Monday 4 March 2024

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 65

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 65 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see:
Issue 65 includes an article in my column entitled Berwyn Mountains- Fifty Years On.
Also you will find in Issue 65: a new pilots' UAP database, repeal of the Schumer amendment, an otherwordly object in the Netherlands and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth Magazine's editor Gary Heseltine:
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 64:

Sunday 3 March 2024

New Skeptic UFO Film

A new feature length documentary has been released entitled The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See. Who is "THEY" (their emphasis) you might ask? The government? Lockheed Martin? No, it's UFO believers like me. Actually I really don't care if you see it; in fact I'm glad we get the chance to see the other side of the story. Steven Cambian describes this as "a movie the UFO believers are gonna hate!" Source: Actually I don't hate it; I don't hate what I do not fear. This glossy and well composed documentary is a crowd-funded skeptic polemic. It was made by Brian Dunning who is a skepper, with a hard "ER". He used to present a weekly soundbite podcast called Skeptoid. It claims to be about "the science behind UFO's" and has been favourably reviewed in Psychology Today and the Skeptical Inquirer. It has been shown at the SETI Institute; see the background links for my own assessment of SETI. In fact the first part of the film is only about SETI and exoplanets. Dunning himself narrates the film from outside a radio observatory wearing a strange black jersey with a mathematical formula on it that seems to say space rockets are greater than ghosts; I think that's meant to be a skeptic pearl of wisdom that passed right over the top of my tinfoil covered head. Like other SETI enthusiasts, including Carl Sagan, Dunning and the scientists he interviews accept that there is bound to be intelligent life somewhere out there in the universe, but it's very unlikely it could ever come and visit us personally. They compare the situation to flashing lights on a Christmas tree, never lit together at the same time close to each other.
The evidence that we are being visited by an extraterrestrial civilization can easily be discredited, they say. For example, The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See has finally discovered the truth about one of the world's biggest UFO cases, the 1980 Rendlesham Forest incident. The exclusive new information presented in the film is that the witnesses to the strange lights in the forest those nights saw the Orford Ness lighthouse flashing its light through the trees. The mystery has finally been solved!... Yes, I know. In fact despite this being a brand new movie professionally edited and supposedly a scientific explanation for UFO's, it says almost nothing original at all. It claims the Ariel school sighting was caused by the children watching UFO news stories on TV and making the whole thing up. The only recent piece of information presented in the film refers to John Greenewald's FOIA request about the 1967 Malmstrom incident. The missiles were indeed shut down, but only for a few seconds. It was caused by a power cut and not aliens. The only source for the story that a UFO hovered over the launch facility and caused the missiles to break down comes from Capt. Robert Salas' books. I don't see why that is a reason to believe the official documents rather then Capt. Salas. I have also been in a position where something bad happened in an institution of which I was a part and I was the only one who spoke the truth about it. Everybody else just nodded along with the false official line. If a future historian ever writes about this matter they will state the official line; and my own testimony will be the only document that disagrees with it. Does that make what I said untrue? Source: There is an entire segment of the film in which Mick West talks Brian through the US Navy videos, and we all know what he thinks about that; and also we all know that he has been fiercely challenged, not by wide-eyed loonies, but by serious investigators with a strong rational case, for example see: The problem, Brian and Mick say, is the presence of a "low information zone" which is where stories about UFO's come from, along with Bigfoot, Nessie, ghosts and conspiracy theories etc. The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See is available to watch free with ads, see: I would not try and dissuade you from watching it. In fact it is vital always to study both sides of every story, but when it comes to the content of this film, I already have, long ago from other sources. This new documentary is deceptively sophisticated when its content is in fact very hackneyed and shallow.
See here for background:

