Wednesday, 11 December 2019

The Empath Test

Jon Ronson famously wrote a book a few years ago called The Psychopath Test, see: Now somebody has developed a test for another personality type: the empath. It's on a blog by a woman called "Willemijn". I don't know if that's her real name. It is a Dutch or South African name, but I don't know where she comes from. She says she used to work in the financial industry, one notorious for its attraction to psychopaths, see background link below. Then she had a spiritual awakening and started her website which also offers psychic services such as healing and divination. Her article is called: Are you an Empath? 13 Surefire Signs with a Personal Empath Test. As with the other examples in the background links below, it really strikes a chord with me, perhaps the most out of all of them. It uses the term "energy vampires" which sounds as if it means something similar to the one I coined: "emotional vampires", see here for details: Willemijn's article's description of relationships and interaction with narcissists is particularly perceptive. Source:

Here are my test results:
Do you feel different or as if you don't fit in with others? Yes
Are you able to feel the pain of people or animals? Yes
Do these feelings tend to manifest physically? Yes
Do you know what others are feeling, even if they are trying to hide it? Yes
Are there times when you (or others) feel you are too emotional or sensitive? Yes
Do you struggle with chronic anxiety or depression that isn't situational? Yes
Does noise, lots of movement, or certain smells make you feel anxious? No
Do you avoid public places because they make you feel overwhelmed? No
Do you feel drained after being around large groups? No
Is your mood affected by the emotional state of others? Yes
Are interpersonal relationships with others hard for you to manage? Yes
Do art, literature, and music move you emotionally? Yes
Do you avoid conflict with others because of the way it makes you feel? No
Are there times when you mimic the accents or mannerisms of others without meaning to? Yes
Does multitasking seem overly difficult for you? Yes
Are you more connected with nature and animals than the average person? Yes
Do people tend to come to you for help with their problems? Yes
Are you affected physically or emotionally by violent images or videos? Yes
Do you overeat, drink, smoke, or engage in other unhealthy habits to deal with strong emotions? No
Do certain medications or caffeine have a strong effect on your physical or mental state? Yes
My score is fifteen yes answers. Anything above eight yeses means you are above average on the empathy scale. Fifteen yeses puts me very high, what the author calls "hyper-empathic". The article concludes with some advice for empaths on how to survive in this world, protect oneself and make the most out of life through spiritual practices and mental discipline.

Tuesday, 10 December 2019

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 4

See here for the programme: (You might need to log into Facebook to watch it.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss extraterrestrials living among us, the real fate of Adolf Hitler, mysteries of the Pyramids.
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft:

Monday, 9 December 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on KCOR's Exploring the Bizarre 5

I have been interviewed again on the Exploring the Bizarre show on the KCOR Digital Radio Network with Tim Beckley and Tim Swartz. See (left click to play, right click and select "save as" to download as MP3):
Also see here for an illustrated YouTube version: (coming soon).
Subjects discussed include: the Tims' books, Nazi UFO's, Prince Andrew being a reptilian shape-shifter and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Exploring the Bizarre:

Friday, 6 December 2019

Edward Snowden with Joe Rogan

Edward Snowden has appeared on the controversial talk radio show The Joe Rogan Experience. In 2013 the former intelligence officer and contractor to the National Security Agency revealed a huge number of classified documents relating to electronic surveillance of innocent citizens, not only in the United States of America, but across the world; see background links below. He contacted the journalist Glenn Greenwald (Not to be confused with John Greenewald of The Black Vault) and the two worked secretly at first. Then the information from Snowden was published by Wikileaks and in several newspapers. In May 2013 Snowden did a Kim Philby and defected to avoid facing prosecution as a spy. He first travelled to Hong Kong China where he remained until his possible extradition to the United States was tabled, then he moved on to Russia. His original destination was Ecuador, the same country that was harbouring Julian Assange, but the Americans put pressure on other countries on the route of his journey to prevent Snowden travelling through their airspace, so the fugitive was stuck in Russia where he was eventually granted political asylum. His actions have made him a popular hero with civil rights campaigners in the same league as Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning. However, does he deserve this accolade? The interview with Joe Rogan is as interesting and entertaining as all of Rogan's programmes, but the testimony of his guest raises some concerns for me. At the nine-minute mark he makes reference to a counterterrorism operation called Stellar Wind which was designed to look for Al-Qaeda sleeper cells in the USA "in the wake of 9/11". However Al-Qaeda had nothing to do with 9/11, as I and many others have demonstrated, for example see: At about twenty-three minutes into the interview Snowden recalls his own memories of 9/11 when he was a new intelligence recruit. He says: "I'm at Fort Meade (the NSA headquarters) when 9/11 happens... What people forget is: who knew what was going on before anybody else on September 11th? The intelligence community, right? What did they do? Did they get out a public warning? Did they tell you guys to evacuate? Did they say do this, that, or the other? No, no, not for everybody, not for a long time; but at the NSA the Director ordered the entire campus evacuated of thousands, tens of thousands of people actually. He just said, 'Go home.' The CIA did the same thing." So Snowden explains how the intelligence community had foreknowledge of 9/11, but how? Surely NORAD and the US Air Force must have been the first, wouldn't they? The obvious answer is because the intelligence organizations were directly involved. If somebody knows a crime is about to be committed, then doesn't this make them the prime suspect? Not according to Edward. He explains it as: "They (The NSA and CIA) were running on skeleton crews at the moment the country needed them more than they ever had... I'm like, 'This is crazy! It never closes down.' We don't know what's happening. Then we start checking the news, which is through websites because we're doing all this stuff and, suddenly, it's the big story everywhere. You know, nobody understands how big it is yet." This is a ridiculous excuse. The nation's major intelligence agencies with an annual budget of two-figure billions just happen to be looking the other way? Pull the other one! How can Snowden possibly be that naive?... He can't be; he must be lying at this point. He then moves onto other matters: "In the book (Snowden's upcoming autobiography), I talk about aliens and chemtrails and things like that and the fact that there's no evidence for that... I know, Joe, you want there to be aliens. I know Neil deGrasse Tyson badly wants there to be aliens, and there probably are; but the idea that we're hiding them… If we are hiding them, I had ridiculous access to the networks at the NSA, the CIA, the military; all these groups. I couldn't find anything so, if it's hidden, and it could be hidden, it's hidden really damn well, even from people who are on the inside. The main thing is conspiracy theories, right? Everybody wants to believe in conspiracy theories because it helps life make sense. It helps us believe that somebody is in control, that somebody is called the shots, that these things all happen for a reason; this, that, and the other. There are real conspiracies, but they're not typically that they've got tens of thousands of people working on them... I think there's four million people in the United States who hold security clearances, and you can get all of these people to not talk ever to journalists or this, that, or the other." It's difficult to know what Edward Snowden's thrust is here. He makes several points. The first is that he saw no evidence at all for anything relating to extraterrestrials or chemtrails etc. He does go on to admit that such matters might be outside his sphere of access due to compartmentalization; however he then states what appears to be a series of classic skeptics' lines about deep-seated psychological needs and how large numbers of initiated people would be necessary to keep secrets of that magnitude, and that it would be impossible to make them all collude. Not true at all. As I said to Dr David Grimes, there are other factors involved connected to psychology such as tacit agreement and the Milgram Experiment; see here for detail: Source:

