Electioneering

I will not be voting in the upcoming UK general election. As regular HPANWO-readers will know, I believe democracy is a con. Democracy is one of the biggest buzz-words in the English language; it is loaded down like no other with emotional, cultural and political baggage. Wars have been fought over democracy which have cost the lives of millions. Some people will start weeping at the very mention of the word. The quest for democracy has produced some of the most dramatic tales in history, from the Chartists to the Suffragettes to Mandela. Yet most democratic countries, even very old democracies, are suffering from a malaise. Democratic governments have a major credibility problem in their relationship with their citizens; some political leaders even have approval ratings in single figures. Cynicism is endemic and electoral turnout is low. Citizens also will vote often for negative reasons instead of positive; they’ll vote for somebody they don’t like in order to keep somebody they like even less out of office, rather than to try and elect somebody they do like. Democratic countries today are ruled by some of the most loathsome people imaginable; cruel, cowardly, weak, gutless, heartless, stupid, selfish and deceitful. Despite the fact that nominally we can “choose our leaders”, these kinds of people always rise to the top and nobody seems to know why, let alone how to stop them. This malaise is growing. For a long time in Britain, certainly during my entire lifetime, elections have consisted of a simple port and starboard watch between two political parties, Labour and Conservative, just swapping office every few years. The principle third party has been various splinter cells of the old Liberal Party; for the last decade or two it has been called the Liberal Democrats. It traditionally gets about fifteen percent of the vote and has a dozen or so Parliamentary seats. However this has now changed. In the 2010 election, for the first time in many years, neither main party achieved an electoral majority and so we had a "hung parliament"; therefore the Tories proposed an alliance with the Lib Dems and they formed a coalition government. The upcoming election this year will therefore be more interesting... or at least slightly less boring... than the previous ones. None of the Lib-Lab-Con triumvirate will be in government on their own after the election, or in the same combination that they were before. So when the BBC held a live TV debate, there were a few extra faces on the panel; Natalie Bennett of the Green Party, Nigel Farage of UKIP, Nicola "big fish" Sturgeon, first minister of Scotland and leader of the SNP and Leanne "Bach" Wood of Plaid Cymru, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Sv2AOQBd_s. The Ulster Unionists, socialists and others have demanded to know why they were not invited; which shows how chaotic the situation is. It seems that nobody can predict what will happen on May the 7th... at least nobody willing to comment in public. This does not mean that the "men in grey suits" have neglected to make arrangements for who will be living at Number Ten on May the 8th, just that it's not as obvious as usual, and there is more potential for slip-ups in their plot. The media is being as unprofessional as always. I've been disgusted at the way the Greens' Natalie Bennett and Caroline Lucas have been treated during interviews; the host keeps interrupting and baiting them, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32aqb167NkE. I'm not a Green Party supporter, but some of their ideas are genuinely progressive, like Basic Income, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/05/basic-income.html. Obviously these have to be shut down. I'm in two minds over UKIP too, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/is-ukip-on-our-side.html.

There's been a lot of talk lately about Labour forming a coalition with the Scottish National Party. This would be a turn up for the books because Scotland would have jurisdiction over what is decided in Westminster for the first time since the reign of King James I. We'd then have Ed Miliband, the Fabian Society boy wonder, as prime minister. His deputy would be Nicola Sturgeon or Bilderberg Group attendee Alex Salmond. The Conservative defence secretary made waves a few days ago claiming that Miliband would offer the SNP a deal by axing Trident; the Scottish nationalists are totally opposed to Trident (so am I, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/replacing-trident.html). Ed "Millipede" has denied this and claimed: "National security is too valuable to play politics with!", see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32229759. However, I have a feeling Labour will end up offering the SNP a bargaining chip; but it won't be Trident, it will be another independence referendum, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/people-of-scotland-please-vote-no-i.html. Sturgeon and Salmond will hang their hopes on a "YES" vote this time and then get rid of Trident from Scotland anyway. However the last referendum was rigged, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbJif7vISQg. What's to prevent that happening again? Remember UK elections are not independently monitored, unlike those in new and fragile democracies. We never think that electoral fraud could happen here, but it can and it does.

Whatever happens at the general election next month, nothing fundamental or important will change. Organized child abuse will still continue, bankers will not stop squeezing the nation dry, the forests will continue to be felled and genetically modified food will still be stocked, unlabelled, on supermarket shelves. I had a rather frustrating telephone conversation a few weeks ago with some friends of mine who have decided to vote UKIP because they so badly wanted Britain to get out of the European Union. I also think our country should exit the EU, immediately and completely. However I'm not going to vote for what looks to me like a controlled populist front. Farage offers a referendum on the EU when we should not be able to vote on it at all. This is because the UK's entry into the EU was an act of treason. You can't have a referendum on treason. You just tear up the membership papers and jail those responsible. One of my friends asked me: "Who are you going to vote for then?" and I replied "Nobody". He then said: "If you don't vote then you've got no right to an opinion." I was dumbfounded. This is coming from a man who has read three David Icke books and regularly attends conspiratorial conferences like Probe and Alternative View. I asked him: "So let's suppose UKIP win the general election and Nigel Farage becomes Prime Minister; what do you think will happen? Do you really think that the 'Men in Grey Suits' will shrug and say: 'OK, well that's our trick rumbled then. We'd better bow to the will of the people'.?" He evaded the question. Luckily most other people in the Conspirasphere are more clued up than my friend. If we could change things by voting they wouldn't let us do it. Indeed the MP Chris Mullin has written a fictional political novel called A Very British Coup which explains this concept. It was adapted into a TV miniseries, see: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/a-very-british-coup/on-demand/1867-001. No genuine improvement will come into our lives until this reality is exposed and dealt with. "The men in grey suits" decide everything and democracy is nothing more than our hard-won right to put a cross on a piece of paper every few years and choose our government's public relations officer.

See here for more details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/vote-for-deek-jackson.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/politicians-new-year-message.html.

Zombie Tube Trick

I've been writing a lot lately about incidents which on the surface appear to be innocent pranks, but might have a darkly serious undertone to them. I've also been examining the subject of zombies and how they are being portrayed as real or semi-real in society; see background links at the bottom. These questions have arisen recently in a Brazilian reality TV show. The programme is of the "hidden camera" variety very similar to Trigger Happy TV or Beadle's About, but is far more extreme. The intention is to play practical jokes on unknowing members of the public for the amusement of the viewer. A recent episode features a woman who is travelling on an underground train. She is sitting in the carriage alone when it pulls into a station and the lights flicker. Noises from the movie Jacob's Ladder are added to the soundtrack for macabre effect. From the outset the passenger senses that something is amiss; she stands up and crosses herself, indicating that she is of a generally nervous disposition. The doors do not slide open as they should when the train is at a station. The passenger hammers on the doors saying: "Open up! I want to get out." The driver then announces on the tannoy that the train is suffering some technical problems and apologizes for the inconvenience. He assures everybody that they'll be fixed shortly... but then suddenly he pauses and begins crying out: "What the...!?... Get out!... Help me!" The passenger looks alarmed. The lights switch off completely and when they come back on, to her horror the passenger sees a group of Romeroesque zombies pressed up against the windows on the platform side. They are looking at her ravenously and pushing their hands through the ventilation gaps. The passenger screams in terror and desperately tries to force the doors on the opposite side of the carriage. She becomes completely hysterical with panic. She kneels down and prays desperately, weeping with fear. As she does so we see that under the cover of darkness when the lights were out, one of the zombies has managed to enter the cabin and it crawls obscenely towards her. As it reaches out to grab her she jumps up and runs to the far end of the carriage. At that moment the doors open and the zombies crowd in, but a second door is left unguarded and the passenger dashes out of it to safety. The jape is then repeated with several other people, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IOSVhfG79U.

I wondered if this scenario could all be staged and the victims are just actresses pretending to be frightened. I hope that's the case; however they look genuine to me. If this is a real set-up then the programme's producers should feel ashamed of themselves. I don't find it entertaining to see people truly thinking that their last moment on Earth has come, and that their demise will be one of being devoured alive by the carnivorous undead. This experience could have left her mentally scarred for life. Not just mentally either; she might have had a heart attack and died. What if she'd been armed? In Brazil gun control is more stringent than in the USA, but far weaker than in the UK; many people still carry firearms for self-defence. In that situation she'd be justified in shooting the "zombies" which could result in the death of the actors. Then again she might consider shooting herself to end it all before having to endure the agony of being dismembered and eaten; one of the characters in George A Romero's Day of the Dead does this. However there's another issue which is relevant whether the scene was real or not. Is the TV programme being used as a cultural experiment? The powers-that-were are trying to engineer our minds to become used to the presence of zombies, whether this symbolizes a sub-social underclass, victims of disease or a transhumanist golem; see background links below. The manipulators will be analyzing that scene frame-by-frame to assess that poor woman's reaction to the attempted zombie assault. They will also be sizing up the response of viewers, which is the reason for articles like this, see: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/cruelest-prank-ever-woman-left-5435850; notice the social media comments section and opinion poll? Of course this blog post will be one of the reactions they'll be studying too, in which case I hope they realize that their scheme will fail because people like me are on to them! They will not have their zombie apocalypse, whatever that means in practical reality.

See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/islamification-in-asda.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/suppressed-evidence-of-giants.html.

And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/real-zombies-2015.html.

Suppressed Evidence of Giants?

Every so often a video or picture appears online of an enormous human skeleton, usually being excavated from the ground. As with UFO and ghost photos, most of these are obviously faked and sometimes, because of the quality and availability of modern special effects technology, it's hard to know which is which. However credible stories occasionally emerge from the melee which do indeed report findings of very ancient human remains of extraordinary size; here's one I covered previously: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/giants-found-in-iraq.html. Sometimes humans do grow to heights way above the average of 5"7 for males, 5"4 for females. Robert P Wadlow of Alton, Illinois USA (1918 - 1940) peaked out at an inch below nine feet tall. This makes him the tallest confirmed human who has ever lived. He had to have clothes, furniture and utensils custom made for him. However the bodies in the graves found by Dr Ali in Iraq were all of people who would have stood at least a foot taller than Wadlow; found nearby were utensils of a comparable size dated to the same time period as the graves.

When an article began circulating that a number of giant skeletons had been destroyed I didn't immediately jump on it and declare it as real. The Smithsonian Institution is one of the largest academic organizations in the world. Based in the United States of America it runs a large number of museums, universities and research centres. According to the article it had been ordered by the US Supreme Court to reveal documents relating to the deliberate destruction of the oversized human skeletons in the early 20th century, see: http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/. However, as you can see, there is no source sited for this information, and Googling the subject brought up no further documentation; therefore I concluded that it was almost certainly a false story. It turns out that the World Daily News Report is a satirical hoax website, rather like "BFNN", see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/islamification-in-asda.html. The name "James Churward" is probably a corruption of Col. James Churchward, the real alternative archaeologist who studied the idea of the lost continent of Mu. However, as with the Muslim Asda story, I wonder if there is a sinister underlying objective related to it, not least because of the photograph it uses as an illustration. Despite this story being a joke, according to many researchers archaeological data has been eliminated before in order to preserve the official narrative. When the Hypogeum on Malta was uncovered it was full of human bones, indicating that it had been some kind of charnel house. Thousands of individuals had been interred there. However nearly all those bones have "been mislaid" and only six skulls remain. The same is reported by Michael Cremo and Richard L Thompson in their epic book Forbidden Archaeology, see: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Forbidden-Archeology-Hidden-History-Human/dp/0892132949. According to them, such scientific fraud is carried out routinely and dates back to the dawn of science in order to maintain a false conventional vision of the past. The photo above is of some skulls found in a cave in Nevada USA. As you can see somebody has placed a silver coin, probably a US dollar, in the frame to provide a rough scale and these skulls are huge. They're from anatomically normal human heads apart from their enormous size. If the rest of their bodies are on the same relative human dimensions then these "people" would have stood over twelve feet high. The local Paiute Indians tell folk tales about a time in the past when giants roamed the local area. They were very fierce and if they captured humans they would kill and eat them. Is this mythology actually based on real events handed down from past generations? In the West we all know of the many legends of giants, from Homer's Cyclops to the bible which states: There were giants on the Earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were fair and took them as wives, and they gave them many heirs. These became mighty men of renown. (Gen. 6:4). The bible also describes the giant warrior Goliath who was killed by the young king David with a slingshot. Goliath was said to be 9"9 tall, so he would have stood ten inches over Robert P Wadlow. (1 Sam. ch 17) Therefore, even if the motive of World Daily News Report is nothing more than mischievous fun, they have still blundered into a genuine and very serious controversy. I think it's perfectly possible that in the past there were races of supersized humanoid beings, possibly emerging out of a union with extraterrestrial life. But what if it's not just the past we're talking about here? For a long time now Nexus magazine has been promoting the book Solomon Islands Mysteries: Accounts of Giants and UFO's in the Solomon Islands by Marius Boirayon, see: http://www.amazon.com/Solomon-Islands-Mysteries-Accounts-Giants/dp/1935487043. This does not only describe legends of giants in the past, but contemporary encounter reports. There are a lot of unanswered questions when it comes to this subject and the people have a right to know the answers. Therefore if any scholar is withholding evidence about this issue then they are doing terrible harm and injustice; I would ask them to come forward.

HPANWO Mailing List

The HPANWO mailing list is now open. To receive email notifications of new posts please sign up by adding your name and email address in the box at the bottom of the side column. Thanks to my friend Mr Jack for helping me sort this out. 
(Edit: This is not currently, working. But I'll get it sorted.)
(Edit x2: It's working now!)

Ben Emlyn Jones on Energy, Politics and UFO's at High Wycombe 2015

My recent talk at the High Wycombe Paranormal Meet-up Group has been filmed, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzD4zxNoXyw.

It is of a lecture entitled Energy Politics and UFO's that I delivered there on the 28th of January, see here for more details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/ben-emlyn-jones-at-high-wycombe.html. Many thanks to Neil Geddes Ward.

English Defence League in Oxford

The English Defence League is a fairly new organization set up just six years ago in Luton in a response to an incident in which a military street parade was heckled by a small group of people dressed in traditional Muslim garb hurling abuse at the marching troops. Since then the group has expanded into a nationwide movement geared towards stopping the rise of Islam in the UK. The EDL says that it's non-racist and doesn't consider itself a part of the far right; its membership includes black people, Jews and Asians of Hindu and Sikh backgrounds. It's become renowned for its noisy and disruptive street protests, and today it brought its presence to Oxford in response to the local Muslim grooming scandal, see background links at the bottom for details. The EDL were opposed by a counter protest organized by Unite Against Fascism, an umbrella front of Muslim pressure groups and leftists; it is also affiliated to the authorities and politicians, and senior figures in the trade unions are involved. Some local councillors have made statements supporting the UAF in their demonstration against the EDL. The UAF regard the EDL as a far right racist and "islamophobic" organization no matter what the EDL themselves profess. I received an invitation on Facebook to attend the UAF event and clicked "maybe" before looking at it more carefully. The person inviting me was a friend from the hospital who himself is involved with UNISON, our trade union. When I looked closer I changed my status to "not going". If you recall, I myself have been labelled a "fascist!"; I was reported to the Birmingham UAF for the talk I gave at BUFOG. A person wrote to the UAF to say that I was a racist, far right anti-Semite, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-bufog.html. Luckily the UAF did not turn up and protest my event; this person has been leading a hate campaign against me for years and he tried to use the UAF as a lynch mob. These so called "anti-fascists" have targeted innocent people before, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/david-icke-loses-lawsuit.html. Are the EDL innocent?

I made my way into Oxford city centre.  What is often called "Oxford" by students and tourists alike, as if the rest of the place just doesn't exist. Immediately I could see something was going on.  There were a row of police vans on Magdalen Bridge and several officers wearing luminous jackets already patrolling the pavements.  According to my declined invite, Unite Against Fascism were assembling the for their anti-English Defence League protest at Bonn Square. More police were waiting there as I arrived and took a seat inconspicuously on a bench. Some were clad in sky-blue waistcoats designating them as police liaison officers, like the ones I met at Bilderberg fringe, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/bilderberg-2013.html. A light rain started to fall. I went into Marks and Spencer to use the toilet and when I came back a group of people had set up a stall with fliers and pamphlets on it. A man appeared from Unison with a handcart carrying a Unison banner and set it up; he was somebody whom I did not recognize or remember, and that was mutual.  A man in a mobility scooter had a loud speaker with him and began to play a song by Billy Bragg that is about the battle of Cable Street, this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWBeGK96pVQ. Two policemen came over and told him to turn down the volume. A pair of blonde women turned up and began selling copies of Socialist Worker. They walked up and down the street with the ream of newspapers in their arms like Big Issue sellers.  People joined the event with their faces masked by hoods and scarves; it reminded me of the protests outside the Oxford union when Marine Le Pen spoke there, http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/marine-le-pen-at-oxford-union.html. Things began to look very tense, a column of riot police marched through the square; among them were medics, and then with a clopping of hooves a drove of police horses trotted past. Not long afterwards the first skirmish broke out, a cluster of young men in dark English Defence League dress came around the corner raising their fists in the air and grunting "Eeh! Eeh! EDL!... Eeh! Eeh! EDL!" The protesters in Bonn Square ran over and began hurling abuse at them. Fists flew and the police intervened to arrest several people. I left Bonn Square and headed for the railway station where I knew the EDL would be gathering soon. The English Defence League contingent were very different to the UAF. They were distinctly working class whereas the UAF looked like students and Bohemians. The EDL were about 80% men and all white whereas the UAF were much more mixed. The EDL were also far more cheery; they greeted each other warmly, laughed and shared jokes; there was almost a party atmosphere in the station forecourt. The UAF looked very grave and sombre, frightened and desperate almost. Another difference from the UAF was that most of the EDL wore regulation clothing with their motifs on, in particular a hooded jersey that so many of them wore that it was almost a uniform. A few of them had on novelty masks and one was dressed as a pig; this is presumably because the pig is considered an unholy animal by Muslims. One man wore a balaclava like a bank robber or terrorist. Two more coaches turned up and the contingent grew to about a hundred and fifty people. They had no fliers or other literature to distribute; they just draped their banners on the railings and sung a series of chants like: "We're the famous EDL!" "Let's go fuckin' mental! Let's go fuckin' mental! La la la la!" and: "Allah, Allah, who the fuck is Allah!?" The melodies were all from popular tunes. Then I noticed that they were passing round six-packs of beer and some of them started drinking heavily; they were doing this quite openly, but police didn't seem to mind. The march began and the chanting cheering EDL were guided away from the station, surrounded by a cordon of armoured police with the horses escorting them front and back. To avoid the roadworks in Frideswide Square the protesters were directed down the narrow residential area of Becket Street and Osney Lane; a few people came out of their front doors to watch as the EDL's strident chanting echoed off the overhanging stone walls. I tagged along behind along with several other onlookers who were not involved and just curious like me. As we turned the corner into Oxpens Road a commotion broke out. Some UAF members were standing at the side of the road waving placards and yelling epithets like: "Nazi scum! Off our streets! Fuckin' fascist bastards!" The EDL responded by hurling abuse back and chanting "You're not English! You're not English! You're not English any more!" which goes to the tune of Bread of Heaven. The police horses galloped round like sheepdogs to get between the two sides and the EDL were herded off to the left. On Park End Street another anti-fascist tried to break into the cordon and another punch-up erupted. I was quite close this time and had to press myself against a wall to avoid being knocked down by one of the police horses. One of the policemen was injured and had to be attended by a medic. As we walked up the hill at New Road somebody was standing on top of the old castle mound shouting something down at the marchers. This was a futile effort because he had no megaphone and so his words were inaudible from that distance; however the EDL assumed it was something antagonistic and shouted their "You're not English..." chant at him. For the EDL that must be the worst imaginable insult. The most dangerous part of the march was where we reached the crossroads by the county council offices for two reasons; firstly the council is considered guilty of culpable neglect by the EDL for supposedly allowing the Muslim groomers to commit their crimes unhindered. Also the crossroads is adjacent to Bonn Square where the UAF were holding their rally. A double line of police vans with a demilitarized zone in between kept the two sides apart, but their voices could be heard and a broadside of verbal artillery was exchanged. Through the gaps in the barricade I could see the UAF activists waving their placards in a menacing way. Halfway down Castle Street the pavement was closed so I got separated from the marchers. I strode down Old Greyfriars Street and headed them off at the magistrates court at Thames Street. The police stopped the march at the public toilets so the protesters could relieve themselves. There were so many of them that the men just urinated against the walls and let the women use the cubicles. I imagine they will have needed to go after all they had been drinking; a trail of beer cans clattered in their wake. The cordon at the top of the hill must have been broken because we looked back to see UAF protesters behind a new police blockade at the bottom of Albion Place. Eventually we reached the site of the rally at the bottom of St Aldates between the police station and crown court. I was surprised to see that the speakers included Albert Burgess who had been at the Critical Mass Radio conference, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-critical-mass.html. By now the UAF had managed to regroup a few hundred yards away by Christchurch and Albert's voice was mixed with their angry jeers.

The English Defence League didn't come across to me as badly as they've been portrayed by the media. They are noisy and boisterous; some of them were drunk, but they were reasonably well behaved when not being harangued by their opponents. One of the curious onlookers was an old lady who was holding a hand-written placard which said: "ONE RACE- HUMAN RACE" and a few of the protesters came over and debated politely with her. One young woman in particular, near the back of the march, regularly stopped to talk to passers-by; she was diplomatic and courteous. Also I saw no symptoms of the EDL being racists; quite the opposite in fact. The young woman who was talking to people outside the protest at one point walked over and affectionately embraced a black woman on the pavement. To call the EDL "Nazi scum!" is slanderous in my view. There was also an incident at the station when I was in the toilets. I was alone in there with an Asian man and a crowd of EDL blokes walked in; I was afraid they were going to give the Asian some trouble, but they were fine with him, even though they were clearly a bit tipsy and very excited. They even held the door open for him with a smile. What they are is very much against militant Islam. This is why they fly the flags of Israel and India as well as the Union Jack and St George's Cross. I've even seen the rainbow LGBT flag on films of their demos too. Their concerns about militant Islam are perfectly legitimate, but their concerns are without awareness. How many EDL supporters ever ask themselves a crucial question: Why has this happened? Why is it, in just two decades or so, we're suddenly beset by millions of Wabbahist radicals? I've spoken to EDL supporters online and the answer you'll usually get is something like: "Because there is so much immigration today from Muslim countries and the government are too lily-livered to do anything about it! And it helps Labour win votes!" But the truth is very different. A lot of Muslim immigrants are being radicalized in British mosques after they arrive in this country, and the government is not just passively allowing radical Wahhabism to grow here, they're deliberately making it happen, as I explain in the background links below. The street mob of angry Muslims in Luton in 2009 which triggered the formation of the EDL was itself almost certainly a government intelligence operation. The leader of it is known to be a UK secret service asset. The EDL themselves are being controlled by many people with strong links to Mossad. They are themselves a controlled opposition. I think they mean well and are sincere people; they're definitely not "fascists!" any more than I am; but they need to become aware of the real rules of the game they're involved in.

See here for background: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/oxford-muslim-grooming-scandal.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/islamification-in-asda.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/engineered-islam.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/poppy-burners-are-shills.html.

Disclosure Champagne

It’s now the first of April, but the following is no joke. The date is significant because the time period in which Stephen Bassett hoped that the Congressional Hearing Initiative would take effect has now expired, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/programme-125-podcast-stephen-bassett.html. Over the last few months I have been covering this process on HPANWO TV; in fact I’ll be producing a new episode of this series within the next few days. So far there are mixed feelings from the UFOlogy and Exopolitics community; some, like Bassett of course, remain optimistic, but others are deeply cynical. Despite the undertone of scepticism and Skepticism, as far as I can tell the atmosphere remains exciting and I’m still watching closely the CHI and also the upcoming Roswell Slides event, see background links. I’ve decided to spur along the process on an energetic level by buying a magnum of champagne to celebrate the upcoming day of Disclosure… maybe. The bottle you see in the photos above is not real champagne of course. I’m an ex-hospital porter and therefore cannot afford the real thing. It is a sparkling perry called Charlemagne; I bought it for £6.99 from a corner shop and it’s the same brand I complain about here: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/toast-new-year-with-fake-champagne.html. However I have no gripes along those lines today; it’s no longer the point. It’s still a bit of a swindle if you ask me, but this time I knew exactly what it was when I purchased it. As you can see, I’ve sealed the bottle with a note which reads: “To be opened on the day of Disclosure”. I couldn’t resist adding a little drawing of a flying saucer and a grey alien… bear with me, I know I’m no Neil Hague. I’m going to keep it under my bed and I’ve wrapped it in a plastic bag to keep the dust off it. Ideally I’d like to store it in the fridge so that it’s nice and chilled, but I share my fridge with a few other people and I’ve found that anything left in there only stays there for a certain amount of time before being consumed by somebody else, regardless of who owns it. I feel more confident than ever about the Disclosure issue; if it’s going to happen at all, it will happen sometime this year. That is not to say that the internal conflict I feel over UFO Disclosure, which I’ve talked about many times before, is completely gone; it definitely has not, see the background links. If Disclosure is possible it will happen round about now. I think if… when it happens, in whatever form it takes, Disclosure will be something to celebrate, hence the need to toast it in. Nevertheless, it will also be an extremely difficult experience in many different ways, as Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel detail in their book AD- After Disclosure, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7rv9Qb6Lho. I think it could be highly traumatic, for the reasons Dolan and Bryce discuss, but also others. Therefore my Disclosure bottle will help me face that glorious and terrible day with a bit of Dutch courage. I’ll film myself drinking it and put the footage on HPANWO TV, if the internet is working of course. Whatever the short term consequences of Disclosure, they will never be as bad as the long term consequences of it not happening. The obvious question is: what will I do with the champagne if we don’t get Disclosure within my lifetime? I thought that maybe my grandchildren can drink it, if I ever have any. But that’s impossible because if we don’t get Disclosure before then they won’t be alive… in fact nobody will.

See here for background: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/ufo-disclosure-2015-doubts-begin.html.

And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/ufo-disclosure-2015-john-podesta-and.html.

And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/ufo-disclosure-2015-roswell-slides-and.html.

And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/ufo-disclosure-2015-happy-new-year-last.html.