Saturday 2 March 2024

Sarah Everard Killer Revelation

Elish Angiolini is a bit of an infamous name in the Conspirasphere because of the government's "independent" child abuse inquiry, but today she is chairing a new inquiry into the murder of Sarah Everard. See the background links below for my own coverage of this crime. I remember at the time a lot of commentators were asking the crucial question about Wayne Couzens; was this the first time he had offended? He was almost fifty years old when he murdered Sarah Everard; it is unusual for this category of murderer to start their spree at such an advanced age. Now the Angiolini Inquiry has revealed that there were what they describe as "warning signs", specifically five incidents that went unreported; however there were dozens more in which he was a suspect. These included numerous incidents of indecent exposure and even a violent sexual assault against a child. He was known to be in possession of criminally obscene pornography involving violence and children. The Inquiry has suggested reforms to police recruitment and training, along with the inevitable feminist beachheads; I refer fully to that angle in the background links. There have been a cascade of apologies from the Met commissioner and of the three other police forces who employed Couzens. Of course, this whole inquiry is just a charade. Leaving aside the possibility that Couzens did not operate alone, again that I detail in the background links, and assuming the official story is true, that he was just an average thrill killer; the authorities probably already knew that very well and there is no way they would do anything to stop somebody like Couzens. I've explained recently that the reason the government are so selective in who they prosecute and which crimes they investigate is because some criminals are "clients of power", see:, and this includes the most violent kind. I've been wondering lately about the death penalty. Not whether it's right or wrong, that's a separate issue; but why was it abolished during the 20th century in most Western countries that had it? I think it is because the government are planning for the future. The kinds of people who commit the most heinous crimes play an important role in a totalitarian society. Who will the government get to run the torture chambers and death camps if all the psychopaths are dead? One of the first things many dictators do when they get into power is open the gates of the prisons and offer jobs to the "right types". It is a form of bioleninism. So don't expect the government to do anything about the institutions in which Wayne Couzens roamed. They created those institutions the way they are deliberately and now this inquiry is over all reforms will be forgotten, apart from the feminist ones of course.
See here for background:

Friday 1 March 2024

Coulthart vs Kaku

In the last few months I have lost interest slightly in UFO's. I have not even yet done a UFO Disclosure 2024 video on HPANWO TV and it's now March. I know why I feel this way; it's because of the frustration and despondency of the current situation, the treachery of "the two Mikes", the repeal of the Schumer amendment and the scorn hurled at David Grusch. The endless SCIF's and "no comments", for example: The Disclosure process has ground to a halt. But now something has happened that may serve as some much needed impetus to start the Disclosure train rolling again. Ross Coulthart has done another interview, this time with none other than Prof. Michio Kaku, one of the world's top theoretical physicists. Kaku has written numerous books and presented numerous documentaries, all of which have become pop science classics. The fact that Prof. Kaku acknowledges the evidence in favour of UAP is highly significant. He rejects the debunkers and feels positive that there is a huge amount of evidence that is slowly emerging. He says, in opposition to the fundamental charter of the skeptic movement, that the burden of proof no longer lies with UFO believers, but with UFO deniers. UAP are obviously the product of a technological civilization, but the five observables make it highly unlikely that they are all from the secret space programme, even if this explains a few of them. SSP craft would not be operating near a naval battle group. Another reason is the antiquity of the phenomenon; UFO's predate the SSP by centuries. It is possible for alien species to reach the earth if they have sufficient technology, says Michio, because one can travel faster than light through wormholes. Therefore if extraterrestrial intelligences exist, we should not be surprised when we see them turn up on our doorstep. It is likely that life is very common in the universe because the chemistry of life everywhere out there in space. He thinks we may not be able to communicate with the ET's on their level because we're like squirrels being studied by humans. Michio has not been approached by the government to help "prepare the people" for ET Disclosure and he doubts if such a thing is happening to his fellow scientists. He thinks we should not advertize our presence to the universe, although it's a bit of a fait accompli; they know we're here already. The general public would be happy with the revelation we are not alone. He believes Roswell was covered up because of the Cold War, but he is not totally sure it was aliens. He has a more open mind than most scientists when it comes to God and religion. It's possible we might regard aliens as gods even if they are not, because of their higher technology. Michio repeats what Carl Sagan recommended to alien abductees, the next time you're taken to an alien spacecraft, steal something! Without evidence, you only have hearsay. Source:
As much as I enjoyed hearing Prof. Kaku's input, I still think he doesn't quite understand the entire issue, especially not the dishonesty and fervour of UFO deniers. For example, when it comes to alien artefacts, they do exist. People have produced physical material of extraterrestrial manufacture, but when they do it is falsely debunked, see: and: I hope Sam Harris watches Michio and Ross' discussion because I know he respects Kaku a lot. Sam Harris was at one point seriously crossing the aisle to accept the UAP issue, but then the skeptics sat him down and fed him the Mick West Kool-Aid. After that he announced that he's "changed his mind", see: So, generally this interview was a good thing, it is a step forward after a few months of standing still. It has come at a good time as well because the Sol Foundation has released the videos of its conference and they are outstanding, see: So things are definitely looking up.
See here for background:

