Sunday, 13 October 2019

MI6 Boss says Aliens Exist

Well he should know!... A friend of mine captured the image above and commented on the front page of The Sun: "Aliens and tits! Sells every time." Sir John Sawers, the former Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service- MI6, has stated in an interview: "I think it would be extraordinary if in an infinite solar system that planet Earth was unique." Source: I think he means "universe" instead of "solar system". The solar system is not infinite; it consists only of our closest star, the sun, with the earth and our fellow planets orbiting around it. This constitutes a miniscule fragment of the entire universe. He is correct of course, but why has he brought this subject up now? The article also refers to several opinion polls that are encouraging; with a majority of British people believing in extraterrestrial life. A planet has just been discovered that may well have life on it, K2-18b, see here for more information: I'm also pleased to report that, according to this article, 20% of Britons believe, correctly, that the government know about aliens and are covering them up. The reason for a former intelligence official talking publicly about the subject may well be connected to the other recent revelations about UFO's, for example see: Sir John has an interesting background. As well as being head of MI6 he has been a diplomat. During his Foreign Office career he served at the United Nations, Syria, South Africa and the European Union. Perhaps more sinisterly, he is a member of the steering committee of the Bilderberg Conferences. Are his words intended to aid Disclosure or to hinder it? We shall see.

Saturday, 12 October 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on EOTT

I have been interviewed on the EOTT- Everything On The Table programme with Jimmy James, see:
Subjects discussed include: Mind control, UFO news, altered states of consciousness and much much more. See here for Jimmy's channel:

Friday, 11 October 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones at RAWCON-2020

I will be speaking at the Research and Witness Convention 2020. The event will be on the Saturday the 29th of February and Sunday the 1st of March next year. The venue will be the Princes Quay Shopping Centre, Kingston upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, HU1 2PQ. There is an early bird offer on for entire weekend tickets of £34. This will rise to £39 after the New Year. One day tickets are £18. See here for the official website: My lecture will be about the mysterious case of the 1944 "Witchcraft trial".

Thursday, 10 October 2019

Sacha Christie- Woodbridge Presentation

Last month Larry Warren's internet detractors held the conference that they've been boasting about at Woodbridge Community Hall. It is sad to see the traditional hub of Rendlesham Forest UFO Incident events being used for this travesty, but they hired it so what can you do? This event was endorsed by Peter Robbins who could not be there, but sent a written message loaded with his usual flattery. Peter did a radical back-flip and turned against his former co-author a year after Sacha Christie first started posting her supposed evidence against Larry. As a part of this volte-face, Peter launched a vicious attack against my own character, see here for details: The highlight of the Woodbridge troll shindig was a one hour twenty-five minute lecture by Sacha called "The Larry Warren Fraud Presentation". Sacha is another individual who made a 180 degree about-turn very suddenly in June 2016 after her personal friendship with Larry came to a bitter end. The material she then began posting was huge in volume and very detailed. I examined it and quickly discovered it to be a total fabrication. When I went public with my conclusion she insinuated that I had been discharged from NHS Portering because I had been abusing disabled people. As you can see below, my review consists mostly of links because she says nothing that she has not said before in written form. Anything I omit has been covered by other researchers in detail and there are links in my own posts to their publications.