What is really going on here? Snowden could be controlled opposition. Richard D Hall is utterly convinced of this, see: and: In the past I have criticized Richard for being much too hasty to slap the shill sticker onto people, and I still do; but this does not mean Richard is automatically wrong. Could Edward Snowden be a disinformer? In which case, what is the purpose of his disinformation? What thoughts and feelings is his deception implanting in the collective human mind? This is a crucial question everybody should consider when wondering if anything is disinformation or not. In this case the answer is: perhaps that the official story of 9/11 is true, that there are no aliens or geoengineering because if there were, then a top ranking CIA insider would definitely know about it, wouldn't he? Richard points to the fact that Snowden, Assange and Manning have been given essentially an unobstructed platform in the mainstream media, as opposed to people like Dr Judy Wood etc; and this can only be because the media want their information spread around; ergo it can only be false information. This is a distinct possibility. However, as I have explained before, the mainstream media doesn't always have everything it wants. Not everything goes the government's way; especially in the last three years, see: The whistle blowing trio's rise to stardom might be a "post-2016 cock-up", something the government really did not want to happen, but were unable to prevent. I'm pretty convinced that Snowden is lying in his interview with Joe Rogan, but his deceit could be of a different nature to the obvious one, that of simple factual disinformation. It is no secret that he has not published all the classified files he has extracted from the NSA and CIA database. Is he keeping some of them back in order to stay alive? Maybe he has to make a coded phone call to somebody every two hours and if he doesn't then these files hit the Net. In which case, I wonder what is in them? Possibly information about the very topics he ridicules in the interview; aliens, chemtrails, 9/11 conspiracies. Maybe something else that the government can't risk being published. If that it the situation then who would dare assassinate him? In Snowden's position it is understandable that he would do something like this and I sympathize with his plight; but at some point he has to find a way to disseminate these files to the people because the world needs to know.

Tuesday, 3 December 2019

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 378

I have been featured on Programme 378 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Mind Set meet-up debrief, the lies of Prince Andrew, terrorist knife attack in London and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Monday, 2 December 2019

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 3

See here for the programme: (You might need to log into Facebook to watch it. It is a better quality recording.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss the UFO's and their presence in places like Los Angeles and Warminster.
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft:

Sunday, 1 December 2019

Another RAF Scramble

At about half past four this morning many people across London and southern England were woken by what sounded like a loud explosion. This was actually a sonic boom caused by high speed aircraft breaking the sound barrier. The aircraft were a pair of Royal Air Force Typhoon fighter interceptors that had just been hastily deployed from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire. They accelerated to supersonic speeds, something RAF planes are only allowed to do during serious operations and never during an exercise. The deployment was done as a precaution because a commercial aircraft had become unresponsive. This is a standard procedure, understandable since 9/11. The RAF located the plane and reconnected it to air traffic control. An RAF press officer said: "Typhoon aircraft from RAF Coningsby were scrambled this morning as part of the UK's Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) procedures after an aircraft lost communications in UK airspace. The aircraft was intercepted and its communications were subsequently re-established." The Metropolitan Police Tweeted: "The loud bang heard throughout north London and surrounding areas was the result of a sonic boom from RAF planes. There is no cause for concern." Source:

The identity of the muted commercial aircraft has not been published. It was intercepted by the RAF over southeast England. It was en route to the USA and developed radio problems while flying over Germany. The pilot commented: "It took us about ten minutes to realize that the radio wasn't working and then about ten minutes to resolve that problem... I looked left and about had a heart attack when I saw (the RAF fighters) so close, strobes on and with bluish glow strips along the side of his fuselage." I've watched a few in-cockpit videos of planes in flight, for example see:, and that story lacks the feel of authenticity. Did they not have a spare radio or other contingencies to cope with a broken radio? Why did it take ten minutes to work out the radio was broken when pilots and air traffic control communicate all the time, especially over southern England, which is the world's busiest airspace? As with the other cases in the background links below, I suspect that the "lost plane" is a cover story. So what really happened? It could have been activity by the Russians or other hostile powers that the government wants to keep quiet. Alternatively it might have been invaders who were a little more exotic. I'm interested to find out if there were any UFO sightings in the area. Interceptions like these are becoming more common. Is this because we are receiving more attention from outsiders, however you define that word?

Saturday, 30 November 2019

Hillsborough Cop Acquitted

The police chief leading the operation during the Hillsborough Disaster has been found not guilty of manslaughter and gross negligence. This verdict has angered and saddened the relatives of the ninety-six football fans who were crushed to death in 1989. For thirty years they have campaigned for justice and in 2014 won a coroners' case against South Yorkshire Police. The original verdict of accidental death was overturned and replaced with unlawful killing. The first hearing in 1991 was accompanied by some truly vicious anti-Liverpudlian propaganda from Rupert Murdoch's News International. To this day you cannot buy The Sun newspaper anywhere in Liverpool. According to the former Chief Superintendent David Duckenfield, he ordered the opening of the exit gate that let the fans rush into the stadium in order to relieve another potential crushing situation outside the ground at the entrance. He had given the order based on urgent advice from other police officers by the entrance. This was compounded by the claim that the stadium's club, Sheffield Wednesday, considerably overstated the capacity of the ground, compared to the recommendations of its architects. Source: Nevertheless, as I explain in the background links below, there was definitely an attempted cover-up. Why would the police do that if they were innocent? It is a very similar situation to the Chelsea Manning Wikileaks scandal in which American helicopters fired on a group of newsmen after they mistook them for terrorists. Again, there was an attempt to suppress knowledge of the incident because the US authorities knew they were guilty, see:,_2007,_Baghdad_airstrike. Both these two cases and many others are proof that the judiciary is not what it is portrayed as, a neutral inanimate arbiter that sits above society like a guardian angel. It is a tool used by the elite for control of society. Jeffrey Epstein is another good example. His first conviction should have seen him jailed for years, but instead he was given thirteen months in an open prison, see: The same will happen with Prince Andrew. It is sad that the truth about the Hillsborough Disaster has not been acknowledged, but it will hopefully serve as a lesson to everybody. If you're rich and powerful or serve the state, you will be treated leniently; if you are none of those things the system will stomp on you for the want of a penny.

Friday, 29 November 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones at Bases 2019 Video

The recording of my recent talk at the Bases 2019 Conference is now available, see:
My lecture is entitled: ET Disclosure and the Secret Space Programme- Is it More or Less Likley? This conference in Devizes, Wiltshire was particularly successful. See here for my own coverage:

Thursday, 28 November 2019

Ben hosts Christine Joanna Hart

At the recent highly successful Bases Project 2019 "micro-conference" in Devizes, Wiltshire Christine Joanna Hart was unable to attend in person, so she appeared remotely. I hosted her lecture. Christine is a psychic and healer from London with a background in the media, private investigation, espionage and mind control, see: See here for Christine's official site:

Wednesday, 27 November 2019

Fireball in Oregon

There have been reports of a fiery object crashing to the ground in Oregon USA. A photograph was taken of the object last Thursday at about 4.50 PM local time from a town called Salem, which ironically came to attention two years ago during the spectacular eclipse over North America, see: The police at the Polk County Sheriff's Office responded by sending officers to search the area. The US Air Force and Federal Aviation Administration have also been involved in the mystery. The original best guess is that it was a descending meteorite, but so far no debris has been found. Polk County is mostly countryside, farmland and small towns or villages. This is reminiscent of a very similar event in southwest England a couple of months ago, see: Source: The police posted this on their Facebook page: "PCSO is scaling back resources. The exact location of the fireball is unknown. PCSO will utilize aircraft during daylight hours tomorrow in an attempt to cover the rough terrain in the area and wrap up the search. PCSO has utilized all available aviation tracking systems and no planes have been lost. PCSO has been investigating a large fireball falling to the earth in the southwest area of Polk County. The fireball was reported as a plane crash and PCSO is working to locate a possible landing location and exactly what the fireball is." As with the Plymouth case, I ask any readers living in the local area, which is too far away for me to visit personally, keep a lookout for any strange activity; roads closed by roadblocks. Excessive military presence in the form of ground troops as well as aircraft. Listen out for any rumours of other strange objects in the sky along with explosions, odd sounds or vibrations. The news story might go quiet or there might be a cover story. We need to be sure this is not... I'm going to get in there first! The Oregon Roswell.

Tuesday, 26 November 2019

Colin and Ben Bases Chats 3

I have been interviewed again by Colin Woolford and Miles Johnston on the Bases Project YouTube channel, see:
(See here for the preview:
We discuss the Bases Project November 2019 conference and much much more. See here for my HPANWO TV coverage:
See here for my previous discussion with Colin and Miles:

Friday, 22 November 2019

Area 51 Pilot supports Lazar

Since Bob Lazar emerged with his incredible story of how he was sent to Area 51 in 1989 and worked on back-engineering crashed flying saucers, the core of his entire case has been his personal testimony. Many have accused him of simply making up the entire account for the sake of fame and fortune (Not that he has gained any of the latter). However, several independent witnesses have backed him up over the years and the latest of these is probably the most prominent; in fact his testimony may well mark a turning point in the Bob Lazar story. The new witness is Capt. David Fruehauf, a highly acclaimed US Air Force pilot who was recruited to a special reconnaissance programme in 1967. His job was to fly what at the time was the most highly classified aircraft in the American fleet, the SR-71 "Blackbird" spy-plane. The pilot was deployed to Area 51 and says he knew that there was an adjacent section of the base which was known as "Site 4" which sounds like what Lazar calls "S4". Fruehauf flew to the base every day from McCarran International Airport on the "Janet" planes and saw a small group of people leave the terminal in a separate direction from the main facility, towards "Site 4", in a bus with the windows covered, just like Lazar claims. Area 51 is totally compartmentalized and nobody among its personnel is told more than is necessary to do their own job; therefore Fruehauf could not confirm what was going on at "Site 4". However, when his own experience is matched with Lazar's reports, a solid narrative emerges. Lazar's anecdotes about life and work in the secret base rang true to Fruehauf. What's more, when he met up with people in the private sector after he left Area 51, Fruehauf says that they told him they had actually met Bob Lazar on the secret base. Source: The words of David Fruehauf fly in the face of the pat skeptic line that all of Lazar's supporters are losers and loonies. Only the most select corps of pilots would be considered for the SR-71 programme and Fruehauf was one of them. Fruehauf actually survived a crash in which one of the twelve SR-71's lost, of the thirty-two built, came down in an uncontrolled dive, forcing him to eject. What could possibly motivate somebody in his position and with his background to lie? Absolutely nothing (leaving aside the usual groundless whining of "disinfo! disinfo! disinfo!"); and this is the fact UFO skeptics, along with Lazar's critics within UFOlogy, are going to have to deal with.

Thursday, 21 November 2019

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 2

See here for the programme: (You might need to log into Facebook to watch it.)
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss the Tavistock Institute and how it affects human society on the personal, social and state level, including me personally.
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft:

Wednesday, 20 November 2019

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 53

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: Prince Andrew's interview, ISIS leader reported dead, Brexit candidate believes in aliens and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Sunday, 17 November 2019

Shill Tribunal Update- Personnel

I have been making some plans for the structure of the Shill Tribunal that I describe in the background links above. These are just my own basic and interim plan and further details can be worked out in the future with the cooperation of others. These latest plans concern personnel. In a courtroom there are always numerous people. How many and what role they play all depend on the type of court it is and the legal system it is under. It is a good enough starting point for me to use this as a model. Below is a list of the personnel in the Shill Tribunal according to my current model, who they might be and what their job will entail. I have drawn up a diagram of the system in the Illustration above.

The Judge in the Shill Tribunal will be very different to any you will find in a normal court because the Tribunal will have no judicial power, just like the Jewish and Muslim courts I describe in the above background links. The role of the Judge will be to organize a hearing and ensure that good order is maintained at all times. Obviously he or she will have no power to deliver a sentence, except personal ones between themselves and the convict. For example, if the Judge is a Facebook group admin they can ban the convict from their group. After a hearing, the prime duty of the Judge will be to announce the verdict of the Shill Tribunal and publish it as far and widely as possible. This is really all that can be done in terms of enforcement.
This is the person accused of an offence and committed to the Shill Tribunal for a hearing.
Defendant's Advocate
This is the person who is presenting the case for the defence, in the same way a Barrister does in a Crown Court. They will also get the chance to cross-examine the Accuser, the Defendant and all witnesses. Alternatively the Defendant can opt to play this role themselves, in which case their Advocate can remain within the hearing as their informal supporter if the Defendant wants this.
This is the person bringing the case against the Defendant. They must submit their application to the Judge who will then investigate and set up the hearing.
Accuser's Advocate
This is the person who is presenting the case for the prosecution, in the same way a Criminal Barrister does in a Crown Court. They will also get the chance to cross-examine the Defendant, Accuser and all witnesses. Alternatively the Accuser can opt to play this role themselves, in which case their Advocate can remain within the hearing as their informal supporter if the Accuser wants this.
The Jury are the people who decide on the verdict. I'm not sure at the moment how many people should be on the Jury. It might even vary from hearing to hearing. I believe there should be some ground rules when it comes to their selection: 1. They should not be partners or relatives of the Accuser or Defendant. 2. They should not be on the friends list of the Accuser or Defendant. 3. They need to have a foundational knowledge the special interest of the Accuser or Defendant, for example UFOlogy, Bigfoot, vaccine dangers etc. The Judge should approach these people in a random manner and ask them to become Jurors of a Shill Tribunal hearing. If they agree then it will be necessary for the Accuser and Defendant and/or their Advocates to approve them as Jurors.
These are anybody else the Accuser's or Defendant's Advocates choose to call the hearing to give testimony if they think it will help their client's position.

Another question is, where and how do the hearings take place. This could be done in the real world by hiring a function room somewhere and the hearing personnel meeting up there, but this will probably be too difficult and expensive in most instances. I believe it is perfectly suitable for hearings to be conducted online via an internet communication service such as Skype, the former Google Hangouts or Zoom. I am very keen on the idea of a public trial and believe the proceedings should be published, in real-time by livestream if possible. This may not be an option if large numbers of personnel are needed in a session of the hearing on the same call; in which case the proceedings should be recorded and uploaded as soon as possible afterwards. The Judge alone must be responsible for this and ensure that no editing of recordings takes place. There is, of course, a lot more that needs to be worked out in this process and my ideas here are just the start, but I like what I have concocted and welcome feedback from readers. We do have a necessity to get this system up and running as soon as possible because there are so many people in the UFO/Paranormal/Conspiracy Theory community who could be described as "pending trial", people who will theoretically be good candidates for Defendants; for example: Larry Warren, Darren Perks, Simon Parkes, Miles Johnston... and of course, myself.

Friday, 15 November 2019

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 39

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 39 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see:
Issue 39 includes an article in my column entitled How many aliens are there?.

Also you will find in Issue 39: US Government confirms AATIP footage, Gordon Cooper's letter to Grenada, Birmingham Men in Black and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine:
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 38:

Monday, 11 November 2019

The Penny Drops!

Nigel Farage has announced that The Brexit Party will not be contesting any seats currently held by the Conservatives. He is cancelling his candidates from all 317 of their constituencies. This is in response to a pledge by the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and the Green Party that they will continue the habit started at the Brecon and Radnorshire by-election and cooperate to stop Brexit, see:; and here for background: Farage calls his action "a unilateral Leave alliance". It is unilateral because Boris Johnson recently ruled out any non-aggression pact with Farage, see: Boris welcomed Nigel's decision while stressing that people should still vote conservative. However this is not enough because Farage still plans to contest Labour seats, crucially many of which are Leave-majority areas in the North Country. This could still end up splitting the Brexit vote in the divide-and-conquer situation I foretell in the background links above. Farage has also denounced Boris' deal and supported a further extension to Article 50 in the hope of organizing a new deal. Boris is still planning to bring his deal back to the commons after he wins the election, but he has not ruled out a WTO Brexit if necessary. I am personally a "hard" Brexiteer and think we should Leave on WTO rules anyway; further details can be found in the background links below. The Remainers are hypocritically accusing Nigel of "selling out!". Such Orwellian doublethink from them no longer shocks me. Source: It astounds me that it has taken this long for Farage to take his leave, if you'll excuse the pun, in this election. What he has said today is so obvious that millions of people, including me, have been urging him and Boris to do so. It seems that Boris and Nigel still have a long way to go in understanding the necessity that they should be all too aware of, seeing as they are two of Britain's most experienced statesmen. In fact I would go as far as to say that if they do not then they are deceiving the British people. If Farage is serious about Brexit then he needs to field no candidates at all except perhaps in SNP and Lib Dem strongholds in Scotland. If Boris is serious about Brexit he must agree to cooperate with Farage and not compete with him. If this doesn't happen then neither of them are serious about Brexit.

Thursday, 7 November 2019

Proof of Epstein Cover-up

ABC News is one of the prime mainstream media journalism outlets in the United States of America. As regular readers will know, I believe such organizations are used for government propaganda and there is considerable evidence for this, however a new revelation may well top all the rest. James O'Keefe's Project Veritas have released a video which appears to be a recording of an off-air conversation after the broadcast is off, but the videotapes are still rolling. It takes place in the ABC News studio between the famous newsreader, Amy Robach, and somebody in the director's gallery. We cannot hear the backstage speaker and this is presumably because their voice is coming through her earphones. A third voice interjects a few times. The footage was recorded in August, shortly after the supposed suicide of Jeffrey Epstein. This is like a real-life and unfunny Jonathan Pie sketch. Ms Robach explains that all the information we have heard about Jeffrey Epstein the network knew about three years earlier. What's more they had additional and exclusive testimony from Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a woman who has accused Epstein of trafficking her when she was a teenager. She's kept silent since the original Florida prosecution... but ABC withdrew the story! Ms Robach says she was fobbed off by her media bosses and then an objection came in from none other than the Queen, who apparently "threatened us a million different ways!" Epstein's solicitor Alan Dershowitz made objections to the studio too. Nobody knows who at ABC made the decision to pull the news story, but it must have been an official at the highest level considering the prominence of this scoop. This was three years before Epstein's arrest and more then ten years since his initial prison sentence, if you can call it that. Giuffre had a massive amount of evidence implicating Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton, who have both long been suspects in Epstein's vice and blackmail racket. Hopefully they will soon become suspects in his murder. Source: This recording was leaked to Project Veritas by an unnamed individual on the staff at ABC News. The big and obvious question is: Why? The third voice answers that question very well: "The creepy thing is we would make access to all these high profile people." The cover-up of this story seems to be connected directly to the faking of Epstein's suicide and is probably perpetrated by the same people for the same reason, to hide themselves from justice. Ms Robach warns Epstein's former girlfriend and business partner Ghislaine Maxwell that she may well also be eliminated. There you have it! If Ms Maxwell has a sudden heart attack or falls in front of a bus, don't try to tell me it's just a coincidence (Although the skeptics will of course). The video also contains other groundbreaking snippets, such as the plan to interview "Kate and Will" at "the Palace". This must refer to Prince William and Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge. Both ABC and Amy Robach have made a statement in reply to Project Veritas, see: This is an astonishing update. It is obvious, as I have said many times, that something very fundamental has changed in the world. Secrets that used to be suppressed almost effortlessly are now a struggle to maintain. Stefan Molyneux has done a very good commentary and asks another obvious question: Couldn't Amy Robach herself have leaked the story independently? She also has been hypnotized by groupthink, see: There will hopefully be further developments, and indeed I expect that the three year old interview with Virginia Roberts Giuffre will be aired. I'll write more about that if... when it happens.

Wednesday, 6 November 2019

Brexit Candidate Believes in Aliens

The long and tedious soap opera known as Brexit has undergone another plot twist that is probably the most unpredictable of all. The Brexit Party announced its candidates for the upcoming general election when the date was finalized and then just today it was reported that twenty of them have stood down. As I've said previously, there are major problems with The Brexit Party having any candidates at all seeing as Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage failed to form an alliance, see: and: It appears that this point is not lost on the candidates themselves even if it is on their leader. They are also clashing over Boris' deal. There was one interesting exception among these dropouts, Jill Hughes, the former prospective parliamentary candidate for Batley and Spen (Ironically, this was Jo Cox's constituency, see: She has apparently withdrawn from the election because she has "a number of unusual beliefs". The source for this scoop is Hate Not Hope... sorry Hope Not Hate. The ex-banker says she is a spirit guide from Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky; it's about 6.8 light years from the earth. The thing is, Hope Not Hate are a nest of liars who spread filthy defamatory gossip about lots of people, including David Icke, see: So what if Ms Hughes said that. There is evidence in ancient records that beings from the region of Sirius visited the earth in prehistoric times and maybe she is one of them who was left behind, see: She also claims that aliens are here on earth and are cooperating with world governments... Well, as regular readers will know, I think that's true! There are too many background links to list. Source: Ms Hughes is a novelist who has written a book called Spirit of Prophesy which she has listed under her pen name "JJ Hughes". It is described as "paranormal crime fiction"; sounds just up my street. Here's the video trailer: HNH make a big deal out of how the book was self-published; but these days that's quite common. My own recent books are too, for example see: According to her Amazon bio she believes in "elves, fairies, mermaids, unicorns and all things elemental and otherworldly." Again, does that sound familiar? What we have here is an attempt to smear the character of an individual rather than address her party line. It's a hackneyed tactic. It takes courage to become a public figure while professing these kinds of ideas. Other examples of politicians brave enough are Simon Parkes and Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera. It's a pity Jill Hughes has stood down from the election. There are no details about exactly why her ideas led to her departure from the Westminster race. We need more people with open minds in government and she would have been a good start.

Tuesday, 5 November 2019

Apollo Detectives Re-Edit

The Apollo Detectives 3 is a film produced and edited by Neil Geddes-Ward. Neil and his fellow presenter Andrew Chaplin host a conversation between Marcus Allen, Jarrah White, Scott Henderson, Bart Sibrel and myself. It is a discussion on the fiftieth year after the first Apollo mission. Have NASA told us the truth about man's first steps on the moon? See here for the original version: and:
Since then the YouTube user "Shill Stompers" has re-edited the two and a quarter hours of the original programme and condensed it to thirty-eight minutes of highlights. It is entitled The Apollo Detectives; "Straight To The Point!".
See here for more interesting videos about the moon landings from the same team:

Monday, 4 November 2019


I listen to a lot of UFO-themed radio shows, seeing as also create one, and I'm a big fan of Somewhere in the Skies, a weekly podcast presented and produced by a man called Ryan Sprague, see: However, Episode 129 was an exception. The guest was an arrogant and foul-mouthed man called EL Tenney. He is billed as: "one of the biggest names in the world of the weird", but I've never heard of him before and I must know nearly everybody in this business. During the interview Tenney boasts about how he has heckled speakers he doesn't agree with at conferences. He justifies this as: "They're talking shit to three hundred people!" when all they are doing is saying something he thinks is "shit!" The good side of this is people who commit bombastic and antisocial actions like that usually end up looking like fools and bullies in the eyes of the audience. However, it got far worse. Ryan and Tenney then subject the listener to a white guilt trip. This is not unusual of course; guilt-laced propaganda against white heterosexual men is everywhere, but it was sad and annoying to hear it on a UFO radio show. It reminded me a bit of my famous debate with Paola Harris on Planet X, see: The two claim that the ancient aliens subject is racist because its proponents think that black and brown people were too stupid to create high civilization and technology, so it must have been aliens instead. I have never heard any ancient aliens enthusiast say that and if they did I would challenge them. The fact is, there is distinct positive evidence that ET's visited earth openly in the past; it's not just about higher technology being present in the historical and archaeological record where it shouldn't be. At that time, the entire world's people were said to be in a primitive state anyway, including indigenous Europeans. Ryan and Tenney also believe that people who report the Nordic "space brothers" also do so out of a sense of tacit racism. Utter nonsense! The reason people report Nordic aliens is simply because Nordic aliens are the ones who contact them. It is pretty obvious that Nordic aliens are not white people, even though they resemble them superficially. They are not human at all. The two men also lament at how UFOlogy is "dominated by white males!" as if that is some kind of crime. I have explained previously that there are natural and unavoidable biological reasons why different kinds of people are drawn to different interests. Natural inequality is the reason why nobody ever goes up to a basketball team and says: "Why are you all black? You should sign up some white guys! We need equality on this team! There's no balance!" This cannot be changed and any attempt to do so would be enormously destructive. See here for details after the main interview: Tenney claims that a person told him Muslims would not be able to cope with Disclosure because it contradicts their dogma. Actually Islam already has the concept of the Djinn which are a kind of alien, so Islam would probably adjust better to Disclosure than the other major world religions. So whoever told Tenney that is wrong... if they exist. Source: Ryan and Tenney exchange numerous inflammatory comments about "white male privilege!" when people like Dr Jordan Peterson have proved that it does not exist, for example see: The whole world is infested with this kind of Orwellian mind-numbing cultural Marxism; let's please not let it spread to UFOlogy as well.

Sunday, 3 November 2019

Epstein Murdered says Pathologist

A former forensic pathologist has published his analysis of the post-mortem report on Jeffrey Epstein. The billionaire paedophile was reported to have hanged himself in his prison cell at the top security Metropolitan Correctional Centre, see background link at the bottom for details. The official conclusion of the investigation was that it was a simple case of suicide. Source: However many people have questioned that including myself. Dr Michael Baden, a former New York City medical examiner, is the most prominent person to have also done so. He has had a respected sixty year career in forensic medicine and has worked on the deaths of John F Kennedy and Nicole Brown Simpson, a woman allegedly murdered by her estranged husband, OJ Simpson. He was hired privately by Epstein's brother to supervise the post-mortem examination. He is not the only doctor to question whether Epstein really did take his own life. Stefan Molyneux has twice interviewed a Dr Kevin Wacasey who is doubtful over the suicide verdict, see: and: The critics are dubious because of what happened to Epstein's hyoid, a small bone in the throat. The damage it suffers during death can reveal a lot during an autopsy about whether a person was strangled by somebody else or by themselves. What's more the DNA profile of the supposed suicide weapon, a bedsheet, has not been done.

I find it quite amusing that at the moment it is we, the "conspiracy kooks", who are the obviously sensible ones and it is the skeptics and believers in mainstream narratives that are on the back foot, having to defend their own position against logical deconstruction. The dedicated skeptic media appears still to be in a state of sheer denial, for example see: I wonder what Prof. Karen Douglas makes of it, see here for background: This change in general awareness towards conspiracy theories goes beyond the Epstein death. Recently the famous pop scientist Prof. Michio Kaku came out of the closet as a believer in UFO's. As he says correctly, UFOlogy is at a tipping point where the burden of proof is now on the skeptics to explain away UFO's, see: Personally I think we reached that tipping point long ago, in the late 1940's probably. (Something tells me Prof Kaku will not be invited back onto Richard Dawkins' next tour.) This is of course partly due to the shift in strategy the media has undergone in its reporting style on UFO's, see here for details:; and the failure of covering up the corruption to do with Brexit, see: However, I suspect it is more than that. It is something deeper and very aetheric transforming in our universe, see here for details:

Saturday, 2 November 2019

No Boris and Nigel

Back in August I wrote about the Brecon and Radnorshire by-election in which the incumbent Conservative was unseated by the Liberal Democrats. This victory was achieved by the other Remainer candidates in the Green Party and Plaid Cymru standing down. They literally sacrificed their individual success in the election for the Remainer cause and they were perfectly eager to do so, see: This was a very important watershed in British politics because it reveals the emergence of an anti-Brexit coalition, if only informal at this point. I said at the time that it was essential for Brexiteer politicians to do the same. It was US President Trump who first said: "Nigel, get with Boris." Nigel Farage's Brexit Party is a very new flag only launched in January 2019 after Farage quit UKIP in disgust at their fielding Carl Benjamin, known online as "Sargon of Akkad", as a candidate in the EU Parliamentary election. Since then it has seized most of the political space UKIP formerly occupied leaving the latter a "zombie party". After the failure of the Halloween Brexit, Boris Johnson called a general election and, against all odds, succeeded. It will happen on December the 12th. UK elections are hardly ever held in winter; the last time it happened was in 1923. Brexit has turned the entire British electorate into single-issue voters and the Remainers will capitalize on that nationally as they did in Brecon and Radnorshire. We may even see a Labour- Lib Dem alliance, in the same way the Social Democratic Party and Liberal Party formed an alliance for the 1983 general election, see: I said back then that the obvious solution was for the Brexiteer organizations to do the same; in fact I believe it is essential. Together they would be unstoppable, even with the inevitable dirty tricks in the form of electoral fraud and fake news (and possibly more; I'll say more about that later). The Tories are currently around twenty points ahead in the polls, a very comfortable lead. However, as I've said before, there are times when Nigel Farage appears to lose his mind, for example see: When there was a council by-election in Torksey, Lincolnshire I wondered what would happen. The ward has been a safe conservative one, although there is a rising Liberal Democrat presence. The council, West Lindsey, is in the Parliamentary constituency of Gainsborough whose MP is a leading Tory Brexiteer, Sir Edward Leigh. He has sat for Gainsborough since 1983. Therefore Brexit is obviously a major commitment of the local Conservative Party branch and voting public. So what did Farage do? He put up a candidate against the Tory one! This is outright insanity. As it happens, the Tory, Jayne Ellis, won the seat, but with a majority twenty-two points down from the previous one. Source:

Torksey was a near-miss. If the Lib Dem had won, then this time the blame would lie not with the Remainers, but with the Leavers; specifically with Farage for splitting the Brexiteer vote. Under the British system only the majority candidate gets any representation which means if two parties with the same agenda compete against each other they will destroy each other. It's the ultimate in divide-and-conquer. If this pattern translates nationally then the same could well happen on December the 12th in Westminster. I assumed this would be obvious, but then yesterday, amazingly, Boris Johnson revealed that he would not be cooperating with Nigel Farage in his campaign. He said he would consult with Farage, and was "grateful for advice", but ruled out any kind of pact. Source: He claimed that it would risk a Labour victory, but as far as I can see the opposite is the case. We, the British people, don't care about party politics; right now least of all. We care about the future of our nation which includes leaving the European Union as mandated by the 2016 referendum. I'm not sure what Boris playing at, and he evades the question in his interview with Laura Kuenssberg. There are only three possibilities: 1. He has lost his mind. 2. He is a fraud, a globalist agent, a Remainer in disguise, as Caroline Stephens has maintained, see: 3. He knows what he is doing and has some kind of trick up his sleeve that he is keeping to himself. Obviously, I hope to God it is the third possibility.

Thursday, 31 October 2019

Al-Baghdadi Killed

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, aka Ibrahim Awad Ibrahim, aka Ali al-Badri al-Samarrai, aka Abu Du'a, aka Al-Shabah the Ghost. aka Amir al-Mu'minin, aka The Caliph, aka Sheikh Baghdadi, aka Faerlan Ramsey, has been killed... allegedly. The leader of the rogue fiefdom known as ISIS, ISIL, IS or Daesh has been positively declared by the United States government as dead following numerous rumours that he had been killed previously. Following the death of Osama bin Laden... his third death that is... al-Baghdadi became the latest Doctor Who regeneration of the Mohammed Evil al-Turban Emmanuel Goldstein Snowball character that has been a part of global mainstream media for several decades. The Islamic State took power after the chaos of the Iraq invasion and occupied a large area of Iraq and Syria. Its fighting force consisted mostly of an international brigade of irregulars and mercenaries. It was very well funded and armed for a rebel guerrilla force. Unlike the Viet-Cong or Fidel Castro for example, who had to build munitions and infrastructure from whatever could be begged, borrowed or stolen, IS had right-off-the-line purpose-built vehicles, brand new weapons and general issue uniforms. This was supposedly from money raised by illegal oil sales, but that is doubtful considering the area was under siege. This state was completely unrecognized by the international community and almost every nation on earth declared war on it. As a result the IS was driven out of most of the territories it occupied and will shortly be officially considered defeated following the death of its leader. Al-Baghdadi was tracked by intelligence to a military compound in Barisha in north-western Syria; and American special forces carried out a raid on it last Saturday. They stormed the compound, blowing a hole in the wall with explosives and used sniffer dogs to find the IS leader. When he was cornered he is said to have killed himself by detonating a suicide vest. Two of his children died with him. The soldiers removed documents, computers and mobile phones for the purposes of intelligence gathering and then the compound was destroyed by an air strike. Source:

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was the perfect media boogie-man with his sinister name, long beard, religious devotion, arrogant manner and his reportedly malevolent behaviour. He had a number of women living with him whom he called his "wives", but apparently none of them married him willingly. One was said to be the missing American aid worker Kayla Mueller. As you've probably gathered, I am dubious about the entire story. Its plot is one that sounds eerily similar to one that has been written before, the aforementioned supposed death of Osama bin Laden. It even has the same ending which I predicted. The body was immediately disposed of. His remains were taken back to the American base and buried at sea, which the commander of the operation said was "in accordance with the laws of armed conflict". This is also in line with Muslim funeral rites. Well, not according to the US Embassy, see: The Americans say they have identified the IS leader by DNA specimens; however the DNA was provided remotely by a spy. Also, did they have a laboratory at the base that could analyze this DNA specimen on the spot? Obviously when one is killed by explosives worn in the clothing the body will be badly dismembered, but was it good practice to throw every physical remnant of al-Baghdadi into the sea? Do you understand why I wonder if the whole report is a sham? If the story of al-Baghdadi's death is faked then why? Why have the, dare I say, script-writers decided to kill off their central antagonist now? These announcements are usually timed for a purpose, for example see: and: Who will replace him as the go-to newscaster's pantomime villain? (As an aside, Stefan Molyneux is very angry that the media are reporting on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi more favourably than they do about him. This is a fair point, see: One thing we should be wary of is the safety of the special forces unit that carried out the Barisha raid. If any of them are reading this then I advise them to watch their backs. This is following the "coincidental" deaths of Seal Team 6, see: