Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Enemy Within Radio 17

I have been interviewed again on Enemy Within Radio with Thomas Barnes and Andy Young, see: https://www.spreaker.com/user/enemywithinradio/enemy-within-radio-live-144.

I appear through the whole of the programme. Subjects discussed include: cultural Marxism, mind control, alien implants, biological warfare and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Enemy Within Radio: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/ben-emlyn-jones-on-enemy-within-radio-15.html.

Monday, 29 June 2015

Bases at Woodborough- Ben Emlyn-Jones

My talk at Bases at Woodborough, formerly Bases at Merlin's Mound, it now available as an online video recording, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eZEaTMHZtk.
Helen Duncan was a materialization medium who was locked in jail seventy-one years ago for a crime she did not commit. Why was this innocent woman framed? And why is this story so relevant and vital to us today? See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/ben-emlyn-jones-to-speak-at-bases-at.html

Sunday, 28 June 2015

Gay Marriage USA

Gay marriage is sweeping across the world; I've written about how it was recently legalized in Britain, see background articles at the bottom. A few weeks ago it was passed into law in Ireland via a referendum, see: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/23/gay-marriage-ireland-yes-vote. There is a campaign to introduce it into Australia, see: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/malcolm-turnbull-says-us-marriage-equality-judgment-clearly-adds-to-momentum-in-australia-20150628-ghzths.html. And yesterday the US Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples could get married in all fifty of the United States, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-33290341. President Obama has got overwhelmingly on board with it, running around with a rainbow flag and making highly enthusiastic speeches (Maybe it's because he himself is already married to another bloke, if rumours about Michelle Obama are true). As I explain in the background articles, I have no objection at all to two people in love getting married, whoever they are. In fact I have no opinions at all on other people's private lives, either positive or negative. However discord has arisen in my mind over gay marriage to the point where I feel almost guilty supporting it. The reason for this is because after gay marriage was legalized in the UK, and in the run up to it, the pro-gay marriage lobby fought a very dirty and ruthless campaign. Peter Tatchell, a former colleague of mine on The People's Voice, was particularly iniquitous. To his great discredit, he accused almost all of his opponents of homophobia. "Homophobia" is a word you'll hear a lot nowadays. It means somebody who hates homosexuals, and using it to describe another person is a very serious matter. Tatchell never hesitated to smear others very liberally with it in public, for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO5KzYMN8ds. This is despite the fact that gay marriage has been rejected by some perfectly calm, peaceful and rational individuals, including the gay historian David Starkey; presumably Tatchell would call him a "self-hating queer!". Now we live in a world where homosexuals can marry, a world of "freedom!", but is it? What concerns me is that the vilification of dissenters continues outside the TV studios. A few months ago a registrar was sacked from her job; she lost her entire career, because she refused to carry out civil partnerships out of a sense of conscience, see background links. I can't see why it would not be possible to accommodate her within the organization with no loss of service to the customer. Realistically, in this day and age there must be plenty of her colleagues willing to task-swap with her. The same goes for the bakery in Northern Ireland who didn't want to make a gay wedding cake, see: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/ashers-bakery-lose-gay-cake-case-we-will-not-be-closing-down-we-have-not-done-anything-wrong-says-boss-31233797.html. We also had a hotelier prosecuted for turning away a gay couple because they wanted to share a room, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25119158. Again, why can't they simply recommend Mr Preddy and Mr Hall to another guest house? If I were a hotel manager they could always come to my place; I'd be perfectly happy to provide them with a love-nest and therefore take business away from a competitor. I think that these court cases were essentially a punishment beating for Thoughtcrime, and to serve as a warning to others. Dictatorship of opinion and left wing ideological purity is being violently enforced under the guise of "equality" and "civil rights". I think this is cultural Marxism in action, see background links. I'm perfectly OK with people being gay; I'd be happy to go to a gay wedding myself if I were invited, but I have these notions because I've chosen to have them; I feel very differently about being coerced to. I will never be coerced into any point of view and I'll defend other people's rights to think whatever they like. Until we all do that, we will not live in a state of freedom.

Saturday, 27 June 2015

My Implant

I was in two minds about whether to write about this subject or not, but after long reflection I think I should. One of the strangest phenomena in the UFO field is that of "alien implants"; it's also one of the most important because of its considerable level of physical evidence. Some people have reported that they have had objects inserted into their bodies, almost always people who also experience contact with extraterrestrial beings and/or are otherwise involved in the UFO or mind control field. There are many theories about what the function and purpose of these implants are, but nobody knows for sure. Skeptics say that these implants are just loose fragments of tooth enamel, gallstones or other natural objects that have moved from their normal place in the body; either that or shards of glass, pencil leads, shrapnel and splinters etc. This is not true. Implants are sometimes retrieved from the body by surgery and they are usually very different indeed. They tend to be metallic lumps, 0.2 to 0.4 inches in size, covered with an outer layer of a plastic or ceramic substance; chemical analysis reveals that they don't very often resemble anything constructed by man on the Earth, and they certainly never look like conventional electronics. Typically there is no scar tissue on the skin close to the implant site nor any swelling and irritation around the location which would normally happen with a natural foreign body. On the contrary, nerves and blood vessels intertwine with the object as if it is intended to become part of the patient's own biology. The late Dr Roger Leir specialized in surgically removing alien implants and examining them, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/dr-roger-leir-dies.html. These implants can sometimes be detected on X-rays and other forms of medical imaging. They also sometimes emit electromagnetic signals. The most common parts of the body they are found in are the hands and feet, other places in the limbs or the head. They have been detected deep in the interior of organs like the brain or eyes; places where they could not possibly have been inserted by any known surgical means, nor have entered the body accidentally unless through some very obvious debilitating or fatal traumatic injury.

Last week I spoke at the Bases at Merlin's Mound conference, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/bases-at-woodborough-ben-emlyn-jones.html. During the interval between speakers there were some small workshops in adjacent rooms. One of those was a team who claimed to be able to detect some implants within the body. They offered their services to delegates free of charge and many volunteered to be examined. I have had no contact experience at all that I'm aware of. I have seen unidentified flying objects, but have never encountered an alien being. Therefore I had no reason at all to think that I myself needed to be checked over. When I voiced that belief to one of the delegates he stared at me very hard and said emphatically: "Don't say that!" I was quite taken aback. So I decided to join the queue of people outside the room they were using for the procedure. In the end there was no time for everybody who wished it to be scanned; but as luck, or providence, would have it another opportunity arose. After the conference I had to stay overnight in Wiltshire because I don't have my own transport. I spent the evening and following morning with some other people who'd been at the event and ended up at the house of one of the team members who'd been doing the implant detection. I asked him if he'd check me over and he agreed. The tools he uses resemble the detector wands airport security staff use for making sure passengers are not carrying anything dangerous. There are three different types of tool; a radio frequency scanner, an electromagnetic field meter and a metal detector. The method was simple. I had to stand in the middle of a room and empty my pockets. The man then switched off all the electrical appliances in the house to minimize any electronic noise that might generate a false-positive or drown out any signal. Then he ran all three devices over the surfaces of my body. The metal detector squeaked loudly when it came across my belt buckle and the metal in my trouser zips, but otherwise remained silent. However after that things got interesting. The RF scanner picked something up. It was just a single pulse of about 800 megahertz coming from my left upper arm. This is the frequency emitted by telephones and TV sets, but all those in the house had been isolated. The electromagnetic field meter also registered activity in that area, although the man doing the scan told me his EM field test is not as precise. What I found interesting was that the spot on my body where the pulse came from is one I alerted HPANWO TV viewers to in a semi-jocular tone just under two years ago, see here at 35.00: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/ufo-truth-magazine-conference-2013.html. I was initially a rather alarmed; I expected that he would find nothing at all inside me, but I was curious and wanted to put myself in the clear. As I said, I definitely had no reason to suspect otherwise. I have no recollection at all of any experience that might correlate with an implant being stuck in me. It didn't take long for me to get a grip though. I know people who are far worse off in that respect. I have friends who have implants in their eyeballs, brain, nose and jaw. In the case of Kieran Lee Perrin these are close to his teeth and seem to have been specifically designed to cause him intense pain, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMMy2-Y9vvo. No, I've got nothing to complain about.

I'm not sure what to do now, if anything at all. While I was at the house where I got scanned, a psychically-sensitive lady was also there and she dowsed me. She told me that the implant had been put there by aliens that looked like greys except they were coloured green. They'd done it two years ago as part of an attempt to make contact with me; about the time I first noticed that mark on my arm. This attempt had not worked and had been abandoned. They said they will not try it again. If this object has been in my body for two years it has had no effect that I'm aware of; therefore why should I be concerned now? Why me? That's the question. Perhaps it's simply due to my interest in UFO's, or to do with my past. I have had issues with people involved in government mind control targeting my family, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/ben-emlyn-jones-on-revolution-radio.html. However, what if there is no implant at all and the scanner registered wrongly? I would need to confirm the presence of this object with proper medical imaging. The problem is that these procedures are not available on the NHS. If I go to my GP and ask him to refer me for an X-ray or magnetic resonance imaging to see if there's an object inserted into my arm by space aliens; he'll refer me alright, but not to X-ray... to the psychiatric clinic. What I could do is feign an injury to the effected limb, go to A and E and get an X-ray that way. However if I demanded that the radiographer let me take home the print they might get suspicious. Anyway some implants are X-ray lucent and only show up on MRI's. A private MRI scan would be expensive; too expensive for my budget. As for surgical removal, if such a thing is even possible; that would cost even more. Prices depend on where the object is in the body, but there's another problem. Some people go to great expense and put themselves through a painful operation to rid themselves of their alien implant, only to have it replaced soon afterwards. A lady I know had an implant in her nose. She travelled all the way to Greece to have a private operation to remove it. A couple of weeks after she'd flown home somebody... or something... had put another one into her, in the exact same spot. So for now I'm going to just let it be. If nothing untoward has happened during the last twenty-four months I don't expect anything to in the next twenty-four or longer. I'll keep you posted with any updates on this matter, should there be any.

Friday, 26 June 2015

Jason Wilson on Cultural Marxism

I first came across this poisonous article from The Guardian a couple of months ago; I meant to write about it at the time, but never got round to it. Then a Facebook friend reminded me so I've decided to demolish this codswallop once and for all. See here for the article: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/19/cultural-marxism-a-uniting-theory-for-rightwingers-who-love-to-play-the-victim.
The prejudicial tone is set from the very start where the author, Jason Wilson, uses the words "the barmy theory of 'cultural Marxism'". However cultural Marxism exists; it is a completely real political movement. Its proponents call it different names like "critical theory" and "deep social research", but the content of their work is exactly as its critics describe it. I myself have already addressed some of these issues; see the background links below. After the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917, it was assumed by communists around the world that the revolution would spread to other nations. There were attempts to foment similar coups in Germany, China and other countries, but they all failed leaving Russia standing alone as the world's sole Marxist power. Some Marxist theoreticians of the day claimed that the purely economic and political notions of vanguardist Marxism-Leninism were too crude and unrealistic. In order to change society into the one the Marxists wanted it was going to be necessary to alter people on a mass-psychological and cultural level. These are areas of research orthodox Marxists wouldn't even consider entering. Cultural Marxism emerged about a hundred years ago and centred around the Frankfurt School; its members drew on the works of psychoanalysts like Sigmund Freud and Erich Fromm as well as Marxist theoreticians like Antonio Gramsci and Herbert Marcuse. One of them was Theodor Adorno whom I've discussed before several times because he worked out how music could be used to control people's minds, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/madonnas-illuminati-song.html. The way to achieve Utopia was to carry out a "long march through the institutions" and install their new ideal communist society by infiltrating education, the media and government. The way to build a new human world... yes, a New World Order... was to knock everything down and build it up again in their image from the very foundations. Therefore cultural values previously assumed to be essential were torn apart and subjected to critical analysis. Traditional human relationships were called into question; those between the social classes, races and creeds, people and the church, men and woman, parents and children, friends and family, were discarded in favour of new models. Controls were suggested on lifestyle, actions, language and even thoughts. This is a process still ongoing today. It is essentially a very virulent form of mind control. George Orwell, who was a member of the British equivalent of the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society, tried to warn the people with his prophetic allegorical novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Cultural Marxism is about getting inside out heads and taking a hatchet to our mental integrity. This is why the Frankfurt School were so keen on the work of Freud and Fromm etc.

Jason Wilson uses a lot of snide rhetoric and dysphemism in his article which is intended to mislead and repel the reader. It is illustrated with a portrait of Anders Behring Breivik, a Norwegian who shot dead sixty-nine teenagers and blew up eight more people in a bomb attack in Oslo. Breivik looks to me like an MK Ultra programmed assassin, but that's not relevant right now. What is relevant is that Wilson is hoping to poison the well by associating this deranged killer with anybody who disagrees with his article. Wilson stoops to the nadir of defamation, as well as intellectual laziness, by bringing up that old chestnut of anti-Semitism, yet again. This is a very tiresome ploy that I've had to discredit many times, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/its-jooooozzz.html. Of course there are those who are opposed to cultural Marxism who do blame it all on the Jews, but luckily these are a minority, certainly at least in the Conspirasphere, and I always debate those individuals when I come across them. Ironically, a lot of the people Wilson is targeting are anti-Islamists and often devout Zionists, at least tactical ones. Wilson only uses the word "racist" in his article once, but I'm sure this is an error on his part. Oppose cultural Marxism and you will quickly be labelled a racist, whether you really are one or not. Also "sexist!", "homophobe!" and many other similarly nasty epithets. The central strategy of modern cultural Marxism is the oppression of white straight males. This is not because the leftist elite favour non-WSM's over WSM's; they want to destroy us all and this is just their current chosen method. If you are a WSM who so much as breathes a word of concern for the well-being of your people then it makes you morally other. In fact for a WSM to be ideologically pure he needs to despise his own people and celebrate their downfall. In today's world WSM's are treated appallingly and hardly anyone notices. We can be refused employment or promotion because we're WSM's; we are banned from some public places, along with dogs. We can be attacked, violated, cheated on, and humiliated. In South Africa we can even be subjected to genocide, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/nelson-mandela-dies.html. The justification for this is that our great-great-great-grandfather might have kept a black houseboy and beaten his wife. WSM's are told again and again that we are "privileged", and nothing that is done to us will ever alter that falsehood. It will be assumed that, as Jason Wilson says: "It allows those smarting from a loss of privilege to be offered the shroud of victimhood..." It is an unbreakable premise that this is the one and only reason anybody could ever wish to oppose cultural Marxism. This is sad because I am a WSM and I don't want to be privileged, even if I thought I was. I consider myself about as un-racist as it's possible to be. I served alongside people of all colours in the hospital and regard them as closer to me than my family. I live happily with three Sudanese Muslims. My daughter has a mixed-race boyfriend. I support gay marriage too.
The difficulty in overcoming cultural Marxism is that the Frankfurt School did a very devious thing indeed; they managed to conflate their toxic propaganda with perfectly legitimate civil rights issues. Feminism began because there used indeed to be very real injustices against women. The same goes for black people, Jews, homosexuals etc. The mind manipulators mutated these perfectly righteous grievances into obsessive hatred and division. I do wonder if it's a coincidence that the words "racist" and "rapist" are so similar. Women were incited to hate men; black people were incited to hate whites. White straight males were encouraged to hate themselves, as I said. And before you knew it there was vengeance, resentment, demoralization and conflict everywhere where none need exist. See the fuss being made over a mere flag at the time of writing: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/keep-flag-up.html. This is all part of the dynamite that the cultural Marxists want to use to shatter the walls of society. If you still agree with Jason Wilson and think I'm being "barmy" then consider the words of Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov. Bezmenov was a Soviet agent who once spied on the West but then defected to Canada. He did a series of lectures and interviews in which he describes the psychological warfare Marxists use against their enemies, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlpODYhnPEo. Bezmenov came straight from the USSR itself and never was a member of the Frankfurt School or any of its affiliates, yet what he depicts is the exact same strategy. Here's Richard D Hall talking about this in more detail, see: http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=178&part=1. One of the tactics in destroying the family that Richard understands is the destruction of the father archetype; this can include all masculine archetypes in our lives. Already fathers are seen by many as an unnecessary and even detrimental part of family life. There are outwardly harmless children's TV shows in which fathers as portrayed as unintelligent and deserving of ridicule and contempt, like Peppa Pig. And we've all seen those TV famous adverts for gravy, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWM3PfcUyUw. Children are also sexualized at a younger and younger age with more and more explicit sexual themes in media programmes aimed at younger and younger children. Sex education at school begins far earlier nowadays than it used to. Language has been warped by political correctness (a term invented by the Bolsheviks- politishikaya pravelnost). The damage has occurred in ways you might not have noticed. For example you rarely see the words "gentlemen" and "ladies" on public lavatory signs; it's always "men" and "women" as Orwell said about Newspeak, eliminate creative and thoughtful synonyms and use as few words as possible, and only the dullest and most basic ones. Also in tennis when women play, it has always been traditionally called the "ladies" game, but today you'll only ever hear "the women's singles final" etc. There are many other examples, such as the actor Benedict Cummerbatch being forced to issue multiple apologies for merely saying the words "coloured actors", see: http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/jan/26/benedict-cumberbatch-apologises-after-calling-black-actors-coloured. Prof. Tim Hunt, one of the country's top scientists and Nobel laureate, made some admittedly ignorant and tactless jokes about female scientists, but he lost his entire career as punishment, even though he apologized. It was as if he had committed blasphemy, and in a way he had, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33090022.

The only part of Jason Wilson's article that is in any way worthy of an analytical reply is where he says: "The whole story is transparently barmy. If humanities faculties are really geared to brainwashing students into accepting the postulates of far left ideology, the composition of western parliaments and presidencies, and the roaring success of corporate capitalism suggest they’re doing an astoundingly bad job. Anyone who takes a cool look at the last three decades of politics will think it bizarre that anyone could interpret what’s happened as the triumph of an all-powerful left." This is the same point made by a Facebook friend, the same one who reminded me about this article. However they both assume that the power structures of the world are geared to further the whims of greedy and selfish apolitical fools who only want material wealth at the expense of others. No; this is a complete misunderstanding of how the world works. Those fools do certainly exist, but they are merely the pawns of those far higher up the chain of command. What Marxists call "the capitalist ruling class" does not rule at all. Corporate dictatorship is a tool being used by the real elite, the Illuminati, to further its ends in one way, but a Corporatocracy is not at the front of the queue nor the end goal. The Illuminati are also behind Marxism and use that as well. The real rulers of this planet are not political partisans; they will use whatever part of any political philosophy that suits them best, both left and right wing. In fact the ultimate model for the New World Order resembles a very extreme form of communism, with a resource-based economy, the abolition of private property etc. What is set out in Agenda 21 and suggested by Bill Gates et al is distinctly anti-capitalist. Far more Pol Pot than Adam Smith. And at a higher level of course cultural Marxism merges with transhumanism and eugenics, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/bases-project-live-in-london.html. This is why we have to resist cultural Marxism, and make it clear why we're doing so. It is definitely an issue of social justice and human rights, but deep down it goes much further than that. Here's a radio show I recommend by Tom Barnes and Andy Young on Enemy Within Radio, see: https://www.spreaker.com/user/enemywithinradio/enemy-within-radio-live-143?.

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Keep the Flag Up

There is a bizarre tussle going on currently in the United States of America to stop officials flying the Confederate "battle" flag, see above, over government buildings in the Deep South. According to the protesters it is "racist", a symbol of black slavery. This is very strange because until recently it was a very common and innocuous symbol that could be seen all over the world. In fact outside the United States the Confederate flag was regarded almost as much a symbol of America as the Stars and Stripes. When I was a child there was a pop music show called No Limits which had a section on the American charts and it illustrated the segment of the show with the Confederate flag. It often decorated the leather jackets of motorcycle enthusiasts and fans at rockabilly concerts, and it was stencilled on the roof of "General Lee", the doorless mode of transport favoured by the two brothers in the TV series The Dukes of Hazzard. I don't think I was wrong to assume that the flag was a popular generic symbol for everything connected to the Deep South, from iced tea to river boats. Some states have laws to protect it as a cultural icon. According to a 2011 U-Gov poll 58% of Americans felt no negative reaction to the Confederate flag at all and 9% actually liked it; statistically those figures must include people of non-Caucasian racial and cultural backgrounds. So why suddenly is it the new Swastika?

The Confederate flag today is an informal standard and has no national officialdom. The only time it did was when it was the military pennant of the self-styled Confederate States of America, a union of secessionist "Rebel" states that existed from 1861 until 1865. The Confederacy covered an area whose primary industry was cotton grown in slave labour plantations. The Confederacy was crushed in the extremely bloody and destructive American Civil War which resulted in the deaths of almost a million soldiers and also many non-combatants. A scorched earth policy followed leaving many Southerners violated, homeless and impoverished. Women were regularly raped and houses were burnt to the ground. Southern lands and assets were stolen by "carpetbaggers". This is why the film Gone with the Wind is such a milestone because it tells the story of the war from the perspective of the losing side. I've since learned that the losers' story has been ignored in other wars as well, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/hellstorm-movie.html. We are told that the US government wiped out the Confederacy because it "cared about the slaves!". Anybody who studies history and politics must realize that this claim is insulting nonsense. It was greatly to their discredit that the Southern states and the Confederacy allowed slavery. At the beginning of the 19th century slavery had been abolished by an international treaty and the South broke that treaty. However the South and Confederacy were only unique because they maintained slavery for a few decades after everybody else had reluctantly abandoned it. It's a sad fact that before the 19th century just about every society on Earth had slavery in one form or another. Contrary to popular belief, it was not just the white man who was guilty. Slave economies could be found across the Middle East and into Africa. Black people in some parts of Africa enslaved each other. Many of the African slaves who were sent to the west were rounded up by their fellow Africans and sold. India was the biggest offender, and it still is; over a hundred million people still live in financial bondage there, that's more than the population of the UK. During the 19th century the United States experienced mass immigration from Ireland, Poland and many other European countries. These people were forced to live in abject poverty in housing worse than southern slave quarters. These people were technically not slaves; they were free to leave any time they liked, but as a pundit at the time put it: "An empty belly is a darn good reason to stay." To suggest that the Confederate flag is nothing more than a symbol of slavery is hypocritical, defamatory and false. I suspect that the current controversy over the modern use of the Confederate flag is engineered by cultural Marxist think tanks. I've written many times about other similar events where conflict, resentment and division are deliberately whipped up out of nothing, see background links below. This is a form of mind control and we must resist it. So please fly the Confederate flag if you want to. Don't let anybody stop you; it's completely harmless.
And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/sexist-comet-shirt.html.

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

Moon Hoax Progress

In a little over four years it will be half a century since man allegedly walked on the moon. Time has dulled the memories and emotions of those exhilarating days, and the participants involved are now elderly; some have already passed away, like Neil Armstrong, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/neil-armstrong-dies.html. The fiftieth anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing will probably be very different in tone to the previous fortieth and thirtieth; during the latter of which this TV programme was broadcast, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75I_6uPtZCg. Nevertheless, there will be some form of celebration to mark the event, most likely including speeches from the US President, special TV shows and books, and public events featuring the surviving astronauts. Apollo 50 will also be an opportunity for us, on this side of the fence, who doubt the official story of man's first steps on the moon. I feel the build up has already begun. Firstly, Marcus Allen, one of the top moon hoax researchers in the world, did a long series of radio interviews with somebody I'm sure you're acquainted with, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/programme-134-podcast-marcus-allen.html. Phil Kouts has also written a fascinating serial about the engineering history of the Apollo hardware and its relationship to modern space exploration- or lack of it, see: https://www.nexusmagazine.com/. A new award-winning research film has come out that has detected yet more incriminating anomalies in the lunar photographic and TV record. It's called Moon Hoax Now and is an independent film by Jet Wintzer, see: https://vimeo.com/126206380. What I find most interesting about this fifty-five minute documentary is Wintzer's unorthodox ethical views on the moon landing hoax. Within the moon hoax community, the almost universal response to the acceptance of chicanery in the official story of Project Apollo is anger; we feel hurt, betrayed and indignant at being lied to on such a huge scale. Jet Wintzer takes a totally different appraisal. He regards the faking of the moon landings as an inevitable and even welcome element to the Cold War. He claims that the fraudulent manned moon missions may well have saved the world by preventing the nuclear armed superpowers from ever resorting to all-out war. He lauds the "astro-nots" as American heroes and has even come to enjoy the moon landings as a great work of art. I've never thought of the moon hoax this way before and will have to consider this angle for a while. I'm not sure I agree with Wintzer morally; but his positive attitude could be beneficial on a pragmatic level because it might encourage the perpetrators of the hoax to help bring the truth to light. He encourages them to do so, to "step forward and get their due."

One of the most common questions believers in the moon landings ask is: "Why didn't the Russians let the cat out of the bag?" A valid question, after all the Soviet Union was the USA's rival in the Space Race. At the time they were also the only other country on Earth with the capability to verify independently America's extraordinary achievement. They must have been very certain the Americans were telling the truth otherwise they could easily have sent a rocket up there themselves to check the Lunar Module descent stage and footprints etc were present on the lunar surface. Up until the moon landings, the USSR had enjoyed a decisive lead in the Space Race; Apollo meant that the Americans had proven themselves their match. Why would the USSR permit that if it wasn't true? Moon hoax researchers see it as more complicated than that. There are many reasons why the Russians might have colluded with the USA to keep their big secret safe. I describe some of these possible reasons in the background links below, but the most important one is that the Americans weren't the only ones lying. The Soviet space programme had some skeletons in its own closet and the Americans were helping them keep a foot firmly pressed against that closet door. One of those is that the Vostok 1 mission of April 1961, the rocket that launched a man into space for the first time, had also been faked. Mary Bennett and David Percy detail the anomalies of that mission in their book and film, see at around 2.49.00: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W79mIGx9Ib4. There's also evidence to suggest that the Soviets had launched other manned space missions before Vostok 1 which had never been publicly revealed because they ended in disaster and the astronauts were killed, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMvg1t133Qc. Did the Russians and Americans strike a deal: "You keep a lid on our deception, and we'll keep a lid on yours."? However, that was a long time ago. Things have changed. Today for more than half of the years since Apollo, the Soviet Union has been no more and Russia has abandoned the dreaded communism. A few days ago a top official in the Russian government announced that he wanted to reinvestigate whether America landed men on the moon. This was an addendum to what he saw as the USA's incompetence to deal with the FIFA corruption scandal. Vladimir Markin, writing in the newspaper The Moscow Times, brings up some of the suspicious elements of the Apollo missions which have generated my doubts, and those of others; for instance the fact that NASA "lost" the original videotapes of the TV transmissions, even though they were stored in huge cassettes weighing five pounds. Also a lot of the moon rock brought back by Apollo can now not be found and a piece of supposed moon rock on display in the Netherlands has turned out to be fake, a chunk of fossilized wood, see: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russian-official-proposes-international-investigation-into-us-moon-landings/523799.html. If a covert agreement, of whatever kind, was made with America back at the start of the Space Race, this will be a sign that the Americans have welshed and the Russians are not happy. Markin's article could be a warning. Does this mean we will have a full confession about faking Apollo from the current US administration? No. Probably there will never a willing one. Like 9/11, UFO Disclosure and institutional child abuse, the faking of the moon landings is probably one of those "bigger than big" secrets; one whose maintenance is quintessential to the current global order. The political structures of the modern world simply do not have the capacity to absorb and process a revelation of that magnitude. This doesn't mean I'm a defeatist. The truth is an irresistible force, and some day soon, one way or another, we will find out what will happen when it meets an immovable object.

Monday, 22 June 2015

Lucifer Project 2017

The Cassini-Huygens unmanned spacecraft was launched in 1997 and flew to Saturn via Venus. It arrived there in 2004 and has since then been exploring the planet and the many rings and moons orbiting it. Cassini has become one of the most successful space missions NASA has ever carried out; it has discovered seven new moons and taken over two hundred thousand close up photographs. It has also deployed the Huygens lander down onto the surface of Titan, Saturn's largest and most interesting moon. The mission was supposed to end in 2008, but NASA extended it up to 2010, and then it was extended yet again beyond that. Concerns have been raised about the fuel source for the probe's electrical power; because it was travelling somewhere so distant from the sun, solar arrays were not feasible for the amount of energy the craft needed. Instead the mission designers choose to power Cassini-Huygens by a radioisotope thermoelectric generator. Its powerplant contains seventy-three pounds of plutonium-238, a highly toxic and volatile mineral. As it undergoes nuclear decay it generates over 700 watts of electrical power. A similar system was also used on the Galileo spacecraft. This was when it came to my attention. Rumours began circulating of something called the Lucifer Project. It didn't take me long to grasp what this entailed because I had already read the Space Odyssey series of books by Arthur C Clarke. These four science fiction novels tell the story of an extraterrestrial intelligence making contact with the human race and transforming the planet Jupiter into a star, creating a second sun in the solar system. The books explain exactly the mechanism of how this is achieved. Jupiter is a gas giant, a huge ball of hydrogen gas; some astrophysicists call it a "failed star" because it is made of the same basic element as a star. Stars, like our own sun, shine because the hydrogen they are made of has undergone nuclear fusion; Jupiter's hydrogen could have also begun fusing if it was slightly hotter and denser. The aliens in the books find a way to convert Jupiter's hydrogen into a heavier form of matter and so increase its overall density until it explodes into fusion-powered heat and light. Mankind names this second sun in the solar system "Lucifer". One of the first signs that something is amiss happens when astronomers notice that there is a large black spot on the surface of Jupiter; this spot eventually grows and grows until it devours the planet and creates Lucifer in its place.

There is a code of conduct all the world's space agencies have agreed to abide by, and this includes "prevention of forward contamination". This means that any dangerous, or potentially dangerous, material humanity launches into space must not be left there in case it harms the environments of extraterrestrial worlds; these may have life on them, and the last thing we want to do is kill alien organisms inadvertently, before we've even discovered them, by being interplenetary litterbugs. Therefore the decision was made to end the Galileo mission by crashing the spacecraft onto the planet Jupiter. If it was left in orbit as floating junk it might eventually strike one of the planet's moons and dump its radioactive plutonium-238 fuel cells onto them; better to de-orbit it and avoid that hazard. However it's possible that the intense pressure of Jupiter's atmosphere might have caused the heavy nuclei in the fuel pellets to reach critical mass and explode. Had NASA inadvertently caused an enormous nuclear explosion on Jupiter? Quite possibly; not least because astronomers noticed a black spot on the surface of Jupiter soon afterwards. There's no way to know fur sure what caused this spot, but it appeared in the exact place of Galileo's final descent, see: http://www.enterprisemission.com/NukingJupiter.html. It was huge, about the size of the Earth, and it lasted for a number of hours. The concerns rose even further because the real black spot was reminiscent of the fictional one in Clarke's Space Odyssey. Galileo contained seventeen pounds of plutonium-238 where the explosive core of the average man-made nuclear bomb is far smaller, a few ounces. This means that the Galileo explosion would have been far bigger than any nuclear bomb on Earth. In a hydrogen bomb, the plutonium pit of the first stage triggers a fusion reaction in the second stage, tanks of hydrogen-based deuterium, "heavy water", surrounding it. The question inevitably arose: could such a titanic explosion trigger a fusion reaction in the dense hydrogen atmosphere of Jupiter? If so, what would happen? Would it create a chain reaction that could spread to every hydrogen atom on the planet and cause it to begin fusion? If so, then Jupiter would become a star, just like in Clarke's story; Lucifer. Lucifer is a mythological figure who appears in one form or another in many cultures around the world. He goes by several names, the Demiurge, Jahbulon, Metatron, Rex Mundi and others. In Gnostic philosophy he is the lesser god who created the universe imperfect, as opposed to how he is seen in mainstream religions, as the dark force of Satan who opposes the one God who made the perfect universe. In Gnosticism, Lucifer and Satan are two distinctly separate entities. Freemasons overcome any confusion by calling God, the God of the Bible who is father of Jesus etc, Adonai and Lucifer Jahbulon. Lucifer is a very important figure to the Illuminati; he is similar to the Hindu deity Shiva, whose statue stands outside the CERN laboratory, see background links below. Therefore I have to wonder whether the nuking generated by the destruction of Galileo was accidental or deliberate. Did the Illuminati use NASA, without their knowledge, in an attempt to turn Jupiter into a star, a morning star to mark the beginning of the New World Order, the death of God and the new era of Lucifer- the bringer of light? Did Arthur C Clarke pick up on this while he was working with NASA in the 1960's, either knowingly or subconsciously, while he was writing the first Space Odyssey novel, and include this theme in his books? I reported on this issue at the time; see background links below.
The Cassini-Huygens spacecraft is powered by a far larger radioisotope thermoelectric generator than Galileo's; seventy-three pounds as opposed to seventeen respectively. Cassini's mission was extended in 2010. The plan now is for the probe to operate up to May the 17th 2017, the summer solstice on Saturn. In fact the extension has been dubbed "the Solstice Mission"; this is highly occult symbolism in itself. After that the spacecraft will be de-orbited in the exact same way that Galileo was and for the same reasons... ostensibly. If this is allowed to take place will the same happen again? After all, Saturn is also a gas giant similar in composition to Jupiter, although somewhat smaller. The explosion on Jupiter failed to ignite the stellar chain reaction, but will this new bigger, more ambitious attempt succeed? There's a major plot-shift between the first and second books of Space Odyssey; in parts 2, 3 and 4 of the quartet the planet that gets turned into a second sun is Jupiter, but Clarke initially intended it to be Saturn and it is in the first book. It would be a tragedy to destroy such a beautiful planet as Saturn, and that fits the Loomies' ethics perfectly. What's more we don't know what the effect the sudden emergence of a second sun in the solar system will have on the other surviving planets, including of course Earth. In the book a sea turtle becomes extinct, but in reality could the intention be to destroy life on Earth; perhaps the radiation from Lucifer will overwhelm the Earth's magnetosphere and sterilize the biosphere. In this case the Lucifer Project could be included under the category of "Götterdämmerung" manoeuvres, like the Large Hadron Collider that I address in the background links below. The question then has to be: what can we do to stop it? I don't know, but I don't feel as worried by the possibility of the Lucifer Project as you might think; I'm not even 100% sure that what I've said above it true. There is another side to the story, and some scientists are writing about how such an outcome is impossible, see: http://www.universetoday.com/15905/project-lucifer-will-cassini-turn-saturn-into-a-second-sun-part-1/. There are forces for good as well as evil at work in the universe today. I'm a great believer in mankind being masters of our own destiny and I dislike the idea of a "messiah" or "saviour"; however being excessively or obsessively opposed to that concept might lead one to despair if we really are faced with a situation which we are powerless to influence. In which case I will happily swallow my pride and accept the help of any passing entity that is on our side and is not powerless. Such entities exist. If they've helped us out with CERN they can do so again with Cassini.

