong in all of history. On the 5th of November 1975 Travis, a lumberjack, was
driving with his colleagues through a forest near Snowflake ,
Arizona USA
when they saw a large multicoloured object near the road. Travis approached it
for a better look and was struck by a beam of light. He collapsed to the ground
while his colleagues abandoned him and drove away in terror. A few days later
Travis reappeared at the side of a road near the town of Heber-Overgaard, a few
miles from Travis' home. Since then a debate has raged continuously, in one
form or another, about whether Travis' alien abduction was real or fake. The latest
flow in that eternal tide comes allegedly from Mike Heston Rogers who was one
of the witnesses in the car that night. However there is currently nothing on
Mr Rogers' social media page about this. The same goes for Noria Hayakawa, a film
maker who once produced a very good documentary about Area 51. He wrote an
article about the latest scandal, but has now deleted it. Therefore, coming
into this class late, it's difficult to obtain primary source information. Erika Lukes
and Jeremy Rys, the "Alien Scientist" still have videos on their
YouTube channels about it though. Apparently Mike and Travis had this
get-rich-quick plan to make a new blockbuster movie explaining how they
"fooled the world!" There was some kind of dispute over money and so
Mike decided to spoil the reveal by going public over how Travis and he concocted
the imaginary abduction story to win the National
Inquirer's prize and get famous generally. There is supposedly a fire tower
near the abduction site, an elevated platform taller than the surrounding
trees, which they rigged up with coloured light to make it look like a UFO, to
fool the other lumberjacks. However nobody is even certain exactly where the
abduction site is. The witnesses don't want to reveal it. Anyway, the story
continues with Travis then hiding in the fire tower for a few days before
climbing down and walking to the phone boxes in Heber. Travis has denied this
and explained in a phone-call to Jimmy Church of Fade to Black that this whole
hullabaloo was a fabrication caused by Mike's fit of personal rage. Since then
the two old friends have reconciled and Mike has withdrawn the allegation. To
me it sounds very similar to the Larry Warren story with the forged evidence
against him invented by a former friend with a grudge, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/sacha-christie-woodbridge-presentation.html.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8D2k25EdZY
and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1NrQUu8x5U.
It's a sad fact though that in UFOlogy mud sticks, for the reasons I explain
above. One of the motives I have in writing this article is because I have
received a lot of correspondence about this matter. People want me to make a
statement; well this is it. The tussle between different theories to explain
the Travis Walton incident, to support Travis' report or debunk it, has been
rambling on and on since the day it happened. The developments of the past
month are not very original and will fade with the passing of time, just like
the others have. I personally think Travis was telling the truth and so far no
evidence has been presented that, in my view, overturns his testimony.
See here for more information: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/09/ufo-truth-magazine-conference-2019.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-16.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/11/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-21.html.
See here for more information: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/09/ufo-truth-magazine-conference-2019.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-16.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/11/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-21.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment