Tuesday, 31 December 2019

Ayem Dies

Yesterday I went to the funeral of my dear friend Ayem. I first met Ayem in 2004 at a Neil Hague exhibition in London and we went on to work closely together on Planet X Radio and the Exopolitics Leeds conferences. For example see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2014/01/ben-emlyn-jones-on-planet-x-radio-12.html. and: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2011/08/leeds-exopolitics-expo-2011.html. She died on the 12th of December and I only realized exactly how sad I am about it when I was on the way home from the funeral in Liverpool yesterday. This despite the fact that Ayem had been keeping herself to herself lately, and I'd not spoken to her for over a year. This experience was very different from David Boyle's funeral. Although I respected David for his work and I enjoyed his company during the few times I met him, he was not an intimate personal acquaintance, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/david-boyle-dies.html. I travelled to Liverpool by train and arrived at the crematorium several hours early. I passed the time by strolling round the huge adjoining cemetery. There were many very elaborate tombs with very moving epitaphs; Liverpudlians are particularly good at that sort of thing. I had my earphones with me and ended up listening to two radio shows which I found very comforting. I didn't choose these shows, they just appeared randomly on shuffle-play; I felt that this was synchronicity, see: https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-419-mark-macnicol and: https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-420-whitley-strieber. I then met up with a good friend of Ayem and myself and we had a long conversation. There were a large number of people at the funeral. Nearly all of them I knew and many I had not seen for a long time. I wish we had been reunited under happier circumstances. I joked that it reminded me of this rather triste German Christmas TV advert:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_B6wQMd2eI. The ceremony was short and simple. It consisted of some music and then a few people did some readings about their relationships with Ayem and some poetry that inspired them. The committal song was Hey Jude by The Beatles. Afterwards we had a wake in a pub near Penny Lane, a place made famous by another Beatles song. Ayem was a bright light in the darkness of the both the blue pilled and red pilled world. In a Truth movement where the only issue that seems to arouse anybody's passion these days is who is, or is not, a shill; Ayem was truly committed to the vision of building a better world. She didn't suffer fools gladly and she was not afraid to put one of the speakers at the Exopolitics conference in his place when he overstepped the mark. However, she was extraordinarily tolerant and easygoing when it came to the human failings and eccentricities of honest people. During one Planet X show, I got into a heated debate with the guest, probably more so than I should have. I was not rude or aggressive, but I still think I exceeded my remit as the interviewer. Ayem didn't mind and the show continued as normal. The guest did not complain and neither did any listener. Ayem had a legendary sense of humour as well. I recall an cringe-worthy episode at Exopol when I was in Ayem's hotel room with her and about half a dozen other people. We all got very drunk and behaved in a manner that I look back on with embarrassment, as I suspect do the others who were there that night; but Ayem did not. For her, it was all part of the fun. RIP Ayem. I'll miss you very much and hope our paths cross again on the other side. This is a very sad way to end the year.

Sunday, 29 December 2019

Space Force Established

On the 20th of December this year, President Trump signed the papers officially establishing the United States Space Force, amid much publicity. The 2020 National Defense Authorization Act creates a brand new uniformed armed force in the USA. This is the first time that has happened since the National Security Act of 1947. He has appointed a government official to lead the Space Force; Gen. John W "Jay" Raymond will henceforth be known as "Chief of Space Operations" and will be sitting on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He was present at the signing ceremony in his dress number ones, the first time that this uniform has been seen in public, although it is worn by a pair of models on this page: https://taskandpurpose.com/pentagon-silent-space-force-uniforms. You can see that the official badges are not based on any of the humourous memes that I enjoyed in the background links below. The US Congress has just approved a budget for the USSF of forty million US dollars. A website has also gone online with an official dot-mil domain. It gives a description of what the US Space Force is about and there is even a careers page; if any HPANWO readers are job hunting, why not apply? See: https://www.spaceforce.mil. The functions and duties of the USSF are as follows: "Provide freedom of operation for the United States in, from, and to space. Provide prompt and sustained space operations. Protect the interests of the United States in space. Deter aggression in, from, and to space. Conduct space operations." Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50876429.

The most interesting clause of that mission statement is the second from last. If it is necessary to deter aggression from space then exactly who are the aggressors expected to be? Obviously this refers to other countries. There are other nations with the equivalent of a space force. Those of China and Russia are particularly advanced and both those states have acted in a hostile manner to the USA in the recent past. However there has been an existing governmental body for dealing with outer space threats from other nations since 1985, the United States Space Command- "USSPACECOM"; in fact there is an even older one dating back to 1956, the North American Aerospace Defence Command- "NORAD". These outfits have kept the American homeland safe against threats from space, in the form of ballistic missiles, for the entire Cold War. Now suddenly that threat has changed somehow. I wonder why, because missiles are really the only dangerous things I can think of that comes from space, whether these are dropped from a satellite or from a suborbital rocket. The US Space Force itself says this: "Space has become essential to our security and prosperity, so much so that we need a branch of our military dedicated to its defence, just like we have branches of the military dedicated to protecting and securing the air, land, and sea. Unfettered access to space is vital to national defence. Space systems are woven into the fabric of our way of life. Space affects almost every part of our daily lives and is fundamental to our economic system. For example, satellites not only power the GPS technology that we use daily, but allow us to surf the web and call our friends, enable first responders to communicate with each other in times of crisis, time-stamp transactions in the world financial market, and even allow us to use credit cards at gas pumps." That's all very well, but if I were in the older service branches I would feel a bit put out: "What's wrong with what we've been doing?" etc. Perhaps the USSF is intended to develop into something beyond that, in which case what will that involve? What else exists in space, that is made by the hand of man, and is a threat to the sovereignty and security of the USA? There aren't many things I can think of, at least things that we know exist through unclassified publications. Or rather is the USSF designed to defend the realm from classified threats, that is the more sophisticated hardware of the secret space programme? In which case, how is the Trump administration going achieve that; by bringing back the Space Shuttle? No, of course not. The USSF will have to be similarly armed as the secret space programme. If that is the case then how can it remain secret, especially as the USSF itself is not classified? Then again, we must pose the question of whether all the threats are going to come from earth, whether conventional rockets or antigravity/free energy technology. Is there a risk of an alien invasion? If the answer is yes, then will it be a real alien invasion? It could be that the incredible change that came about in the way UFO's are portrayed in the media two years ago are a part of that agenda, see here for background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/09/ufo-disclsoure-2019-attip-videos-real.html. Alternatively the TTSA and AATIP revelations could be a genuine leak from inside the secret government. Dr Michael Salla has written what could prove to be a highly significant article with the brazen title of  Trump signs Space Force Act, Stage Set for Secret Space Programme Disclosure. The reason Salla believes this is because several people involved in the process of the force's founding have made interesting statements, Lt. Gen. Steven L Kwast who was head of US Air Force training, Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett and Alabama congressman Mike Rogers. I agree that these are not the kind of people who could say such things unless it was a serious business, see: https://www.exopolitics.org/trump-signs-space-force-act/. Whatever the solutions are to any of these conundrums, it is clear that the USSF is opening the door to a situation where secret information is going to have to be divulged, one way or another, and this might include secret science and the presence of an extraterrestrial civilisation. This could lead to literally Disclosure with a capital D. The flip side will mean fake Disclosure and possibly a fake alien threat leading to the New World Order. Either way, the USSF places this old dilemma on a knife-edge.

