Tuesday, 26 April 2011

Popping the Question

At work today a nurse “popped the Question”. She did it right there and then and asked me directly! I didn’t know how to respond!

We were walking along a corridor and she asked me how long I’d been a Porter. I replied: “Dunno, 23, 24 years”. She then said: “Oh, have you ever thought about becoming a HCA?” (Health Care Assistant). I admit I was caught on the back foot! I decided to be sarcastic: “No, I’m too young! I want action and adventure on my life. I’m not ready to settle down into a quiet and sedate civilian life…. So have you ever thought about becoming a Porter?” Ha ha!

It could have been worse! I hate it when they make that tutting noise in the mouth and go: “Ben… Ben… 24 years as a Porter? Why don’t you do something better? You could go up the ladder? Surely you don’t want to be just a Porter all your life! It’s such a waste!” If she had said that I’d have walked off after saying something to her that would have landed me in a whole heap of trouble.

Thursday, 21 April 2011


Today I watched a remarkable film. PharmaWhores is the latest movie from Dr Len Horowitz and Sherri Kane (See here for background to Len Horowitz: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/06/alternative-view-ii-part-1.html) You can watch it as an online stream for just a small donation; it’s well worth it! I’ve often said that I suspected that major media Skeptics are funded and supported by mainstream establishment science institutions to suppress dissent, but I never saw any hard evidence… until now! This film explores the links between two of the most famous Skeptic celebrities, Penn and Teller, and the Pharmaceutical Industry. There’s a wonderful scene where Len and Sherri turn the tables on Penn and Teller. As you’ll know if you watch their Skeptical programme Bullshit!, the not-so-Dynamic Duo don’t interview their victims personally, but do so incognito with anonymous camera crews. (This table has already been turned before a bit with the Expelled movie which I review here: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2011/04/expelled-no-intelligence-allowed.html) In this way the victim will act naturally and not suspect that they’re about to be BS-slain. But Len and Sherri got wise to them and there’s a wonderful scene where the camera crew turn up and Len and Sherri have posters about their research all over the walls, and they’re even wearing T-shirts with it on too! The camera crew takes a very brief look around with worried expressions on their faces; hushed conversations into mobile phones follow, and then they almost bolt like rabbits! I recommend this film very much! Here’s the page where you can watch it: http://www.pharmawhores.com/Wake_Up_or_Die.html

Alternative Voting

Here’s a website opposing AV: http://www.no2av.org/
And here’s one supporting it:

In the annual May the 5th Council Elections the British electorate will get the chance to vote in a referendum on the Alternative Voting Scheme. Up till now I assumed AV stood for “Alternative View” (See: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2010/03/alternative-view-4-part-1.html) But not any more. The new system is supported by the Prime Minister David Cameron, but the public divided over whether to switch to AV or keep the existing system One-Man-One-Vote (I know the official name is “One-Person-One-Vote but I loathe Political Correctness!)

I won’t be voting in this referendum at all because the third option which I support is not available: “Who Gives a Shit!?” What difference does it make how we select the public-relations officers of this Illuminati-Occupied Government!? Democracy is a con, whatever form it takes! Boycott all elections!

Sunday, 10 April 2011

I've got a Banned Book!

I’ve managed to get my hands on a banned book! I feel really pleased with myself and a little excited. To be honest the book is not banned as such by law in the same way that many books were banned under the former Communist or Nazi regimes. It was published in two editions, firstly in 1957 as The Divine and The Decay and then in 1983 with a new title, The Leap!, and a foreword by Colin Wilson. It is a copy of this second edition that I managed to buy off Amazon for £30; copies of the original sell for hundreds. As I said, the book was not banned by law, but it was “voluntarily recalled” by the publisher and every unsold copy was pulped.

The author is a man called Bill Hopkins who was born in 1928 and was famous in the post-war decades for being included as part of the “Angry Young Men” literary school, along with other notable writers like Harold Pinter, John Osborne, Kingsley Amis and Colin Wilson. He only ever managed to get this one novel published. He wrote a second one, but it never stood a chance with any publisher for the same reason that his first was destroyed. I’ve not read the book yet, but it is said to have “fascistic sympathies”. The political Left-wingers went on a rampage, attacking the book and its author with the kind of ignorance and venom that the Left excels at. Basically they were the same kind of people who gave David Icke such a hard time in Canada, see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2912878405399014351# . Today Hopkins is largely ignored by the mainstream. The book is a political thriller whose anti-Hero is Peter Plowart, a ruthless and power-hungry statesman who seeks refuge on Vachau, an imaginary isle in the Channel Islands to provide an alibi for his assassination of a political rival. The work is said to be Nietzschean, inspired by the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. (Here’s some background articles on philosophy: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2010/11/meaning-of-life.html and: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2010/10/in-burning-darkness.html ) Nietzschean artworks are renowned for their pitilessness, and dark and potent harshness, “killing God” as Nietzsche put it. They are completely devoid of all sensitivity, compassion and political correctness.

The copy I’ve got is signed and dedicated to somebody called “Barry”. There’s a covering letter folded inside from a friend of the author’s. Considering this it really was a bargain. I’ve written to the Amazon seller to tell them that if they have any more signed and/or dedicated copies then they might consider bumping up the price a bit. I look forward to reading it. I may not agree with all the book’s philosophies, or I may agree with them and not find them objectionable at all (After all I don't find David Icke objectionable), but I’m very curious. As far as its “fascism” goes, the only real fascists involved with this book are the ones who attacked it in the first place. Destroying books: the very cipher of barbarism.

Friday, 8 April 2011

Submarine Shooting

See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-13014640

There has been a shooting incident aboard the Royal Navy's latest and most advanced nuclear submarine, HMS Astute. No details have been released except that one man has been killed and several others injured. The submarine was on a courtesy visit to Southampton when the incident happened.

We'll have to wait and see what's going on here, but after going through Royal Navy training, something I myself have experienced, it's possible that somebody lost their mind.

Then again, this could be an attempted hijacking. Stealing a submarine! Since Tom Clancy's The Hunt for Red October this plot has been the stuff of so many thrillers. these invariably occur when the boat is in dock away from its home port and therefore poorly-defended. However, if this was an attempted hijack, was it real or was it a false-flag? Time will tell.

This submarine hasn't had much luck so far. Since her commission she ran aground off the coast of Scotland and had to be towed free.

(Addendum- 9/4/11) The Astute crewman who was killed has been named. He was Lt Cdr Ian Molyneux.

Now on Eternal Patrol. Condolences to his family.

Monday, 4 April 2011

Expelled- No Intelligence Allowed

The official website for Expelled- No Intelligence Allowed has been taken down. This controversial film is now available on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEvq4xIHmH4

I'm personally not convinced by the ID-Theorists at all, not that the film covers their actual ideas in detail. I also fail to see why there's such a theological imbroglio over it. Even the Pope is now an Evolutionist! It also bothers me, sespite the film's reassurances, that there is a link between ID institutions and the American Religious Right. However why shouldn't God, if He exists, have used Evolution; that's far neater than all these messy miracles!

But it does worry me when lecturers are thrown out of university for their ideas. This has happened before with Climate Change, Alien Abductions, vaccines, Near-Death Experiences etc.

Here's a webpage countering the movie: http://www.expelledexposed.com/ How dare the Skeppies whinge because they were tricked into being interviewed! There are any number of occasions where Skeptical agents have sneaked into Woo facilites, posing as mediums, astrologers etc. How about Penn and Teller? Hypocrites! In fact Dawkins, if not the others too, would have refused to participate in the film if he'd been told the truth. Under the circumstances, Ben Stein did the right thing.

The movie concentrated on the political and socio-scientific paradigm issues relating to the individuals involved in the ID Movement; it didn't explore the actual science very deeply. That's a shame, although I can see that covering both aspects would be a lot for one movie. Perhaps Stein could make a sequel about the idea behind ID itself

Sunday, 3 April 2011

BritCon Conference- Stoke-on-Trent

The official site of the British Constitution Group: http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/

Yesterday I attended the British Constitution Group’s conference in Stoke-on-Trent. Among the speakers were Brian Gerrish, Albert Burgess and Roger Hayes, the leader of the “Black Umbrella Day” insurrection at Birkenhead Crown Court last month, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2011/03/back-umbrella-day.html . He opened the event by telling us of his vision for Britain, a country free from the tyranny of the EU and international banksters. A nation that embraces many of the same things I do like workers cooperatives (http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2007/09/workers-cooperatives.html), small local currencies (http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2009/03/credit-crunch-what-credit-crunch.html and: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/04/welsh-pound.html) and organic farming: (http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2008/06/terra-preta.html) BritCon also has an accommodating ear for Conspiratorial matters like 9/11, Exopolitics, Codex Alimentarius and Chemtrails. I was fascinated by the informnation on the Magna Carta and English Common Law. It’s not widely reported that the United Kingdom has a constitution, just like the United States; a series of legal rights and standards that cannot be overturned by Parliament or the Monarch. I’ve used this information when I was filling in my Census form, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2011/03/hpanwo-tv-guide-to-your-census-form.html . Albert Burgess revealed that the Magna Carta actually goes back much further in history than its official ratification by King John in 1215. It’s really a pre-Norman Conquest document from the late Anglo Saxon period and there is a question over whether it originates from a system of Illuminati-occupation. It’s true that laws in pre-Illuminati societies very strongly resemble English Common Law. Common Law is the basis of most criminal law, in that it forbids citizens from committing harmful acts against other citizens: murdering them, stealing their property etc. This system can be found in indigenous societies like the Australian Aboriginies and their Tjukerpa legal system. Human beings have evolved to be social creatures and therefore would not survive for long if we didn’t have laws prohibiting such antisocial behavior as murder, rape, assault etc.

I’m really behind their message and I’m going to join them, however I feel there’s an element of lukewarm Nationalism about the BGC that is a mistake, and I feel that they don’t quite grasp the Bigger Picture. This quote about the Queen from their mission statement sums it up: “Why Her Majesty has failed in her duty is not for us to judge at this point in time.” I think it is. Ray StClair’s confident assertion that “The Queen will back us up!” here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDWVFrdYao8 at 3.06 is na├»ve and extremely premature. The Queen is one of the people, if she is indeed a person, who is behind the demolition of natural indigenous law.

I was delighted to meet David Shayler at the conference. I’ve wanted to for a long time. He showed me the draft of his new book about law and its relation to the Bible. He, like David Icke did, is facing enormous ridicule right now, including some from people who ought to know better. Sure, he has some very odd ideas that I don’t go along with completely, but let’s at least listen to the guy and hear what he has to say and where he’s going with it! I was kicking myself afterwards actually because I had my camera with him and could have done a HPANWO TV interview with him. Never mind, I’ll probably get another chance to meet him at another similar conference.