The BBC News article below contains a very long clip, over
seven minutes, and it's one of the most disturbing and remarkable ones that
I've ever seen. It talks about a Metropolitan Police investigation in 1980 in
which a block of flats in London
was wired with CCTV to catch a paedophile ring red handed. It succeeded;
footage was gathered of men sexually abusing young boys (I don't envy the task
of the coppers who had to watch that) and one of those was Cyril Smith MP. Also
identified in the operation were a senior intelligence officer and even some of
their fellow policemen. Smith was later arrested at an orgy involving more
underage boys, as if they actually needed more evidence against him, but
somehow... incredibly, he was released without charge and the detectives on the
operation were told to drop the case, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31908431.
One of the few people inside the walls of Parliament whom I'd trust with my
last farthing, Simon Danczuk MP, has written a book trying to expose what was
going on, see: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Smile-For-The-Camera-Double/dp/1849546444.
It has taken thirty-five years for the truth to emerge and what strikes me most
about the above report is its tone of understatement; as if they don't
comprehend the true magnitude of what this means. At the time of writing the
story is headlines on the BBC, yet by tomorrow it will have been replaced by
something else. Why? This revelation and everything associated with it ought to
be front page news for months. People should be weeping in the streets!
Instead we're sitting patiently waiting for Lowell Goddard
to walk to London from New
Zealand , see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/new-judge-for-child-abuse-inquiry.html.
Perhaps it's because what is being exposed today happened so long ago. The word
"historic" is often used in association with these stories and it's
become rather Orwellian in nature. It gives the impression that this was a
terrible thing, yes, but it's OK, it was just a one-off and it happened a long
time ago. What the word "historic" really means in this context is
that the weight of the truth over time finally broke down the barriers holding
it back. However this was not a "one-off" that took place a long time
ago; it's something ubiquitous that has always been a part of government,
probably for centuries, at least. Witnesses are coming forward claiming they've
been sexually abused by very senior people in the political elite much more
recently than 1980. In fact all the evidence suggests that these horrors are
still going on in secret today. It's good that this massive cover-up now seems
to have a limited shelf life and the truth about individual atrocities does
come to public attention with this time-delay. But we have to get rid of the
time delay and expose what's going on now.
We must also understand that these individual atrocities are all constituent parts
of a single organized institutional pathology. This reality will be
heartbreaking to face up to, but it must be done, for the sake of the children,
but also for the sake of the entire world. Those behind the conspiracy will not
surrender quietly; in fact another news story was published when the evidence about
Parliamentary child abuse was first appearing, see background links at the
bottom. David Cameron stated: "There
will be lessons from the report and people should study it closely. But I think
it is important that it says that there wasn't a cover-up. Some of the people
who've been looking for conspiracy theories will have to look elsewhere".
This is an insult to our intelligence and it's about what I'd expect from
Cameron, caught as he is in the headlights of this scandal. The term
"conspiracy theory" of course covers most of what I deal with on
HPANWO, but it is a loaded phrase wheeled out whenever they want people to
avoid rationally examining any information, see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2831025/Cameron-attacked-sexual-abuse-victims-calling-claims-Home-Office-cover-conspiracy-theory.html.
How much longer can the authorities keep reacting like this and getting away
with it? It's interesting to see how much priority they give to other cases
instead of ones like Cyril Smith. Carla Buckle in trouble again, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/carla-buckle-returned-to-court.html.
Since then she has been attacked once more in her home; I might be able to
write more about this in future posts, but for the moment details are
confidential. The authorities didn't hesitate for a moment to use all the
weapons in their arsenal to bring Carla to "justice". I long for the
day when we get to use them, and more, on the real bad guys in this world.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/still-no-mr-fixit-for-child-abuse.html.
3 comments:
I don't know who is more devious, Cyri Smith for perpetrating or Cameron for haveing the audacity to deny a cover up existed en toto, psychopaths Ben (And I don't use the word lightly). Important post. Thank's Ben.
You're welcome, X. Cheers. Both are equally repugnant in my estimation. If organized state-sanctioned child abuse is still going on, which surely it is, then Cameron may be involved himself, in whatever capacity. There's no doubt that his derisory dismissal of "conspiracy theories" is beneath and beyond denial. He definitely knows something that he doesn't want us to know.
Indeed Ben, Indeed...
Post a Comment