Sacha begins by describing how she first met Larry in 2007 and how he was a frequent visitor to her family home. For four months, so she reckons, she gave him a place to stay and at the end of this period she then began her blogging campaign against Larry. It begs the question when and how she came across the information she posted and if she kept it to herself beforehand; why? The core thesis she presents is that Larry is a Walter Mitty figure who inserted himself into a false narrative of the UFO encounters in Rendlesham Forest in December 1980. The testimony of another witness, Adrian Bustinza, she regards as genuine and that Larry purloined it for his own use. She points to similarities in Larry's and Bustinza's story. However there are distinct differences too. In my view the two stories are both sincere accounts. They are exactly what you would expect from two witnesses of the same events. The differences are mostly during the aftermath in which their experiences diverge considerably. This could be because of their roles at the RAF Woodbridge-Bentwaters base. Bustinza was an old hand at the rank of staff sergeant, a senior non-commissioned officer. Larry was a new recruit. The evidence is supposedly in Georgina Bruni's book You Can't Tell the People, but when I read it I discovered that was not the case. What's more, Sacha cites that book and also Sky Crash, the original RFI book, to suggest Larry lied about seeing aliens and even faked his hypnotic regression sessions. Even if it is possible to fake a hypnotic trance I still interpreted the texts differently. Details:
Sacha claims that Bustinza gives an inadvertent alibi by being with Col. Halt when the deputy commander was recording his famous tape. However this assumes that Halt and Larry's experiences happened on the same night, which has never been established. Bustinza made a short public appearance a few years ago and did some interviews in which he supported Larry. Then he started making some very cryptic statements and went completely quiet again. Larry supposedly confessed to Linda Moulton Howe in 1986 that his story was a copy of Bustinza's, but Linda has never published the tape of their interview, if indeed she did the interview at all. Only a transcript of it is available and who knows who wrote that. Details: and:
Larry is apparently guilty of grand larceny when it comes to trading fake rock-and-roll memorabilia; however he has never been prosecuted for this very obvious crime. He has not even been arrested and questioned. (I have additional information on this matter that I'm not able to share right now). Details:
For some reason Sacha resuscitates the dead case of the A10 photo. It has become a moot point which nobody is discussing any more. In fact unless the original negative can be unearthed there is no point. Details: and:
There is apparently a discrepancy over Larry's whereabouts during the Christmas period of 1980 immediately before his close encounter. Sacha plays a clip of an interview he did with Tino on the matter, but it is only a brief one. I advise people listen to the whole programme. Details:
Larry apparently faked his handwriting on official documents. No he didn't. Details:
Sacha and her supporters were eventually forced to admit that they had no hard evidence for Larry faking his handwriting and eventually cancelled their own analysis project. Details:
Sacha says that Larry cannot have been seen by Dr Echols after his experience became the UFO caused him to have eye problems and Dr Echols' current speciality is orthopaedics. That doesn't necessarily follow seeing as Dr Echols was a USAF medic at the time and would therefore probably have been qualified in combat medicine which involves multiple specialities, rather like an A&E house officer in the NHS. He may well have been standing in as a locum during Larry's consultation. Details:
There is a tape that Kevin Randle recently published which is supposedly incriminating. (This is not to be confused with Linda Moulton Howe's transcript which emerged at the same time and from the same source). In it Larry discusses his VSA test which he passed. There is a letter from MUFON to Philip Klass of all people, denying this. So is this proof? I think not. Details: and:
Larry allegedly defaced the "lemon squeezer", the Forestry Commission UFO monument in Rendlesham. No he didn't. Details:
Larry supposedly issued threats of violence. No he didn't. In fact if one word of this allegation, or the allegations concerning fake memorabilia, were true, Larry would have been jailed years ago. Sacha virtually admits this at 1:06:52. Details:
Larry claims that Sacha was a close acquaintance of some of the men who have been named as the 7/7 bombers. Actually it was she herself who said this in a TV documentary. (I was asked to take part in this series myself... I declined!) Details:
Sacha incites feminist outrage by claiming Gary Heseltine hates women. No he doesn't; and it is very serious matter to make such an allegation about man who has a wife and daughters whom he loves. His exact words were:  "Somebody... asked me a very good question, why are there no women (at the upcoming UFO Truth Magazine Conference)? It's not done deliberately. We've had four women speak in the past. There aren't many women, in my opinion, who can stand up in front of two hundred people and talk about evidential things. There are lots of women out there talking about abductions and things like that, but not many on evidential-based things... Unfortunately there aren't many and there certainly aren't many in the UK that would fall into that category. While we've had women in the past and I certainly encourage women to come forward, there just aren't that many about. Although I'm sure we'll have women in the future." Not quite the same, is it? Sacha is once again twisting and distorting people's words to produce a false context. It would be fair to say that Gary is making an observation, one which I agree with; but he is not advocating the removal of female speakers from bookings due to any fundamental flaws of their sex. There are many women who have contributed to evidential UFOlogy; they are simply smaller in quantity, not quality, than the men. I expand on that very issue here, see: Details:

At the end of Sacha Christie's lecture she is presented with a cut glass ornament with text engraved on it by David Young, the conference organizer. This is an obvious parody of Gary's "Courage in UFOlogy" awards. I doubt if anybody failed to see through Young's pale imitation. The conference ended with a long and very complimentary message from none other than Nick Pope. Surely I am not the only one who is suspicious of Nick Pope's interest in this matter. You would think such frivolities would be way beneath "the man from the Ministry", "Britain's Fox Mulder", the official international media pop UFOlogist whom every journalist has on speed-dial whenever a UFO story comes in. Clearly Sacha Christie is not a government disinformer. She is simply motivated by a personal grudge. However she may have inadvertently hit the right note, the one that the government want to amplify. I think this explains the involvement of Nick Pope. Details:
All in all this was a very boring and unoriginal presentation by Sacha in which she brings up no new information at all. According to David Young we "Warrenites" were not banned and could have turned up if we wished. I know a few people who went along. However, I had more interesting and enjoyable activities booked for that day; like having a tooth out at the dentist after watching the paint dry on the walls of the waiting room...

Tuesday, 8 October 2019

Twin Towers- The Missing Evidence

A few weeks ago it was the eighteenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. This terrible atrocity has come of age. There are now adults walking the earth who have lived their entire life in the post-9/11 world. To mark the occasion a TV documentary was screened. This was not a premiere; the programme was originally shown in 2015. After eighteen years of telling people that they were simply deluded for thinking fuel and office fires combined with impact damage from the two airliners caused the two giant skyscrapers to collapse; the "experts" are now saying their critics were right all along. The official story does not make sense... What!?... The alternative view of what happened in the forty-five minute programme is provided exclusively by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group of people who have spread false information about "what else happened?". This centres on supposed forensic evidence that conventional explosives and thermite charges were used to destroy the buildings. The programme then focuses on the work of Dr Frank Greening and Dr Christian Simensen, two scientists who have supposedly cleared up the remaining questions raised over the destruction of the World Trade Centre (Only towers One and Two of course. We don't talk about Building 7) and successfully debunks the "EEEEEvil conspiracy theorists!" What they claim is that a vital piece of evidence has been ignored through an astonishing oversight. With grand fanfare the truth is revealed. The presence of the aircraft wreckage itself was the principle cause of the burning that caused the structure to weaken; not the fuel, but the airframe. Airliners are constructed primarily of aluminium, a light strong metal. However when it is molten and heated above a certain temperature, and then mixed with water, a chemical reaction takes place in which the metal and water become aluminium oxide and hydrogen. This mixture generates intense fire and explosions. It is these explosions that the fire-fighters supposedly heard. It also is the alleged source of the glowing molten metal seen pouring from the building. Source:

