Second NYT UFO Article

See here for essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/07/aatip-was-not-closed-in-2012.html.

And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/07/new-york-times-ufo-livestream.html.

Sometimes I think it would be nice to be two people simply because it would allow me to spread my attention wider and not miss news stories like the one I've just found out about. While I was busy preparing for my trip to Truth Seekers North East, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/08/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-truth-seekers.html, a second UFO article was published by the New York Times that if anything is more interesting than the first one. It's is an "office tour" report on the paper itself and the people behind it, the ones who published Blumenthal's original story. Its title alone is intriguing: Do We Believe in UFO's? That's the Wrong Question. What's the right question then? The answer is: "(It's) not about belief. It's about a vigilant search for facts." Therefore they are maintaining that what has been saying previously about UFO's or "UAP's" as the Pentagon calls them, is factual. It also reveals that the UAPTF has intelligence officials, aerospace executives and US Congressional staff who are in regular contact with the organization about "reported" UFO crash-retrievals and the debris resulting. This is almost unbelievable. Sure, the key word is "reported" and naturally the skeppers will pick it up and emblazon it on a banner. It implies that so long as these are "reported" events then they might not be real. However when a child run indoors from the garden on Christmas Eve and yells that he heard sleigh-bell noises, that is a reported Santa Claus encounter. How come there are no intelligence or political officials briefed on that? The fact that there is this organization and it is actively involved in the political establishment at enormous effort and expense means they are taking the "UAP" subject very seriously, or as the NY Times would put it, the search for facts is very vigilant. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/28/insider/UFO-reporting.html.

The next few paragraphs are the paper justifying its stance in reporting on this subject and why it feels duty-bound to do so in a world where the conditioned mainstream response is still: "But all this is crazy stuff! You're supposed to be a serious newspaper!" The Times team presents this justification in an assertive and unapologetic way. The final paragraph is the most interesting of all. It effectively divulges some stories in progress that involve covert sources revealing classified information. This might include positive evidence that Roswell-like incidents have indeed occurred. They wouldn't say that unless they felt there was a good chance they will be able to publish more on this matter in the future. When they do, you may hear about it first in the New York Times, but you will hear about it second on HPANWO Voice!

See here for more background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.