Sunday, 14 April 2013

Ben Emlyn-Jones on We The People 3- Podcast

My latest appearance on the We The People show has been put on a YouTube podcast.

We The People is a weekly 2-hour show on ITalk FM, an English language Spanish radio station. The presenter is Venerina Conti, who will be already well-known to fans of The Mind Set Podcast. (See here for Venerina's website: http://www.venerinaconti.com/) The subject of the programme is occult symbolism and mind control in the music industry. I was joined on the air once again by Bryan Wells, see: http://mrfreaklips.com/ and also by Alex Fate of The Mind Set Podcast, see: http://www.alexfate.com/

Friday, 12 April 2013

Ben Emlyn-Jones on We The People 3

Tomorrow, Saturday the 13th of April, I will be interviewed live on the We The People show broadcast on the English language Spanish radio station ITalk FM, see: http://www.italkfm.com/; click "listen live". The presenter is Venerina Conti, who will be already well-known to fans of The Mind Set Podcast. (See here for Venerina's website: http://www.venerinaconti.com/. The programme will start at 1pm Greenwich Mean Time (that’s 2pm in Spain.) The subject of focus will be Occult symbolism and mind control in the music industry.

See here for a recording of my previous appearance on We The People: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ben-emlyn-jones-on-we-people-2-podcast.html

Wednesday, 10 April 2013

Rupert Sheldrake Stabbed in 2008

A long time ago now, on the 2nd of April 2008 in fact, Rupert Sheldrake was attacked by a man wielding a knife. The incident happened at the International Conference on Science and Consciousness at Santa Fe, New Mexico USA. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TaMvICAoT4. The police treated the case as attempted murder; the suspect was a Japanese man called Hirano Kazuki. I'm sure I wrote an article on HPANWO about this at the time, but I can't find it now. I've no positive evidence that this attack was anything more than what it seems to be at first glance, another "lone nutter" does something completely independently of their own accord, like Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Mark Chapman etc etc etc... but I don't think it can be ruled out that "other forces" were behind it. There are many people who might want Sheldrake out of the way. I've started reading his new book The Science Delusion and I can immediately understand why the Skeptics have reacted so viciously against it. Would some of them go to more drastic lengths? Maybe we should warn Dr Sheldrake that there might be more attempts on his life. I don't want to give the man nightmares, but better safe than sorry. See here for background: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/down-with-skeptocracy.html

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

Margaret Thatcher Dies

Margaret Thatcher
13th of October 1925 - 8th of April 2013

The former Prime Minister, the only woman to be elected to the post and one of the longest serving in history, has died aged 87 after a long period of illness. She was born into a family of grocers in Grantham, Lincolnshire on the same day as me, the 13th of October; albeit a couple of years earlier. She was became Prime Minister on the 4th of May 1979 and remained in the post until the 22nd of November 1990. The response to her death has been unprecedented, with all the front pages cleared, and there has been enormous reaction from the British people and others around the world. It has resulted in tributes from her political allies but also, a unique situation, street parties celebrating her passing. Several city centres, especially in Scotland and northern England, have filled up with people laughing and cheering, some were singing songs. This one from The Wizard of Oz musical seems especially popular right now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Jn8K8EA7-Q. Forgive me, but I couldn't keep it out of my head myself! One woman had been keeping a bottle of Champagne in her fridge for years in preparation for this day. Just see the difference in public outcry between Thatcher's death and that of Hugo Chavez a few weeks before. I'd like to say to those people making merry over Mrs Thatcher's death, if you think you can do a better job than her, then shut up and try it yourself! See: http://www.eventtr.co.uk/public_relations_course_distance_learning.php?gclid=COL7-KShvbYCFRDKtAodvDgAtQ... Sorry, you have to be a regular HPANWO-reader to get that joke!

Seriously: twenty years ago I'd probably have been joining in with the celebrations. I had to witness the NHS reforms of her government personally, from the inside. They did enormous harm to the Health Service, harm that has never healed; in fact it has worsened. Public services that benefited everybody and were widely-loved British institutions have been decimated. Her philosophy of Thatcherism has changed this country in almost every way; a lot of the widely-believed myths concerning unemployment come from her government and the supporters she had in the media, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRYEmGZDs1g. She decided that one of her political goals was to "take on the unions!" Having been involved in trade unionism myself I can sympathize with her there. However the way she chose to curtail trade unions was a strange one; she would wipe out the industries in which they operated. This she did with ruthless efficiency and the result was the chronic economic death of entire communities in the traditional mining and manufacturing heartland of the United Kingdom. As I said in my film, Friekraft, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtjY166ErTg, the local power station near Oxford is fuelled by coal that comes all the way from Russia because there are not enough mines working in Britain to serve it any more. I wonder if her real political goal was actually the destruction of those industries; the unions were the excuse... but did she know it? In a way I feel more well-disposed towards Thatcher than I do to some of her living successors. You knew where you stood with her; she was refreshingly honest for a politician. She represented big business and corporatism and she was loyal to those she represented. Unlike Tony Blair who is a political chameleon, the invisible man, a thespian statesman. I think Thatcher actually believed her own fairy tales. When she said that she was going to liberate the Falkland Islands out of a sense of compassion, patriotism and human rights, she was being genuinely sincere. I doubt if she had any clue about the very obvious falsehood contained in that statement, see here for more details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-knobheads-of-war.html. A Russian journalist christened her "Железная Леди"- The Iron Lady, and she adopted it personally. I think in her later years her naivete led to megalomania, a sense of omnipotence and invulnerability. She brought in the Poll Tax, a policy so manifestly unjust and so extremely unpopular that it almost generated a new civil war (a poll tax contributed to the original English Civil War in the 17th Century). Then when she stood up to Europe, the only thing she ever did that I truly admire her for, it became clear that the Iron Lady was nothing more than a Paper Dolly; she was removed from office by her own party in what was effectively a bloodless coup. She was no longer useful to what journalist Alan Watkins called "The Men in Grey Suits", so they disposed of her with terrifying ease. They will do the same to any of the other supposed "world leaders", and the "most powerful men in the world", if they put one foot wrong. Margaret Thatcher lived to the ripe old age of 87, but she only did so because she was not American and was careful to avoid driving past any school book depositories. 

Monday, 8 April 2013

Ben Emlyn-Jones on The Mind Set Podcast 15

The new episode of The Mind Set Podcast's round table discussion, featuring myself, is now available. Subjects discussed this week include North Korea again, Michelle Obama drops a brick, electromagnetic hallucinations and much much more.
See here for The Mind Set Podcast- Episode 147: http://www.mindsetcentral.com/archives/11183

(See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ben-emlyn-jones-on-mind-set-podcast-14.html)

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

What Class are YOU?

Answer the question! You do not have the right to opt out!
The BBC have created this survey (You'll need to register for a BBC ID, but this is easy and free): https://ssl.bbc.co.uk/labuk/experiments/class/

As if we haven't been divided-and-ruled enough through creed, colour, gender and religion etc, our rulers have seen fit to categorize us into "socio-economic classes", and constantly remind us of how much we should identify with our place in this class structure and how little in common we have with those in other places within it. The class system is something emphasized and fixated upon by all political and cultural stripes. For Marxists and socialists on the Far Left it's the fulcrum of the entire human world; they see it as something that defines all of human history, and that it has to be abolished by a revolution and replaced with a classless communist utopia. For the aristocracy it is a product of breeding and tradition that has to be preserved and defended to maintain social order... as well as their own privileges of course. Whether the class system is something natural or whether it is an artificial construct is something I'll come on to later; but whether it is or is not, the way the authorities try to socially engineer us is something I find very distasteful and worrying. In the modern world there are now seven discernible classes apparently, when there were originally three. Here's a BBC Radio interview about it: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22012935

I must concede that I am what would conventionally be known as "working class", but I really hate being thought of as a class. I never identify being in a class and I strenuously avoid thinking of others in those terms. Therefore I filled in the survey hoping I could make the BBC computer go phut! like a Star Trek robot. The survey begins by asking what kind of neighbourhood you live in, what kind of holidays you have, about when you eat out and your musical tastes. Then it asks about the education and the professions of yourself and the kinds of people you know. Then they ask you about the kinds of newspapers you read. Luckily they never said "buy" because I never buy any newspapers and never have. They also ask many questions that make me think Common Purpose have their grubby finger-marks all over the survey; for instance they ask whether "people can be trusted". At the end of the survey I got presented with a huge data readout describing exactly where I strand financially and socially. Then it told me about another aspect of myself using a very Orwellian and sinister word: "social capital"! Yuck! Apparently I have a lot of it, but it's almost all through t'Internet! My social life was so ingrained into my hospital that when I was kicked out of it I lost everything. I still keep up with a few of my old Bro Po's now and again though. I have a lot of "cultural capital" despite my being officially "working class"; because I'm very much an amateur intellectual and like reading books etc. They've even given me a novelty coat-of-arms, and you'll get yours too if you complete the survey.

Maybe it's because of the recent implementation of the Welfare Reform Act that this subject is topical. Because this move by the Government will increase the "precariat" many-fold; there's even talk of a New Dark Age, thanks to Iain Duncan Smith and his determination to suck the poor for every penny he can get while tiptoeing around the bankers whispering with incredible care in case they think he's begging for a single penny! Am I sounding like a Marxist who thinks class has to be destroyed? Well, no I'm not. Despite what I said above about not wanting to be identified as a class I don't reject the concept as a whole. I don't believe "universal equality" is possible, and if it were possible it wouldn't be healthy. In fact the futile and deceptive quest for "universal equality" has been used as a Trojan horse for a lot of the increasing authoritarian and Conformist aspects to politics and culture that I'm always complaining about on HPANWO. Somebody once said to me in a "Charles"-like way (see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/charles-doing-washing-up.html): "There will always be rich and poor, Ben. That's natural; it's just the way things are." I don't agree at all; I think there will always be rich and "less rich", but poverty is a product of contrived scarcity and is completely avoidable. However rich and "less rich" is natural. In the same way that people of different creeds and colours are different from each other, so are people within a single social group. I think some kind of natural hierarchy will emerge in the post-Illuminati world; there would be an upper-caste of political leaders or industrial directors and the "rest of us" which will comprise of an entirely new kind of social class consisting of people in all kinds of occupations earning a wide scale of income and owning comparatively diverging amounts of property. But, I repeat, there's no reason a single person should be poor anywhere in the world. We may not all be born equal, but we are all equally valuable; we all have the same worth as human beings. What we have in today's world is a very unnatural hierarchy that is the source of the power on Earth for a tiny elite few that are so far up that class ladder that they are beyond it. They hover above it in the clouds of secrecy; the rest of us can't even see them. They are the invisible, detached capstone hovering above the rest of the pyramid, controlling us all, from "precariat" to aristocrat.

Monday, 1 April 2013

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Fortean Radio


I have been interviewed on Programme 5 of Trystan Swale's new radio show, Fortean Radio. His fellow hosts are Andy Russell and Anna Nimeton. Regular HPANWO-readers will recall Trystan's old show Righteous Indignation. We discuss my dismissal from the Hospital Portering Service, the attempt to fingerprint my daughter at school and the trend towards increasing authoritarianism and conformity in politics and culture.