This entire documentary is a distraction and is designed to confuse the viewer, especially those who are allowing their curiosity to lead them into alternative explanations for 9/11. I don't know personally whether this inadvertent watery and aluminium forge could have occurred in the shattered and smouldering segment of the two towers; but really it doesn't matter. It's a moot question and it is meant to be. The work of Dr Judy Wood proves that the atrocity in New York City on September the 11th 2001 was of a fundamentally different nature, see: Everything in the Channel 5 documentary above, including the counterproposition presented by Dr Richard Gage, is irrelevant and it is intended to misdirect and obfuscate; therefore maintaining the official story.

Saturday, 5 October 2019

David Boyle Dies

David Boyle
1948 - 2019
I'm very sorry to report that David Boyle, the great alternative thinker from the north of England, has passed away. David was famous for the exhibitions he ran in Blackpool, Llandudno in Wales and other places. His Doctor Who exhibitions were world famous. When he died, Sylvester McCoy, the third best Doctor after Tom Baker and Christopher Eccleston, Tweeted: "I’m so sad to hear David Boyle is no longer with us. He brought myself and many Dr Who fans great fun at the Llandudno and Blackpool cons he ran. His enthusiasm and love for all his projects were infectious! He will be much missed by us all. Sylvester x". David was seventy-one years old. Source: I know David best from his UFO/paranormal/conspiracy theory-themed exhibition in Blackpool known as "Alien Base" and several other names. He was a good friend of the Probe community. In 2010 he gave me and Sue Ustane, my partner at the time, a personal tour of that amazing place, see: I didn't understand everything he told us, but found it impossible not to be captured by his enthusiasm. Last week I attended David's funeral in Lytham St Annes, Lancashire; see here in the first hour of the film: It was a moving and respectful service attended by his family and friends. As a devoted Whovian, the casket was designed to look like the Tardis. Rest in peace, David. Wherever you are now, I wish you all the best and hope to meet you again one day.

Friday, 4 October 2019

Bernie Sanders Heart Attack

Bernie Sanders announced in February that he would definitely be running in the 2020 United States Presidential Election. He ran in the 2016 election and had his application wrongfully terminated as the result of a conspiracy by Hillary Clinton and other members of the Democratic National Convention. This made it utterly galling when the old fool then went and endorsed her, see: Mind you, it probably helped with Donald Trump's campaign because many ex-Bernie supporters switched to Trump afterwards, in understandable outrage after Bernie's betrayal; not to mention the 255 million dollars his campaign had cost them. Believe it or not, Sanders is definitely the major American political figure most similar to Trump. Many people will be astonished at what I just wrote, seeing that Trump is, to use the terminology of American politics, a radical conservative and Sanders is an ultra-liberal. However, both are non-establishment upstarts who have gate-crashed a political world they are not licensed to be involved in. Sanders is a leftwing populist and Trump is a rightwing populist. Bernie Sanders is destined never to US President. It has nothing to do with his comments on UFO's, see: He is simply not wanted to represent the Deep State in the USA. They couldn't stop Trump getting into the White House, but they will not make the same mistake again. Therefore you'll understand that I was immediately suspicious when I heard that Bernie experienced angina. Angina is a very serious medical symptom. It can be the first sign of potentially fatal heart disease. The 78 year-old senator and candidate was admitted to hospital and was treated with a "stent". This is a device inserted into the coronary arteries, the blood vessels that feed blood to the heart, that clear away any embolism and restore circulation. I hope this procedure was successful. As regular readers will know, Trump is my man; but despite my political disagreements with Sanders, I do not wish him dead. He Tweeted on Tuesday after the operation that he was "feeling good." Source: He intends to continue with his campaign; and indeed his polling figures are on the rise whereas those of Joe Bidon, his principle rival, are falling.

I do wonder whether Bernie Sanders will live to see the end of the 2020 US Presidential campaigns. There are already memes circulating of gravestones with "Sanders 2020" on the epitaph. The DNC will once again attempt to thwart his grasp for the Democratic ticket. They cannot use the same trick again; everybody will be expecting it and they will not get away with it twice. Therefore they will try something else; and the most obvious option is to arrange for him to "conk out" before the final hurdle, and allow the Bidons and Warrens of this world to do their dirty work for the establishment. After all, he is a pretty elderly man and nobody lives forever, do they? Between 1992 and 1994 the UK Labour Party was led by John Smith. He was almost certain to become Prime Minister in the 1997 General Election, but then on the 11th of May 1994 he "suffered a heart attack" which killed him. He had had a heart attack six years earlier, making this a plausible modus operandi to disguise his assassination, as it sadly will be for Bernie. Labour's official social media has a tribute to Smith, but it's odd that comments are disabled, see: John Smith's convenient death left the opposition leadership wide open for The Chosen One, elected on Mayday 1997; one Tony Blair... and the rest is history (I voted for him. I know; I'm not proud of myself). I'm in two minds whether I should pay Larry Sanders, Bernie's brother, a visit. I know him fairly well, having worked with him during my misspent youth as a trade unionist. He is a Green Party councillor here in Oxford and I was briefly reunited with him a few years ago during a local anti-fracking protest, see: (In the bottom pic, I am to the left of the Green banner while Larry is to the right of it, looking sideways behind the man with the grey jacket). I want to warn him that his brother is in danger. Mind you, would it do any good? I've changed so much since Larry and I were close and he probably thinks I am now an "evil fascist Nazi conspiracy crackpot!" I will continue to hope and pray for the safety of Bernie Sanders. As much as I would dislike seeing him become US President, I would not want the Deep State to claim his life.

Thursday, 3 October 2019

Crashed Lunar Lander Left Something on the Moon

A new video has been posted to YouTube called Crashed Lunar Lander Left Something on the Moon...This Could Turn Out Bad! It is a documentary short with great production design and it has excellent graphics. The reason I am referring to it is because the narration is by me. It's not my voice, obviously; but I wrote the script for it.
The video is on the Matrix Wisdom YouTube channel which is a part of the Zohar Stargate Entertainment group, see: It works in association with Phenomena Magazine, see: There will be more videos on the channel written by me coming soon. See here for the previous one:

Monday, 30 September 2019

Incredible Anti-Gravity Machine captured on Camera

A new video has been posted to YouTube called Incredible AntiGravity Machine Captured on Camera, Defying Gravity is a Reality! It is a documentary short with great production design and it has excellent graphics. The reason I am referring to it is because the narration is by me. It's not my voice, obviously; but I wrote the script for it.
The video is on the Matrix Wisdom YouTube channel which is a part of the Zohar Stargate Entertainment group, see: It works in association with Phenomena Magazine, see: There will be more videos on the channel written by me coming soon. See here for the previous one:

Thursday, 26 September 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 51

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: new evidence of the Loch Ness Monster, exciting UFO developments, eighteenth anniversary of 9/11 and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Monday, 23 September 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 371

I have been featured on Programme 371 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Storm Area 51, the secrets of Freemasonry, UFOlogical infighting and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Saturday, 21 September 2019

Loch Ness Monster Found?

An interesting underwater video has been published filmed in the river which serves as an entrance to Loch Ness. It shows what looks like a huge eel. This news broke as I was in the middle of last Thursday's HPANWO Show, see: The idea that the Loch Ness Monster might be an eel was proposed by Jonathan Downes of the Centre for Fortean Zoology, see: It is an extremely big eel, and this is because it might be a "eunuch eel". These are eels born with atrophied genitalia, hence the name. Because of their deformity, they don't travel vast distances to breed and then die, so they grow to abnormally large sizes, up to thirty feet long. The photo was published at this time when an environmental DNA study of Loch Ness has just been completed. Scientists led by Prof. Neil Gemmell collected water samples full of skin, fur and other debris left by living creatures. They identified fifteen species of fish and thousands of microbes. However, they found nothing unknown. Source; the article includes a comment by Richard Freeman, also of the CFZ: The most popular theory about Nessie, for those who believe it exists, is that it is a reptile. The so-called "surgeon's photo" shows what looks like a plesiosaur, an aquatic dinosaur that supposedly became extinct sixty-five million years ago, but might not have. The surgeon's photo is very controversial and most experts claim that it is fake; although this has never been proven. I am convinced that the Loch Ness Monster is real, but I am open to the possibility that it might be a fish or shark. It seems more likely to remain illusive that way. Reptiles breathe with lungs, just like mammals, and so would need to surface regularly and would probably be seem more often. Fish and sharks have gills and so can remain submerged indefinitely. However, many of the photographs and eyewitness descriptions of Nessie do not resemble eels of any variety, either in form or behaviour. The monster is often reported to raise part of its body well clear of the water; this is often thought to be a long neck. It also has humps on its back; sometimes these are interpreted as coils like a giant snake. There are too many credible reports to ignore, even if some of the photographs are faked (Of course nowadays that could potentially be any of them, see here for details: This does not mean that it is in fact a snake or dinosaur. We won't know for sure unless we get more evidence of what it is. It might still be a fish or shark; but if it is, then it is an unknown and highly unusual species.

Thursday, 19 September 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 22

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the book A Very British Coup, Lord Blackheath the House of Lords rebel, the spiritual war behind the New World Order and much much more. See here for Caroline's channel:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Tuesday, 17 September 2019

AATIP Footage Real- It's Official!