Thursday 29 February 2024

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Paranormal Peep Show 21

I have been on the Paranormal Peep Show again. This programme discuses new information on the Apollo moon landings, sixty years since the Kennedy assassination, will Tucker ask Putin about the aliens? and much more.
See here for the audio version:
And here for the video:
See here for my previous appearance on the Paranormal Peep Show:

Tuesday 27 February 2024

Crazy Plane Lady back on TV

Tiffany Gomas, the Crazy Plane Lady, has once again emerged from her hermit cabin in the woods to do another exclusive television interview. This time she had a brief slot on Prime Time with Alex Stein. Alex Stein is a comedian who started off on social media, but became so successful he has effectively joined the mainstream. The programme begins with a rather unsubtle product placement ad for the Italian restaurant chain Olive Garden; and Alex and Ms Gomas do a rather gross Lady and the Tramp imitation of sharing a bowl of spaghetti. Alex then announces that his friend Jimmy is such a big fan that he is naming his baby daughter Tiffany after Her Craziness. The programme then cuts to another scene later when the baby is two months old. Despite showing lots of photos of her smiling, Tiffany Jr does not look very cheerful when she meets her namesake. Source: There is no discussion in this show about Tiffany Gomas' past or the reason she achieved this level of public prominence in the first place. It's possible she has now changed strategy and plans to leave all that behind to become simply another one of these "famous because she's famous" kinds of celebrity.
See here for background:

Monday 26 February 2024

Giant Snake Discovered

This story might give a few readers nightmares. A giant snake has been discovered in the Amazon rainforest. The monster serpent is twenty-six feet long and weighs thirty-one stone. Its head is about the same size as a human's. It has been christened the Northern Green Anaconda, Eunectes akayima. It is not venomous, but still is potentially very dangerous. It is a predator and extremely strong; and it kills its prey by "constriction", wrapping its body around them and literally crushing them to death. It can swim very well, but, being a reptile, breathes air on land with lungs. The discoverer, amusingly and unusually, was a Dutch wildlife TV presenter with the name of Freek Vonk. There is a video that shows Prof. Vonk swimming fully clothed through some water right next to the snake. He gesticulates with excitement as he approaches the beast very closely; and with as little fear as Steve Irwin. Source: If you happen to come across a Northern Green Anaconda I would recommend treating it with caution and respect. Observe it from a safe distance. That snake could easily take out a human if it wanted to; and snapping a few sensationalized selfies with it is not a casual undertaking. As enormous as that specimen is, there may be even bigger Northern Green Anacondas out there, or other new species yet to be discovered. There are native legends of snakes in the Amazon, such as the "Yacumama", that dwarf even this new discovery. A discovery like this teaches us that we know less about our world than most people think. There are vast regions that have barely been visited, or even never visited; another example: Therefore, why are people incredulous that there might by a large animal living in the deep waters of a Scottish lake or walking upright through the forests of North America? I call for a "utopian zoological season", where we drop all our preconceptions and indoctrination, and carry out more rational investigations. Let's just give these ideas a chance!
See here for background: