The Paracas skulls were unearthed
in 1928 by the archaeologist Julio Tello. From the moment they were first
examined there has been debate over them because they are an extremely unusual
shape and are heavier than normal human skulls. The upper part of the cranium
is extended backwards and upwards instead of being the natural shape. Making
somebody's head an unusual shape can be achieved by binding the head of a baby
before the sections of the upper skull have joined together. This used to be
carried out by many ancient cultures and was done for cosmetic reasons.
Sometimes an unnaturally shaped head was a status symbol and only the children
of the elite classes or priesthood would be granted it. Contrary to what you
might think, artificially warping an infant's head involves no negative health
risks, however once the alteration is done and the bones of the skull are set,
the process cannot be reversed. The Paracas skulls are different from other
examples of artificial cranial deformation because of their extreme difference
from normal and the way they have added weight and size as well as altered
shape. Then a few days ago the archaeologist and ancient alien researcher Brian
Foerster announced that he'd organized DNA tests on the skulls that indicate
that they are not human, or not completely human. He reported that: "...the mitochondrial DNA (from the
mother) presented mutations unknown to any man, primate or any other animal...
the mutations suggested we are dealing with a completely new human-like being,
very distant from Homo sapiens,
Neanderthals or Denisovans." The skeptics have responded, but their
dismissal is very ad hominem and addresses mostly the supposed personal flaws
of Mr Forester's character and credibility rather than the actual information
he's provided. Forester says the DNA tests were done privately and anonymously.
The results were not published in any accredited scientific journal, but were
announced by him independently. Source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/630567/Could-bizarre-skulls-with-non-human-DNA-be-proof-of-aliens-on-Earth.
This is understandable purely because whoever had the expertise to carry out
DNA tests on these skulls, which are almost three thousand years old, probably
earns a living in an existing job. They might not want to risk their livelihood
by going public. The case against Brian Foerster also fails to take into
account two highly significant correlations. One is the Starchild skull. This
was from a body found in Mexico some distance away, and it's from about two millennia
later than the Paracas ones, but the study project on that has been far more
developed and has produced much more evidence. It does suggest that there was,
and maybe still is, an extraterrestrial biological presence in the American
continents, and it's been there for thousands of years, see background links
below. What's more the Paracas people lived close to a very interesting society
that emerged a few centuries later, the Nazca culture. These people are world
famous for drawing huge diagrams and pictures on the flat surface of a desert
many miles across. They can only be seen properly from at least several
thousand feet up in the air. This meant that the Nazcans were creating this
enormous work of art specifically for the benefit of individuals who were up in
the sky; because it would be invisible to them on the ground. So I think we
should take Brian Foerster's claim far more seriously than the skeptics are
saying, and wait for more information. There also other occasions where human
remains of a very abnormal shape or size have appeared, see background links.
See here for background:
http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/lloyd-pye-dies.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment