Sunday, 17 November 2019

Shill Tribunal Update- Personnel

I have been making some plans for the structure of the Shill Tribunal that I describe in the background links above. These are just my own basic and interim plan and further details can be worked out in the future with the cooperation of others. These latest plans concern personnel. In a courtroom there are always numerous people. How many and what role they play all depend on the type of court it is and the legal system it is under. It is a good enough starting point for me to use this as a model. Below is a list of the personnel in the Shill Tribunal according to my current model, who they might be and what their job will entail. I have drawn up a diagram of the system in the Illustration above.

The Judge in the Shill Tribunal will be very different to any you will find in a normal court because the Tribunal will have no judicial power, just like the Jewish and Muslim courts I describe in the above background links. The role of the Judge will be to organize a hearing and ensure that good order is maintained at all times. Obviously he or she will have no power to deliver a sentence, except personal ones between themselves and the convict. For example, if the Judge is a Facebook group admin they can ban the convict from their group. After a hearing, the prime duty of the Judge will be to announce the verdict of the Shill Tribunal and publish it as far and widely as possible. This is really all that can be done in terms of enforcement.
This is the person accused of an offence and committed to the Shill Tribunal for a hearing.
Defendant's Advocate
This is the person who is presenting the case for the defence, in the same way a Barrister does in a Crown Court. They will also get the chance to cross-examine the Accuser, the Defendant and all witnesses. Alternatively the Defendant can opt to play this role themselves, in which case their Advocate can remain within the hearing as their informal supporter if the Defendant wants this.
This is the person bringing the case against the Defendant. They must submit their application to the Judge who will then investigate and set up the hearing.
Accuser's Advocate
This is the person who is presenting the case for the prosecution, in the same way a Criminal Barrister does in a Crown Court. They will also get the chance to cross-examine the Defendant, Accuser and all witnesses. Alternatively the Accuser can opt to play this role themselves, in which case their Advocate can remain within the hearing as their informal supporter if the Accuser wants this.
The Jury are the people who decide on the verdict. I'm not sure at the moment how many people should be on the Jury. It might even vary from hearing to hearing. I believe there should be some ground rules when it comes to their selection: 1. They should not be partners or relatives of the Accuser or Defendant. 2. They should not be on the friends list of the Accuser or Defendant. 3. They need to have a foundational knowledge the special interest of the Accuser or Defendant, for example UFOlogy, Bigfoot, vaccine dangers etc. The Judge should approach these people in a random manner and ask them to become Jurors of a Shill Tribunal hearing. If they agree then it will be necessary for the Accuser and Defendant and/or their Advocates to approve them as Jurors.
These are anybody else the Accuser's or Defendant's Advocates choose to call the hearing to give testimony if they think it will help their client's position.

Another question is, where and how do the hearings take place. This could be done in the real world by hiring a function room somewhere and the hearing personnel meeting up there, but this will probably be too difficult and expensive in most instances. I believe it is perfectly suitable for hearings to be conducted online via an internet communication service such as Skype, the former Google Hangouts or Zoom. I am very keen on the idea of a public trial and believe the proceedings should be published, in real-time by livestream if possible. This may not be an option if large numbers of personnel are needed in a session of the hearing on the same call; in which case the proceedings should be recorded and uploaded as soon as possible afterwards. The Judge alone must be responsible for this and ensure that no editing of recordings takes place. There is, of course, a lot more that needs to be worked out in this process and my ideas here are just the start, but I like what I have concocted and welcome feedback from readers. We do have a necessity to get this system up and running as soon as possible because there are so many people in the UFO/Paranormal/Conspiracy Theory community who could be described as "pending trial", people who will theoretically be good candidates for Defendants; for example: Larry Warren, Darren Perks, Simon Parkes, Miles Johnston... and of course, myself.

Friday, 15 November 2019

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 39

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 39 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see:
Issue 39 includes an article in my column entitled How many aliens are there?.

Also you will find in Issue 39: US Government confirms AATIP footage, Gordon Cooper's letter to Grenada, Birmingham Men in Black and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine:
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 38:

Monday, 11 November 2019

The Penny Drops!

Nigel Farage has announced that The Brexit Party will not be contesting any seats currently held by the Conservatives. He is cancelling his candidates from all 317 of their constituencies. This is in response to a pledge by the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and the Green Party that they will continue the habit started at the Brecon and Radnorshire by-election and cooperate to stop Brexit, see:; and here for background: Farage calls his action "a unilateral Leave alliance". It is unilateral because Boris Johnson recently ruled out any non-aggression pact with Farage, see: Boris welcomed Nigel's decision while stressing that people should still vote conservative. However this is not enough because Farage still plans to contest Labour seats, crucially many of which are Leave-majority areas in the North Country. This could still end up splitting the Brexit vote in the divide-and-conquer situation I foretell in the background links above. Farage has also denounced Boris' deal and supported a further extension to Article 50 in the hope of organizing a new deal. Boris is still planning to bring his deal back to the commons after he wins the election, but he has not ruled out a WTO Brexit if necessary. I am personally a "hard" Brexiteer and think we should Leave on WTO rules anyway; further details can be found in the background links below. The Remainers are hypocritically accusing Nigel of "selling out!". Such Orwellian doublethink from them no longer shocks me. Source: It astounds me that it has taken this long for Farage to take his leave, if you'll excuse the pun, in this election. What he has said today is so obvious that millions of people, including me, have been urging him and Boris to do so. It seems that Boris and Nigel still have a long way to go in understanding the necessity that they should be all too aware of, seeing as they are two of Britain's most experienced statesmen. In fact I would go as far as to say that if they do not then they are deceiving the British people. If Farage is serious about Brexit then he needs to field no candidates at all except perhaps in SNP and Lib Dem strongholds in Scotland. If Boris is serious about Brexit he must agree to cooperate with Farage and not compete with him. If this doesn't happen then neither of them are serious about Brexit.

Thursday, 7 November 2019

Proof of Epstein Cover-up

ABC News is one of the prime mainstream media journalism outlets in the United States of America. As regular readers will know, I believe such organizations are used for government propaganda and there is considerable evidence for this, however a new revelation may well top all the rest. James O'Keefe's Project Veritas have released a video which appears to be a recording of an off-air conversation after the broadcast is off, but the videotapes are still rolling. It takes place in the ABC News studio between the famous newsreader, Amy Robach, and somebody in the director's gallery. We cannot hear the backstage speaker and this is presumably because their voice is coming through her earphones. A third voice interjects a few times. The footage was recorded in August, shortly after the supposed suicide of Jeffrey Epstein. This is like a real-life and unfunny Jonathan Pie sketch. Ms Robach explains that all the information we have heard about Jeffrey Epstein the network knew about three years earlier. What's more they had additional and exclusive testimony from Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a woman who has accused Epstein of trafficking her when she was a teenager. She's kept silent since the original Florida prosecution... but ABC withdrew the story! Ms Robach says she was fobbed off by her media bosses and then an objection came in from none other than the Queen, who apparently "threatened us a million different ways!" Epstein's solicitor Alan Dershowitz made objections to the studio too. Nobody knows who at ABC made the decision to pull the news story, but it must have been an official at the highest level considering the prominence of this scoop. This was three years before Epstein's arrest and more then ten years since his initial prison sentence, if you can call it that. Giuffre had a massive amount of evidence implicating Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton, who have both long been suspects in Epstein's vice and blackmail racket. Hopefully they will soon become suspects in his murder. Source: This recording was leaked to Project Veritas by an unnamed individual on the staff at ABC News. The big and obvious question is: Why? The third voice answers that question very well: "The creepy thing is we would make access to all these high profile people." The cover-up of this story seems to be connected directly to the faking of Epstein's suicide and is probably perpetrated by the same people for the same reason, to hide themselves from justice. Ms Robach warns Epstein's former girlfriend and business partner Ghislaine Maxwell that she may well also be eliminated. There you have it! If Ms Maxwell has a sudden heart attack or falls in front of a bus, don't try to tell me it's just a coincidence (Although the skeptics will of course). The video also contains other groundbreaking snippets, such as the plan to interview "Kate and Will" at "the Palace". This must refer to Prince William and Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge. Both ABC and Amy Robach have made a statement in reply to Project Veritas, see: This is an astonishing update. It is obvious, as I have said many times, that something very fundamental has changed in the world. Secrets that used to be suppressed almost effortlessly are now a struggle to maintain. Stefan Molyneux has done a very good commentary and asks another obvious question: Couldn't Amy Robach herself have leaked the story independently? She also has been hypnotized by groupthink, see: There will hopefully be further developments, and indeed I expect that the three year old interview with Virginia Roberts Giuffre will be aired. I'll write more about that if... when it happens.

Wednesday, 6 November 2019

Brexit Candidate Believes in Aliens

The long and tedious soap opera known as Brexit has undergone another plot twist that is probably the most unpredictable of all. The Brexit Party announced its candidates for the upcoming general election when the date was finalized and then just today it was reported that twenty of them have stood down. As I've said previously, there are major problems with The Brexit Party having any candidates at all seeing as Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage failed to form an alliance, see: and: It appears that this point is not lost on the candidates themselves even if it is on their leader. They are also clashing over Boris' deal. There was one interesting exception among these dropouts, Jill Hughes, the former prospective parliamentary candidate for Batley and Spen (Ironically, this was Jo Cox's constituency, see: She has apparently withdrawn from the election because she has "a number of unusual beliefs". The source for this scoop is Hate Not Hope... sorry Hope Not Hate. The ex-banker says she is a spirit guide from Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky; it's about 6.8 light years from the earth. The thing is, Hope Not Hate are a nest of liars who spread filthy defamatory gossip about lots of people, including David Icke, see: So what if Ms Hughes said that. There is evidence in ancient records that beings from the region of Sirius visited the earth in prehistoric times and maybe she is one of them who was left behind, see: She also claims that aliens are here on earth and are cooperating with world governments... Well, as regular readers will know, I think that's true! There are too many background links to list. Source: Ms Hughes is a novelist who has written a book called Spirit of Prophesy which she has listed under her pen name "JJ Hughes". It is described as "paranormal crime fiction"; sounds just up my street. Here's the video trailer: HNH make a big deal out of how the book was self-published; but these days that's quite common. My own recent books are too, for example see: According to her Amazon bio she believes in "elves, fairies, mermaids, unicorns and all things elemental and otherworldly." Again, does that sound familiar? What we have here is an attempt to smear the character of an individual rather than address her party line. It's a hackneyed tactic. It takes courage to become a public figure while professing these kinds of ideas. Other examples of politicians brave enough are Simon Parkes and Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera. It's a pity Jill Hughes has stood down from the election. There are no details about exactly why her ideas led to her departure from the Westminster race. We need more people with open minds in government and she would have been a good start.

Tuesday, 5 November 2019

Apollo Detectives Re-Edit

The Apollo Detectives 3 is a film produced and edited by Neil Geddes-Ward. Neil and his fellow presenter Andrew Chaplin host a conversation between Marcus Allen, Jarrah White, Scott Henderson, Bart Sibrel and myself. It is a discussion on the fiftieth year after the first Apollo mission. Have NASA told us the truth about man's first steps on the moon? See here for the original version: and:
Since then the YouTube user "Shill Stompers" has re-edited the two and a quarter hours of the original programme and condensed it to thirty-eight minutes of highlights. It is entitled The Apollo Detectives; "Straight To The Point!".
See here for more interesting videos about the moon landings from the same team:

Monday, 4 November 2019


I listen to a lot of UFO-themed radio shows, seeing as also create one, and I'm a big fan of Somewhere in the Skies, a weekly podcast presented and produced by a man called Ryan Sprague, see: However, Episode 129 was an exception. The guest was an arrogant and foul-mouthed man called EL Tenney. He is billed as: "one of the biggest names in the world of the weird", but I've never heard of him before and I must know nearly everybody in this business. During the interview Tenney boasts about how he has heckled speakers he doesn't agree with at conferences. He justifies this as: "They're talking shit to three hundred people!" when all they are doing is saying something he thinks is "shit!" The good side of this is people who commit bombastic and antisocial actions like that usually end up looking like fools and bullies in the eyes of the audience. However, it got far worse. Ryan and Tenney then subject the listener to a white guilt trip. This is not unusual of course; guilt-laced propaganda against white heterosexual men is everywhere, but it was sad and annoying to hear it on a UFO radio show. It reminded me a bit of my famous debate with Paola Harris on Planet X, see: The two claim that the ancient aliens subject is racist because its proponents think that black and brown people were too stupid to create high civilization and technology, so it must have been aliens instead. I have never heard any ancient aliens enthusiast say that and if they did I would challenge them. The fact is, there is distinct positive evidence that ET's visited earth openly in the past; it's not just about higher technology being present in the historical and archaeological record where it shouldn't be. At that time, the entire world's people were said to be in a primitive state anyway, including indigenous Europeans. Ryan and Tenney also believe that people who report the Nordic "space brothers" also do so out of a sense of tacit racism. Utter nonsense! The reason people report Nordic aliens is simply because Nordic aliens are the ones who contact them. It is pretty obvious that Nordic aliens are not white people, even though they resemble them superficially. They are not human at all. The two men also lament at how UFOlogy is "dominated by white males!" as if that is some kind of crime. I have explained previously that there are natural and unavoidable biological reasons why different kinds of people are drawn to different interests. Natural inequality is the reason why nobody ever goes up to a basketball team and says: "Why are you all black? You should sign up some white guys! We need equality on this team! There's no balance!" This cannot be changed and any attempt to do so would be enormously destructive. See here for details after the main interview: Tenney claims that a person told him Muslims would not be able to cope with Disclosure because it contradicts their dogma. Actually Islam already has the concept of the Djinn which are a kind of alien, so Islam would probably adjust better to Disclosure than the other major world religions. So whoever told Tenney that is wrong... if they exist. Source: Ryan and Tenney exchange numerous inflammatory comments about "white male privilege!" when people like Dr Jordan Peterson have proved that it does not exist, for example see: The whole world is infested with this kind of Orwellian mind-numbing cultural Marxism; let's please not let it spread to UFOlogy as well.