Since December 2017 when the To the Stars Academy first published a series of video clips showing what looked like military gun-camera footage of unidentified flying objects, it has been impossible to eliminate the prospect that the images are merely fakes and that the whole sensation is just a giant hoax. At first, the 2017 news story was met by cagey silence from the US government. Then in May this year the Department of Defence revealed that there had indeed been a UFO research project called AATIP, the Advanced Aerial (or "Aerospace" depending on the source) Threat Identification Programme, see: Today it confirmed something else, that the released footage was also authentic, just as David Fravor and the other pilots said it was. This is a major vindication for Cmdr. Fravor and his fellow witnesses. There are still many questions that need answering, see background links below for details, but what has been admitted today is undoubtedly a major step forward. A spokesman for the US Navy, Joseph Gradisher, said that the visual material was indeed produced by the Navy and it did show objects that were regarded as unidentified. The videos were declassified, but were still not intended to be released. Source: It is most likely that the "Tic-Tac" footage constitutes an accidental leak. However, it could still be the result of a canny person on the inside "working to rule". Hopefully there will be more details released soon. This significant unveiling by the government does not mean they intend to be completely honest with the people from now on. It also does not mean we can lower our guard against the risk of disinformation. However the information control strategy for UFO's is clearly changing significantly; whether this leads to Disclosure, with or without a capital D, or just further and more tangled obfuscation, this fog bank clearly contains something solid inside it, whatever that is.

Wednesday, 11 September 2019

David Icke on London Real

Today is the eighteenth anniversary of the World Trade Centre and Pentagon attacks. This terrible atrocity has come of age. There are now adults walking the earth who have lived their entire life in the post-9/11 world. To mark the occasion London Real interviewed David Icke; the live broadcast began this morning at exactly nine-eleven AM.
Here is the interview. You will need to submit your social media details to play the recording:
David sits in an armchair opposite the host Brian Rose. David is launching a new book called The Trigger, his twenty-second, which centres on the 9/11 subject; it's his second volume which specializes thus. He dedicates the book to those who died in New York, in Arlington, Virginia USA and on those four planes... or supposed planes... on that terrible day. That's an important point to make because it cuts away the most frequent tactic believers in the official story use to attack those who challenge it, see: Brian Rose was living in New York City on the 11th of September 2001 and he watched the whole horror emerge in front of him from a taxi. David describes the basics of the case against the official story, the way it was so politically useful, the destruction of World Trade Centre Building 7 and the way the rubble was so quickly disposed of. He describes his model of the New World Order in which he often uses the analogy of a spider's web with the Illuminati in its centre or in the capstone of a pyramid. Surrounding it are all the secret societies and private thinks tanks and further out, overt organizations like the United Nations and nation states. This is fairly accurate. David also addresses the smears against his character that have goaded mobs into harassing his activities, for example see: What is most interesting and unique about this interview is that David appears to be drifting away from his previous position on President Donald Trump. David's attitude to 2016 has always been a bit ambiguous; for example he was previously very pro-Brexit, but at the same time considered Trump just another insider. Yet in the last quarter of this interview he gives a far more positive assessment of the US president, even portraying him as a bit of a "renegade", to use his own terminology. Trump's recent dismissal of the neoconservative hawk John Bolton was a bit of a catalyst for David I expect.

I'm a big David Icke fan and David has been very influential on me, especially in the early period of my "awakening" process. I no longer focus on David as much as I used to, but still respect what he does and think he talks a lot of sense. I endeavour to attend his live shows whenever I can, see the background links below. However, David makes some mistakes (like we all do) and some of them are related to his position on 9/11. In this interview he does bring up the "controlled demolition" of the World Trade Centre, but does not go into details about the method of this demolition. He even seems to avoid any clarification on the matter; in fact in a previous interview he said this: "All we need to agree on about 9/11 is that it was created on purpose to provide the excuse for what has followed. That's all we need to agree on. We don't need to agree on whether this substance brought the towers down, or these energy weapons. That might be interesting, but we don't need to agree on that; we don't need to argue over it. We don't need to come into conflict over it, like children... Let's move on!" However, knowing how 9/11 was carried out is essential to uncovering who did it and why. We have heard David say how the official story is incorrect, but he does not provide an alternative correct story. He does provide a reference for an alternative story, but that reference is Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. As I've explained before, this organization is giving out a fake alternative to the mainstream hijackers and plane crash account. See here for details: and: If we are led up the garden path into false narratives about rigging the buildings with explosives or using thermite, then we'll become confused and doubtful. When we see these fables disproved we may even be drawn back into the official story... That's the idea I think. Instead of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, David should refer the viewer to Dr Judy Wood. Not only has Dr Wood carried out a completely independent proper scientific study of the destruction of the WTC, she has also taken the matter to court, see: I hope David completes his otherwise excellent presentation of the 9/11 issue by addressing Dr Wood's study in future.

Tuesday, 10 September 2019

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 38

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 38 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see:
Issue 38 includes an article in my column entitled: Aliens of the Caribbean- the Puerto Rico Flap.

Also you will find in Issue 38: a tribute to columnist Bill Chalker, a prime minister's pilot sees a UFO, Bletchley abduction update and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine:
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 37:

Monday, 9 September 2019

Brexit Protest Interviews

On Saturday I attended the second protest against Brexit being betrayed and I made a HPANWO TV film about it, see: I was one of many independent journalists doing so and I was also interviewed on other people's productions. Firstly, on Anon Media UK's Periscope channel at timestamp 19:20, see: Periscope is a very good livestreaming platform with a positive reputation for free speech. I also spoke to a man with a very sophisticated double-headed selfie stick and antenna array who was also streaming live on YouTube, see: Apart from those who caused the trouble later on of course, I was very impressed with the people who were there that day. It was a good feeling to be around these kindred spirits who are genuine, courageous and want to change the direction Britain is going, and the world beyond, from destruction to creation. Despite the rather dramatic end to the demonstration and my own involvement in it, I have no regrets and I'm glad I attended this second pro-Brexit protest.

Sunday, 8 September 2019

Mystery Object crashes near Plymouth

There are reports across southwest England of a strange glowing object being seen in the sky that was described as "falling" towards the ground somewhere near Plymouth, Devon. Others thought it might be an impacting asteroid. A number of 999 calls to the police sparked a huge aerial and ground search operation that lasted all of this morning and the police have released a statement claiming that no wreckage has been found and that it was just a meteor shower. This is a possibility, however the photograph above of the phenomenon does not look like such a shower, in fact specialized astronomical cameras are usually needed to record such a spectacle. Neither do many of the descriptions,. No recorded flights have been lost. Although the most obvious anomalies were spotted by people in Devon and Cornwall, there have been reports from as far afield as London and Cardiff. Source: (Thanks to my Facebook friend James for bringing this to my attention) What if this is none of those above explanations and it is in fact a crashed flying saucer? If so then we can anticipate a cover-up and secret salvage operation, as we saw in Roswell in 1947 and on numerous other occasions before and since then, across the world, see background links below. Whichever country a UFO crashes, the same outcome occurs every time; as if all nation states of the world are obeying the same global policy. If this is a UFO crash-retrieval then now is a crucial opportunity. I'm addressing readers in the area directly: please find out what you can. I am not able to travel to the location myself right now so would be grateful for all and any boots-on-the-ground. We must act quickly before the cover-up is complete. After that the "Plymouth Incident" would become just another piece of conspiratorial and UFOlogical history.

Friday, 6 September 2019

Boris Johnson's Speech

Yesterday the British Prime Minister Boris Johnson made a speech that will change the world. He was visiting the Carr Gate police training college in Wakefield, West Yorkshire and was addressing the press. A reporter asked him: "Hello, Prime Minister. Can you make a promise today to the British public that you will not go back to Brussels and ask for another delay to Brexit?" The PM replied: "Yes." The reporter then said: "Sorry?" Obviously she was not accustomed to such a succinct response from a politician. Boris then uttered the words that have launched a thousand headlines: "I'd rather be dead in a ditch." Source: This is a very strange feeling for me, one that I've never before experienced in my entire life; looking at my Prime Minister and feeling a sense of respect and admiration. (In fact I could add before my lifetime too because the same applies to most of the historical Prime Ministers I've studied.) In the background links below I provide a resource for my commentary and research on the Brexit situation, especially the recent Parliamentary crisis. I don't know how this conflict is going to end. You know how I want it to end, obviously. I want it to end in Brexit happening; but if you take a step back and look at the larger and more long-term developments unfolding across the globe, the Brexit question is only one part of a much greater whole. In fact the more stubbornly the government deny the people Brexit the steeper the cliff they're falling off becomes. Victory is already ours because this is a process that is bringing goodness onto our earth and it cannot be stopped. When Boris Johnson first became Prime Minister, President Donald Trump called him "Britain Trump", meaning "the British Trump". However inarticulately the President delivered the metaphor, I know exactly what he was saying. I was concerned that Boris was not "Britain Trump" because he has a very different background to Trump, but I said he deserved a chance. Boris has so far exceeded my highest hopes for him. Of course, it's not over yet... but then again maybe it is. Saying what he did in public yesterday in Wakefield was an unprecedented move by a figure in his position and it displays how tenuous the grip of the Illuminati has become. I'm sure I am not the only person who felt the way I did when I heard him speak. How on earth did a man like him end up becoming Prime Minister? Well, I can answer that question with four words: "Two"... "Zero"... "One"... and "Six"...

Thursday, 5 September 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 21

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: HS2 "severely delayed", local community activism, the latest Brexit crisis and much much more. See here for Caroline's channel:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Wednesday, 4 September 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 368

I have been featured on Programme 368 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include:an update on Brexit, "straight pride" festival, conmen and narcissists in UFOlogy and much much more. I made a major error in this programme. At one point I commented on who I thought was a UFOlogical conman or narcissist and I replied "David Adair". This was a slip of the tongue and I did was thinking of somebody else and corrected him to the wrong name.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Monday, 2 September 2019

Storm Area 51- State of Emergency

The local authorities in Lincoln County, Nevada USA have signed an emergency declaration over the Storm Area 51 event, an online craze which has so far registered more then two million supporters. A spokesman for the Lincoln County commission said: "We passed this with the caveat that this may or may not happen. We're just trying to do the best we can to prepare for something we know not of. We have no idea what we're going to face, if anything." The social media meme was started by a young man from California called Matty Roberts who is being interviewed here by Jeremy Corbell: (Matty looks exactly like how I expected him to.) Here he is on TV news: He says that he came up with the idea for fun after watching the Joe Rogan Experience, probably the programmes with Annie Jacobson or Bob Lazar, see: and: Government alien secrets are probably not only present at Area 51; indeed Wright Patterson Air Force Base is at least one other place that is likely to be involved, see: They may even have been moved from Area 51 because of the adverse publicity. However, the Groom Lake Test Site is a cultural symbol of UFO secrecy and classified science, which is why Matty Roberts chose it. Lincoln County is where Area 51 is. It's a desolate desert region about the size of Belgium, but with only about five thousand inhabitants. The region includes Area 51, but the secret base is not governed or connected organizationally to the local authorities. (Actually, Area 51 is not under the jurisdiction of any civil authority. It is a political black hole. It operates above Congressional oversight, above executive oversight; and even the US President himself cannot enter it without permission from the commandant. One is forced to consider whether it is even part of the United States at all, and might instead be an enclave of some kind of super-government.) Source:

As I said in the background links below, I really hope nobody takes this seriously. It would be far better to campaign peacefully and legally for increased transparency over the UFO issue. Times are changing and the way the UFO subject is portrayed also is. There is great potential at the present time for a breakthrough that does not involve people risking their lives and liberty. The public passion generated by the Storm Area 51 trend could be channelled far more productively. I know that the majority of those who have signed up to Storm Area 51 will not turn up on September the 20th, but a few of them inevitably will. I hope they have the sense simply to stay outside the restricted area and enjoy themselves at the music and arts festival that is accompanying the proposed invasion. I will cover the event myself on HPANWO TV, see:

Sunday, 1 September 2019

Swansea UFO Network Video 4

The official recording of my latest lecture at the Swansea UFO Network is now available. My lecture is entitled: SETI and UFO's. "SETI", the "Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence", is a scientific project to find intelligent life beyond the earth. So is UFOlogy. Then why are the two so divided from each other? See here for background:
Thanks very much to Emlyn, Mike, Steve and everybody else at SUFON. It was a lovely evening and I really enjoyed it. Thanks to everybody who attended.

Saturday, 31 August 2019

Another Gatwick Drone

There has been yet another drone incident at Gatwick Airport, possibly the most serious yet... which goes without saying because the others were faked of course. See background links below. The air safety organization Airprox reported that on Wednesday an A320 airliner was on its final approach to land at Gatwick's single runway when it had to take an emergency course correction to avoid colliding with a drone. This happened at 1,700 feet, above the 400 foot limit for private drone operators. It was also in controlled airspace. The flight and operator have not been named and many carriers fly A320's out of Gatwick including British Airways and EasyJet. This aircraft can carry up to 186 passengers. Airprox classified this incident as a "near-miss", the second highest level of seriousness after an actual collision. This is apparently the latest in a run of three reported drone incidents at Gatwick since the big scandal in late 2018 that I reported on in detail below. Source: (Thanks to my Facebook friend Jemma for finding this for me). This time there was no major disruption to the airport and only the flight involved was affected. This leads me to believe this was not a contrived drone threat to cover up a major systems breakdown for which the aviation industry would be liable. It is therefore probably a real drone. Alternatively it could be a UFO. As I said in the background links, the way UFO's are being reported has changed considerably in the last few years. I doubt if the word "drone" is code for a UFO in the same way "UAP" or "fastwalker" is. It might simply be a useful diversion to "prevent public panic" etc.

Wednesday, 28 August 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 20

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the useless and destructive nature of HS2, forest fires in the Amazon, the G7 summit and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Tuesday, 27 August 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 50

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated and extended YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: Aleister Crowley's house mysteriously burns, the Larry Warren troll crisis, forest fires in the Amazon and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Monday, 26 August 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 367

I have been featured on Programme 367 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Public relations departments, holographic reality, Platonic noble myths and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Saturday, 24 August 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 19

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: the death of Jeffrey Epstein, Barclays head given immunity, the UN migration agenda and much much more. See here for Caroline's channel:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Friday, 23 August 2019

What has Happened to Q?

For those who follow QAnon updates, this month has been very bleak because the mysterious online entity known as "QAnon" has gone silent. This is not unusual; Q has been known to vanish for several weeks at a time since its posts began in 2017, however this time his/her/their silence might be more significant because it was caused directly by 8-Chan closing down. The host has dropped the board after several of its regular contributors were involved in the horrific crimes. Brenton Tarrant, the mosque shooter in New Zealand and others in the United States of America all used 8-Chan. However, Q has not returned to their old stomping ground on 4-Chan even though that site is currently active and it was where they made their debut. The QAnon aggregators like this one:, remain frozen. Why has this happened? There are many theories. My good friend and fellow radio broadcaster Kev Baker is absolutely convinced that QAnon is a massive hoax. He has made several programmes about it, for example see: I've watched this, but I've also watched debates between the two sides, for example: and I think the Q-supporters get the upper hand. I've also discussed the issue with Duncan Campbell and Mark Cocking on HPANWO Radio, see: and:, and I think there is some reality to Q. Now, a new document has appeared with a brand new take on the issue. It claims Q is indeed real, but that it is in fact not a liberator and beacon of hope that we've been told it is; but that it is really a sinister psychological warfare operation conducted by the very globalist government it claims to oppose. The article is by somebody called Bernard Grover who is quite well-known and sometimes appears on Jeff Rense's current radio show. He has written a whole series of posts about QAnon on his blog and his latest is called "The Quiller Q". He begins with the statement: "My father, who was both an historian and a politician, taught me one important lesson that has followed me for life: Never trust a government anytime, anywhere, for any reason. To that, I would add: most especially when the military gets involved in civilian affairs." It is quite a fashionable idea at the moment to believe that absolutely everything is fixed, everything is bent; and whenever anything happens that makes you think some truth is coming out; then it is not really truth, it is just a deeper level of the deception. On the surface, and before 2016, that makes sense seeing as we have lived in what George Orwell called "an age of universal deceit". The problem with this worldview is that it means the age of deceit can never be seen to end short of some overt and obvious revolution that itself is generally regarded as impossible. This means that the lying government would have to be eternal and invincible. Well, I don't believe that is the case; and I give more details in the background links at the bottom. The problem is that the "everything is fixed!" mentality has literally become part of the identity of certain people in the Truth movement, and even in a strange way their sense of self-esteem. When I read Grover's article I suspect that he is one of them. For instance he has invented some new words such as: Qnuverse, Qvians and Qult. This indicates that he has a very low personal opinion of anybody who disagrees with him over QAnon. This is confirmed by some of the derogatory remarks he makes such as: "... Qvians may be able to dismiss this interpretation because it does not fit with their myopic loyalty to an invisible entity..." and: "...hundreds of thousands of people not only trust Q, but spread its pronouncements like a surreal gospel..." and: "...Just what the Deep State means in the Qnuverse is undefined by Q, though Qvians all 'know' what it is when they see it..." He also calls Q commentators "Acolytes". This all too frequent writing style indicates that Mr Grover is not being entirely rational. He is giving away clues that he might be a bit of a typical "I can see through the disinfo but you can't!" poser. However, we should still examine his logical points.
Bernard Grover claims that the multiple mass-shootings that are occurring across the world, especially in the United States, are not isolated events, but are in fact being perpetrated deliberately in sequence by an organized conspiracy for the objective of generating a mass psychosis of fear. Those responsible are also controlling the QAnon phenomenon. Q's final post before going to ground was: "The month of AUGUST is traditionally very HOT". "Hot" in military parlance means a high possibility of violence. Within four days there had been two mass-shootings in the USA; in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. Thirty-two people were killed and dozens more injured. Two days before the last drop, on the 30th of July, Q posted this: "_Hot8_Hot9_Red_Red_y__FREEDOM_mark1-99_yPc_sigDConf_net[w1]" This makes no sense at all in normal language. To me it resembles a line from a computer program; but it could be some kind of code. Grover thinks that it might be a form of mind control activation for a targeted individual or a secret signal to an agent, like the old numbers stations, see: As I said, it is known that some of the gunmen over the last couple of years regularly contributed to the Chans. Q also posted: "[24hr Warning] Be vigilant. See something. Say something. Know your surroundings at all times." which Grover interprets as a certainty that they had full knowledge of what was to come. He cites a previous situation in which QAnon seemed to know exactly when Senator John McCain would die, even though McCain supposedly died of natural causes. The long silences of a few weeks every so often are apparently the Q entity going into "listening mode" to gauge what internet users are seeing the material they already have and how they are sharing it. The current deletion of 8-Chan is a useful excuse for the latest of these periods. Source: The problem with QAnon analysis is that it is open to all kinds of interpretations. Q usually writes in a very abstract manner, specifically to encourage discussion and education among their readers. Drawing exact meaning from Q-drops is similar to doing so from Nostradamus who also used symbolic and sometimes surreal dialogue to deliver messages. Q also sometimes admittedly disseminates false information for strategic purposes; all to further the Plan. I don't think Bernard Grover's theory about Q is conclusive at all. Perhaps if more actions happen in this "HOT" month of August, or none at all, before it ends in just over a week, at the time of writing, it will add or subtract credibility to his idea. QAnon is a highly complex subject and I've had to think long and hard about where I stand on it, but I do maintain, without apology, Q is both real and benevolent. People have accused me of wishful thinking, and of course I am guilty as charged. Who wouldn't want Q's vision of an end to the New World Order to be true? However, nobody is without bias. I get very suspicious of those who claim that they are totally unbiased; they tend to be some of the most biased people imaginable. Just because an idea is one we would desire does not automatically make it is false. As I said, the "I can see through the disinfo but you can't!" poser is a familiar type. The atmosphere of pessimism in the Truth movement has partly been cultivated by those whose pessimism for them is a back-slapping badge of bravery. I once had a long conversation with somebody at paranormal event about who was a shill or wasn't a shill, what was disinfo and what wasn't disinfo. I grew tired of their attitude because for them the latter factors in both subjects were a tiny minority... with themselves in the heroic vanguard of course, and it was pretty clear that they were revelling in their self-superiority over others. I am perfectly aware that disinformation exists, and I also know that we have to be on the lookout for it. However, this does not mean that we should automatically dismiss absolutely everything as disinformation a priori, unless it immediately proves itself to be one hundred percent legitimate, especially if our motives are just personal and not part of the Truth movement's mission. Yes, if we switched on the Ten O'Clock News and saw Dr Judy Wood being interviewed, we could be pretty confident that the New World Order was on shaky ground, but I don't believe such an occasion would happen spontaneously; it would have to have a cause. I think it would be the end result of a process. Perhaps we are seeing the beginning of that process now. If so, then it behoves us to give it a chance. We should proceed warily, but hopefully. I think QAnon might well be a sign of that very beginning.