Saturday, 13 May 2017

Keep the Eighth

Several readers have recently asked me to write about the subject of abortion. Ireland is unusual among Western nations in that its constitution protects the lives of unborn people. For most developed countries human rights apply equally to everybody from the moment of birth, but not before. The Irish Republic, on the other hand, has the Eighth Amendment to its constitution that states: "The state acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right." This is distinctively different to British law which includes no such right. To kill a baby the moment after it is born would mean prosecution for murder, but to kill that same child a few minutes earlier while it is in its mother's womb is merely a medical procedure... I know; I've seen it done. Killing the child a few weeks or months before birth is routine and socially acceptable. Millions of terminations of pregnancy, usually just called "abortions", have been performed in the United Kingdom. It's as everyday as a trip to the dentist and, thanks to modern medical techniques, is often not much more invasive. I am totally pro-life, but debating those who disagree with me is almost impossible because I'm so vulnerable to ad hominem. You can absolutely guarantee that a pro-abortionist will go on to respond: "But, Ben, don't you believe in a woman's right to choose?" A woman's right to choose. That little phrase is a masterpiece of propaganda. It effectively says: "If you don't want to be a misogynist, support infanticide!" Whoever came up with that at the Fabian Society, or Ireland's equivalent cultural Marxist think-tank, must be a mind controller extraordinaire. There is no honest answer I can give that won't lead to the rebuttal: "So, Ben, are you, as a 'white!', 'heterosexual!', 'male!', prepared to tell a 'WOMAN!' who has just been 'RAPED!' that she has to carry the baby to full term?" I'm forced to reply "yes," and you can guess how the rest of the conversation will go. There are a few alternative responses you can use. I once said to somebody: "OK, imagine I'm not an 'EEEEEEvil WHM!' and instead pretend I'm a one-legged black lesbian with dyed green hair, and I'm saying the same thing. How would you counteract my actual point?" However, a far more cogent answer, that I will definitely use next time I'm in that situation is: "If you were the child conceived, would you want to live or die?"

All people alive today are former foetuses. Humans begin as all mammals do, as a single cell inside our mother's body. In just nine months we grow into a fully-formed miniature human being. During those first nine months of our lives, we too could have been aborted. We always hear from pro-abortionists: "It's not a human being yet, it's just a clump of cells!" Well a clump of cells is all I am right now, although it's a much bigger clump today, admittedly. At what point does one become the other. Is an embryo of a thousand cells non-human and one with 1001 cells human? If so why? What's the difference and why is the cut-off point where it is? If you set a legal term limit on abortion at, say, thirty weeks, does the foetus magically transform into a human baby at the stroke of midnight? You see how absurd the justifications for abortion are? The objection to abortion is not just a religious bugbear; it's a serious secular human rights issue. Sometimes abortion has to be done because it would otherwise put the mother's life in danger. An ectopic pregnancy is doomed from the start because if it is not terminated it will eventually kill the mother and then both mother and baby will be dead anyway. There is currently a campaign in Ireland to repeal the Eighth Amendment led by feminists, several medical experts, secular activists and leftist politicians. There is a counter-protest as well, see: https://www.yestolifeireland.org/. I very much recommend the lectures of Dr Anthony Levatino, a gynaecologist who used to perform terminations until he experienced a crisis of conscience, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5E2qobpSOI. Even though I support a total ban on abortions except for the obvious exemption I discussed above, I don't believe women who have had abortions should be criminally charged. Instead I would like to ask what is wrong with society when it makes a mother feel she has to kill her own child. I would like to address that. Women who have abortions often suffer terrible emotional trauma afterwards. I knew somebody once who confided in me that she had done this and she broke down in tears. I wish those women peace and comfort. They weren't to know.

Wednesday, 10 May 2017

The Larry Warren Controversy- Part 13

See here for essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-12.html. Peter Robbins was recently featured on Raconteurs News where he speaks about his falling out with Larry Warren for the first time since his brief announcement a few months ago, see: https://raconteursnews.com/peter-robbins-returns-raconteurs-news/. Peter is a good orator and is normally very articulate, yet in this interview he sounds uncomfortable when he comes on to the subject of Larry. He pauses, stammers and trips over his words somewhat. I was lurking in the chatbox when the show went live and, predictably, a baying gibbering lynch mob gathered, including the usual suspects, demanding Larry's head on a spike. Peter, to his credit, did not deliver. He was rather reticent and evasive, and gave only limited details. The response from Sacha Christie has been outrage; she posted this lengthy piece on her website the very next day (She must have stayed up all night writing it!), see: http://sacha-christie-infomaniachousewife.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/open-letter-to-peter-robbins_5.html. So Peter is now standing on the bridge being shot at from both sides. I don't believe Peter Robbins is a malicious person, far from it; but I maintain that he is mistaken. In the material in Sacha's article he speaks more comprehensively about his rift with Larry. Larry will be addressing all the points he makes on the next HPANWO Show. I don't know how Sacha managed to get hold of Peter's private correspondence to Larry. Did he give it to her? Sacha is very good at retrieving private information and has no misgivings about publishing it. She posted my confidential email exchange with Chris Evers, see link to Part 12 at the top. I'm going to let her get away with that, simply because it is an own goal. If you read what Chris and I actually say to each other it contradicts the narrative she posits for it. (According to her I apparently wasn't banned from the OLM conference at all; I was merely "asked not to attend"... Hmm, yes. And this is not a bowl of cherries; it is merely a hemispherical container into which I've put some cherries.).

The anti-Larry Warren brigade have also announced that they're abandoning the handwriting analysis scheme that I detailed elsewhere, especially in Parts 2 and 11, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/is-larry-warren-fraud-part-2.html and: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-11.html. They can't go ahead without the original documents, which is actually what I said at the time. They lambaste Larry for not helping them himself; suggesting that he ought to if he is innocent and should therefore be eager to prove them wrong. That makes no sense. Even if he were not working with people who can't even bear to sit on opposite sides of a conference auditorium from him, what would be the point of getting involved in a venture that could never succeed for the reasons I describe in the background links? Even with the original documents, all the analyzer will say at the end is: "Well this might be Larry Warren's handwriting... but then again it might not." So after all the hype, including some very silly Downfall memes on YouTube, the handwriting endeavour is off. The money will be returned to the donors. Perhaps then the six hundred pounds they were about to waste can be spent on more productive UFOlogy projects, like... well... doing UFOlogy?
See here for the next part: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-14.html.

Tuesday, 9 May 2017

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 24

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 24 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see: http://www.ufotruthmagazine.co.uk/subscriptions-shop/.
Issue 24 includes an article in my column, entitled: Suburban Saucers. Some UFO's are giving tantalizing hints that their occupants are attempting some kind of communication, in their own way, with humans by approaching residential areas of towns.

Also you will find in Issue 24: Has the mystery of "foo fighters" been solved? Nick Redfern on the 70th anniversary of Roswell, a review of the second Southern conference by Gary Heseltine and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/programme-233-podcast-gary-heseltine.html.
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 23: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-23.html.

Monday, 8 May 2017

Au Revoir la France

The French people have just committed national suicide. They had the opportunity to elect their very own Donald Trump, a maverick anti-establishment patriot, Marine Le Pen; and instead preferred a Rothschild globalist suited smooth-talking dandy called Emmanuel Macron, see here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/french-election-first-round.html. As I explain in that background link, there were attempts by the elite to rig the election in favour of Macron, but in the end their machinations were superfluous because the electorate willingly chose Macron. His victory was a landslide, 66% to 34%, way too great a margin to be created entirely by fraud. Madame Le Pen acted with great dignity, congratulating her rival in a live speech. She also said: "The French people have chosen continuity." That's a very interesting statement, as well as a veiled insult. In truth, continuity is the last thing France needs right now. Continuity is the central problem of that nation. The French establishment and media were entirely behind Macron; he was their Hillary Clinton, only this time they succeeded. If Le Pen had won then she would have become France's first woman president, in fact the first female ruler of France since Queen Marie Antoinette was beheaded in 1793. During the US presidential election the refrain "first woman president!" was repeated over and over again like a mantra when describing Hillary Clinton, but I have never heard it said once on the BBC or any other mainstream media source when describing Marine Le Pen; even though it is an equally true fact. "I'm with her!" just doesn't ring quite the same this time. Macron has set his agenda immediately when he delivered his first presidential speech with the biumvirate of the French Tricouleur and the European Union flag behind him, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39839349. In fact the twelve gold stars are never far away from Macron in his public appearances. I'm sure there's a Kalergi Prize coming his way soon. This is not the first time the Empire has struck back since 2016; they retook Austria and the Netherlands, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/dutch-election.html, yet the loss of France is more significant. France is one of the proudest nations on earth; they have always had a naturally independent spirit. They have expended a lot of effort on national defence, including their own independent  nuclear deterrent. Unlike Britain theirs was domestically created without American help. Yet France was something of a loose cannon during the Cold War with a very on-and-off relationship with NATO. It had a powerful communist party and an accepted middle class far right. Peter Wright describes in his infamous book Spy Catcher how he spent more time spying on the French than the Russians during his career at MI5, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/frederick-forsyth-was-real-spy.html.

All hope is not lost. Macron only has five years in office and then Le Pen can challenge him again. She is young for a politician and energetic. However during those five years Macron is going to try and cement establishment rule over France and create a monopoly that cannot be unseated through the ballot box. Centrists know that they can't persuade the people to vote for them by argument, because they have no argument; they're also mind-numbingly boring. He will never win lasting and dedicated supporters among the French people so instead he is going to import them. He will fling the gates wide open to bring as many immigrants as possible into France because he has learnt the lesson of Britain's Labour governments; refugees always vote down the middle of the road. Up to six million could enter the country by 2022; that's almost the entire population of Paris. This means we can expect more terrorist attacks in France, both real and false-flag. Macron just shrugs at this threat calling it "a part of daily life". So when Le Pen takes him on again in 2022 she will have a much steeper hill to climb. I wonder if it's too late. I recently read an interesting novel called The Partisan by Fenek Solere (despite his very French name the author actually comes from south Wales), see: http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-partisanreview/. It is set in France in the near future in which the country has descended into civil war. Could it come true? I fear that the 2017 election was the last chance to save France from total Illuminati occupation by peaceful means. It would have been pleasant to have France transition to freedom in a civilized and diplomatic manner; we will not know until 2022 whether that can still be achieved. If it can't then we will have no choice but to fight because the alternative will be extermination. The title of this article means "Goodbye France", but in French there are several different translations for "Goodbye". Au revoir is a goodbye that includes a temporary condition, in which the subject expects to see the person they're saying it to again soon; whereas adieu implies a more permanent situation. So I hold on to hope for the time being. 2016 is not over yet.

Sunday, 7 May 2017

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 20

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast: http://truthfrequencyradio.com/the-kev-baker-show-72124/.
And here for the illustrated YouTube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9EFtujlajo.
Subjects discussed include new evidence on the Rendlesham Forest UFO, unexplained sounds from above and below, alien skulls and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/ben-emlyn-jones-on-kev-baker-show-19.html.

Tuesday, 2 May 2017

Ben Emlyn-Jones at AwakeCon (postponed)

I will be speaking at the upcoming AwakeCon event organized by my friend and fellow researcher Tajinder Gill.
EDIT 22/5/17: Event postponed. Will hopefully be reorganized later in the year.
Along with myself you can see talks by Thomas Sheridan, Maria Wheatley, Tony Topping, Sarah Adams and Kieron Lee Perrin, see here for details: http://www.awakecon.com/home.html.
See here for a HPANWO Radio interview with Tajinder and Sarah: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/programme-228-podcast-tajinder-gill-and.html.

