Friday, 4 September 2020

BoJo slams the TV Licence

Just one day after his previous coup the other day, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/09/boris-repeats-no-deal-threat.html, our Prime Minister Boris Johnson has announced what I hope is the first stage in his plan to defund the BBC. The basis of his case is one that has been made by TV Licence critics ever since the scheme was introduced in 1946. Why should viewers pay a subscription to a service regardless of whether or not they choose to watch it? If you want to watch Netflix, Amazon Prime or Gaia TV you have to pay a regular fee. You have to pay the BBC whether you watch it or not, merely by owning an instrument that gives you the means to. It's not fair. Source: https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1330399/boris-johnson-bbc-licence-fee-bbc-reform-pmqs-latest-news. Of course, this is not the real reason Boris is opposed to the TV Licence. He knows it is a tool of globalist cultural Marxist subversion, as described by people like Yuri Bezmenov, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhAzGLb1j40. He even gave an interesting hint about it a few days ago. It concerns the plans to ban the performance of Edward Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March Number 1, the Fantasia on British Sea Songs medley by Sir Henry Wood and Thomas Arne's Rule, Britannia! at the Last Night of The Proms, even though this is a tradition that dates back to 1954. This is supposedly because of the piece's glorification of slavery, British imperialism and "whiteness!". He said that somebody was "trying to restrain me from saying this...". Who!? He's the Prime Minister for goodness sake! Is he suggesting there are higher powers in the world that he is opposing? I'm glad to say that the decision has been reversed and the piece will be performed with vocals, although it will only be a small choir because of the coronavirus. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-53998584. It's interesting that I used the possessive adjective above without even thinking about it; I called him "our Prime minister". That's the first time ever I have used that terminology when I mention a British PM. Boris Johnson may well be "Britain's Trump!"; in which case he is hopefully regaining the lost territory that has reflected his premiership over the last few months. A lot of the criticism he has suffered from the Truth movement comes from simple fact that he is not a dictator. One of the advantages of democracy (or maybe disadvantages in this case) is that one person cannot have too much power. He's on our side. He will do as much as he can. Give the man a chance!

No comments: