Sunday, 16 February 2020

Bird Death Update

The Department of Food and Rural Affairs- DEFRA has published its post-mortem report on the mysterious death of over three hundred starlings on Anglesey, Wales two months ago, see here for essential background: The toxicology reports came back as negative; the birds were not infected by any unusual bacteria, virus or chemical. They were killed by blunt force trauma. Many of them had broken bones and internal bleeding. The veterinary pathologists on the case think that the birds crashed into the ground while taking evasive action to avoid an airborne predator, possibly a hawk. Starlings often gather together in enormous flocks called "murmurations" that can include thousands of birds flying together in tight formation. Source: Murmurations are a spectacular sight. The individual birds fly so close and react so quickly that they act like a single object. No human aerobatics pilot could ever come close to such a performance, for example see: This murmuration phenomenon is so tight and unified that for a long time psychical researchers thought that it was evidence for telepathy; that the birds literally form a collective mind when flying like this. However, when films of murmurations are slowed down enough, it's possible to see that the birds do act as individuals, following the one in front. Their reactions are incredibly fast, but they are finite and so not telepathic. This still leaves the question of why such proficient flyers would flee from a hungry bird of prey by diving headlong onto the ground. The manoeuvrability and quick thinking that starlings obviously enjoy in abundance would surely prevent that. Obviously they are not perfect and accidents happen, but why did it happen in this case three hundred times?

Friday, 14 February 2020

Jet Fuel Hoax

I've recently been sent a large amount of correspondence about a strange new story concerning aviation. The claim goes that jet aircraft need no fuel to fly and they really run off compressed air. Some of the air is added to pressurized chambers aboard the aircraft in places roughly corresponding with the location of what is believed to be the fuel tanks. This is used for taxiing, takeoff and landing; but when the plane is cruising the air comes from the atmosphere and is converted to a useable pressure by the jet engines themselves. The original source videos were removed from YouTube, but I've found them elsewhere plus additional documents. The hypothesis comes from several ideas. One says that aircraft could never store the fuel load designated as their capacity, either in terms of weight or volume. For example, the world's largest passenger aircraft, the Airbus A380, when filled up contains 83,291 gallons of kerosene. This weighs altogether about 315 tons. The theorists illustrate this by showing the equivalent weight in elephants, London buses and tanker lorries perched on the wings. They also claim that there is not enough spare space available on the plane to store all that fuel. The workings of a modern turbofan jet aircraft engine also provide a source for their suspicions. The presence of a large amount of liquid on board a plane would cause an inertia problem because the fuel would slosh around during tight manoeuvres, like beer in a glass when somebody jostles you in a pub. It only takes about forty-five minutes to refuel an A380 which means the hosepipe used must be capable of about twice the flow rate of a fireman's hose; such a spray would break the wing apart and endanger the refuelling workers should it break loose. Source: and:

If this theory is true then it is a massive hoax. The implications are enormous. Everybody who has ever travelled by air has the right to sue the carrier for about half of their air fare, because that is the average proportion which covers fuel costs. This appears to be the principle concern of the video uploader; but in fact that is one of the more trivial eventualities, because it also would mean that the airlines are operating free energy devices without telling anybody. However, there are major problems with this whole assertion. An aircraft's fuel tanks are not just in the wings; they are in the centre of the fuselage too. In fact the pilots have to be very careful to expend each tank evenly to keep the plane balanced. The problem of inertia is solved by having baffles to prevent sloshing. This video explains comprehensively how an aircraft's fuel tanks work: What's more, if jet fuel hoax theorists are right then why have there been so many instances of planes crashing because they ran out of fuel; seventeen since 1953, according to this database: The uploader shows us a video from the famous beach next to the airport on St Maarten island where tourists like to play with the exhaust stream of aircraft taking off. The reason they are not burned to death by the exhaust is because at that distance from the engines the thermal energy is very low. A jet engine produces about as much heat as a back garden bonfire, but you would have actually to climb inside the engine combustion chamber to get close enough to the heat source to suffer burns. The same goes for the kerosene soot in the exhaust. At the distance from the tailpipe the tourists are standing, the concentration of soot particles is far too low to cause any acute toxicity (Incidentally, this is a reason why chemtrails have to be real, but that's something I cover in other publications, for example see: Therefore all that those tourists experience is a blast of strong wind. This is also why there are no scorch marks from the exhaust on the underside of the wings. The reason the engine pylons place the engine ahead of the leading edge of the wings is to keep an undisturbed direct flow of air into the engines. While ascending or at some angles of attack, if the engines sit right beneath the wings, then the wings might block some percentage of air from getting into the engine. I would also ask, why does the auxiliary power unit need a small turbojet and fuel to run it? Wouldn't a set of batteries charged by the primary compressed air engines be good enough? Of course, you'd have to keep the batteries secret from all the flight engineers, but that would be no more difficult than any of the other covert elements of this supposed conspiracy. And this brings us onto the central flaw in the jet fuel hoax theory. How many people would be needed to keep the secret? Of course I am well aware of the psychological factor in conspiracy theories, the tendency towards tacit collaboration. This is why I disagree so much with Dr David Grimes and his famous formula, see here for details: However, even the most extreme examples of subconscious compliance have their limits. For the jet fuel hoax to be correct, almost everybody involved in the aviation industry would have to be in collusion. This would include every engineer from Frank Whittle onwards. The builders in the factories, the draughtsmen and technicians. The maintenance crews of not only the aircraft themselves, but the pressurized fuel delivery piping systems at airports. The inspectors measuring consumption of fuel stores, the fitters of gauges and pumps, the pilots and in-flight engineers who have to measure fuel expenditure while in the air, the auditors in the oil refineries... the list goes on. Such a conspiracy would be impossibly top-heavy. What the producers of the second source videos say about Viktor Schauberger and Viktor Grebennikov is totally correct, as I detail myself in the background links below; but a conventional turbofan engine does not use anything like the kinds of technology those two men invented. Indeed why would a covert power-plant and propulsion system be both classified under the black budget and at the same time distributed across the globe for everyday use? Why don't the oil companies kick up about it? The "90% of the thrust!" figure in a turbofan engine is true, but this is because the jet is driven by a large fan which is the second stage of the system; and the first stage is a turbojet that turns a crankshaft for the fan. The turbojet itself does not provide much of the thrust because its primary output goes into driving the fan. The reason airline passengers hear the jets make a buzzing noise like a bee is because that is how the vibrations sound when they are transmitted through the airframe to the cabin. It is true that the jets throttle down when the plane is cruising; this is because it takes a lot less thrust to keep a speeding aircraft at a level altitude going than it does to make an aircraft go from a standstill at ground level to three hundred knots at thirty-five thousand feet, but at no time is the kerosene powered jet engine switched off. The refuelling operation does not involve any local pumps because the kerosene is already kept at high pressure inside the fuel lines under the apron. Also if the wings contain a pressurized air bunker than it must be made of a solid metal shell. Why is this not too heavy to put into a flying plane? I don't want to make an ad hominem point here, but the jet fuel hoax seems to be very popular with flat earthers. I notice there's quite a flat earth overlap with the fake moon landing community as well and sometimes the jet fuel conspiracy pops up in it, for example see: (Bill Kaysing has now passed away and I don't think he would approve of all the material on his tribute site, see: This is not why any of the flat earthers' ideas are wrong per se. I don't get angry with flatheads just for being flatheads. I know somebody who immediately blocks all flatties on social media the moment he sees them. I never do that, in fact I have friends who believe the earth is flat. I even debate them, see:; but one of the reasons that I am cautious of their various adjacent theories is because I do question their ability to assess the evidence. Free energy definitely does exist and many forgotten or underrated geniuses developed it, but their discoveries were appropriated by the government and are today only used in secret. I'm always open to new notions and emergent facts. If somebody can demonstrate successfully that commercial airliners really do run off compressed air than please go ahead. However, right now I would say that free energy is certainly not being used in everyday air travel right under our noses.

Wednesday, 12 February 2020

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 55

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast:
And here for the illustrated YouTube version:
Subjects discussed include: Strange signals from outer space, astronauts seeing UFO's, head of the US Space Force takes his oath and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show:

Tuesday, 11 February 2020

HS2 Going Ahead

After its suspension and review, the government have announced that work on the High Speed 2 railway network will continue. The network is due to be built in two phases over the next fifteen years. It will be modelled on the London to Channel Tunnel route and consist of two lines carrying trains at speeds of up to 225 miles per hour. The original budget for the project was fifty-six billion pounds, but so far it has cost about double that, even with only the work so far done; just the stations at London and Birmingham half built. The effect on the environment will be similar to the building of a large motorway with over two hundred homes being lost. The people unlucky enough to be living on the route of HS2 will be forced out of their houses with the bare minimum of compensation. Even the people who live close to the route and keep their homes will witness their world transformed. You can see by the illustration above that the phase one route runs very direct between London and Birmingham, cutting a laceration through the green heart of England. Small villages that are mentioned in the Domesday Book will be ruined. Woodland of ancient oaks will be torn to the ground. The noise pollution caused by the speeding trains will disturb wildlife and farm animals, and will spoil the atmosphere of rural communities. Mahatma Gandhi once said that the village is the fortress of a nation's culture. Well, it looks like the plan is to sack that fortress. And for what benefit? It is estimated that the current average journey time by rail between London and Birmingham will be reduced from one hour twenty-four minutes to fifty minutes. The Prime Minister Boris Johnson said: "It has been a controversial and difficult decision" and he has added to the budget by appointing a full-time minister to oversee the project. Source: and: He claims that it will create jobs and boost the economy. Unlikely seeing as the increasing trend towards automation in the next few years means that the trains may well be driverless and the stations full of automatic turnstiles and ticket vending machines. It is a pity because this is a big black mark against a Prime Minister who has done a lot of good in other areas, see: And how much will the tickets cost? Even the existing railway network is so expensive to travel on these days that many people, including myself, hardly ever use it. I prefer instead to use coaches. HS2 will probably be far more pricy that the existing network. It will be nothing more than a rich man's plaything like the Concorde supersonic airliner. (Caroline Stephens has covered HS2 as well, for example: I often hear people complain that their taxes are rising, but services are becoming scarcer. "Where is all that money going?" they ask. The answer is: on destructive white elephants like HS2. I just hope common sense returns and we can put a stop to HS2 before they start laying the track. The terminuses can then be turned into ice rinks or something.

Monday, 10 February 2020

New Exopol Videos

Exopolitics Great Britain have uploaded recordings from the Exopolitics Leeds Expo, an outstanding series of conferences that I loved going to; see background links for my HPANWO TV reportages. They unfortunately finished in 2015 and many of these recordings have never been seen before. Some of them briefly feature myself because I was the master-of-ceremonies for two of the conferences. Rosemary Ellen Guiley's lecture is a true exclusive because the speaker sadly passed away recently, see: I hope you enjoy them and, who knows, one day the Expo might resume.
The best way to watch the new recordings is to follow them on the playlist:

Saturday, 8 February 2020

Good Omens

I spend a lot of time writing hate-reviews of TV programmes and films that I can't stand, for example:, so wouldn't it be nice for a change for me to write about a programme I do like? There's not much on TV that I can stomach these days, so little in fact that I've basically given up watching it except on those odd occasions when somebody else who knows my tastes makes me aware of a jewel in the dung-heap. In this instance it was a Facebook friend of mine who told me about Good Omens. This is a comedy miniseries that has just been released onto the BBC and Amazon Prime and is based on a book co-authored by the late Terry Pratchett. Because it is a joint BBC production, my hopes weren't high; but they were dispelled the moment I started watching it. Good Omens is a six-part comedy serial about a very unusual friendship between an angel and a demon. It is both incredibly witty and very well produced; it is also deeply thought-provoking. Aziraphale is an angel played by Michael Sheen. He's a rather effete and goody-two-shoes kind of person, as you'd expect an angel to be. Because of a mishap during the process of Creation he ends up having to collude with a demon called Crowley. Crowley was the snake in the Garden of Eden who then takes on human form as David Tennant, of Doctor Who fame. Crowley is a wise-cracking man-about-town who reminds me of that other very charismatic Hornèd One played by Al Pacino in The Devil's Advocate. He drives recklessly around London in an old Bentley Derby, playing Queen at full volume on the stereo; although he always has to wear sunglasses to conceal his serpentine eyes. He and Aziraphale have a strange and fascinating love-hate relationship. The blunders continue in the run-up to Armageddon when the Antichrist is born and is handed to the wrong parents. This results in a very abortive and botched apocalypse.

There are numerous skits on the film The Omen as the Devil Child grows older, along with the burgeoning errors in the plan for Judgement Day because he is with the wrong mother and father. By the time the denizens of Hell realize their mistake, it is too late. Another player in the game is the descendent of a prophet. Her name is Anathema Device and her ancestor is called Agnes Nutter. The naming of the characters in this series is superb and reminds me of Stanley Kubrick's Dr Strangelove. Anathema is fixated on Agnes' legend and uses her mystical book of predictions to find the Antichrist herself. Good Omens is clearly a satire of Judeo-Christian eschatology. What makes it fascinating is that the moral of the story is far less black-and-white than the mythology it lampoons. Aziraphale is not pure lilywhite goodness. Beneath his squeaky clean exterior he can be deceptive, manipulative and very passive-aggressive. Conversely Crowley is not pure evil. He feels very fond of his angelic friend and has a sense of fair play and justice. It is as if these two agents become more like the other as a result of their companionship. This gets both of them into serious trouble with their overlords, or rather underlords in Crowley's case. The idea that earthy experience breaks down the duality of Heaven and Hell is a very prevalent one in Gnosticism. In the process of Crowley and Aziraphale's friendship, you could say that the two poles of Yin and Yang are blended in the perfection of the Tao, all energies in balance. As the angel says to the eleven-year-old Antichrist: "Some hoped there would be a God incarnate. Crowley hoped you were the Devil incarnate. But you're better than both of those; you are human incarnate!" Oddly enough there is no actual Messiah or Second Coming in this story. It is interesting that the problem Aziraphale causes in the Garden of Eden is all to do with a flaming sword. In Genesis 3:24 it reads that: "The Lord God drove out the man and He placed at the east of the Garden of Eden cherubim with flaming swords which turned every way to keep the man distant from the tree of life." In this revised scripture Aziraphale gives the flaming sword to Adam because: "There are vicious animals! It's going to be cold out there and she's expecting already." Indeed in the same scene we see Adam using the flaming sword to drive away a lion. Later on, the same sword is used by the school friends of the Antichrist to kill the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. It is astonishing that in this version of the perennial tale, the weapon of Promethean divinity is put into the hand of man which allows him to destroy the forces of darkness without the help of God. In the final scene, Crowley says to Aziraphale: "Doesn't it make you wonder if the Almighty planned it this way all along." I also wonder if He did. In fact both the demons and angels join forces and stand side-by-side and shoulder-to-shoulder in unison to punish Crowley and Aziraphale for their treason; for spoiling the fun they were expecting in the final battle of the End Times. Despite it being a joint BBC production, in Good Omens there is a refreshing lack of political correctness. There are some elements that could be interpreted as culturally Marxist, such as God being female; also the fact that Adam and Eve are black people, but this didn't particularly bother me. Besides, from a theological point of view it is a valid quandary; what colour would Adam and Eve be anyway? Why do we think of God as male when He is not a mortal being? Am I imagining that there is even a very daring attempted spoof of feminism in some of the dialogue coming from the Antichrist's friend Pepper? There are some other very intriguing features such as the fact that the demons are all portrayed as having small animals attached to their heads or backs; usually these are reptilians or toads. Where did the programme makers get that idea from? It reminds me of stories of possession by archons or the "scuttlers" Miles Johnston talks about. This series is extremely well-scripted. A classic line is when Crowley accuses Aziraphale of being "holier than thou" and the angel replies: "But I am holier than thou! That's the whole point!" This six-part saga is painfully funny, mentally inspiring and utterly absorbing. It is very like Gone To Seed, see the background links below, with its style and originality. There's also a Tim Burtonesque feel to it; in fact Good Omens is easily as hilarious as Mars Attacks; and that it really saying something. It can be watched now on Amazon Prime, see: I highly recommend it.

Friday, 7 February 2020

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Raconteurs News 6

I have been interviewed again on the Raconteurs News show with Jason Holmes, see:
Subjects discussed include: Brexit celebrations, the scandal of taxation, crop circles and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Raconteurs News:

Thursday, 6 February 2020

Trump Impeachment Ends

President Donald Trump has been acquitted in his trial by the United States Senate following his impeachment. He was found not guilty on all charges. It was obvious this was going to be the outcome. Of the hundred Senators, fifty-two are Republicans, a small majority. As it happened they voted along party lines with two exceptions, one Democrat and one Republican; so the results were the same as a pure partisan vote. In order to remove Trump from office there needs to be two-thirds in favour of it; completely impossible. The accusation was that President Trump abused his position and also obstructed Congress over an incident in which he conferred with the president of Ukraine about Hunter Biden, the son of his main political rival, Joe Biden. Biden Jr was involved with a local oil company called Burisma. I discuss it in more detail in this Third Rail Radio programme: Impeachments of US Presidents are very rare. They have only happened three times in the nation's history. In 1998 Bill Clinton was impeached and also acquitted. You have to go all the way back to 1868 for the previous example in which the seventeenth US President, Andrew Johnson (not the 9/11 researcher), was impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanours". He was also acquitted just like the incumbent. The whole story is very complicated, and I go into more detail in the Third Rail show, but from what I've seen there was no cause to find Trump guilty. It is obvious that this was a trick pulled by Trump's opponents for ulterior motives. Said opponents have displayed their dishonesty and malice for the whole country to see. In this way they are very similar to the Remoaner movement in the UK. It gets even worse for them because one of their ringleaders, Nancy Pelosi, was given her copy of Trump's State of the Union Address and she tore it to shreds. This was a speech that has been well-received by the American people. It indicates that life in the USA is improving. The nation is growing stronger in its economy and the wellbeing of its citizens. America has indeed been made great again! Trump refused to shake Pelosi's hand, which is a breach of protocol because she is the Speaker of the House; but who can blame him after what she has done, see: For Pelosi to tear it up in bitterness over her failed attempt to depose the President could be interpreted as her tearing up the goodness of her country; this is political suicide for herself and for the Democratic Party. In fact Trump's approval ratings have risen significantly over this impeachment. The Democrats do not have a credible candidate to challenge Trump in the November Presidential Election, so things are looking rosy for the God Emperor. The bad guys' plans have backfired on them; an increasingly common occurrence in the post-2016 world. I'm glad this impeachment is over and we can move on from it. It has ended the way everybody knew it would. How much time, energy and taxpayers' money have been wasted on this music hall farce?

Sunday, 2 February 2020

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 387

I have been featured on Programme 387 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: What happens after Brexit?, Coronavirus spreads across the world, problems with SecureTeam10 and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Saturday, 1 February 2020

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 25

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: Now that we've found Brexit, what are we going to do with it? Tower of Babel energy infiltrates the world. Coronavirus... AHH! and much much more. See here for Caroline's channel:, and her official website:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Sunday, 26 January 2020

Space Force and the Deep State

Last week saw the inauguration of the first ever commander of the United States Space Force, see here for essential background: There are many theories and possibilities for the true role of the US Space Force and, as I said in the link above, what we're seeing on the surface cannot be the whole story. Since then I've received additional information that might give us a clue. It turns out that the US Executive has in place a contingency plan in the event of a coup d'etat. Obviously this does not surprise me considering the post-2016 political climate in the USA and beyond, see background links for details, but this plan dates back to 1999, the twilight period of the Clinton administration. It allows the president a provisional continuity of government structure that would operate in a separate chain of command should be conventional one be compromised by subterfuge. This is not unlike the Cold War preparations for the event of a nuclear attack which destroys the entire legislative body politic. Indeed this plan has been enacted on several occasions, for example the Cuban Missile Crisis and 9/11. According to a report on Alex Jones' Infowars, this structure has been subverted by the Deep State in its ongoing campaign against President Donald Trump. We see this in the various alleged Russian hacking scandals and the Ukrainian oil company scandal that led to Trump's impeachment. At the same time there is a counter-coup ongoing by the mainstream armed forces and intelligence agencies who are supporting President Trump. This tallies with the information coming out of QAnon posts, see the background links and here for an overview: There are many overt signs of this going on and the Trump administration's drive to repulse it, one of which, according to Infowars, is the Space Force. Just before the recent incident in Iran, see:, Elon Musk's SpaceX launched a US satellite which was actually flying over the Middle East when the drone strike took place. Coincidence? Source: Following the livestream I did in the above link there has been a devlopement. President Trump has played an ingenious manouvre that has defeated his enemies both at home and abroad. He has allowed the Iranians to disengage while saving face, and at the same time derail the Neocons, pro-Israelis and never-Trumpers in the GOP who want all-out global war with Iran. The attack by Iran caused no reported casualties, possibly because the missiles never got off the ground or that the targeted bases were evacuated as a result of intelligence gathered by the satellite. Also there was an internet blackout at the same time in Iran. Could the US Space Force actually be a part of Trump's independent supporters' club?

There is another possibility. I came across another video showing a lecture by Randy Cramer, somebody I've not heard of before. I'm surprised because what he has to say is extraordinary. It matches exactly what I myself have worked out about UFO Disclosure. By far the most likely kind of Disclosure we're going to have, at least initially, is false Disclosure. If the government are unable to suppress the truth about extraterrestrial engagement then they will admit that it exists, but with the proviso that the aliens are actually hostile and plan to destroy us. This is the fake alien invasion scenario which is unfortunately quite plausible. It would not only justify increased internationalism and authoritarianism in the form of a global state of emergency to "save the planet!"; it would also negate most of the credibility obstacles that the government would face. They would be able to say something like: "We didn't want to lie to you for eighty years, but we had to so we could protect you." etc. Source: Indeed, I cover this conundrum in my series of novels, the Roswell trilogy, see: However, Cramer takes the issue one step further and brings up an element that never occurred to me. He believes that a fake alien invasion is actually a beneficial proposal and is even a necessary part of the Disclosure process in order to prevent public panic. In Cramer's model, real Disclosure would occur after a fake alien invasion that also involved a fake response. The whole thing would be a charade to channel public opinion. This would, he believes, mitigate the inevitable instability of the public reaction to the truth about the extraterrestrial presence. Cramer clearly has a very low opinion of his fellow man. I feel very irritated by those who are convinced that public panic would emerge out of anything and everything in any way novel that occurs. I always ask them: "But what about you? Would you panic?" The answer I always receive is: "Oh no! I'd be fine. It's only other people who would panic." After I'd asked a large enough cross section of the population this question I eventually concluded that if everybody thinks everybody else would panic except themselves, then probably very few people in fact would. Cramer also believes that the engineered threat of hostile aliens might be a good way of maintaining world peace, by backstaging differences between warring rival groups on earth; Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland, Muslims and Hindus in India etc. Don't let the light-hearted tone of his speech fool you; Cramer is a true Machiavellian. His strategies are not that different to the terms in which I suspect the Illuminati are themselves talking. Cramer's intentions are clearly humanitarian, but his methods merge almost seamlessly with those he opposes. He claims that he knows from sources inside the Truth Embargo that the very outlook he describes is currently the most popular. The US Space Force might fit into the scheme that Cramer is suggesting. The question is though, for which outcome; his or the Deep State's?  

Saturday, 25 January 2020

Brexit Survival Kit

It is less than a week to go until Brexit, but it is not too late to purchase your very own Brexit survival kit. There are many options, some more expensive than others; but they tend to go for around the three hundred pound mark. This one is fairly typical of what's on offer. It contains numerous canned meals, a firelighter and a device for purifying water, see: Despite the life's essentials contained in the "Brexit Box," it lacks other things that we will definitely need in a post-Brexit world, like the zombie-killing gun. Presumably that is extra. However, what could never fit into the box are the nuclear tipped cruise missiles for taking down Godzilla. We will just have to hope that the army has a few of those. Nevertheless, surely a few doses of the drugs for treating the super-gonorrhoea that we will all inevitably come down with could be fitted inside the Brexit Box. For years now I have been trying to persuade people over and over that Brexit is nothing to be afraid of. It is actually a good thing. In the meantime, somebody else has been selling packets of groceries to frightened people for three hundred pounds a pop... I'm in the wrong business.

Friday, 24 January 2020

Telekinetic Chelyabinsk Meteorite

A strange piece of CCTV footage has emerged from a museum housing a fragment of the Chelyabinsk meteor. The meteor struck the earth on the 15th of February 2013 and burst apart above the city of Chelyabinsk in the Southern Urals region of Russia. The explosion was 0.8 megatons, more powerful than most nuclear bombs, but luckily it happened very high up, at an altitude of 90,000 feet, so the shockwave only broke a few windows. Some people had to be treated for cuts from flying glass, but there were no serious injuries. The pieces of the meteor scattered over a wide area and some were recovered, including the piece in question. It is in a display cabinet at the State History Museum in Chelyabinsk which consists of a table where the fragment is placed, covered by a pyramid of glass. In the footage the pyramid slowly rises into the air. It hovers for a few minutes and then descends back into place. This happens very slowly, over a number of minutes; in fact the footage has been speeded up so we can see it. There is currently no explanation for how this happened. This has sometimes been reported as a "levitation", IE the lid rising into the air with nothing to support it; but it was not. There is an electric mechanism for lifting the lid, but it was deactivated; so this is almost as mysterious as if it were a true levitation. The museum's curator Vladimir Bogdanovsky said: "We spoke to all our specialists in electronics and wiring who said unanimously that it was impossible to have it opening by itself." What's more the cabinet has an alarm that sounds whenever the cover is lifted unless it is deactivated by a special key that only the staff have. Source: One explanation is that this was an attempted theft, probably an inside job involving an accomplice on the staff who could have raised the lid and deactivated the alarm. There is a lucrative black market trade in stolen meteorites, see: However in this case it makes no sense. The incident happened in the middle of the day when the museum was full of people. If it had taken place at night when the museum was closed I could have believed that solution. Some people have claimed that the fragment on display at the museum is actually part of a flying saucer, but it clearly is not. It is a true meteorite, a natural lump of space rock. However, could there be something special about this particular meteorite that might interest intelligences beyond this world? Entities that have the means to hack lifting mechanisms and alarms? Could the Chelyabinsk meteorites be hot property for the extraterrestrial equivalent of mineral prospectors? We shall see if there are any other weird incidents involving that museum piece.

Thursday, 23 January 2020

Bases Project Ayem Tribute

See here for essential background:
Miles Johnston has found a very rare gem of a video. It was in a file lying deep in his oldest records and he has luckily managed to unearth it. It's a recording of Ayem speaking at the Wake Up Call conference in Belfast in 2010. Wake Up Call was a series of conspiratorial conferences that ran for a few years in the 2000's in Scotland and sometimes, as we can see, Northern Ireland. Apart from the period when she hosted Planet X, Ayem didn't do very much public speaking. She was more the kind of person who works behind the scenes organizing, managing, supporting and directing; therefore this is a very unique piece of footage which is all the more precious now she has left this world. It is a bit crackly in places, but is still of reasonable quality. It has never been seen before. Miles has managed to get the file open and playing, and he has uploaded it to the Bases Project channel with his own introduction as a tribute to her.

Wednesday, 22 January 2020

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 385

I have been featured on Programme 385 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Harry and Meghan run from the Royals, Space Force uniform design, Muhammad Ali saw a UFO and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Sunday, 19 January 2020

Space Force Commander Sworn In

Service guarantees citizenship! A ceremony has been held in which General John W "Jay" Raymond took an oath of office and became the first ever commissioned officer of the United States Space Force. This is a few weeks after President Donald Trump officially established it, see here for essential background: The event was handled by the Vice-President Mike Pence and Col. Curtis Fernandez of the National Space Council. It took place in the Vice-President's Ceremonial Office in Washington DC. The people all stood while a US Air Force choir-member sung The Star Spangled Banner. Interestingly the national anthem of the USA contains the lyric "and the rocket's red glare". The composer of the anthem was referring to signal rockets launched by the US Army during the Anglo-American war of 1812. However, there is a strange cosmic joke with the anthem being sung at the establishment of a space force; perhaps doubly so because rockets themselves are obsolete technology that are only used today because of the secrecy in which free energy and antigravity are held. In the background link above I go into more detail about that. After the song there were prayers led by a chaplain; this is America after all. Then Vice-President Pence did a speech, thanking various individuals, including some of the names in the above background article. Gen. Raymond took his oath with his hand on the bible and became the first ever Chief of Space Operations. Then he made a speech about his personal feelings, with some humour. Mixed with that was the usual statements about the supposed need to extend military might into space, although just as a "deterrent", Gen. Raymond said. Source: There has been some criticism of the USSF uniforms; they supposedly look too much like those of the other services. There has been particular scorn shown to the DPM camouflage utilities that are worn during everyday duties. Why do space force members need to wear them when they're only meant for land forces? One reason is simply military culture and traditions. Members of the navies and air forces often wear them, both in the States and other countries. Also it is far cheaper to make them. Instead of a tailor designing and weaving totally new outfits, they usual line can be continued, simply with different badges on them. The same goes for the officers' dress number 1's. They're the same colour as the USAF's, and for the same reason. This question came up on the recent episode of the Mind Set Podcast, see: Where this new organization will lead us in the 2020's is anybody's guess, but in the background links, above and below, I explore possibilities. Would you like to know more?

Wednesday, 15 January 2020

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 384

I have been featured on Programme 384 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: the Alien Autopsy film returns, the Harry and Meghan scandal, big trouble in Iran and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast:

Sunday, 12 January 2020

US Navy has More Nimitz Evidence

The United States Navy has made a stunning announcement. Following its statement in September last year that the "Tic-Tac" footage was real government material, see:, it has now revealed that more evidence exists. They said this in reply to a Freedom-of-Information Act request by a researcher called Christian Lambright. It proves that at least one other UFO video from the same encounter exists. It could be that it is the full version of the original clip that was leaked and published by the To the Stars Academy back in 2017, or it may be an entirely separate video, maybe shot from another aircraft. The US government maintains its stance that the objects featured in this evidence are "UAP- Unidentified Aerial Phenomena". They have now added that there exists not only more video, but further evidence in the form of briefing slides. The problem is that this new evidence is all currently classified as Top Secret. The FOIA response does state that the reason for the classification is technical and auxiliary. It seems not to be because of the nature of the content itself; it is because it might reveal information about intelligence gathering methods, sources and other matters whose confidentiality is needed for national security interests. This scoop comes at a good time because just a few weeks ago another pilot, Chad Underwood, came clean about being involved and joins his colleague David Fravor in the list of witnesses to the Nimitz UFO Encounter, see: This story has been widely circulated in the mainstream media, including the inevitable and unavoidable interview with Nick Pope, see: Pope believes that the additional material might include telemetry, data from other sensors and targeting systems that will tell us more about the properties of the UFO. Source: It remains to be seen what happens next. The government have so far not given any indication that the material under discussion will have its classification reviewed in the foreseeable future or at any time in the future. I am filled with curiosity about what it says and so obviously I hope that it will be published soon.

Saturday, 11 January 2020

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 7

See here for the programme:
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss demonic possession and how it relates to human beings on a personal and political level.
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft:

Friday, 10 January 2020

Peter Tatchell- What's Wrong with the Left?

Although I've never met him, Peter Tatchell could be considered a former colleague of mine on The People's Voice, a now defunct internet TV service. Tatchell is originally from Australia, but rose to prominence in 1960's Britain when he was part of the Gay Liberation Front, an organization campaigning for the civil rights of homosexuals. He has also become renowned as an activist for many other causes; most notably, to his immense credit, he arrested Robert Mugabe. I have had major problems with some of the things Tatchell has come out with in the past, especially his worrying fixation on sex around the borders of the age of consent. I denounced him at the time for such disgusting statements; however in recent years he has changed his attitude. He has developed a more libertarian outlook. He refused to condemn Ashers Bakery, the Belfast company who declined to make a cake for a gay wedding and as a result he was "cancelled". I suspect it was this experience that inspired him to give a lecture at the Institute of Art and Ideas called "What's Wrong with the Left?" He makes the point that the Left defines itself more by what it is against than what it is for. Just think how many organizations there are that are called "so-and-so against such-and-such". Therefore the Left is essentially negative, identified purely by what it opposes. It seems undecided or even unaware of what it is in favour of. It is beset by infighting (as if the Right is not!?). Momentum activists turned viciously against Owen Jones when he came out and said he did not support Jeremy Corbyn in the Labour leadership race, see: Tatchell complains that the Left cannot perceive a good intentions. They have this "one strike and you're out" rule in which a single deviation from orthodoxy results in total and permanent excommunication. He wants to see the Left become more forgiving and embrace a wider range of opinions. He decries complete state ownership of industry and calls for that ultimate expression of capitalism: employee cooperatives. He stresses the need for free speech in the same kinds of words Dr Jordan Peterson or Sargon of Akkad would use. Source:

The Left criticizing itself from within is not a new thing, in fact George Orwell did this a lot in the 1930's, see: Oddly enough some of the stereotypes he runs through are recognizable to somebody living in the modern world, almost ninety years later; the "fruit juice drinking, sandal wearing, nudist, sex maniac, pistachio-coloured shirt wearing crank!" The thing which both Orwell and Peter Tatchell do not understand is that the Left doesn't have a problem, the Left is the problem. It cannot be reformed or healed because it is fundamentally pathological. It is a mind virus created by the New World Order to imprison human beings on a deep psychological and cultural level. (And I'm not just condemning the Left; the same can be said for most of the Right, but that's a topic for a separate article.) It is revealing to see the acerbic fury which the Left descends into over its own internal conflicts, for example the TERF's versus intersectional feminists, see: The anti-Semitism row in the Labour Party is another example. The reason Labour is not tackling their anti-Semitism problem is because it is coming almost exclusively from the radical Islamist tendency who have infiltrated the party. Labour have painted themselves into a corner. Not to tackle the issue is "anti-Semitic!", but to tackle the issue would be "Islamophobic!" It's easier just to run away and turn Jeremy Corbyn into a scapegoat. It's interesting and encouraging that Peter Tatchell now has viewpoints that are very much in flux. This is the only response any intellectually honest thinking person can have when confronted with the cultic brutality and logical contradictions of the leftist milieu. I hope he continues on his journey much further and I wish him luck.

Thursday, 9 January 2020

Peter Croft and Ben Emlyn-Jones 6

See here for the programme:
A discussion between me and Peter Croft, real name Chris. We discuss the drone strike in Iraq, the fall of Gold Standard finance and global warming or cooling?
See here for my previous interview with Peter Croft:

Tuesday, 7 January 2020

Ricky Gervais Golden Globe Speech

Ricky Gervais is a comedian best known for creating and starring in the TV sitcom The Office. This year he was the master-of-ceremonies at the Golden Globe Awards. Like the Academy Awards, the Golden Globe is one of the biggest celebrations on the Hollywood calendar. All the most famous stars in cinema attend to pick up their trophies or to watch others doing so. Gervais' speech was not what anybody expected and has proved beyond doubt that he is well and truly "based". He opens by saying: "You'll be pleased to know that this is the last time I'll be hosting these Awards." I've no doubt that is true; in fact I'll eat my hat if he ever gets invited back again! At 3:30 he makes a joke about Jeffery Epstein's fake suicide and adds: "I know he's your friend!" The audience gasp and hoot with a mixture of amusement and confused derision. At 5:20 he tells a joke about Prince Andrew. Ricky repeats several times: "I don't care!" and he doesn't. Source: Just remember, Ricky Gervais did not kill himself! It is encouraging that things like this happen. I was just talking about it today with an old Truther friend and we considered this a sign of the times. Cover-ups are becoming harder to engineer and maintain. Oddly enough just after this speech a number of media outlets began distributing pictures that are allegedly photographs of Epstein's prison cell; for example see: However, these are very different from the initial photos and diagrams published of his cell, see background links below. The cell in these new photos looks far less "suicide proof" than the original ones. See here for a good analysis: The other suspicious elements are also present, such as that CCTV cameras were trained on the prisoner at all times; and that warders were on standby just fifteen feet away. These new media spots sound like a reaction to Ricky Gervais' speech. They hope to dampen the rising tide of awareness in the people. They have as much chance of that as King Canute.

Monday, 6 January 2020

Helen Sharman believes in Aliens

The first British person in space has made an astonishing public statement. She says she thinks aliens exist. Helen Sharman OBE was taken to the Mir space station, the predecessor of the International Space Station, in 1991, the first Briton ever to leave the earth and one of the youngest people ever in space. She voiced her opinions about extraterrestrial life in two interviews with The Guardian. The majority of the articles, especially the first one, are a tiresome feminist propaganda tirade, typical of that newspaper. It falsely accuses history of sexism by "writing out!" Helen Sharman in favour of that "EEEEEEvil white male!" Tim Peake; when in fact this issue is due to a technicality, as I explained here long ago: The only interesting bit is the eighth paragraph of the second article where she says: "Aliens exist, there's no two ways about it. There are so many billions of stars out there in the universe that there must be all sorts of different forms of life. Will they be like you and me, made up of carbon and nitrogen? Maybe not. It's possible they're here right now and we simply can't see them." Source: and: The last sentence is the most significant, because it's not really controversial any more to say life exists "out there"; indeed, the former head of MI6 said as much, see: As I detail in the background links, this concept has actually been used to distract from the fact that they are not just out there, but down here; and then Dr Sharman says just that. UFO's are often reported to appear and disappear instantly. Perhaps they actually become invisible through some means, possibly because they are made up of different substances or even a different form of matter. Her mission took place in May of 1991 and only lasted eight days. During that time she did not do any extravehicular activity, unlike Tim Peake. She spent her time carrying out an experiment to gauge the effect of cosmic radiation on seeds. However, I wonder if she saw anything out of the window she was not supposed to. Well done, Dr Sharman, for speaking out on the issue of aliens and for expressing your opinions publicly. It's not easy to do that in this atmosphere of official ridicule and denial.

Sunday, 5 January 2020

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Seeking the Truth 24

I have been interviewed again on the Seeking the Truth Show with Caroline Stephens, see:
Subjects discussed include: The United Nations behind the EU, Unity of the churches, Cameron's pre-Brexit vote U-turn and much much more. See here for Caroline's channel:
See here for my previous appearance on Seeking the Truth:

Friday, 3 January 2020

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 40

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 40 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see:
Issue 40 includes an article in my column entitled Attention from Outsiders.

Also you will find in Issue 40: "Tic-Tac" pilot speaks out, AATIP correction from the Pentagon, the Cold War Anglo-Soviet UFO project and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth Magazine's editor Gary Heseltine:
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 39:

Thursday, 2 January 2020

Brexit Countdown

Somebody has gone to the trouble of creating a Brexit countdown clock. Actually, several people have. There is also one on Sky News Australia. Thank you all the people who have done this. I'm going to embed this here on HPANWO Voice. Here's the page where you can get it:

Wednesday, 1 January 2020

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 382

I have been featured on Programme 382 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Advancing technology in the 2020's, Russia's "Internet 2", Prince Philip goes to hospital and much much more. A very happy New Year to all HPANWO readers.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast: