ID Petition Response, Omissions and Distortions

 

The UK government have responded to a petition signed by almost three million people, including me, opposing their plan to introduce digital national identity cards. Their reponse is worth analyzing in detail. I will make some running comments and add them in bold:

We will introduce a digital ID within this Parliament to help tackle illegal migration, make accessing government services easier, and enable wider efficiencies.
That's not your real reason and you know it!
We will consult on details soon.
You'll say nothing to us about your plot except to tell us afterwards what you think is going to be.
The Government has announced plans to introduce a digital ID system which is fit for the needs of modern Britain.
Meaning your needs to destroy Britain.
We are committed to making people's everyday lives easier and more secure, to putting more control in their hands...
Bollocks!
(including over their own data), and to driving growth through harnessing digital technology.
This means creating new ways to control people using digital technology.
We also want to learn from countries which have digitised government services for the benefit of their citizens, in line with our manifesto commitment to modernise government.
Emulate nations that have sunk further into the globalist swamp than Britian has.
Currently, when UK citizens and residents use public services, start a new job, or, for example, buy alcohol, they often need to present an assortment of physical documents to prove who they are or things about themselves.
No, we need to prove who we are to start a job, and to buy alcohol etc, proof of age. We already have passports and driving licenses etc for that.
This is both bureaucratic for the individual and creates space for abuse and fraud.
Problem-reaction-solution.
This includes known issues with illegal working and modern slavery...
Of which the government couldn't give two piece of excrement.
...while the fragmented approach and multiple systems across Government make it difficult for people to access vital services.
Those services are being degraded deliberately anyway. If they were more functional those problems would be solved.
Further, there are too many people who are excluded, like the one in ten UK adults who don't have a physical photo ID, so can struggle to prove who they are and access the products and services they are entitled to.
Why has this never been an issue before? Why have other ways to resolve it that have been common practice for years suddenly become unworkable?
To tackle these interlinked issues...
Of which you have no intention of doing. If you have your way you will never mention these "issues" again.
...we will introduce a new national digital ID.
You will do no such thing!
This is not a card but a new digital identity that will be available for free to all UK citizens and legal residents aged 16 and over (although we will consider through consultation if this should be age 13 and over).
Which means you'll register the youngest citizens so they get used to Big Brother practices early. Winston said in 1984 "fear the children the most."
Over time, people will be able to use it to seamlessly access a range of public and private sector services, with the aim of making our everyday lives easier and more secure.
Yeah, there's always bait in the trap eh?
It will not be compulsory to obtain a digital ID but it will be mandatory for some applications.
"We won't force you to have it. You can always decline, but we'll make your lives unbearable without it." Just like with the V666ine passports.
For example, the new digital ID will build on GOV.UK One Login and the GOV.UK Wallet to drive the transformation of public services. Over time, this system will allow people to access government services, such as benefits or tax records, without needing to remember multiple logins or provide physical documents.
What's wrong with multiple logins? We've never had a problem with that before.
It will significantly streamline interactions with the state, saving time and reducing frustrating paperwork, while also helping to create opportunities for more joined up government services.
Come off it! You love complex bureaucracy because it gives you the excuse to create vast numbers of overpaid jobs for yourselves.
International examples show how beneficial this can be.
This is like the kid saying "But Johnny's mum and dad let him watch TV late." This is Britain, not other countries. We can do things our own way.
For instance, Estonia's system reportedly saves each citizen hours every month by streamlining unnecessary bureaucracy, and the move to becoming a digital society has saved taxpayer money.
So you want us to be like an ex-Soviet republic being used a footstool for NATO.
By the end of this Parliament, employers will have to check the new digital ID when conducting a "right to work" check.
They won't be able to when three million people tell you where to stick your digital ID!
This will help combat criminal gangs who promise access to the UK labour market in order to profit from dangerous and illegal channel crossings.
But YOU are the biggest client of those criminal gangs! They wouldn't exist if it wasn't for you!
It will create a fairer system between UK citizens and legal residents...
Do you think we're stupid!?
...crack down on forged documents...
Which is only an issue because you made it happen.
 ...and streamline the process for employers, driving up compliance.
We will not comply!... And, by the way, alarm bells should go off whenever you hear a bureaucrat say "streamline".
Further, it will create business information showing where employers are conducting checks, so driving more targeted action against non-compliant employers.
What will you do when thousands of private sector employers are forced into overlooking your Big Brother "papers please!" laws because so many people will be outside that system?
For clarity, it will not be a criminal offence to not hold a digital ID and police will not be able to demand to see a digital ID as part of a "stop and search."
To begin with. Once the infrastructure is in place it can be adapted into any role you want.
Privacy and security will also be central to the digital ID programme.
You couldn't give a shit about either.
We will follow data protection law and best practice in creating a system which people can rightly put their trust in.
Is this the same data protection law that doxed a hundred thousand Afghans to the Taliban?
People in the UK already know and trust digital credentials held in their phone wallets to use in their everyday lives, from paying for things to storing boarding passes. Those are related to banks and retail. They cannot be adapted into a total state control system.
Why do you even need to say that? Because you know we know it can and you know we are suspicious of that!
The new system will be built on similar technology and be your boarding pass to government. Digitally checkable digital credentials are more secure than physical documents which can be lost, copied or forged, and often mean sharing more information than just what is necessary for a given transaction.
"It's ever so conventient!"
The new system will be designed in accordance with the highest security standards to protect against a comprehensive range of threats, including cyber-attacks.
So are air traffic control computers and they're being hacked every day.
We will launch a public consultation in the coming weeks and work closely with employers, trade unions, civil society groups and other stakeholders, to co-design the scheme and ensure it is as secure and inclusive as possible.
Even in prisons there are "inmates councils" where the captors listen patiently to the opinions and wants of those they have total power and control over. Don't give us that crap!
Following consultation, we will seek to bring forward legislation to underpin this system.
The MP's are way too cucked to stop you out of principles, but they will hopefully stand up to you when it threatens them losing their seat, therefore no longer having a luctrative lifestyle with little work and meaning they'll have to go out and get a proper job like everybody else.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Is this connected to the Ministry of Peace, the Ministry of Plenty and the Ministry of Truth?
Source: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/730194?reveal_response=yes.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2025/09/orwellian-archaeology.html.
And: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2025/09/third-rail-radio-programme-222.html.