Railways are industrial society's oldest and most fundamental form of long distance transport. As a result they have always been very politically and economically charged. It's just been announced that Southern Rail has voted to strike following the company's decision to introduce driver-only trains, see: http://www.surreymirror.co.uk/Southern-rail-strike-Train-drivers-vote-walk/story-29323915-detail/story.html. Up till now, Trains have always had at least two crew-members; a driver and conductor. The conductor's main job is to take care of the passengers; ensure their comfort and safety during the journey. Trains and railway stations are also infested with CCTV cameras and they even have a special police force, the British Transport Police. Therefore I have to wonder at new proposals suggested, to his disappointing discredit, by Jeremy Corbyn, UK Opposition leader and one of the few statesmen in the country I feel any sense of respect for: women-only coaches. A women-only coach is a compartment on a train designated for the use solely of female passengers. These are not a new idea; in fact a lot of British trains had them until 1977 when equal rights legislation outlawed them... those were the days when the term "equal rights" was meant literally. Today women-only coaches can be found in many other countries; they're most common in
Brazil, Japan and India, see: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/26/women-only-train-carriages-a-possibility-under-jeremy-corbyn.
The rationale is that it protects women from being the victim of violent crime,
especially sex attacks. Over a thousand such crimes were reported in 2014.
There are many issues associated with women-only coaches. To begin with, why
has CCTV not been enough to stop violent crime on the railways? Weren't we
promised that it would? We gave up our privacy because of that promise; why has
Big Brother not delivered? Also, why not scrap the proposals to do away with
the conductor? Having a member of staff on board the train whose role it is to
defend passengers from harassment by other passengers is a vital deterrent and
source of security. Despite this there are still calls from the feminist lobby
and their allies in government to bring in this Apartheid system on British trains. My concern is, what effect will
this have on human society? As with much of feminism, see background links for
more examples, this superficially benign measure could do catastrophic damage
to our psychology. To women the message is: "You are not a sovereign individual. You are a mere component in a
political dynamic. You are an oppressed victim of men (specifically white heterosexual
men). All of them will rape you unless the state protects you from them. They
are your enemy. Form no loving or friendly relationships with them. Interact
with them only as a means to exploit them and/or achieve indiscriminate abstract
revenge." For men the message is: "You
are not a sovereign individual. You are a mere component in a political
dynamic. You are a rapist. I know you think that you are not. You might even
tell yourself that you would never dream of harming a woman. But this is complete
self-delusion. If it wasn't for the power of the state holding you back, your
inner demon would burst out and you would immediately become a rapist serial
killer. You are evil. You must feel guilty. Form no loving or friendly
relationships with women. Instead fear them as conduits to the awareness of
your true self; a violent, sadistic, brutal monster." I know it
doesn't sound like a big deal: "Who cares if women have their own coaches?"
I hear you say. But it is a big deal; in fact it may poison our culture and
mass psychology. What's more I believe it is intended to do just that. Along
with organized religion, cultural Marxism is the most devastating and virulent
type of mind control ever invented. Feminists are the brainwashed shock troops of their agenda. The actual definition of sexual harassment is being liquidized
and broadened. Words like "misogynist", "rapist",
"sexist" are used so casually and liberally nowadays that they have
lost their original meaning. They're tossed around like sweeties to the point that
people no longer recognize the genuine article. This is why radical feminists
will happily stroll past the embassy of Saudi Arabia without giving it a second look, even though that country
has the worst women's rights record on Earth. A Saudi woman can be beheaded in
public for simply cheating on her husband. No, the feminist will pass by on the
other side while heading to a picket of the office of a university professor
who used the word "mankind" in a lecture. All this is intentional and
purposive, and it is leading up to an appointed end: nothing less than the
conquest of the human mind. For the elite propagandists carrying out this
agenda they don't care if you're male or female, black or white, gay or
straight. All of us are farm animals and we're being led to the slaughter.
Women only coaches are another hoof-step in that direction.
See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/rape-axe.html.