My Internet service provider is TalkTalk and until very
recently I was always perfectly happy with their service; what's more I even gained
a distinct sense of loyalty to them when they decided to resist the Digital
Economy Act of 2010, a piece of legislation which was nothing more than an
attempt at backdoor online censorship. Nevertheless I've become concerned over
an element of their practice when I ordered an upgrade a couple of years ago to
TalkTalk Fibre, a "super-fast" broadband service than runs on a
national fibre-optic system. An engineer came to my home and fitted a new phone
socket, and he dropped off a special new router to replace my old modem. There
is a helpline TalkTalk customers can call where the staff all speak with a
Filipino accent, suggesting that the call centre is in the Philippines; I
suspect TalkTalk is therefore using cheap Third World labour. As they discussed
my service with me they were very keen to show me how to run my internet access
via a wireless local area network. In fact their tone was strangely
overenthusiastic; I've heard from friends who have experienced the same thing.
I told them I didn't need a wireless LAN because I only have my personal computer
and that sits about two feet away from the phone socket where the router is
plugged in, easily within reach of the five-foot Ethernet cable they provided
me with. This seemed a very straightforward explanation to me, but the helpline
man's reply was curious: "Are you sure you don't want to set up a wireless
connection, Mr Emlyn-Jones?" It was as if he hadn't heard me; I had to
repeat myself several times. Eventually he accepted the uncomfortable truth
that I was happy with just a wired connection and he ended the conversation.
The other reason I didn't want wireless is because I'm concerned about the
health and safety aspects that have been raised over cellular transmissions,
"electrosmog" and its dangers. I'm currently trying to persuade my
landlord not to allow a smart meter to be installed and I've been following the
research of people like Barry Trower and Deborah Tavares, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z99_SzoXZdY
and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOpCtLQIZJ8.
So I plugged my PC into the router using the cable, but then I noticed that the
light on the router box's display that indicated WiFi was still lit. It turned
out that the wireless transmitter in the router still operates even if you're
not connected up to a wireless LAN. I immediately called back TalkTalk and
demanded to know how to disable it. They told me this wasn't possible. I
wondered what to do and in the end decided to construct a Faraday cage to put
my router in, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/tin-foil-hat.html
(I found out afterwards that I didn't make it quite right because I should have
fitted an earth wire to channel the current). However when I told a very
IT-savvy friend of mine what had happened he was astounded. He told me that it
was very easy to disable the WiFi signal on a TalkTalk Fibre router; you can
access the router's driver using an ordinary web browser and this will give you
the option to switch off the WiFi signal for "saving power and network
security". I followed his instructions and it worked. The question is; why
did TalkTalk technical support not tell me this?
Everything was fine for a while until last week when I
changed my ISP package. The Filipina saleswoman offered me a 20% discount for
six months and I gave way to temptation. Part of the new package was sending me
a new router and TV box (not that I'll ever use that!) called a
"super-router". Alarm bells rang. "Are you certain nothing else
will change in my use of your services?" I asked. "Absolutely
positive, Mr Emlyn-Jones. You just use the new router in the same format as
your existing one." I had a very bad feeling about it even as I agreed to
the offer over the phone. When the new super-router arrived I set it up and
switched it on, and it worked fine, including the WiFi transmitter. I opened up
the driver control to disable the signal as I had done with my old router and
noticed that it was an entirely different page. I searched in vain for the WiFi
toggle, but it was not there. I called TalkTalk and explained to the adviser that
I wished to switch off the WiFi transmitter and that I was using a wired
connection because I live in a small room, only have a single device on the
router and the cable is easily adequate for that... "Why do you not want a
wireless local area network, Mr Emlyn-Jones?"... I gritted my teeth and
groaned inwardly. I try to be always polite to call centre staff, but I
couldn't keep a twinge of irritation out of my voice, and I snapped back:
"Do I have to give you a reason?" There was a pause. "Alright,
Mr Emlyn-Jones. I will have to discuss this with my supervisor. Please hold the
line for a few minutes." I held for two minutes and then suddenly the line
went dead... Maybe we were just accidentally cut off. I called back and was put
through to a different adviser and he said. "Not a problem, Mr
Emlyn-Jones. I will disable your wireless signal from here... there, it's
done." I looked down at the box; the WiFi light was still shining.
"Are you sure? The light's still on." "Yes, Mr Emlyn-Jones. I've
definitely deactivated the wireless signal on your router." I thanked him
half-heartedly. I had fortunately not thrown away my old router. I pulled it
out from where I'd been storing it and plugged it in. At the time of writing
I'm still using my old TalkTalk Fibre router. Obviously this situation cannot
last forever; the router has a limited service life. What I'll do after that
I'm not sure; build another Faraday cage? Switch to a new ISP? I'll cross that
bridge when I come to it. What bothers me about this saga is that that the
wireless technology we have in modern society, that most people use quite
willingly, is becoming more difficult not
to use when you're not willing. If
WiFi really is a form of electromagnetic weaponry intended to do us harm in any
of the ways Trower and Tavares discuss, then the attackers wielding it could be
making sure that their targets have no defence. The staff at TalkTalk may have
been given instructions to pressure customers who dislike WiFi into complying.
This is still an ongoing situation and I'll write an update as soon as there
are more developments.
6 comments:
Good article Ben. I am having this dilemma as well. I have often wondered if the psycho-physical brainwaves of people who are more aware, meditational etc are less adversely effected by the outer transmission being inwardly attuned, I believe this is a benefit. Time will tell but there is very strong and proven evidence that this may be a form of psychological warefare to those more susceptible or unable to counteract such psychological invasion not just at the molecular level. Take care
I can't contact you on Youtube anymore so here's a good a place as any to post a link to the latest Zombie like attack...probably not the first in the UK.
Says he was high on cocaine but more likely LSD or 'bath salts'...
What do you reckon??
Buther
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2823314/Man-kills-woman-hotel-attack-dies-police-custody-Tasered.html
Buther
Not again, Buther! These zombie incidents are totally up everywhere!
Sorry you're off YT
Thanks, X. I think at a higher level that's exactly what it's all about
Post a Comment