Monday, 1 May 2017

The Larry Warren Controversy- Part 12

See here for essential background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-11.html. Sacha Christie has published an article on her website entitled Benned!!!. See: http://sacha-christie-infomaniachousewife.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/benned.html. It's the first thing she's written on her blog for almost two months and it addresses issues that were raised a long time ago, especially my being excluded from the OLM conference. Why did she only post her screed on the 29th of April? Clearly because she was waiting for the UFO Truth event, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/ufo-truth-magazine-southern-conference.html. She must think that the timing will give her "revelations" some kind of tactical significance or spoil whatever progress was made at UFO Truth. This is probably her most vicious and blustering post to date. Along with myself, Tino also receives some really nasty personal abuse; including a disparagement of his personal appearance. Yes, that is the level Sacha's "mission" has stooped to, folks! As always, the greater part of the blog's content is simply noise. It would take me hours to unpick every single point, and what purpose would it serve? To prove Sacha wrong? She already knows she's wrong and she doesn't care. It would be a futile effort on my part, as I explain in the background links below. Most of what she says I've already addressed in previous article in this series; the solicitor's letters etc. The larger part of what remains are statements most people know are false anyway; people who matter that is. However there are a few pinpricks of factual thrusts in her coal-sack of vile nonsense that must be addressed. She claims Malky managed to obtain Sacha's address from her medical records forwarded by a friend who works in the NHS. As a former hospital porter (have I mentioned that before?) I can tell you that is highly unlikely. First of all, it would mean that the individual would have to have clearance for the medical records storage database. NHS medical records are sealed off MJ-12 style in a restricted area behind a locked door through which only the medical records staff can gain access. If I was sent to get some documents from the storage unit at my hospital I would ring a bell and wait in an anteroom while the clerk went and retrieved them and gave them to me in a zip-locked folder. Malky's supposed friend is in serious breach of NHS confidentiality regulations and would lose their job for certain and maybe even face criminal charges. Are they really likely to risk that just so their mate can settle some Facebook barney? Sacha also claims that I accuse her of being the mysterious face reflected in the A10 photo screenshot. Not true. What I actually said was: "The reflection is far too indistinct to get a provable positive ID, as I've said before. I must say it does look rather familiar... but I will not name the person I think it is because I cannot prove it. However I think we can all honestly agree who it is not: Larry Warren." Source: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/is-larry-warren-fraud-part-7.html. Any abuse Chris Evers has received as a result of this matter was not incited by me. I am totally against that kind of behaviour and have been from the start, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/im-banned-from-conference.html. In fact I stated clearly in my interview with Tino on the matter, that I hoped people would still attend the OLM conference and enjoy it; see background link at the top. I said that I wished to remain dignified throughout. However firmly I put my foot down, it will always be wearing a spit-polished brogue. It is actually necessary to reduce the hate as much as possible in any situation like this. Projects for rehabilitating terrorists include a programme called "rehumanization"; and it applies just as much in far more petty situations such as this, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sI6HIsV2rM. (I wonder what those people would think of the "mission" Sacha and her accomplices are on.) Another factual distortion Sacha makes is to claim Larry Warren is not a veteran. Yes he is. He passed out of a joint forces basic training centre in the United States and then did security and law enforcement police training and advanced air base combat training at a US Air Force facility before going on active deployment to Britain. See Left at East Gate; what's more he has all the certificates to prove it... and yes, they are genuine. In fact he was injured in the line of duty like John Burroughs was. The length of his service is irrelevant. So, I hope that clears things up. No doubt there'll soon be more to come from Sacha et al, and when it does I shall be waiting.
See here for the next part: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-13.html.