With all the gloom and dread associated with the COVID 19
pandemic, I'm happy to present to you a different kind of story about it, one
that I can guarantee will warm the cockles of your locked-down hearts. Dale McLaughlan
is a young man from Irvine Scotland Isle of Man until the
lockdown is over; he would be banned from boarding a ferry. Therefore he bought
a jet-ski and travelled there independently. Source: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/6408888/jet-ski-scotland-isle-man-dad-jailed-covid/.
This is incredibly dangerous and he is lucky to be alive. He sailed from the
Isle of Whithorn, on the southern coast of Dumfries and Galloway
to Ramsey on the northern coast of the Isle of Man which
is about twenty-seven miles. Jet-skis are a recreational craft to be used at
the seaside just a few yards from the beach. They are not designed for voyages
across the open sea. How did he navigate? He must have used a GPS or magnetic
compass. Still, as the 10CC song goes, the things we do for love. Mr McLaughlan
was jailed for four weeks for "a deliberate and intentional attempt to
circumvent the Manx border restrictions, potentially putting the community at
risk." If you look at the background links below you will guess that I
find that an appalling injustice. The restrictions on the Isle on Man, just
like everywhere else, have nothing to do with any threat of disease; they are
the governments excuse to take more power and justify measures like the Great
Reset. At the moment I consider myself lucky to be a single man, but I have
been in love. My ex-partner, Sue Ustane, did not live on a remote island, but
if I had been separated from her for months on end, but then found a way to go
and visit her, even if it meant taking an enormous risk and possibly drowning;
would I do it?... Without a moment's hesitation. However, I would get myself a proper boat.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/11/liverpool-covid-military-tests.html.
And: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2020/08/covid-19-whistleblower.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/09/lockdown-ii-livestream.html.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/11/liverpool-covid-military-tests.html.
And: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2020/08/covid-19-whistleblower.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/09/lockdown-ii-livestream.html.
11 comments:
Slightly off topic, but it's good to hear Richard D Hall is back with a new show after being gone for a few months since his last video. Apparently he's been renovating his house and making it semi off grid; I bet he must've spent a fortune on all those panels, where does he find the time. Seems abit drastic if you ask me as if he believes financial armageddon is approaching, even David Icke isn't going off grid. It's easier said than done, especially for the majority of us who don't have the money and time (and patience and skills), and I know my girlfriend wouldn't be too happy if I started growing organic food in the garden and installing a wood burner in the living room with the little uns running wild. Noone will be truly off grid no matter how much they try, the system we have is too rigged for that to be possible. I dont know why I bother watching Richard's show as the last time I emailed him (last year) my email bounced back (meaning he's blocked me for some reason? or he changed his email address), and the same happened when I emailed Mark Devlin a few months ago, my email bounced back. I never go trolling anyone or be aggressive or confrontational, so I think that's abit rude if you ask me. I understand they get "thousands" of emails, but banning/blocking someone is a little arrogant I think.
Hi Anon.
It might just be a technical problem when you emailed Mark.
Good to see RDH back on the air. not seen his new show, but sounds good.
I'm not an off-grid person. I believe the NWO can be stopped, including its planned financial meltdown. I understand his concern though seeing as his child is still young.
All the best.
Ben
Hi Ben,
Could be anything really. I did email them both a few times (emailed Richard back in October I think after his show about missing Richie Edwards) so they've probably got tired of the same questions from people. Richard brought up many good thoughts with Andrew Johnson, and I'm glad he agrees (as most but not all in the truth movement) there is no virus, but I wonder what he would think of Chris Reinhart ("he's controlled opposition"). I believe Mark is at a Questioning History conference in a few days, with other researchers John Hamer and Gloria Moss. Hamer has done alot of research on the alleged Titanic switch, a theory which I'm dubious about; love his other work but that theory has sadly been debunked so many times, but I do find it an interesting theory.
Richard and Andrew think that anybody who disagrees with them is controlled opposition! They're right in a few cases, but they go way over the top. The Titanic switch theory was studied by a local Oxford author, Robin Gardiner. It doesn't make sense though for several reasons as I detail here: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2011/05/was-titanic-scuttled.html
I agree with you there Ben. I was going to email Andrew Johnson about the great show they both did covering the covid scam, and it was an excellent discussion, but his FAQ on his website put me off because he seems to think email's are only worth reading or replying to if they suit his views or are worth reading and not questions he regularly gets, and his "messages are screened" is abit OTT, if he was that bothered he would've reveal his home address. Bit of an opinionated attitude in my view. I do agree with Richard about Julian Assange being an asset and controlled opposition.
Yes it was Robin Gardiner from Oxford who originally came up with the switch theory back in the 80s/90s, I have read his switch theory book which he goes into detail, and there are many intriguing things in that that are very thought provoking, but I think alot of what he says is unproven assumptions backed up with no evidence (alot of claims about names in the inquiries that I haven't been able to find). Switch debunkers (titanicswitch.com) go into great detail in showing how unlikely it was for the switch to have taken place, going into the many changes that Titanic and Olympic had that would've made it impossible to switch. I've looked at dozens of photos of each ship from photos I have found (some quite rare ones) and I have found no evidence that the Olympic became Titanic and vise versa. The names of the ships were said to have been etched into the steel not letters bolted on, so if that's true then how did they remove and swap the names over?. That's just one example. And the wreck was filmed in 1987 which clearly shows the decaying letters on the bow. I assume once those letters are there they're there for to entirety of the ships life.
I love the switch theory and wish it were true, and it would make a great story for a film, but I'm not convinced Titanic was switched. John Hamer however is though.
Apologies for the long reply.
That's quite alright, It's always good to communicate with readers. I've not seen the new Richplanet show yet, but I anticipate it will be very good. Most of RDH's material is. He is not perfect and makes major errors, but he gets a lot right as well. I've fallen out with Andrew Johnson unfortunately. It's over a purely personal issue and not based on any difference of opinion. I still recommend his work.
I'd like to have met Gardiner, seeing as we live so close, but sadly he's now died. As I say in my article, if the ship has been set on fire in the dockyard it would have been much more plausible. To scuttle it in the the middle of an ocean voyage would be effectively a suicide mission for all the conspirators. According to the scientists who have dived down to the wreck, it IS Titanic because her unique hull number is still embossed on the propellers.
The new RP show is well worth watching, I was completely glued to it and had to watch it all the way through without stopping, though the videos on his site do tend to not play as they should and you have to keep refreshing to get it to play, why that is I don't know, but I know Andrew Johnson will say "nothing to do with Richplanet, speak to your internet provider". I don't think ISPs are blocking any RP videos hosted on Richard's site, that's just a little paranoid for my liking. Andrew did make a good point (don't mean to spoil it if you haven't already watched it) about most of his video's not being deleted by youtube yet mot of Richard's 9/11 videos (and Covid related videos) have been taken down. And regards to censorship and rules on social media regarding Covid remarks, it's not just the likes the facebook, youtube, twitter etc that are banning or warning people not to post comments that aren't of the official narrative and can considered "conspiracy theories". I visited a computer/video forum a few days ago to ask for help regarding a problem I had with a video connection, and I noticed they had their own Covid thread and the mods of the site gave a whole list of things that forum members aren't to discuss: no talk of vaccines being linked to autism, claims that 5G causes the virus, claims that mask wearing is harmful to people's health, etc. The people who run this site seem to think they are an authority on medical health and know everything that's going on in the world. in other words they are just repeating the official MSM story. It's likely they don't want to have their site shut down which is why they are discouraging people from talking about these ideas.
Regarding the Titanic, yes you're right the propeller on the wreck has been filmed to show the No. 401 (Titanic's build number) rather than 400 which was Olympic's build number. The theorists argue that this was because Titanic's propeller was taken off and put on the Olympic. And also, they filmed the decaying letters TITANIC on the bow that could still be visible. I think the general theory as to why the scuttle simply didn't happen in the dockyard is because part of the reason was to murder the three men on board that were against the federal reserve act which was passed the following year, Astor, Guggenheim and Strauss. It's interesting though that, when Robert Ballard gave a talk in Belfast one of the audience brought up the switch theory, and oddly Ballard replied with "yes, I think it is Titanic at the bottom of the Atlantic". Why would he say "I think it is"? and not "of course it is"?. Was he telling us something, giving us a clue perhaps?. Mark Devlin would call this masterful speaking.
Regarding Richard going semi off grid, but I wonder if he is going to take all of his money out of his bank account and keep it in a safe?. I hear people say removing your money from a bank is the best option, but it presents many problems, for instance how the hell do you pay your utility company when most people use a direct debit payment, not to mention where does your employer pay your wages into, or are people going to go cash in hand?. And with more and more places only accepting cash, having physical money is going to be more harder to keep. And completely ditching your utility company isn't going to get you anywhere, because as soon as you do that they will stop you and prosecute you. I assume Richard's wife must be fully on board with his project, I wish my partner was. If he's done all that work on his own that's some skill and dedication. It's worrying when Andrew remarked that a high street bank could go bust. When my mother died a few months ago I was left with a large sum of money, and to lose all that isn't worth thinking about. I can't just take it out of the bank for many reasons. People who think you can just have it locked away in a safe under the bed are living in cloud cuckoo land.
The rules of censorship on YouTube are terrible. I always play Richard's video on YouTube because I've noticed the same problem with his house player. I've seen lots of Richplanet videos on Bitchute, but all mirrors. RDH should get his own Bitchute channel.
If they wanted to murder those bankers, then putting them a doomed ship is not a very reliable way. Titanic took over two hours to go down, but some ships sink within seconds, depending on the kind of damage they suffer. As it happened there was enough time to save a few people and those bankers, being in first class, would have been the most likely to survive. As it was, the reason Gugenheim died is because he very bravely refused to board a lifeboat until everybody else had.
It's hard to know how to protect yourself financially in the future with all the economic vandalism planned by the Deep State. As somebody with very few assets I'm actually in a privileged position! Maybe invest in an array of places via a hedge fund. Put some in gold, some in cryptocurrency, like Bitcoin.
Good point about the three wealthy people on board, not sure if they were all bankers (Astor was the wealthiest man in the world at thw time, Strauss was a the owner of Macey's in New York). It's possible they couldve been lured onto the ship and murdered, but doing so in all the panic on board wouldve been hit and miss. Miles Mathis alleges that neither ship that night, instead it was a staged/hoax sinking invooving mostly few passengers, many of whom never existed. He draws parrells with the alleged passengers on 9/11 who are said to have never been on board.
Alot of people are talking about Bitcoin and gold of late.
Now that is something pretty extreme to suggest! Then again, obviously today it would be impossible. The passengers would be livestreaming their own drowning on YouTube. The only photographs of the Titanic disaster are taken from the Carpathia, including the alleged iceberg with the ship's paint scraped off on it. None of the passengers or crew took photos. Cameras in those days were large and bulky. They would not have bothered carrying them to the lifeboats. Could the entire thing be faked? That could be done. With actors in boats, an accompanying secret ship to transport them. The liner could then be abandoned and sunk with scuttling explosives on a timer.
Post a Comment