Thursday, 18 June 2015

9/11 Debate- Ben Emlyn-Jones vs Andy Mercer

I will be taking part in a live radio debate about 9/11 on the KTPF community show. This will take place at 8 PM on Sunday the 27th of September. My opponent will be Andy Mercer, the editor of The KTPF Magazine and co-host of the radio show. He issued the challenge to me following my appearance on the show a few weeks ago, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/ben-emlyn-jones-on-ktpf.html. Obviously I will be supporting the motion that 9/11 was an inside job and Andy will be arguing against it. I'm very confident that I can prevail. I also have no doubt that this will be a good-natured discussion. Andy and I get on well, and a difference of opinion doesn't have to lead to anger and hostility. I'd be a pretty lonely man otherwise, seeing as my family and local acquaintances all think I'm barking mad. I hope you can tune in and follow the action, go to the KTPF homepage at the date and time, see: http://www.ktpf.co.uk/.

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

John Kerry Attempted Assassination

Newspapers have been reporting that The US Secretary of State John Kerry has broken his leg in a cycling accident. The seventy-two year old former presidential candidate is a keen cyclist and often carries his bicycle with him on overseas trips so he can go for a ride between diplomatic appointments. He was in Geneva, Switzerland taking part in nuclear arms limitation talks with the foreign minister of Iran, Mohammed Javad Zarif, when the incident happened. According to the press, on Sunday May the 31st he was riding in the French Alps near Scionzier when he struck the kerb and fell off. He was taken to a nearby hospital and had X-rays that confirmed he had broken his right leg. He scrapped the rest of his tour and was flown back to his home in Boston, Massachusetts USA where he underwent surgery to repair his fractured right femur. Within days he was back to work from his hospital bed. He was strongly criticized by the businessman Donald Trump who said: "Secretary Kerry has absolutely no concept of negotiation... and then goes into a bicycle race at seventy-two years old, and falls and breaks his leg!", see: http://uk.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-criticizes-john-kerry-for-cycling-2015-6?r=US#ixzz3dJ8VQIAP.

John Kerry is married to the heiress Maria Teresa Simoes Fereira-Heinz, one of the richest women in the world. He is a member of the elite esoteric order the Skull and Bones Society; its rituals include the practice of homosexual acts while lying in a coffin and their temple is decorated with the skeletons of Red Indian chiefs. Another famous "Bonesman" is George W Bush, the former US President who "defeated" John Kerry in the 2004 Presidential "election". It's amazing to think that in that election the US citizenry had no other choice than to have a president from the Skull and Bones Society. The duplicity surrounding Kerry of course continues to the present day, and that includes the above news story. I find it unusual that there is no visual record at all of John Kerry's bicycle crash. This is remarkable when you take into account the constant activities of the paparazzi and CCTV, as well as the omnipresent folk surveillance of mobile phone cameras. A famous face like John Kerry should have been filmed and photographed continuously yet not one image of him coming off his bike has been published, no doubt alongside the headline OUCH! or some other tabloid witticism. When the accident took place The Jerusalem Post supposedly began reporting that the Iranian news agency Nasim had revealed that there was no cycle accident at all; it was a cover story to explain John Kerry's injuries. The story goes that on the Sunday the 31st when he was supposed to be pedalling through the Alps, John Kerry travelled in secret to the Phalsbourg-Bourscheid military base in the Alsace region for a meeting with Colonel Gulmurod Khalimov, a top official from ISIL; this was just two days before a major conference in Paris on what to do about the Islamic State. Khalimov is the former head of Tajikistan's special forces and intelligence agency who purportedly defected to ISIL. However he is in fact an asset of the CIA. A shoot-out erupted during the meeting in which John Kerry was severely injured. This appears to have been a planned ambush with the intent to assassinate Kerry; maybe because he was about to let Iran walk away with its nuclear weapons programme intact. Perhaps it was a protest against current US involvement in Tajikistan. Or was there another motive more nebulous and unexpected? John Kerry was repatriated to the United States immediately by a top military combat medical team, see: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1874.htm. I don't normally consider Sorcha Faal a reliable news source, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/edward-snowden-ufo-disclosure.html, but there are some suspicious elements that might make this revelation real. The aforementioned lack of pictures and eyewitnesses accounts of this alleged bike crash is one. I went to The Jerusalem Post's website and there was no reference at all to the secret incident described. Of course this could have been removed from their website, and Nasim's too; however when using search I could not find any material on John Kerry dated after June the 2nd and nothing at all about any untoward incident, either two-wheeled or double-barrelled. This could mean that the JP's website editing was done very hastily and more was deleted than the censors intended. That is almost as incriminating as the presence of a positive report. The motive for the US government covering up this attempted murder of their Secretary of State is probably because it would simply divulge the fact that their country is involved in secret negotiations with Islamic State. Nobody wants that do they? Not least because it might come out that ISIL is a creation of Mossad and their own intelligence services.

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

Zombie Wasps

Last year I came across a report that bees were behaving like zombies; the so-called "flight of the living dead" caused beehives to be left deserted as their residents became mindless and uncoordinated like Romeroesque zombies, until they died. This was caused by a parasitic fly larva and spread right across North America; another addition to the worrying phenomenon of disappearing bees, "colony collapse disorder", see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/zombie-bees.html. There has also been the emerging trend of fictional zombies becoming a reality, see background links below. Now a new species of wasp has been discovered. It lives in Indochina and the first specimens were found last year in the Greater Mekong region of Thailand by a German biologist, Herman Ohl... allegedly. It is from a family of wasps that preys on cockroaches, yet this particular species is highly unusual, especially in its hunting methods. When it attacks a cockroach it aims for the head, bites it and injects specialized venom into the insect's brain. The poison blocks the receptors for octopamine, a vital insect neurochemical. This causes the cockroach to lose its ability to move properly. It remains alive, but ungainly and uncontrolled. The wasp can then lead it back to its nest where it can devour it at its leisure. The museum that organized the expedition which discovered the wasp asked its visitors to choose a name and they favoured "dementor" because of the fictional creatures from the Harry Potter books, so the insect was given the Latin name Ampulex Dementor, "Ampulex" being the genus of cockroach-eating wasps it belongs to, see: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/05/27/say-hello-to-the-dementor-wasp-it-turns-cockroaches-into-zombies/. Dementors are one of the most frightening creations of JK Rowling; she invented them when she was clinically depressed and it shows. They are soulless spectral beings which attack living humans and suck out their consciousness in order to gain spiritual sustenance. The victim's body remains physically alive, but inert and robotic. An book that I once read long ago is a good fictional exploration of this state, although it's quite old now, The Soul of Anna Klane by Terrel Miedaner, see: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1999547.The_Soul_of_Anna_Klane. So these beings are not zombies themselves, but they create zombie-like beings out of the living, like the wasp. I can't help wondering where this wasp species actually comes from. Did it really evolve naturally? If so why wasn't it discovered long ago? The region in which it was found, northeast Thailand, is not far from the borders of Vietnam and Laos. The United States of America had a major presence there during the 1960's and early 70's because of that long, devastating and futile war. During the war various new military methods were used and tested, including chemical attacks with Agent Orange, a toxin created by Monsanto. Also weather control experiments, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/lynmouth-flood.html. These operations are no longer classified, but did the Americans also do biological warfare experiments there which still are? Could the "Dementor wasp" have been one of the results? If so is there a connection between that and the biowarfare programme at Fort Detrick which might be behind the zombie-like behaviour in humans, see background links?

Thursday, 11 June 2015

You've been Mango'd!

I am a regular passenger on Trent Barton buses and a few years ago I wrote an article about their Mango system; this is a method of electronic payment that acts as an alternative to giving the driver cash. As an incentive it comes with a discount in the fare. It also has serious civil liberty and privacy issues connected to it, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2009/06/big-brother-is-paying-you.html. It's similar to the Oyster system in London, see background articles below. I realized that I could use the system and take advantage of the lower fares, and still protect myself, by buying one from their office with cash and only topping it up with cash at that same office. However, in the first article I made a prediction; I said that a time would come when either cash purchases and top-ups would be banned and/or you would need to register your identity along with your purchase. This has come true. The other day when I entered the office, the woman behind the counter tutted. "Oh dear, this is a 'ghost card'. I can't top this up until you've registered it."
"What do you mean?" I asked.
"From May the 3rd all Mango cards have to be registered under the owner's name and address."
I objected and tried to explain my concerns about Big Brother, but she didn't really understand and tried to reassure me: "It's alright, sir. This is simply for your protection. Mango cards can easily get lost and so if that happens we can just issue you with a new card and you don't lose any credit you have on it." The librarian who tried to justify the attempt to fingerprint my daughter at school gave me similar platitudes, see background links below. She then directed me over to a computer console for me to register my card in their office. I asked if I could register from home online and she said "Sure." The reason why I wanted to register the card at home online was because it suddenly occurred to me that I could maintain my privacy by registering myself under a false identity and still topping up by cash in their office. I have done so; I've created an account with an imaginary name, address and other personal details. I'm not sure how long this ruse will work. Obviously only for as long as they maintain cash top-ups. My next prediction is of course that this practice will also be banned and you'll have to use your bank account or direct debit only. There will probably be a "contactless" system introduced at some point, see background links below. Already it is very inconvenient to top up your Mango with cash; you can only do it when the central office is open at the Nottingham bus station and there's always a long queue to wait in. It's only a matter of time before Big Bus Driver is watching me. I value my privacy and the freedom to travel anonymously and will defend them for as long as I can, but I can't help feeling like I'm climbing up the mast on a sinking ship.

Sunday, 7 June 2015

Oya in conversation with Ben Emlyn-Jones

I have been interviewed by the YouTube user "Oya", whose real name is Kathy. In this informal discussion we cover a multitude of subjects, from UFO's and Tesla technology to ghosts and war with Russia. All three video parts are available on Kathy's channel OYA1100.

Saturday, 6 June 2015

LHC Data Tap On

The Large Hadron Collider at CERN on the border of France and Switzerland has begun the operational experiments for "Run 2". It was restarted in March 2015 after a two-year maintenance and upgrade period and it will now be capable of generating collision energies more than twice as powerful as it ever did on its first run where it discovered the Higgs Boson in 2012. During March the protons, basic hydrogen nuclei, were gradually spun up first in the linear accelerators LINAC 1 and LINAC 2. Then they were passed on to the 150 foot diameter Proton Synchrotron Booster. Once at a 50 mega-electronvolt energy they were transferred to the next stage, the Proton Synchrotron, the first and oldest circular accelerator at CERN, built in 1959. Once they're up to 1.5 GeV they go to the Super Proton Synchrotron, the first accelerator built in a deep underground tunnel; in this case one with a 4.35 mile circumference. Then, when they're at 450 GeV they are finally injected into the Large Hadron Collider. On the 20th of May the scientists at CERN began proton collisions in the LHC at a record-breaking energy level of 13 tera-electronvolts. Spokesmen from CERN have issued a press release stating that collisions had happened and that the "data tap" is on, meaning that scientific experiments are underway. The LHC will continue to be powered up to full throttle, 14 TeV, by mid-July. Some, like Stan Deyo, claim that the LHC is capable of even higher energies and has already circulated non-colliding beams of 16 to 17 TeV, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-32976838. The strange picture you see above is actually a diagram of one the first 13 TeV collisions; it shows the subatomic debris scattering in all directions from the pulverized protons. This is an explosion of a kind never seen before on Earth, possibly never in the entire universe; what effect will it have? In the background links at the bottom I discuss in detail the kinds of hazards the LHC might pose, like creating mini-black holes and runaway strangelets; and opening up a wormhole into parallel universes. Numerous materials have appeared online by people thinking along similar lines to myself, albeit mostly from a Christian perspective. They tend to be Americans from the Bible Belt and see the LHC as the instrument of Satan intended to bring on the Apocalypse, for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dDlSYl3J6c and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e62z5zJjp2I. Despite our different religious perspectives, these people make similar points to me about this. And it's not just men of the church who have "conCERNs"; more alarmingly, fringe tendencies within the scientific community are also dubious about the LHC's safety. The most prominent of these was Walter L Wagner, see background links, but they have been joined by others, and one of them is probably the most famous and respected physicist in the world, Stephen Hawking, see: http://www.inquisitr.com/1824353/cerns-move-to-restart-large-hadron-collider-at-double-power-reignites-doomsday-fears/.

Whatever harm the LHC is capable of doing it may well already have done it, in that case, and we have simply to wait to see its effects. CERN management have hit back by saying that their giant six billion dollar, five and half mile wide machine is completely safe; and their most prominent public defender is Prof. Brian Cox, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/prof-brian-cox-watch-this-space.html. That means in the belief system of these American Christians, Prof Brian Cox must be the AntiChrist. (Disclaimer: that's just a joke. The Coxxer is not the AntiChrist in my view, so please do not hurt him in any way.) I may not be religious, but I am no atheist. I've explained in the background links how I think there is an occult element to CERN and the LHC. The statue of the Hindu god Shiva standing in the grounds of the laboratory is very odd. Shiva is the most potent god in the Hindu pantheon and is the creator-destroyer of the universe. It also appears that for the first time there may even be physical evidence of the huge instrument's interdimensional properties in the form of the "unidentified lying object", see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/mystery-object-found-inside-lhc.html. This doesn't seem to have obstructed current operations; but what might come out it next could. I've also heard rumours that the remains of a Roman temple were found at CERN; this might indicate that the laboratory is constructed on a powerful energy ley line site. The HPANWO reader might wonder why I'm still cheerful. If the Large Hadron Collider really is in the act of triggering Armageddon then what can we do to stop it? Well, I have a powerful intuitive feeling that things are going to be alright. As I say in the background, there are occult forces for good at work in this world, as well as evil. What's more some of the information in those videos might not be accurate; for instance the Roman temple was not a temple at all, but a villa, see: http://timeline.web.cern.ch/gallo-roman-ruins-discovered-at-cms-dig-site. It was just a house where somebody lived with an adjoining farm; there's no archaeological evidence to say that the area around CERN was known in the past to be charged with geoenergy in any way, and the discovery that the Romans lived there was only made during the LHC's later periods of construction. Also some sources claim that Stephen Hawking was misquoted about the LHC, see: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a11217/what-stephen-hawking-really-said-about-destroying-the-universe-17192502/. I've recently begun watching the videos of Anthony Patch, for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJkx-I4fw4o. Patch is an American Christian, but he is far more knowledgeable and level-headed than much of the rest of the conCERNed community. He is a physicist and so can talk the language that the experts use. He agrees that the LHC is very dangerous, but he comes across as very optimistic and appears to believe that this story will have a happy non-Rapture ending. Obviously we all share that hope I'm sure. Time will tell, watch the HPANWO Voice blog for further updates. 

Friday, 5 June 2015

Ditchley Park on Internet Security

The Ditchley Foundation is an international political think tank that is headquartered at Ditchley Park, an eighteenth century manor house near Charlbury in Oxfordshire. It occupies a very strange demimonde between the official published politics of Westminster and Washington, and that black world of hidden organizations like the Bilderberg Group. Unlike Bilderberg though it has a very detailed and glossy official website, see: http://www.ditchley.co.uk/, and it publishes a report on all its meetings. However, Ditchley's members operate under strict rules of confidentiality; none of them ever comment to the press and the actual minutes of meetings are always kept private. Since it was founded in 1958, just four years after Bilderberg, it has hosted several conferences every year, all under the "Chatham House rules" of covert politics. Renowned members include its chairman former Prime Minister Sir John Major, Lord Carrington and, very strangely, the civil rights activist Shami Chakrabarti. A few years ago I took a little "stroll" around the public access areas surrounding Ditchley Park, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/ditchley-park.html (something tells me I'll be heading back there again soon). A couple of weeks ago, a three day conference took place there concerning digital security. Attending were senior officials of GCHQ, the UK's national electronic intelligence agency, and police experts on cybercrime and terrorism. Also present were officials from Google and Apple from many countries around the world. Unusually a few selected press representatives were allowed to attend, although only under strict regulation. In fact although the BBC's Gordon Corera was present the corporation has not broadcast a single word about this conference. The prime source for what went on is in fact a page in Glenn Greenwald's The Intercept, see: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/22/apple-google-spy-summit-cia-gchq-ditchley-surveillance/. The Ditchley Foundation itself has yet to publish its official report on this event, but it has released a conference program (contrary to what The Intercept implies, there's no need to "obtain" it; it's openly available from the Foundation's website: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2085593-ditchley-intelligence-and-security-conference.html.

Top of the agenda were the revelations of Edward Snowden. I'm personally still not sure whether Snowden is a real whistleblower yet; he might be a plant designed to ease pressure on the authorities and even disseminate false information. However, if he is real then it's to be expected that the likes of Ditchley Park are concerned by him. The veteran investigative reporter Duncan Campbell was there. The fact that the likes of him managed to get through the door adds to the question of whether this meeting really was a covert gathering to discuss real secrets. Perhaps it was just some kind of show trial. Our suspicions should be raised even more in that one of the spy attendees stated that Snowden's renegade actions had permanently changed the landscape of electronic surveillance and that "the cold winds of transparency are here to stay"; as if these people really give up that easily. There was some conflict between the head of GCHQ and the representatives of tech giants of Apple and Google. This is portrayed as nice liberty-loving internet companies trying to remain free under the criticism of authoritarian state intelligence agencies. I find that unlikely. The boards of the major internet companies are as much political appointments as those of any other media; it sounds like this is what Richard D Hall would call a "phoney bone of contention". Campbell has written his own post about the meeting, see: http://www.duncancampbell.org/content/talking-gchq-interception-not-required. Interestingly this entire event took place under the shadow of the US Congress voting whether or not to renew the Patriot Act of 2001, see: http://www.ibtimes.com/patriot-act-renewal-senate-overwhelmingly-votes-proceed-1948604; this subject was also brought up in last week's Mind Set Podcast, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/ben-emlyn-jones-on-mind-set-podcast-88.html. It has now been approved overwhelmingly by the Senate, and there was never any possibility otherwise in my view. Was this event at Ditchley Park a "charm offensive" the way Duncan Campbell says it was? If so then he himself was brought in to be one of the smiling suits. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was timed specifically to placate the anticipated reaction to the Patriot Act renewal. I doubt very much if anything was talked about at Ditchley Park last month that the Foundation wasn't perfectly happy to have spread all over the media like wildfire. In fact that might have been its specific purpose. Other workshops might well have taken place there to which the press were not invited, ones that had a very different theme and agenda indeed. 

Thursday, 4 June 2015

John Harris Dies

I'm very sad to report that John Harris has died. I first came across John when he was a regular on the conference circuit talking about the corruption of the legal system. He founded The People's United Community, see links column on main site and: http://www.tpuc.org/, and is one of the pioneers of the Freeman-on-the-Land movement. I found him very inspiring and interesting and he was highly influential on me a few years ago. His passing was announced on the TPUC website yesterday:

It's with sad regret to inform you all that John Harris has passed away. I would first like to ask that every one please respect the wishes for privacy of the family at this difficult time. And also if you feel the need to get in touch, you can email ben@tpuc.org
John has been a father to me for so many years. He showed me compassion, love and respect and never wanted anything in return and for that I thank you, John.
John influenced my life in a massive way, and made me the person I am today, and for that, John, I thank you.
I will miss our daily conversations, our jokes and the times we called each other names. I will miss the times we have moaned at each other, told each other when we were wrong, but the most I will miss is you.
You could talk for ever and often I could never get a word in. I used to say to you that I wished you would give it a break. But now, I would love just to hear you talk again.
I love you John, like a father, like a brother and especially as a friend. I will miss you my friend.
Love You
Ben

There has been some speculation about his death and one of the announcements said that it was suicide; however John himself wrote something on the website last week that does not sound like the words of a suicidal man:
Hi to you all,
I would like to wish you all the best and may I say that this is a goodbye for good, which is long overdue. TPUC main site is now re-directed and the Forum is in Ben’s control and has absolutely nothing to do with me. All I have ever wanted to say is in my book Memoirs of the AntiChrist.
If I had my time over I would never have got on that stage in Stoke and done "it’s an illusion" as it turned me into a self obsessed monster and not only did I nearly destroy the love of my life, I nearly destroyed my family with my selfishness, delusions of grandeur and thinking I am something special.
I have now been offered a lifeline and a chance to rebuild all I have destroyed and I am so humbled by the fact this has been offered to me, considering what I have done. I consider myself to be the luckiest man on the planet to be given this chance and I turn my back on TPUC and everything that took me away from my family. I now have become what I should have been all along a loving family man, husband to be and a hard working plumber who pays his tax.
I strongly suggest to anyone who reads this that if you too are about to forsake your family the way that I did, then please rethink, as I promise you there is nothing more important than your family, nothing!
So all that is left to say is goodbye and I wish you all the happiness, good health and all the love in the world, as I now am so privileged and lucky to have back and never will I forsake it again…
John Harris

If evidence is there that should make us feel suspicious then I've done the right thing in publishing it, but until all the facts are known then I advise withholding judgement. Right now John's death in itself is the principle matter. John has helped many people and organizations understand who we really are as human beings in lawful terms. This has led to an unparalleled understanding of the legal and financial system, for example see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/a-reply-from-bank.html and: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/tom-crawford-wins-in-court.html. His new book Memoirs of the AntiChrist has just been launched, see: http://www.lulu.com/shop/john-harris/memoirs-of-the-antichrist/paperback/product-22189302.html?ppn=1. Rest in peace, John. Deepest condolences to your family and friends.