Saturday, 28 December 2019

Stephen Bassett with a Difference

Stephen Bassett regularly speaks at conferences around the world and each time gives us his rundown of the UFO Disclosure situation, as he sees it. He actually objects to the term "UFO" and believes it was created by the keepers of the "Truth Embargo" to keep the extraterrestrial presence secret. After all, if what you're looking at is unidentified then how can you ever decide positively what it is? I personally don't object to the term UFO because over the years it has taken on a meaning in human minds and culture that goes beyond the literal words which the acronym stands for. I don't think I could replace it with another word in my own consciousness now. However I share Steve's concerns about disinformation. I first saw Steve live at the Beyond Knowledge 2 conference in Liverpool in 2009, and since then have avidly followed his work. I have also interviewed him on HPANWO Radio many times, for example see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2019/10/programme-340-podcast-stephen-bassett.html. The things Steve says, more than anybody else, represent a wedge within myself, the question that I keep coming back to that I can neither endorse nor dismiss: Is willing Disclosure possible? See the background links for details about my musings on that. The question even inspired me to write a trilogy of novels, see: https://hpanwo-bb.blogspot.com/2018/12/roswell-redeemed-is-here.html. There is a massive amount of material online by Steve; lectures, interviews and even a very respectful and affectionate short documentary, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YmOsGBR51o. However, a new video has just emerged which is highly unusual and stands out from the rest. What makes it different is that in the first twenty to thirty minutes Steve talks earnestly and candidly about his background. He gives information that he never has before. He mentions his father, a World War II veteran and how he came to have a son in 1946 who would go on to become the Steve Bassett we all know today. Steve talks about how he suffered from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and how he has battled with depression and his fear of nuclear war. He also was once very keen on playing tennis and could have made a career out of it. The recording is called Unpresidented Events Are Coming Up, Will UFO Disclosure Be One of Them? (I don't know if the first word of the title is a spelling mistake or a pun), see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNAdH4ZZrg4.

Thursday, 26 December 2019

Richplanet on Rendlesham

For quite a while now Richard D Hall, the presenter of Richplanet TV, has been hinting that he has some breaking new information on the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident of December 1980. He has now published this information in a video series that he uploaded on Christmas Day. I don't know if there was a specific reason why he chose Christmas Day to do that, or maybe it is just where it happened to fit into his schedule; but the effect of that is there has been a delay in response from his viewers because obviously on Christmas Day most of us have been celebrating with our families and watching Christmas movies on TV etc. Maybe it's because it was the thirty-ninth anniversary. It was Boxing Day lunchtime when I first noticed that the programme was available, plus several tags and inboxes from people who had seen it and were asking me for a comment. The programme is called Rendlesham UFO, Forty Years of Lies. The RFI is one of the best researched UFO events in history, but it is also probably the most controversial. Richard intends to shed some light on some of the doubts by bringing in the statement analyst Peter Hyatt, an expert in forensic psychology whose speciality is detecting deception in language; an essential part of police and intelligence work, see: https://www.hyattanalysis.com. Hyatt has already provided very revealing and suspicious information for Richplanet from studying the words of Kate and Gerry McCann, see: https://www.richplanet.net/store/series-dvds/DF018 and Neil Armstrong, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKJOcUFIvFw. Now Peter Hyatt has done the same to three of the witnesses to the RFI, Jim Penniston, Charles Halt and Larry Warren. He has also done the same with Peter Robbins; Larry's co-author and former supporter. Seeing as all four of these men have been accused of deceit, Richard hopes Hyatt will clear up the confusion and work out what the truth is. This is a far more difficult assignment because, unlike Neil Armstrong, the three nominated RFI witnesses have spoken extensively to the media. Their statements are therefore "contaminated by time and repeated re-telling"; the recordings may have been edited and the witnesses are not necessarily speaking in the "free editing process". The samples chosen for analysis are all very old, possibly to reduce the contamination as much as possible. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSVfPDkiwrs. At the end of the analysis session it turns out that, in Peter Hyatt's view, all four of the people interviewed were lying. They all employed "distancing language" like overuse of the passive voice instead of the active voice; for example: "the craft was touched by me" instead of "I touched the craft". They sometimes used the wrong verb tenses and even mixed them up in a single sentence, a grammatical error, such as: "I enter the office and spoke to the staff sergeant". They use collective instead of singular pronouns; "we" when it would be more proper to say "I". They also mix up the proximal pronouns, saying "this" when they should say "that" and vice versa. Jim Penniston was doing an investigation rather than being a direct witness in the way he claims. Hyatt also reckons that the interviewer of Penniston, George Noory, knows more than he is saying and is leading the witness on (Another name for the list!) Col. Halt is probably hiding information as a result of his secrecy oaths. Larry Warren was on the periphery of the incident rather than being actively involved himself. Peter Robbins does not have a good relationship with his co-author. Of course, he certainly doesn't now. In fact he has publicly denounced Larry in the strongest possible terms (He has also done the same to me, see: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-robbinsic-12-document.html), but according to Hyatt, when he was interviewed in the 1993 TV show used, he was even back then antagonistic towards Larry and was a reluctant participant in their project.

Of course, it is no surprise to me that some witnesses to the Rendlesham Forest incident are lying. In fact there has been an active disinformation project to discredit the event, operating continuously in one form or another, ever since the RFI happened. I don't think I am qualified to comment on the veracity of three of those witnesses; but I think I am with one of them, Larry Warren. The reason is because he is a close personal friend of mine and I have been carrying out my own much focused investigation into his case. There are background links to my extensive publications on the matter at the bottom. There is also a new professionally produced documentary film shortly to be released called Capel Green which provides a huge amount of new information, as well as strongly supporting Larry Warren's account of the story, see: https://www.capelgreen.co.uk. It has already been revealed that Larry passes a top level polygraph test with flying colours and this is covered in detail in the movie. The already nebulous history of the RFI has been further thrown into turmoil by a more recent spate of attacks against Larry from Sacha Christie. She is not a disinformation agent working for the government, but merely a former friend of his who has fabricated a completely bogus exposé of Larry in order to avenge herself over a purely personal dispute with him, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/sacha-christie-woodbridge-presentation.html.
Peter Hyatt's work on the RFI witnesses is relevant to researchers, but his conclusions directly contradict my own findings about one of the four subjects. Not just my own, but also Gary Heseltine of UFO Truth Magazine and researcher for Capel Green, see: https://www.ufotruthmagazine.co.uk. Either we are wrong or Hyatt is wrong and I honestly don't believe we are wrong. I'm keen to find out what is the status of Peter Hyatt's testimony under law. Is his word alone enough to convict somebody in court? Have any control studies been done with truthful people? Richard D Hall then gives us his own commentary about what he has learned. He does think Jim Penniston was involved with something unusual that December night, possibly as part of a military exercise. Col. Halt also was involved with something significant in the woods during this period, but it was something to do with radiation and the risk that it might cause a public relations disaster. Larry Warren does not believe his own account about seeing a UFO and alien beings and people should ignore everything he says, but he does believe the government is lying to the people and this alone concerns him. He feels a lot of patriotic sentiments towards his nation of origin, the United States of America. Seeing as Larry Warren was the original whistleblower, Richard suspects that he had some kind of link to US intelligence. It is highly unoriginal of Richard to make this assertion. He is certainly correct in several cases of psyops that he has covered, but in most he is not; and I have no doubt that he is incorrect in this case for reasons I detail in the background links below. Peter Robbins also disbelieves Larry's account and regrets being an accomplice to it from the very beginning. Richard believes this might mean that Peter is party to whatever plot Larry was sucked into. I don't know Peter as well as I do Larry, but I have met him a few times and spent some time with him. I have fallen out with Peter and consider him a deeply distasteful person, but I doubt if he is connected to any covert government cover-up. Of course I can't prove that, but neither can Richard; it doesn't stop him saying it though and it also won't stop me. What's more I am privy to some confidential information on this matter as well that will hopefully be freely available soon that also discounts Richard's notion of a Halt-Robbins-Warren spy ring. The public reasons that I think Peter did a sudden about-face with Larry are detailed in the background links below. Obviously, as I have explained, I think Richard is wrong about Larry; as for the others, I'm not sure. Richard believes something strange happened in the forest outside the bases that night. He doesn't know exactly what it was and simply calls it "the sensitive thing". He thinks that it is likely that officials at the base had some idea of what the sensitive thing was otherwise there would have been a far more intense government response. That is possible, but alternatively it might have been an eventuality for which the local commanding officers had no contingency plan. Richard thinks Penniston had a need-to-know, but Halt didn't. Despite his status as a senior officer, Halt was kept out of the loop and more junior staff were employed operating through a separate chain of command. This is a familiar situation, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-wilson-notes.html. Richard than brings up the possibility that the extraterrestrial explanation we're all familiar with, thanks to the Halt memo, was staged deliberately as disinformation to protect the secrecy of the sensitive thing. Halt and Larry were encouraged to spread the story of aliens in the woods far and wide in the hope that this would bury the true nature of the sensitive thing under a layer of confusion. As I've said in the past, the idea that the UFO phenomenon itself is, in whole or in part, a piece of engineered modern mythology designed by the intelligence services to launder their more down-to-earth secret operations is quite a fashionable one. However in most instances it doesn't make sense. It's a very risky gambit to draw somebody's attention towards something with the ultimate objective of deflecting it away. It could backfire in any number of ways, see here for details: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/mirage-men-by-mark-pilkington.html. I can't see how dazzling the public with exotic stories about little green men landing in the middle of a forest in Suffolk could contribute to maintaining the secrecy of the sensitive thing, whatever it might be. It would actually turn people's attention towards the sensitive thing, and sooner or later somebody would work out what it really was.

Richard doesn't state in this broadcast what exactly the sensitive thing is and only lists a few possibilities, but he has voiced his suspicions on a previous programme that it was some kind of highly secretive experimental aircraft using an esoteric propulsion system and/or power-plant, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAMSYlergYc. Richard invited into the studio his regular collaborator Andrew Johnson and they entered into the subject of Rendlesham Forest through the secret space programme. This is an unusual but not entirely unique gateway. A lot of the information they subsequently raised is also addressed by Andrew Pike in his doorstep of a volume, The Rendlesham File- Britain's Roswell? which I reviewed for UFO Truth Magazine in Issue 28, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/01/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-28.html. They bring up Mark McCandlish, a very interesting military contractor who has spoken publicly about sophisticated aircraft designs based on back-engineered extraterrestrial vehicles. He took part in Dr Steven Greer's Disclosure Project. Richard and Andrew then state that they have changed their position somewhat and now think that there are some UFO cases that they previously called as extraterrestrial in nature that are more likely to be the result of man-made classified technological projects, even if they are based on captured ET designs. For instance a lot of the UFO's that are triangular in shape are likely to be the TR3B, an antigravity spacecraft developed by a covert engineering project by the USA in Area 51, see here for details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKcIO_Qmr9I. There is good reason to believe that this craft exists and it might explain the Belgium flap of 1990 and the Sheffield incident of 1997. In my view it does not explain all flying triangle encounters; for example the Pentyrch incident is probably ET, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/11/pentyrch-ufo.html. Also at Sheffield an RAF jet was lost. If this was secret Government Issue then was the crash a result of an accident, or war between the overt and covert state? Another fascinating piece of information refers to an aviation device known as "the Dart". It looks like an aeroplane with a blister cockpit, but it has no wings and is much smaller than a normal single or double-seater jet. It is shaped like an arrowhead with a hull of flat panels rather like the F117 stealth fighter, possibly for the same reason. It is powered by three spherical antigravity generators embedded into the underside at each corner like ball-casters. According to the story from McCandlish, the Dart crashed in Germany in 1989. This was in old East Germany just before the Berlin Wall came down. The spheres that produced the propulsion were about the size of a beach ball. One popped out and started flying around randomly and had to be caught in a rather comical scene. It's interesting to consider the observations of many flying triangle craft reported that they have glowing lights near the corners. Richard suggests that the Berwyn Mountains UFO, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxW7HnLfnxE, might by a detached gravity generator too. If that is the case then the sphere is thirty feet across so it must come from a vehicle of some considerable size. The Dart bears a resemblance to the UFO that landed in Rendlesham Forest in Christmas 1980, according to the first night's witnesses. Could the object seen by Penniston and Burroughs actually be an unmanned version of one of these craft; an antigravity drone? Also Col. Halt took a plaster-cast of the indentations left by the object and their shape makes them appear to be made by a section of a sphere or ovoid. Then again it could be a shallow cone; it's hard to tell for sure based on the cast. The witnesses describe feeling static electricity in the air surrounding the object; their hair standing on end etc. This could be caused by the electrogravitic drive of the craft... Then again, maybe real aliens landed and everything Richard has described is an elaborate double-bluff. Rendlesham UFO, Forty Years of Lies is worth your time to watch, like all Richplanet shows are, but it has totally failed to clear up the uncertainty that Richard riles against at the start of the programme. It actually contributes little or nothing to research into this, the greatest of British UFO cases. In forming his opinion of Larry Warren, Richard has relied entirely on Peter Hyatt's analysis and his own cogitation. He has not consulted with either of the two principle investigators into Larry's case, Gary Heseltine and myself. We are not shy people and we have no problem corresponding with total strangers when we're on the trail of a good story, but in this case Richard doesn't need to. He already knows us. He meets with us regularly at conferences and his own tours. At any time he could have asked for our input into his investigation, but he did not. Of course he is not obliged to do that, but if he had done so then this episode of Richplanet would probably have been a far better one.

Wednesday, 25 December 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 381

I have been featured on Programme 381 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed on this special Christmas show include: the pagan origins of Christmas, the Trump impeachment, Trump ratifies the US Space Force and much much more. A very merry Christmas to all HPANWO readers!
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-378.html.

Tuesday, 24 December 2019

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 5

See here for the programme: https://www.facebook.com/peter.croft.3766/videos/1420581528110598/. (You might need to log into Facebook to watch it.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss the strange case of Helen Duncan and the witchcraft trial, the scientific evidence for life-after-death and consciousness studies.
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/peter-croft-and-ben-emlyn-jones-4.html.

Friday, 20 December 2019

Brexit Bill Passed

Boris Johnson has wasted no time since the general election last week, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/12/post-general-election-livestream.html. He has presented his EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill for a second reading in Parliament and it was comfortably approved of by the new set of MP's. This means Brexit on January the 31st is now far more likely. Not only that, but the bill sets a maximum duration for the post-Brexit transitional period of just eleven months. This may well be the spur it needs after the endless dithering under Theresa May's direction. This breakthrough comes after a few days of negotiating with Brussels in a way that makes it clear that the rules have now changed. You can see it in the way Guy Verhofstadt looks and talks. The European Parliament's Brexit Coordinator now knows very well that Boris means business! The Leader of the Opposition, Jeremy Corbyn, of course opposed the bill, saying: "there is a better and fairer way for this country to leave the EU.". This is odd seeing as he has never proposed one that doesn't involve Britain not leaving the EU. He also said something else that took my breath away with its audacity: "The government's mishandling of Brexit had paralysed the political system, divided communities and was a national embarrassment." The link below means I don't have to repeat myself over what I think of that and have commented on many times, but suffice to say he is projecting somewhat! It is incredible that in just three days with Boris there has been more progress towards Brexit than in the previous three and a half years. Boris' deal is not perfect by any means, but it is a way of moving forward. I am very confident now that we will be a free country on January the 31st and that now we don't have the Yvette Coopers and Oliver Letwins of this world being able to block no-deal, there is an alternative option. The door to Brexit is finally open!
See here for my Brexit portal containing all my Brexit publications: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/10/brexit-portal.html.

Thursday, 19 December 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 54

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast: https://tfrlive.com/the-kev-baker-show-88867/.
And here for the illustrated YouTube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaCqUoWp1sM.
Subjects discussed include: fake alien invasion via TTSA, bird massacres, parallel universes in Hollywood and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/11/ben-emlyn-jones-on-kev-baker-show-53.html.

Monday, 16 December 2019

Bird Deaths Explained?

The UFO/Para/Con internet was abuzz a few days ago over a story from north Wales. On a small country lane on the isle of Anglesey, a multitude of birds were found lying dead on the road. Almost three hundred of them, all of the same species, were covered in blood; apart from which there was no obvious case of their deaths. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds is concerned they were poisoned. It's also odd that a very similar event happened on the same spot twelve years ago. The police claim that they have a "rational explanation" for what happened, but are not revealing it at this point. The rural crime investigations officer complained that the force had been contacted by people with "all sorts of weird and wonderful theories." Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-50763597. I assume he means the kinds of things you would read about on HPANWO. If so then perhaps they should not be dismissed for being "weird and wonderful". Actually this is not the first story I have heard along these lines. There was a very similar case reported a few years ago in Arkansas USA. Again a large number of birds dropped dead out of the sky for no apparent reason. Again they were all the same species; in that case red-bellied starlings. There were no birds of other species mixed in with them. Source: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/1/110106-birds-falling-from-sky-bird-deaths-arkansas-science/. These sudden bird deaths are sometimes associated with what have been called "skyquakes", loud sounds being heard from an unidentifiable origin up in the sky. These sounds often resemble prolonged thunder, aircraft engines or even trumpets blowing. They have been explained as space rockets, meteors striking the earth, solar wind and several other natural phenomena. Nevertheless I also wonder if there is some link with UFO's, HAARP, chemtrails or even the mysterious phenomenon of unusual objects dropping out of the sky, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2013/09/out-of-blue.html. I'll post an update when the police publish their investigation... if they ever do.

Sunday, 15 December 2019

It's a Wonderful Life Censored

Christmas is coming and television is getting fat with Christmas movies. One of the most popular and distinct releases of that entire genre is Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life, see: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038650/. It is one of my personal favourites and I can enjoy it at any time of the year. The director considered it his finest achievement and screened it to his family and friends every Christmas for the rest of his life. It is based on an unpublished novella by Philip van Doren Stern. It was released in 1946 and has never been free from controversy; in fact I've had to refer to it on HPANWO Voice before, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/12/ayn-rand-denounced-its-wonderful-life.html. The storyline follows the life of a man called George Bailey, played by James Stewart, who lives in a town called Bedford Falls. It begins in his childhood and ends with him as an adult family man just before the film concludes. As George grows up he falls in love with a woman called Mary, played by Donna Reed. His courtship with Mary is one of the sweetest and most romantic I have ever seen. At the same time, George Bailey is not a typical Hollywood invulnerable alpha male. He is very flawed and has weaknesses that any viewer could identify with; in other words, he is you and me. The couple have four children. George dedicates his professional life to his family's business, a credit union called the Bailey Building and Loan that allows the people of Bedford Falls to buy homes at affordable prices. Yet George feels unfulfilled. He has longed to travel the world and come back to get an education and then become a mega-rich businessman. He once boasts to his lover: "You want the moon? I'll throw a lasso around it and pull it down!" Yet he never leaves Bedford Falls. He spends his life fighting a notoriously greedy property developer called Henry Potter who is determined to take over the entire town and force all the people into poverty and degradation to line his pockets, meaning the Bailey Building and Loan is his bitter enemy. In the end Potter steals some money from George's uncle and business partner, threatening the firm with bankruptcy. George responds by attempting to commit suicide. But the moment he is on the brink, he is visited by an angel who transports him to a parallel universe, the earliest example of this concept I know of that is explored in cinema; a universe in which George Bailey was never born. It is a living hell. Bedford Falls is called "Pottersville" because George was not there to stop Potter's evil plan. George's brother is dead because George was not there to save his life when they were children. All the people's lives George's brother saved are also dead. It is eerily reminiscent of A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens. George then realizes that he has actually had a wonderful life. He begs the angel to return him to his original universe. His wish is granted and he runs home to celebrate with his loved ones. His family and friends turn up with as much spare cash as they have to pay the debts of the firm off. They do it because they love George so much because he has loved them so much and given so much to them. In my view, it is one of the most moving and uplifting moments in the history of fiction.

According to a recent video, It's a Wonderful Life has suffered censorship. Why? Its script contains no swearing or explicit references to sex. It has a few scenes of mild violence, but nothing that would be too strong for any contemporary children's programme. It is pretty typical therefore of the cinematic standards of its era. It was a box office flop when it was released, but slowly grew in popularity over time. It was booked for re-screenings more and more often, and was shown all the time on television. Eventually it became a big hit in the home entertainment market of VHS, DVD and ITunes etc. Many people around the world find It's a Wonderful Life enormously inspiring. The famous Greek-American actor Telly Savalas first saw the film during its initial release in 1946. He was something of a wide boy in those days and so sneaked into the cinema through the fire exit before anybody spotted him. When the film was over he voluntarily went to the box office, confessed and paid the cinema what would have been his ticket fee. There was no need for him to do that; he had got away with an illicit entry and could have easily just left the cinema with the crowds afterwards, but the film affected him so much it piqued his conscience. As the source video explains, It's a Wonderful Life brings out the integrity in people. There are many "feel-good" films on the market; sometimes they are called "blues busters". These are films made with an optimistic theme and happy content intended to make the viewer feel better in themselves. It's a Wonderful Life is probably the most extreme feel-good film of all time, but in truth it is far more than that. Its powerful message of hope and inspiration plunges deep into the most fundamental levels of humanity and spirituality. Despite that... no, because of that, attempts have been made to restrict the film's distribution. The film was released into the public domain in 1974 by the original producers, Republic Pictures, but a lawsuit was filed against that release, not by the writers, director, any actor or photographer, but by representatives for the score composers. This courtroom tussle has been picked up and run with by NBC, the eventual people who won the rights to show the film on television. The film has still been distributed since then by NBC, but only very rarely, and it has been torn apart by edits for commercial breaks that many fans consider spoils the movie. It was even snubbed at the 1946 Oscars. Its only award was a technical one; how they created a realitic snowy winter scene while filming in the summer through a record-breaking heatwave. The truth is, the globalist rulers of this world do not want us feeling inspired and uplifted. They don't want us to be exposed to profound spiritual concepts that enrich our lives and bond us to each other; man and woman, father, mother and child. It's a Wonderful Life has an almost magical power of positive influence over people. As I say in the background link above, it promotes traditional values and relationships. On the Cold War level this was seen as very pro-American, but the true message of the film is far more profound. It is about human value, self-esteem and universal love. These things are the ultimate antidote to the hatred of the Illuminati and their plan for a New World Order. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySatDqciDpA. Thanks to my friend Viv for bringing this to my attention. If any readers want to watch It's a Wonderful Life, it can be seen on many platforms, despite the censorship, including Amazon, see: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Its-Wonderful-LIfe-Lionel-Barrymore/dp/B00FZ32V3G.

Wednesday, 11 December 2019

The Empath Test

Jon Ronson famously wrote a book a few years ago called The Psychopath Test, see: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12391521-the-psychopath-test. Now somebody has developed a test for another personality type: the empath. It's on a blog by a woman called "Willemijn". I don't know if that's her real name. It is a Dutch or South African name, but I don't know where she comes from. She says she used to work in the financial industry, one notorious for its attraction to psychopaths, see background link below. Then she had a spiritual awakening and started her website which also offers psychic services such as healing and divination. Her article is called: Are you an Empath? 13 Surefire Signs with a Personal Empath Test. As with the other examples in the background links below, it really strikes a chord with me, perhaps the most out of all of them. It uses the term "energy vampires" which sounds as if it means something similar to the one I coined: "emotional vampires", see here for details: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/03/a-message-to-steve.html. Willemijn's article's description of relationships and interaction with narcissists is particularly perceptive. Source: https://www.alittlesparkofjoy.com/empath/.

Here are my test results:
Do you feel different or as if you don't fit in with others? Yes
Are you able to feel the pain of people or animals? Yes
Do these feelings tend to manifest physically? Yes
Do you know what others are feeling, even if they are trying to hide it? Yes
Are there times when you (or others) feel you are too emotional or sensitive? Yes
Do you struggle with chronic anxiety or depression that isn't situational? Yes
Does noise, lots of movement, or certain smells make you feel anxious? No
Do you avoid public places because they make you feel overwhelmed? No
Do you feel drained after being around large groups? No
Is your mood affected by the emotional state of others? Yes
Are interpersonal relationships with others hard for you to manage? Yes
Do art, literature, and music move you emotionally? Yes
Do you avoid conflict with others because of the way it makes you feel? No
Are there times when you mimic the accents or mannerisms of others without meaning to? Yes
Does multitasking seem overly difficult for you? Yes
Are you more connected with nature and animals than the average person? Yes
Do people tend to come to you for help with their problems? Yes
Are you affected physically or emotionally by violent images or videos? Yes
Do you overeat, drink, smoke, or engage in other unhealthy habits to deal with strong emotions? No
Do certain medications or caffeine have a strong effect on your physical or mental state? Yes
My score is fifteen yes answers. Anything above eight yeses means you are above average on the empathy scale. Fifteen yeses puts me very high, what the author calls "hyper-empathic". The article concludes with some advice for empaths on how to survive in this world, protect oneself and make the most out of life through spiritual practices and mental discipline.

Tuesday, 10 December 2019

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 4

See here for the programme: https://www.facebook.com/peter.croft.3766/videos/1400696973432387/. (You might need to log into Facebook to watch it.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss extraterrestrials living among us, the real fate of Adolf Hitler, mysteries of the Pyramids.
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/peter-croft-and-ben-emlyn-jones-3.html.

Monday, 9 December 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on KCOR's Exploring the Bizarre 5

I have been interviewed again on the Exploring the Bizarre show on the KCOR Digital Radio Network with Tim Beckley and Tim Swartz. See (left click to play, right click and select "save as" to download as MP3): https://kcorradio.com/KCOR/Podcasts/Exploring-The-Bizarre/2019/december/ben-emlyn-jones.mp3.
Also see here for an illustrated YouTube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N292OLgoYxw.
Subjects discussed include: the Tims' books, Nazi UFO's, Prince Andrew being a reptilian shape-shifter and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Exploring the Bizarre: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/04/ben-emlyn-jones-on-kcors-exploring.html.

Friday, 6 December 2019

Edward Snowden with Joe Rogan

Edward Snowden has appeared on the controversial talk radio show The Joe Rogan Experience. In 2013 the former intelligence officer and contractor to the National Security Agency revealed a huge number of classified documents relating to electronic surveillance of innocent citizens, not only in the United States of America, but across the world; see background links below. He contacted the journalist Glenn Greenwald (Not to be confused with John Greenewald of The Black Vault) and the two worked secretly at first. Then the information from Snowden was published by Wikileaks and in several newspapers. In May 2013 Snowden did a Kim Philby and defected to avoid facing prosecution as a spy. He first travelled to Hong Kong China where he remained until his possible extradition to the United States was tabled, then he moved on to Russia. His original destination was Ecuador, the same country that was harbouring Julian Assange, but the Americans put pressure on other countries on the route of his journey to prevent Snowden travelling through their airspace, so the fugitive was stuck in Russia where he was eventually granted political asylum. His actions have made him a popular hero with civil rights campaigners in the same league as Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning. However, does he deserve this accolade? The interview with Joe Rogan is as interesting and entertaining as all of Rogan's programmes, but the testimony of his guest raises some concerns for me. At the nine-minute mark he makes reference to a counterterrorism operation called Stellar Wind which was designed to look for Al-Qaeda sleeper cells in the USA "in the wake of 9/11". However Al-Qaeda had nothing to do with 9/11, as I and many others have demonstrated, for example see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/01/free-energy-and-911-reply-to-steve.html. At about twenty-three minutes into the interview Snowden recalls his own memories of 9/11 when he was a new intelligence recruit. He says: "I'm at Fort Meade (the NSA headquarters) when 9/11 happens... What people forget is: who knew what was going on before anybody else on September 11th? The intelligence community, right? What did they do? Did they get out a public warning? Did they tell you guys to evacuate? Did they say do this, that, or the other? No, no, not for everybody, not for a long time; but at the NSA the Director ordered the entire campus evacuated of thousands, tens of thousands of people actually. He just said, 'Go home.' The CIA did the same thing." So Snowden explains how the intelligence community had foreknowledge of 9/11, but how? Surely NORAD and the US Air Force must have been the first, wouldn't they? The obvious answer is because the intelligence organizations were directly involved. If somebody knows a crime is about to be committed, then doesn't this make them the prime suspect? Not according to Edward. He explains it as: "They (The NSA and CIA) were running on skeleton crews at the moment the country needed them more than they ever had... I'm like, 'This is crazy! It never closes down.' We don't know what's happening. Then we start checking the news, which is through websites because we're doing all this stuff and, suddenly, it's the big story everywhere. You know, nobody understands how big it is yet." This is a ridiculous excuse. The nation's major intelligence agencies with an annual budget of two-figure billions just happen to be looking the other way? Pull the other one! How can Snowden possibly be that naive?... He can't be; he must be lying at this point. He then moves onto other matters: "In the book (Snowden's upcoming autobiography), I talk about aliens and chemtrails and things like that and the fact that there's no evidence for that... I know, Joe, you want there to be aliens. I know Neil deGrasse Tyson badly wants there to be aliens, and there probably are; but the idea that we're hiding them… If we are hiding them, I had ridiculous access to the networks at the NSA, the CIA, the military; all these groups. I couldn't find anything so, if it's hidden, and it could be hidden, it's hidden really damn well, even from people who are on the inside. The main thing is conspiracy theories, right? Everybody wants to believe in conspiracy theories because it helps life make sense. It helps us believe that somebody is in control, that somebody is called the shots, that these things all happen for a reason; this, that, and the other. There are real conspiracies, but they're not typically that they've got tens of thousands of people working on them... I think there's four million people in the United States who hold security clearances, and you can get all of these people to not talk ever to journalists or this, that, or the other." It's difficult to know what Edward Snowden's thrust is here. He makes several points. The first is that he saw no evidence at all for anything relating to extraterrestrials or chemtrails etc. He does go on to admit that such matters might be outside his sphere of access due to compartmentalization; however he then states what appears to be a series of classic skeptics' lines about deep-seated psychological needs and how large numbers of initiated people would be necessary to keep secrets of that magnitude, and that it would be impossible to make them all collude. Not true at all. As I said to Dr David Grimes, there are other factors involved connected to psychology such as tacit agreement and the Milgram Experiment; see here for detail: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/11/conspiracy-theories-mathematically.html. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efs3QRr8LWw.

What is really going on here? Snowden could be controlled opposition. Richard D Hall is utterly convinced of this, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2WSI_M15-k and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sndPG6Hw01U. In the past I have criticized Richard for being much too hasty to slap the shill sticker onto people, and I still do; but this does not mean Richard is automatically wrong. Could Edward Snowden be a disinformer? In which case, what is the purpose of his disinformation? What thoughts and feelings is his deception implanting in the collective human mind? This is a crucial question everybody should consider when wondering if anything is disinformation or not. In this case the answer is: perhaps that the official story of 9/11 is true, that there are no aliens or geoengineering because if there were, then a top ranking CIA insider would definitely know about it, wouldn't he? Richard points to the fact that Snowden, Assange and Manning have been given essentially an unobstructed platform in the mainstream media, as opposed to people like Dr Judy Wood etc; and this can only be because the media want their information spread around; ergo it can only be false information. This is a distinct possibility. However, as I have explained before, the mainstream media doesn't always have everything it wants. Not everything goes the government's way; especially in the last three years, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/03/why-2016-matters.html. The whistle blowing trio's rise to stardom might be a "post-2016 cock-up", something the government really did not want to happen, but were unable to prevent. I'm pretty convinced that Snowden is lying in his interview with Joe Rogan, but his deceit could be of a different nature to the obvious one, that of simple factual disinformation. It is no secret that he has not published all the classified files he has extracted from the NSA and CIA database. Is he keeping some of them back in order to stay alive? Maybe he has to make a coded phone call to somebody every two hours and if he doesn't then these files hit the Net. In which case, I wonder what is in them? Possibly information about the very topics he ridicules in the interview; aliens, chemtrails, 9/11 conspiracies. Maybe something else that the government can't risk being published. If that it the situation then who would dare assassinate him? In Snowden's position it is understandable that he would do something like this and I sympathize with his plight; but at some point he has to find a way to disseminate these files to the people because the world needs to know.

Tuesday, 3 December 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 378

I have been featured on Programme 378 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Mind Set meet-up debrief, the lies of Prince Andrew, terrorist knife attack in London and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-375.html.

Monday, 2 December 2019

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 3

See here for the programme: https://www.facebook.com/peter.croft.3766/videos/1391837680984983/. (You might need to log into Facebook to watch it. It is a better quality recording.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss the UFO's and their presence in places like Los Angeles and Warminster.
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/11/peter-croft-and-ben-emlyn-jones-2.html.

Sunday, 1 December 2019

Another RAF Scramble

At about half past four this morning many people across London and southern England were woken by what sounded like a loud explosion. This was actually a sonic boom caused by high speed aircraft breaking the sound barrier. The aircraft were a pair of Royal Air Force Typhoon fighter interceptors that had just been hastily deployed from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire. They accelerated to supersonic speeds, something RAF planes are only allowed to do during serious operations and never during an exercise. The deployment was done as a precaution because a commercial aircraft had become unresponsive. This is a standard procedure, understandable since 9/11. The RAF located the plane and reconnected it to air traffic control. An RAF press officer said: "Typhoon aircraft from RAF Coningsby were scrambled this morning as part of the UK's Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) procedures after an aircraft lost communications in UK airspace. The aircraft was intercepted and its communications were subsequently re-established." The Metropolitan Police Tweeted: "The loud bang heard throughout north London and surrounding areas was the result of a sonic boom from RAF planes. There is no cause for concern." Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50618956.

The identity of the muted commercial aircraft has not been published. It was intercepted by the RAF over southeast England. It was en route to the USA and developed radio problems while flying over Germany. The pilot commented: "It took us about ten minutes to realize that the radio wasn't working and then about ten minutes to resolve that problem... I looked left and about had a heart attack when I saw (the RAF fighters) so close, strobes on and with bluish glow strips along the side of his fuselage." I've watched a few in-cockpit videos of planes in flight, for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWqwzCTIW3Q, and that story lacks the feel of authenticity. Did they not have a spare radio or other contingencies to cope with a broken radio? Why did it take ten minutes to work out the radio was broken when pilots and air traffic control communicate all the time, especially over southern England, which is the world's busiest airspace? As with the other cases in the background links below, I suspect that the "lost plane" is a cover story. So what really happened? It could have been activity by the Russians or other hostile powers that the government wants to keep quiet. Alternatively it might have been invaders who were a little more exotic. I'm interested to find out if there were any UFO sightings in the area. Interceptions like these are becoming more common. Is this because we are receiving more attention from outsiders, however you define that word?

Saturday, 30 November 2019

Hillsborough Cop Acquitted

The police chief leading the operation during the Hillsborough Disaster has been found not guilty of manslaughter and gross negligence. This verdict has angered and saddened the relatives of the ninety-six football fans who were crushed to death in 1989. For thirty years they have campaigned for justice and in 2014 won a coroners' case against South Yorkshire Police. The original verdict of accidental death was overturned and replaced with unlawful killing. The first hearing in 1991 was accompanied by some truly vicious anti-Liverpudlian propaganda from Rupert Murdoch's News International. To this day you cannot buy The Sun newspaper anywhere in Liverpool. According to the former Chief Superintendent David Duckenfield, he ordered the opening of the exit gate that let the fans rush into the stadium in order to relieve another potential crushing situation outside the ground at the entrance. He had given the order based on urgent advice from other police officers by the entrance. This was compounded by the claim that the stadium's club, Sheffield Wednesday, considerably overstated the capacity of the ground, compared to the recommendations of its architects. Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/hillsborough-trial-verdict-david-duckenfield-not-guilty-why-prosecution-a8840691.html. Nevertheless, as I explain in the background links below, there was definitely an attempted cover-up. Why would the police do that if they were innocent? It is a very similar situation to the Chelsea Manning Wikileaks scandal in which American helicopters fired on a group of newsmen after they mistook them for terrorists. Again, there was an attempt to suppress knowledge of the incident because the US authorities knew they were guilty, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_12,_2007,_Baghdad_airstrike. Both these two cases and many others are proof that the judiciary is not what it is portrayed as, a neutral inanimate arbiter that sits above society like a guardian angel. It is a tool used by the elite for control of society. Jeffrey Epstein is another good example. His first conviction should have seen him jailed for years, but instead he was given thirteen months in an open prison, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-death-portal.html. The same will happen with Prince Andrew. It is sad that the truth about the Hillsborough Disaster has not been acknowledged, but it will hopefully serve as a lesson to everybody. If you're rich and powerful or serve the state, you will be treated leniently; if you are none of those things the system will stomp on you for the want of a penny.

Friday, 29 November 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones at Bases 2019 Video

The recording of my recent talk at the Bases 2019 Conference is now available, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZoYITHlB_s.
My lecture is entitled: ET Disclosure and the Secret Space Programme- Is it More or Less Likley? This conference in Devizes, Wiltshire was particularly successful. See here for my own coverage: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/11/bases-conference-2019.html.

Thursday, 28 November 2019

Ben hosts Christine Joanna Hart

At the recent highly successful Bases Project 2019 "micro-conference" in Devizes, Wiltshire Christine Joanna Hart was unable to attend in person, so she appeared remotely. I hosted her lecture. Christine is a psychic and healer from London with a background in the media, private investigation, espionage and mind control, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh_Xi6I1Q9g. See here for Christine's official site: https://christinejoannahart.com.

Wednesday, 27 November 2019

Fireball in Oregon

There have been reports of a fiery object crashing to the ground in Oregon USA. A photograph was taken of the object last Thursday at about 4.50 PM local time from a town called Salem, which ironically came to attention two years ago during the spectacular eclipse over North America, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/08/2017-american-eclipse.html. The police at the Polk County Sheriff's Office responded by sending officers to search the area. The US Air Force and Federal Aviation Administration have also been involved in the mystery. The original best guess is that it was a descending meteorite, but so far no debris has been found. Polk County is mostly countryside, farmland and small towns or villages. This is reminiscent of a very similar event in southwest England a couple of months ago, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/09/mystery-object-crashes-near-plymouth.html. Source: https://thejjreport.com/world-news/fireball-that-streaked-over-oregon-and-crashed-was-likely-a-meteor/. The police posted this on their Facebook page: "PCSO is scaling back resources. The exact location of the fireball is unknown. PCSO will utilize aircraft during daylight hours tomorrow in an attempt to cover the rough terrain in the area and wrap up the search. PCSO has utilized all available aviation tracking systems and no planes have been lost. PCSO has been investigating a large fireball falling to the earth in the southwest area of Polk County. The fireball was reported as a plane crash and PCSO is working to locate a possible landing location and exactly what the fireball is." As with the Plymouth case, I ask any readers living in the local area, which is too far away for me to visit personally, keep a lookout for any strange activity; roads closed by roadblocks. Excessive military presence in the form of ground troops as well as aircraft. Listen out for any rumours of other strange objects in the sky along with explosions, odd sounds or vibrations. The news story might go quiet or there might be a cover story. We need to be sure this is not... I'm going to get in there first! The Oregon Roswell.