Tuesday, 31 March 2020

Hot Summer Coming Up!

No, this article is not a typical springtime one by the Daily Express... I am writing these words on the last day of March 2020. Despite the COVID 19 lockdown there is a fairly pleasant atmosphere around my hometown because the spring weather in southern England where I live has been warm and dry. The winter that has just ended has been extraordinarily miserable. This is not the case across the entire earth or even the entire British Isles, but it has definitely been in my home region, which is the political centre of the United Kingdom, where decisions are made that affect the whole country and world beyond. The weather from November last year to early March barely changed at all. It was wet and windy. There was hardly a single day without some rain. The rivers of England and Wales flooded badly causing much damage and forcing people out of their homes. Several motorists drowned when floodwater inundated the roads they were driving on. Temperatures were very mild with only a handful of icy days. There was no snow at all. For somebody who works outdoors, this weather was difficult to deal with in terms of practicalities and morale. What caused it? Well, nature can do things like that. Britain's weather continually changes and varies wildly off the climactic norm. Sometimes it gets caught into patterns of settled conditions for a long period. We call these "heat-waves", "cold snaps" and other nicknames. However, I've never seen a settled pattern last as long as the one that has just ended. The winter just left behind fits exactly with the predictions made by believers in anthropogenic carbon dioxide emission caused climate change. There are only three possibilities here. Firstly: the 2019-20 English winter was caused by man-made climate change. Secondly: it was a freak of nature that happened without any specific cause. I do think the second possibility could be true; however, there is a third possibility: It was not natural. As I've said before and you can read about it in the background links below, not all weather is natural. It is possible to control the weather and even create artificial weather. Why would somebody deliberately give the south of England and Wales a very wet, windy and mild winter? Why this winter in particular? The answer could well be something that is due to happen in November in Glasgow, the 26th session of the Conference of the Parties, see: https://sdg.iisd.org/events/2020-un-climate-change-conference-unfccc-cop-26/.

This is the biggest international climate change conference on the planet and the aim of it is to introduce a huge amount of international legislation that will increase centralized control of the economic and political systems of the world's nations to "save the planet!" To make the point that this legislation is necessary, weather typical of the changes the Carbonistas predict will hammer the message home, especially in the governmental heartland of the country which is hosting the conference. If you think this is a coincidence, then how come the same thing happened for COP 21? I made this point at the time, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2015/12/happy-christmas-hpanwo-tv-viewers.html. The Carbonistas' predictions state that as climate change takes hold, along with wet and mild winters we will have hot and dry summers. Therefore I predict the summer coming will be extremely hot and dry; records will be broken. By the time November comes, the COP 26 delegates will be nicely softened up for global dictatorship. No doubt Greta will be a guest of honour as well to make them all feel guilty.

Sunday, 29 March 2020

Ben Emlyn-Jones at Truth Seekers North East 6

I am pleased to tell you that I will be speaking again at Truth Seekers North East. The event will take place at the Walkerville Community Association, Pinewood Close, off Appletree Gardens, Walkerville, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE6-4SZ. It will be on Saturday the 1st of August. It starts at 1 PM and lasts until 4 PM. It will cost only £5. My lecture will be entitled: Zombies and the Coronavirus. Zombies are well-known figures of mythology and horror fiction, and their profile is steadily increasing in recent books and films. However more and more they have been appearing in the media and in official government publications portrayed as real or semi-real. They have also been associated with viral diseases such as the COVID 19 pandemic. What’s going on? This lecture contains disturbing information and is not suitable for small children.
See here for a HPANWO TV video of my previous talk at Truth Seekers North East: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/04/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-truth-seekers.html.

Saturday, 28 March 2020

Larry Warren's Discharge Papers

David Young has produced yet another video in his series of supposedly groundbreaking bombshells that prove Larry Warren was not involved with the Rendlesham Forest Incident. Most of the first few minutes of this thirteen minute video are him recapping his previous ones which I have already comprehensively discredited, see here for the previous one: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/03/larry-warren-and-m203.html. In this segment David quotes another witness, Adrian Bustinza. It seems that everybody is currently claiming Bustinza as their own when the man himself has been through talkative and cagey moods, and has said many different things over the last few years, for example: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/sacha-christie-woodbridge-presentation.html. David has repeated statements Bustinza made allegedly disproving Larry's involvement, but at other times the same witness has made statements indicating Larry was definitely present. Who knows what he might say next if he chooses to speak out again...? The issue of Left At East Gate is covered here: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/10/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-25.html. David claims Larry's defenders put all this down to a conspiracy involving all the other witnesses. No, we do not. Some people close to the RFI act suspiciously in my view, but most of them are either mistaken or they are biased against Larry because of a personal dislike of him.

In this video Donald and David focus on Larry Warren's discharge papers. Larry left the United States Air Force in May of 1981 just nine months after joining. Despite several years of claiming that Larry was dishonourably discharged from the service, in other words being sacked, or that he never was on active service at all and was dropped during phase one training; the trolls now admit that Larry did serve and that his discharge was honourable, but that it was on medical grounds. The code number on the form is "4M". This means that Larry was not eligible to reenlist. In Left At East Gate, Larry says that he did not understand what the letter "M" in the code meant and that it didn't exist in regulations to his knowledge. Donald and David explain how it does. However, this is a minor discrepancy and I would say has little bearing on the book's principle theme. Perhaps at the time Larry was in the recruiting office the codes were different. I don't think this can be used to claim Larry deliberately tried to mislead his readers; and the same goes for the next point. The document reads that Larry's medical discharge was because of a problem with his right arm; in Left At East Gate Larry talks about it being a burns on his eyes. Donald and David say that for this reason Larry would not have been issued a weapon, however he was on active duty and was passed as fit during training. What use would he be in the security police if he couldn't handle a gun? The covering letter of his discharge papers was written by a Col. Gordon Williams, but it has a mark on it that looks slightly like a fingerprint and no actual signature. However, it could be something other than a fingerprint; the quality is not good enough to tell. This is odd, but is it really anomalous with the practices of the USAF at that time? Is the signature hidden by the low resolution of the document's copying? As with all these accusations by the trolls, they are made by the analysis of copies, not original documents. Also, if Larry is supposedly so good at faking signatures why did he not do so this time? The trolls' case against Larry is loaded with contradictions like this. This reminds me of the storm in a teacup generated over Dr Paul Echols. It turns out that it had a perfectly obvious explanation and there was no need for Larry to fake anything, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-16.html. Indeed David and Donald bring this up again in the video when their point was thoroughly debunked back in 2017. Apparently nobody knows who Gordon Williams was; or to be precise, David and Donald don't know. Perhaps if they checked with the DoD Bureau of Personnel they would find out. Either way, it seems very far-fetched that Larry would make up an imaginary officer to authorize his papers without a signature. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwklMQewECQ. Another contradiction the trolls commit is that at one point they will talk about Larry as if he is some kind of criminal mastermind and at others that he is an incompetent dullard. Which is it, because you can't have it both ways? I maintain that it is neither. The solution to the irregularities in Larry's paperwork might lie in the Rendlesham Forest Incident cover-up itself. A few years ago a court ruled in favour of John Burroughs when his medical records were classified, putting his life in danger when he fell ill, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2014/09/programme-102-podcast-john-burroughs.html. Perhaps Burroughs was not the only one affected.

Tuesday, 24 March 2020

Star Wars in Anglish

See here for essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/06/anglish.html.
Somebody has taken it upon themselves to translate the script of Star Wars into Anglish, quite a task. They have so far done Episode 4 and 5 which they call A New Hope and The Rich Strikes Back. From reading it I have learned that there are different types of Anglish. Because it is a constructed language created by a large group of people online, there is no standard form of Anglish or any official academy that directs what the language should be. For example, the script uses the word starset for "galaxy"; but I have seen other Anglish Moot members using the words starswirl and milkway. All three are correct in that they are made up of Anglo-Saxon words; this is the only criteria required for the word being entered into the Anglish Wordbook (dictionary). You will see the word rich used many times in the script. This does not mean the same as it does in English; for that use geldy or wealthy. It means "empire". It counts as one of the constructed words of Anglish; it was invented to be hypothetically what word might have been used had not English adopted Normanisms and other foreign loanwords. It is related to the words reich (German) and rijk (Dutch) which are both West Germanic languages that do not share English's foreign influence. Rich is a word English might have had if it had the same purely Germanic roots. Others use ryke. Star Wars generates a challenge for the translator because it is a space fantasy with many science fiction elements which includes some that are unique to the story. Words like "droid" which is a kind of intelligent robot. The writer uses manhew. I have also seen wileman, sparkman and sparkthrall for "robot". The first line in the script comes from the C3PO character: Did you hear that? They've shut down the kiln. In this case kiln is the word chosen to mean "reactor" as in the power source for the spaceship; even though it has a different literal meaning in English, a device for heating clay to turn it into chinaware. Source: https://anglish.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Wyes.

Two different kinds of Anglish are known as "Greater Anglish" and "Mean Anglish". Greater Anglish is stricter and more conservative; there are even Moot members who write it in runes or the Old English alphabet, a script today only used by Icelandic which includes many letters lost from English and the other Germanic languages. Mean Anglish permits words like Americkland for "America" while Greater Anglish insists on Markland or Westland. They even translate some personal names literally. Napoleon Bonaparte is called Newtonlee Goodshare. The influence of Greater Anglish is in the Star Wars script because they have changed Han Solo's name to Han Lone. The translator has assumed that the character's second name means the same as the musical term for a performance by a single player or instrument; which is recently borrowed from Italian. Seeing as the character lived a long time ago in a galaxy far far away that is hardly likely. His name must mean something totally different. The translator is being pedantic here. As regular readers know, I am very much opposed to linguistic engineering, but I don't think Anglish is a serious attempt to do that. The Anglish Moot members clearly like the idea of English remaining pure and not adopting foreign words which it is has done so much in its history, but I don't think they seriously intend to impose Anglish on the global Anglosphere. It's just a thought experiment; a bit of fun. I understand their sentiments however, despite my insistence that language should always be left to change naturally. When writing or speaking Welsh I try to avoid the many loanwords Welsh has, almost as many as English. For instance I invented a term: PNH- Peth Nid wedi nabod yn Hedfan. This is a literal but probably inaccurate translation of "UFO- Unidentified Flying Object", for an example of how I use it see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/03/pentyrch-three-years-on.html. All other Welsh speakers I've seen discuss the subject simply say: "UFO". Maybe a Welsh equivalent of Anglish is not a bad idea. The French are already doing just that. A French football commentator on TV got into trouble for using the word le goal, which means "goalkeeper"; but it is a borrowed word from English, part of the multitude of Franglais which irritates linguistic conservatives in the Francosphere. The TV company commanded the man to use the indigenous term le guardian in future. So I can see both sides of this argument and I'm not sure what the right thing is to do. Anyway, may the Thrake be with you!

Sunday, 22 March 2020

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 394

I have been featured on Programme 394 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: The impact of coronavirus on the medical system, a new economic order out of chaos, banknotes spreading COVID 19 and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-393.html.

Saturday, 21 March 2020

Larry Warren and the M203

David Young has made a new very short video the beginning of which is a reply to me. He calls me a "pretend hospital porter" which means his constant accusations of stolen valour directed towards Larry Warren have now totally gone to his head and he has started directing them at me. No, David. I was a hospital porter; I was one for twenty-three years. Not that I need to prove it to you; I don't care what you think. He then claims I am getting my "sweaty fat blog fingers all riled up". It has honestly descended to that level, ladies and gentlemen. The very physical nature of the fingers of a person writing a rebuttal now supersede the rational content of that person's rebuttal. Who says we are not living in Clown World? The only logical claim made in this video by David and his collaborator, once more Donald Laisure, refers to an incident Larry talked about once in which he assisted a USAF Law Enforcement unit with a "wild party" in the officers' quarters involving some of the officers' children; Col. Halt's son was one of them. The revellers were vandalizing one of the officers' houses. The Law Enforcement man had a .38 pistol in an open-carry holster and the rioters didn't obey his orders so Larry approached them with an M203 grenade launcher and this scared them into submission; and they ran home. Donald describes this story as a "bunch of bullshit!" Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuuOAziu5jQ. Why should this be? We've already established in previous articles that there is no guarantee that Donald would have dealt with Larry's weapons issue nor that he would have known Larry was assigned to D Flight, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/03/larry-warren-was-on-duty-part-2.html. Why would Larry have not been issued with an M203 grenade launcher? This is a weapon that has been in use in the US military since 1969 and is still in use today, including the USAF; although it will soon be phased out in favour of the more modern M320, see: https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2015/01/10/army-smart-grenades-can-sense-walls/. It is designed to be fitted onto the barrel of a standard service rifle like a bayonet. We know that Law Enforcement and Security Police duties often overlap. In fact the story of the entire RFI involves personnel from both services. Is it therefore not possible that Larry's anecdote about the wild party is true? Whether it is or not, what bearing does it have on the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident? Douglas also makes note of the fact that Larry never visited him in England when all other former USAF police did. He also relates an argument he had with Larry in which Larry allegedly threatens him. Looks like we're back to square one! Did Donald call the police etc etc etc... It seems Larry and Donald are not on good terms generally. This could be the reason he is willing to assist David. I'm breaking my own rules here, but David has been personally very rude to me and I'm the kind of person who gives as good as he gets. I'm going to declare publicly my dismay at the fact that David's next video is an interview he does with Anthony Peake, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Jryjuv8qQ. How does a radio host who can hardly string together a coherent sentence end up interviewing one of the greatest thinkers in modern consciousness research? Talk about casting pearls before swine!

Thursday, 19 March 2020

The Coronavirus Industry

I have caught the COVID 19 disease. I don't know where I picked it up. It has a very long incubation period; that is the time between infection and when the infected person falls ill. For colds and influenza this is a few days, but for the coronavirus it can be as long as a month. As regular readers know, I travel a lot and so I might well have contracted the illness in London, Essex or Hull, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/03/jayson-harrington-live-event.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/03/rawcon-2020.html. I began feeling poorly in the middle of last week and have self-isolated since Monday. Luckily today I feel a bit better so hopefully I have began to recover. For me the disease feels like an exceptionally bad case of flu. I was hot and dizzy with a slightly drunk feeling of detachment that filled my head. My neck glands expanded making it difficult to turn my head. My limbs ached and felt weak. I was devoid of energy and felt tired all the time. I coughed a lot; it was a painful dry cough that raked my throat. My lungs were sore and it felt difficult to draw my breath in too much. I could not have run or carried out heavy exercise because I would not have been able to breathe fast enough. I've also lost my appetite and had to force myself to eat. It's an unpleasant illness. I've not been this sick since I was a child and had glandular fever and mumps. However, it is not life threatening for me. I am reasonably young and fit. I have no health conditions that make me vulnerable. I've kept away from my father who is seventy-two; and my daughter's uncle who is generally very sick. I managed to do an episode of The Mind Set Podcast from my sickbed, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-393.html. In a minority of cases, the malaise develops beyond the initial symptoms into pneumonia that can kill and does. So far, about eight thousand people have died of COVID 19. Those most at risk are the elderly. As always, the Remoaners have cashed in on this opportunity. Somebody Tweeted: "Coronavirus is the ghost of Brexit coming to kill the old people for voting wrong". Readers can guess what I think about that, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/10/brexit-portal.html.

The COVID 19 disease is bad in itself, but the effect it has had on people psychologically and culturally is also very serious. There has been a lot of panic-buying in shops, including this ugly scene from Australia where shoppers fought over the remaining toilet paper stock, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVHYTdGUAZM. Napoleon Bonaparte once said that every society is just three meals away from revolution; it appears ours is three bog rolls away. The news media have been filling their screens and pages with stories of doom and gloom. The pound has fallen to its lowest level in thirty years. Schools are shutting in Britain, as they already have done in Iran and Italy. The railway network and London Underground are scaling back their services. The country is entering a state of lockdown. The economy is failing; the FTSE 100 and Dow Jones, these are the top companies in the world, have lost value on all their shares. The US Treasury has cut interest rates to almost nothing. The UK police have been given the right to detain people who refuse to self-isolate. The army is on standby. It's all such a mess, but is it for everybody? Is nobody gaining anything out of COVID 19? The answer is yes. The virus appeared last autumn in the city of Wuhan in China, which just happens to be the location of a major international biological laboratory; could be a coincidence, but... Oddly enough all the major viral outbreaks of the last few years have begun in China; avian flu, swine flu, SARS etc. Laboratories around the world are working to develop a coronavirus vaccine. When this vaccine becomes available it will become the hottest property the pharmaceutical industry has ever enjoyed. It will be their ultimate payday. State and private healthcare providers across the globe are going to be desperate for vast amounts of the new vaccine. They will pay very high rates for it. Entire factories will have to be set up to produce it. Whoever wins these production contracts will earn, not billions, trillions! Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-vaccine-covid-19-trials-seattle-cure-immunity-us-a9410201.html. The financial chaos caused by COVID 19 ought to be temporary. It was inevitably going to happen as a result of people not buying and selling; the collapse of service industries and retail sphere. However, what better excuse exists for those who want to engineer a more long-term economic crisis? It's the perfect opportunity for the currency world reset, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/10/deutsche-bank-collapse.html. The future of the economy is designed to be cashless; after all, you can catch the coronavirus off banknotes, so we've been told. It has also given the governments of the world a chance to stretch their authoritarian muscles. The state has clamped down with the biggest jackboot it can slip on. Nations have been sealed off, transport networks have been restricted, and conferences have been cancelled such as Probe and Awakening Manchester, see: https://awakeningufo.com. Football fixtures have been called off and even pubs have been shut in Ireland, something I never believed would be possible even if Dublin were invaded by aliens. These new government restrictions are not being brought in because the government cares for the people; no, it cares for itself and its own power. Even if the coronavirus is not as bad as has been dreaded, the fear of it has caused people not to object to encroachments of tyranny that they would otherwise object to. David Icke has done another interview with London Real in which he describes the emergence of a "Hunger Games society". He predicted many years ago that a global pandemic would be used for what he calls "problem-reaction-solution". Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMTZu6_TjU8. There's no doubt the illness is real; I've had it and I can assure you. I understand the need to protect vulnerable people from infection, but to take it to such alarmist extremes that the whole world falls into a state of emergency won't protect anybody from anything? The news is reporting that the infection has already peaked in China where the disease first emerged... if you believe them. Either way, the pandemic cannot last forever. It's struck at its weakest time of the year too, the northern spring; and so if the weather becomes warmer the season will end making it peak here sooner. History shows that once the population has allowed the state to take additional power it is very reluctant to part with it after the need, or perceived need, for the power is over. Examples include the Reichstag fire and 9/11. Therefore we must stay calm and not panic. Do your best to stay healthy, but if you get sick, take care of yourself. Seek medical attention if necessary. Avoid infecting other people. However, keep it in proportion. It's not the end of the world, but if we let fear drive us into the arms of dictators it might be.

Monday, 16 March 2020

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 393

I have been featured on Programme 393 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: a report on the Research and Witness Convention, Ben catches coronavirus, eyewitness at a seance and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-390.html.

Saturday, 14 March 2020

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Kev Baker Show 56

I have been interviewed again on the Kev Baker Show (aka MrGlasgowTruther) on Truth Frequency Radio, see here for the podcast: https://tfrlive.com/full-woo-with-ben-emlyn-jones-90023/.
And here for the illustrated YouTube version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaH01nryWBc.
Subjects discussed include: Volcanoes erupting across the world, the coronavirus crisis, BBC propaganda on UFO's and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on the Kev Baker Show: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/02/ben-emlyn-jones-on-kev-baker-show-55.html.

Friday, 13 March 2020

Larry Warren was On Duty- Part 2

David Young has not heeded the warnings of those trying to prevent him turning himself into a public laughing stock. First he tried to convince us that Larry Warren was not on duty when the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident happened, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/03/larry-warren-was-on-duty.html. Now he reckons Larry was not even a qualified security guard. David has once again been joined by his collaborator Donald Laisure to propose some more claims. First of all, they once more bring up that old chestnut of Larry faking his documents. This is because Larry is listed on his D Flight assignment form, dated December the 3rd, as an Airman First Class. Donald thinks that it's not possible for him to have achieved that rank so soon after his first deployment. His title should simply have been Airman, as it was when he passed out of training on October the 28th 1980. It takes six months for a recruit to reach the level of A1C, which means Larry should only have been able to be called Airman First Class in late March at the earliest. However Larry has a photo of himself at a social event in February 1981 wearing his dress uniform; he was part of the honour guard. (This also disproves Col. Halt's assertion that Larry was on punishment duty, cleaning up rubbish etc.) It distinctly displays the US Air Force A1C badge on his arm that is illustrated above. Source: https://youtu.be/qpW_HX-neuk?t=5654; also see illustration below. This means it must be possible to reach A1C in a shorter time period than six months, from which we must conclude that Donald's timeline is actually not evidence Larry's document is faked. The same goes for "PRP", the qualification to allow a serviceman to work with nuclear weapons.
Donald Laisure notices some other discrepancies between his own paperwork and Larry's welcome letter to RAF Bentwaters-Woodbridge. Both men are told to report for duty to a Sergeant Kiner when they arrive in the UK; yet according to Larry's letter, Sgt. Kiner gets into his office at 7.30 AM while with Donald it is 8 AM. This is a discrepancy, but it could be explained by Sgt. Kiner's office hours being altered slightly. Isn't that a more likely explanation? This happens regularly in any large institution. David and Donald bring up a few more technicalities like that which, in my view, can be explained in similar terms. It is very speculative to use them as evidence that Larry allegedly forged these forms. They do present a second group photo, this time with just four other men, and it's a lot clearer than the last one. It has the caption: "Heading back to the US in May 1981. Larry Warren with Greg Battram, Larry Walls and two members of D Flight." Don does not recognize any of these men as being members of D Flight. Again, this is a weak point that can be explained through other causes than fraud. Anyway, the caption was written by Peter Robbins, not Larry. Then the two men really clutch at straws when they highlight what they claim is a mistake Larry made mixing up a photograph of security police at RAF Upper Heyford in Oxfordshire with those at Bentwaters. Who doesn't make errors like that occasionally? However, Larry says he didn't even make that mistake at all. He just said he didn't recognize the people in it. The Capel Green social media team have also said: "We chose this image to represent what a flight team looked like back in the day, no claim was made that it was Bentwaters, it is marked as D flight 1980 Upper Heyford, but it sure has produced some great comments. Also we liked it because of the M60 on the right hand side, some people have claimed that you guys never had access to such weapons! Thanks all." David and Donald also claim that Larry doesn't know how to handle a service rifle because he holds it wrongly. Their basis for this is not any old photo of Larry actually in the USAF, it is a single publicity photo from the location shoot of Capel Green, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/09/capel-green-update.html. However, there are other photos in that series of Larry holding the weapon correctly, in fact he was coaching the actor playing his younger self how to avoid common errors you sometimes see in films with military scenes. There is another photo of Larry holding the prop correctly. Donald also criticizes Larry's actor for wearing his beret wrongly. Donald and David obviously belong to the Kevin Randle School of Cinematic Purity. So what if the actor's beret is worn incorrectly? How does this effect whether or not Larry is a liar? Besides that, a later shot shows Larry helping the young actor fold his beret flap down in the correct manner. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTgXY2wxlrE. I really hope that this tiresome rigmarole soon comes to an end; however, I will be speaking publicly to refute any deception made about Larry Warren's involvement in the Rendlesham Forest incident as and when required, and so David Young and his fellow detractors had better learn to expect that.

Monday, 9 March 2020

Larry Warren was On Duty

David Young has produced a new video. Actually he produces new videos all the time, but all of them are of very poor quality so I don't bother mentioning them. This one, however, requires a response; not because it is any better than his usual low standards, but because he makes a factual claim that must be either confirmed or discredited. David has made contact with a man called Donald Laisure who was in the US Air Force and served at RAF Bentwaters-Woodbridge during the period when the Rendlesham Forest Incident happened in December 1980. His job was the armourer, the man who guarded and catalogued weapons and ammunition. He issued them to the personnel when they came on duty and stored them again in the armoury when they went off duty. As a result, he got to know the security police very well; including all of "D Flight", the shift Larry Warren was assigned to. The reason David has interviewed him is because Mr Laisure claims that Larry was never assigned to the shift at all. This is a matter that has been brought up before by Larry's detractors; they claim that Larry is a "Walter Mitty" who has simply made up the story of his UFO experience. I don't think this is true, for the reasons I state in the background links below, however David thinks otherwise because Mr Laisure says that he knew all the men of D Flight and does not remember Larry being one of them. He has provided David with a photograph of a group of about thirty airmen posing, and they say that Larry is not among them. Donald claims that this is a photo of D Flight and that some of the other names that come up in the story can be seen in the image, although the scan of the print is a bit blurred and it's hard to recognize all the faces in it. There is actually a man in the second row, one from the left, who does resemble the other photos I've seen of Larry in his youth. David and Donald then try something that the anti-Larry Warren trolls have already totally failed at, by their own admission; handwriting analysis, see:  https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-13.html. Despite their previous embarrassing blunder, we once again are told that Larry has faked the documents he has presented as evidence that he was present to witness the UFO incident that night. David this time pins all his hopes on the possibility that Larry forged the signature of his shift supervisor, Senior Master Sergeant Lee Swain. The two samples of Swain's signature that they provide don't look all that different to two separate samples of my own signature, or most other people's; and bear in mind, as I said the background link above, that they are not using the actual document, just copies of it. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4FLH2PyVQY.

David and Donald also refer to a second document, a duty roster for March of 1981 for D Flight, although they do not show it on camera. Donald reckons that if Larry had been assigned to that shift then his name would have been on that roster and it was not. However, the owner of that document is not Donald Laisure; it is a man called Tim Egercic. Tim was a roommate of Don's at the Bentwaters dorms and so knew him well. He has already submitted the document to research into the testimony of Jim Penniston. He says that the roster does not prove that Larry was never assigned to D Flight at all. He also doubts that Don could remember so certainly that Larry was not there after forty years. Tim also mentions that there were two armourers on duty during the changing of the guard and there is no certainty that Don would have handled Larry's weapon issue. Remember that Larry was only on active guard duty for a few days. At the end of the video David tells us that more is coming... I'm sure it is and I look forward to it!

Sunday, 8 March 2020

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 41

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 41 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see: http://www.ufotruthmagazine.co.uk/subscriptions-shop/.
Issue 41 includes an article in my column entitled When Skeptic Tricks Fail.

Also you will find in Issue 41: Nimitz goes mainstream, first British astronaut believes in aliens, secret space programme from Skoda and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth Magazine's editor Gary Heseltine: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2019/08/programme-334-podcast-gary-heseltine.html.
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 41: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/01/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-40.html.

Friday, 6 March 2020

Dreaming Saucers Group

Since my return from the Research and Witness Convention, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/03/rawcon-2020.html, I've been thinking a lot about my life; in particular my relationships with others. It's sobering to think that almost my entire social life is online; in fact when my internet was cut off a few weeks ago I honestly felt like I was on a desert island. This is a common complaint among people who have the kinds of ideas that you read about on HPANWO Voice. I have a family, but they have their own lives. My daughter is now an adult; in fact she hits her quarter-century this month. She has her friends and work colleagues to hang out with. I split up with "Sue Ustane" in 2016. Since leaving the hospital I do not have any close friends of the kind I had there. There are several porters I am still in touch with, but I only see them every few months. UFO/paranormal/conspiracy theory conferences are literally the only occasions where I can interact with others honestly and openly. This is probably why I find them so emotionally intense. The UFO/para/con community is a thin sprinkling of individuals scattered across the world. We only usually socialize at all on the net. However, some people do succeed in making contact with others in the area where they live and form social circles in "meatspace". For example Truth Seekers North East, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/05/truth-seekers-north-east-5-off-duty.html, and the East Anglia UFO Group, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/02/seti-and-ufos.html. My hometown is sadly a "sheeple" stronghold and has no such organization. Therefore the solution to my problem is to become proactive and try and set one up myself where I live, which is Oxford UK. I have put an advertisement in a local classifieds page which reads: "Are you interested in UFO's, the paranormal or government cover-ups? Do you live in Oxford or the surrounding area? Then why not join Dreaming Saucers? We are a friendly local meet-up group for like-minded people who love talking about the above subjects. Email Ben at bennyjay74@gmx.co.uk for details." I have also set up a Facebook group, see: https://www.facebook.com/groups/230549361452790/. This group is set to Private because some parties might need personal and professional confidentiality. It is only open to people from Oxford or nearby locations. I have decided to stick with the "Dreaming Saucers" franchise because I like it and it combines the subject matter with local identity. I would also like to hold a second Dreaming Saucers conference at some point and with other people on my side in Oxford this will be a lot easier. I know that there can be hazards when reaching out to strangers in this manner and I will keep my personal details private. I will only meet with other members in a public place. However, if my plan works then it could be a new lease of life for me, and for others. Who knows how many tin foil hat-wearing solitary individuals there are in Oxford stumbling around in the dark thinking they are the only one.

Wednesday, 26 February 2020

The Mind Set Podcast Programme 390

I have been featured on Programme 390 of the Mind Set Podcast.
Subjects discussed include: Elena Freeland on chemtrails, travel restriction by car design, targeted individuals and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on The Mind Set Podcast: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-mind-set-podcast-programme-387.html.

Sunday, 23 February 2020

Bigfoot Body Taken

The presence of an elusive large unknown primate living in North America is, I think, proven beyond reasonable doubt. Bigfoot is described as being a type of ape that is very large, about twenty to forty percent bigger than a human. It has long fur over its whole skin and, most interestingly of all, it stands upright and walks on two legs just like a human does. Reports of the creature date back to before the arrival of European settlers on the continent and even today it is often known by its Amerindian name Sasquatch. Of course there are many skeptics who doubt the existence of Bigfoot and until now the question has been fairly one-dimensional. It's a dispute over evidence or or alleged lack of it. This makes Bigfoot very different to the UFO issue because with UFO's there is a distinct political angle; by that I mean government suppression through media propaganda and crash-retrievals etc. However, a story has emerged that throws the Bigfoot subject into a completely new light. If it is true then it means Bigfoot has to be dealt with more like the way we address UFO's. In 2013 a man in Pennsylvania USA called the emergency services number, 911, and made an astonishing report. He had been out in the woods hunting wild turkeys and had shot a Bigfoot. He left the beast lying dead in the forest. He also found numerous unknown footprints in the area. What followed was extraordinary. People in the area saw military helicopters and a massive police presence moving in on where the creature was. The story of a dead Bigfoot then went quiet and the police dismissed the footprints as those of a bear. Source: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/bigfoot-shot-dead-body-disappears-1923180.

This is a sinister development. What I describe is exactly what happens during a UFO crash-retrieval like Roswell, Aztec and Pentyrch etc. Why would this happen? Why would the Deep State suppress the existence of Bigfoot? Surely from their point of view it is neither here nor there whether the existence of a big upright simian is real or not. It's not as if Bigfoots (or Bigfeet) have the key to free energy or antigravity. The answer could lie in the field of strategic psychological warfare. It could be detrimental, from the Cabal's position, for humans to know we share this planet with such creatures. Upright locomotion is rare in the animal kingdom. Humans are the only known living primate which walks like that. Our closest known relatives, the chimpanzee and gorilla, walk on all fours because they are primarily tree dwellers. There are many extinct apes which walk upright and it could be Bigfoot is one wrongly listed as extinct when it is not, like the coelacanth. Its description matches a very big upright walking ape known through the fossil records as Gigantopithecus blacki which supposedly died out a hundred thousand years ago. Maybe it didn't. The mass psychological and cultural effect of Bigfoot, Yowie or the Yeti etc being real could cause people to think and feel in a way the Illuminati do not want us to. It might give us a subversive affinity with the natural world. Therefore Bigfoot hunters may need to take the same precautions that UFOlogists do. Be prepared for a cover-up the moment you make your report. Collect evidence and keep it secret; photos, DNA samples, spoor plaster-casts etc.

Saturday, 22 February 2020

Will the TV Licence Abolished?

The British TV licence is a special tax paid by everybody who owns a television set in the United Kingdom and its dependencies, the Isle of Man and Channel Islands. The revenue from this tax is used to fund BBC television and radio services. Every TV set owner must pay by law regardless of whether the viewer ever watches the BBC. There have even been cases of people in remote regions where they cannot receive the BBC signal being forced to pay nonetheless. The current fee is £154.50 per annum. For a long time there have been calls to take a second look at this funding model and finally there is a serious plan to do so. This has, I'm sure, been spurred on by the practical as well as the ethical issues at stake, like that fact that there is a backlog of licence evasion cases in the courts stretching for years. At one point, up to ten percent of magistrate hearings were concerning TV licences that were unpaid or in gross arrears. In 2014 it was announced that TV licence non-payment would be reduced from a criminal to a civil offence, which was probably simply because the courts can't cope with it, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/03/tv-licence-change-in-law.html. Last year it was announced that people aged over seventy-five would no longer be eligible for the licence and part of Boris Johnson's election campaign was to decriminalize evasion. The government have gone further since the election by announcing that they are going to review the very existence of the TV licence. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/09/boris-johnson-looking-at-abolishing-tv-licence-fee-for-bbc.

I would be delighted if the licence fee were axed. It is morally questionable even if the BBC were producing quality material, and they are not. The BBC's programming includes some of the most boring, disgusting, depressing, frightening and confusing publications I've ever seen. I hardly ever watch it because some of it is unbearably toxic. As far as I am concerned, the TV licence is the people being made to forge our own shackles. Some people are scared that without the licence the BBC will cease to exist, such as the former news reporter Martin Bell, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Leo5Ck7i4F0. He shouldn't worry; the BBC will still endure. For me, that's a bad thing and I would much prefer it to be destroyed, but it will not. It will continue under a different system. This could mean total privatization in which case it would earn money by advertizing in the same way ITV does. Alternatively it could become semi-private and apply for government subsidies or a National Lottery grant. It will be able to keep its name "BBC". This will probably be a trademark. It might end up being a subscription service like Sky or Netflix. People therefore choose whether they want to put their hands in their pockets to be propagandized or not. The BBC themselves are obviously terrified of this because they know very well that very few people would subscribe. It would mean that for the first time ever they would be forced to produce programmes that people actually want to watch. For too long the BBC have been arrogantly wallowing in their lemonade stand ivory tower, knowing that they can do whatever they like because the viewer was forced to fork out whether they wanted to or not, or even whether they watched or not. This could be the impetus for a huge improvement at the corporation, however I find that unlikely. I'm not even going to bring up the sex abuse allegations and Jimmy Savile etc. I hope the un-British Brainwashing Cartel falls apart and we never see or hear anything from it again.

Thursday, 20 February 2020

Brexit Negotiations

For anybody who thought I would shut up about Brexit now it has actually happened, sorry to disappoint you. Actually the real fun is just beginning. Everything that has happened between June the 23rd 2016 and January the 31st 2020 was simply about delivering the referendum. As I explain in my HPANWO TV coverage, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/02/brexit-day.html, on that 11 PM moment everything did not automatically change. At 11.01 PM most of the laws that were in force at 10.59 PM remained in force. To dismantle the federal infrastructure into which Britain has been hogtied over the last seventy years cannot be done overnight. As I've said before, this is a big test of the sincerity of Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Is he a fake Brexiteer? Will he now turn into another Theresa May now he has "got Brexit done!"? Well, so far so good. Michel Barnier's negotiating team in Brussels have been taking a very obstinate and vacillating position. They want to continue exploiting British fisheries for up to twenty-five years. They also insist on the continuing supremacy of the European Court of Justice on British soil and several trade demands that look like they're intended to cause economic sabotage. They describe this as "maintaining a level playing field". For example, if Britain does not submit to the European Union's fishing demands they have threatened to impose extra duty on the UK's fish exports to the continent. This is after just two years ago they themselves suggested a "Canada-style" free trade agreement. Boris' response is so far hopeful. He has refused to fall into Barnier's trap, and has called the EU's attitude "ridiculous and unreasonable", and he is right. Source: https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/eu-referendum/negotiations/. Even Nigel Farage has congratulated Boris as a result.

These negotiations are scheduled to take eleven months, so by the end of the year the whole process should be complete. Some people, especially in the EU, are asking for this transitional period to be extended for varying lengths of time. We know all about the EU's love of extensions, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/10/another-bloody-delay.html and the background links below. Boris Johnson has so far insisted that the current pace is maintained. Best of all, he has not ruled out simply walking out of the negotiations and going back to the World Trade Organization rules, the "Bali Package". This is a perfect response because Brussels' entire position is based on Britain wanting to arrange a deal more than they do. Boris' judgement is that they need us more than we need them. You may have heard the phrase "Singapore on Thames" which is the prospect of the UK becoming a huge enterprise zone; a deregulated financial relationship on the borders of a monetized empire. My own view was that we should have gone for the WTO option as the primary strategy to begin with. Before Brexit I was concerned that we would not even have made the progress we have. It was quite likely we would end up with a "half-Brexit" or "Brexit lite" in which we would remain indefinitely... ie: permanently, in the EU customs zone or Common Market. This has not happened so far. We won't know for sure how this will develop, but hopefully in a few weeks or months the situation will become clearer. One thing is for sure, the globalists are looking for ways to give Britain a punishment beating and Brussels seems to be trying to arrange that. Everything bad that happens in the next decade is going to be blamed on Brexit. If a rare species of beetle in the Solomon Islands goes extinct... that's because of Brexit! And Guy Verhofstadt has told us that the door is always open to go back. Don't be surprised if a "rejoin alliance" emerges before the next general election consisting of the political parties who tried to bully Boris last year. We will have to make sure that in the event of any post-Brexit strife the true culprits are exposed.

Tuesday, 18 February 2020

UFO's- Something's Brewing

There have been some odd occurrences in the world of UFO's lately, and by lately in this case I mean the last two weeks or so. Obviously there have been odd occurrences related to UFO's throughout the last three or four years, as I explain in the background links below; but the last fortnight has been especially interesting. Nothing overt has happened, but a subtext has emerged that makes me sense something is going on in the background that will shortly become manifest. I get the inkling that a few people know it is coming, like Richard Dolan. He has made three videos on his YouTube channel that have a bit of a "back to basics" feel about them. Two are an introduction to the Roswell incident and his own analysis of it, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2OdKWDAhr8 and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAUNbwlE_5Q. He has also, at the time of writing, just uploaded a new one about Area 51, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23Cx6yNG9wM. He says this is all about covering aspects of the new series of Project Blue Book (Damn! I knew there was something I'd forgotten!) Has somebody tipped Dolan off about a development we're about to see? At the same time there have been several publications that I would describe as preventative propaganda. A few days ago The Guardian revealed that there was going to be another major push in the Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence- SETI. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/feb/15/astronomers-to-sweep-entire-sky-for-signs-of-extraterrestrial-life. This is being done by the original SETI Institute and it comes soon after Breakthrough Listen was suspended after no success, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/07/apparently-we-are-alone.html. However, the whole question of SETI is meaningless when you accept the fact that the extraterrestrials are not "out there", they are down here. In fact I suspect that the whole SETI movement was established as an act of public distraction; see here for details: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/08/ben-emlyn-jones-at-sufon-2019.html. Along the same lines, but far less subtle, is a programme broadcast on BBC Radio 4, a live audience episode of the science show The Infinite Monkey Cage. It was presented by the repugnant Prof. Brian Cox and was about UFO's. There was only one person on the show who professed any belief in UFO's, the comedienne Lucy Beaumont. The programme took on a bit of a vaudeville tone and was very much a debunker, but it was no more original than any other skeptic programme on UFO's presented since home entertainment media began. All the talking points were ones uttered decades ago by the likes of Philip J Klass and Carl Sagan and they were comprehensively discredited back then. Why are they being repeated once more to the listening public? Perhaps something is about to happen for which the keepers of UFO secrecy want the populace already in a particular frame of mind beforehand.

Sunday, 16 February 2020

Bird Death Update

The Department of Food and Rural Affairs- DEFRA has published its post-mortem report on the mysterious death of over three hundred starlings on Anglesey, Wales two months ago, see here for essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/12/bird-deaths-explained.html. The toxicology reports came back as negative; the birds were not infected by any unusual bacteria, virus or chemical. They were killed by blunt force trauma. Many of them had broken bones and internal bleeding. The veterinary pathologists on the case think that the birds crashed into the ground while taking evasive action to avoid an airborne predator, possibly a hawk. Starlings often gather together in enormous flocks called "murmurations" that can include thousands of birds flying together in tight formation. Source: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/mystery-of-300-starlings-found-dead-in-middle-of-road-may-have-been-solved/ar-BB102sQt?li=AAnZ9Ug. Murmurations are a spectacular sight. The individual birds fly so close and react so quickly that they act like a single object. No human aerobatics pilot could ever come close to such a performance, for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4f_1_r80RY. This murmuration phenomenon is so tight and unified that for a long time psychical researchers thought that it was evidence for telepathy; that the birds literally form a collective mind when flying like this. However, when films of murmurations are slowed down enough, it's possible to see that the birds do act as individuals, following the one in front. Their reactions are incredibly fast, but they are finite and so not telepathic. This still leaves the question of why such proficient flyers would flee from a hungry bird of prey by diving headlong onto the ground. The manoeuvrability and quick thinking that starlings obviously enjoy in abundance would surely prevent that. Obviously they are not perfect and accidents happen, but why did it happen in this case three hundred times?

Friday, 14 February 2020

Jet Fuel Hoax

I've recently been sent a large amount of correspondence about a strange new story concerning aviation. The claim goes that jet aircraft need no fuel to fly and they really run off compressed air. Some of the air is added to pressurized chambers aboard the aircraft in places roughly corresponding with the location of what is believed to be the fuel tanks. This is used for taxiing, takeoff and landing; but when the plane is cruising the air comes from the atmosphere and is converted to a useable pressure by the jet engines themselves. The original source videos were removed from YouTube, but I've found them elsewhere plus additional documents. The hypothesis comes from several ideas. One says that aircraft could never store the fuel load designated as their capacity, either in terms of weight or volume. For example, the world's largest passenger aircraft, the Airbus A380, when filled up contains 83,291 gallons of kerosene. This weighs altogether about 315 tons. The theorists illustrate this by showing the equivalent weight in elephants, London buses and tanker lorries perched on the wings. They also claim that there is not enough spare space available on the plane to store all that fuel. The workings of a modern turbofan jet aircraft engine also provide a source for their suspicions. The presence of a large amount of liquid on board a plane would cause an inertia problem because the fuel would slosh around during tight manoeuvres, like beer in a glass when somebody jostles you in a pub. It only takes about forty-five minutes to refuel an A380 which means the hosepipe used must be capable of about twice the flow rate of a fireman's hose; such a spray would break the wing apart and endanger the refuelling workers should it break loose. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXRmcumPL3k and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFlAutyo-Q8.

If this theory is true then it is a massive hoax. The implications are enormous. Everybody who has ever travelled by air has the right to sue the carrier for about half of their air fare, because that is the average proportion which covers fuel costs. This appears to be the principle concern of the video uploader; but in fact that is one of the more trivial eventualities, because it also would mean that the airlines are operating free energy devices without telling anybody. However, there are major problems with this whole assertion. An aircraft's fuel tanks are not just in the wings; they are in the centre of the fuselage too. In fact the pilots have to be very careful to expend each tank evenly to keep the plane balanced. The problem of inertia is solved by having baffles to prevent sloshing. This video explains comprehensively how an aircraft's fuel tanks work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpzUbYex4dg. What's more, if jet fuel hoax theorists are right then why have there been so many instances of planes crashing because they ran out of fuel; seventeen since 1953, according to this database: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airline_flights_that_required_gliding. The uploader shows us a video from the famous beach next to the airport on St Maarten island where tourists like to play with the exhaust stream of aircraft taking off. The reason they are not burned to death by the exhaust is because at that distance from the engines the thermal energy is very low. A jet engine produces about as much heat as a back garden bonfire, but you would have actually to climb inside the engine combustion chamber to get close enough to the heat source to suffer burns. The same goes for the kerosene soot in the exhaust. At the distance from the tailpipe the tourists are standing, the concentration of soot particles is far too low to cause any acute toxicity (Incidentally, this is a reason why chemtrails have to be real, but that's something I cover in other publications, for example see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/no-chemtrails.html). Therefore all that those tourists experience is a blast of strong wind. This is also why there are no scorch marks from the exhaust on the underside of the wings. The reason the engine pylons place the engine ahead of the leading edge of the wings is to keep an undisturbed direct flow of air into the engines. While ascending or at some angles of attack, if the engines sit right beneath the wings, then the wings might block some percentage of air from getting into the engine. I would also ask, why does the auxiliary power unit need a small turbojet and fuel to run it? Wouldn't a set of batteries charged by the primary compressed air engines be good enough? Of course, you'd have to keep the batteries secret from all the flight engineers, but that would be no more difficult than any of the other covert elements of this supposed conspiracy. And this brings us onto the central flaw in the jet fuel hoax theory. How many people would be needed to keep the secret? Of course I am well aware of the psychological factor in conspiracy theories, the tendency towards tacit collaboration. This is why I disagree so much with Dr David Grimes and his famous formula, see here for details: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/11/conspiracy-theories-mathematically.html. However, even the most extreme examples of subconscious compliance have their limits. For the jet fuel hoax to be correct, almost everybody involved in the aviation industry would have to be in collusion. This would include every engineer from Frank Whittle onwards. The builders in the factories, the draughtsmen and technicians. The maintenance crews of not only the aircraft themselves, but the pressurized fuel delivery piping systems at airports. The inspectors measuring consumption of fuel stores, the fitters of gauges and pumps, the pilots and in-flight engineers who have to measure fuel expenditure while in the air, the auditors in the oil refineries... the list goes on. Such a conspiracy would be impossibly top-heavy. What the producers of the second source videos say about Viktor Schauberger and Viktor Grebennikov is totally correct, as I detail myself in the background links below; but a conventional turbofan engine does not use anything like the kinds of technology those two men invented. Indeed why would a covert power-plant and propulsion system be both classified under the black budget and at the same time distributed across the globe for everyday use? Why don't the oil companies kick up about it? The "90% of the thrust!" figure in a turbofan engine is true, but this is because the jet is driven by a large fan which is the second stage of the system; and the first stage is a turbojet that turns a crankshaft for the fan. The turbojet itself does not provide much of the thrust because its primary output goes into driving the fan. The reason airline passengers hear the jets make a buzzing noise like a bee is because that is how the vibrations sound when they are transmitted through the airframe to the cabin. It is true that the jets throttle down when the plane is cruising; this is because it takes a lot less thrust to keep a speeding aircraft at a level altitude in thin air going than it does to make an aircraft go from a standstill at ground level to three hundred knots at thirty-five thousand feet, but at no time is the kerosene powered jet engine switched off. The refuelling operation does not involve any local pumps because the kerosene is already kept at high pressure inside the fuel lines under the apron. Also if the wings contain a pressurized air bunker than it must be made of a solid metal shell. Why is this not too heavy to put into a flying plane? I don't want to make an ad hominem point here, but the jet fuel hoax seems to be very popular with flat earthers. I notice there's quite a flat earth overlap with the fake moon landing community as well and sometimes the jet fuel conspiracy pops up in it, for example see: https://news.billkaysing.com/2018/04/04/the-great-jet-fuel-hoax-free-energy-is-real/. (Bill Kaysing has now passed away and I don't think he would approve of all the material on his tribute site, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIRGGWdjjQg.) This is not why any of the flat earthers' ideas are wrong per se. I don't get angry with flatheads just for being flatheads. I know somebody who immediately blocks all flatties on social media the moment he sees them. I never do that, in fact I have friends who believe the earth is flat. I even debate them, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2019/06/flat-earth.html; but one of the reasons that I am cautious of their various adjacent theories is because I do question their ability to assess the evidence. Free energy definitely does exist and many forgotten or underrated geniuses developed it, but their discoveries were appropriated by the government and are today only used in secret. I'm always open to new notions and emergent facts. If somebody can demonstrate successfully that commercial airliners really do run off compressed air than please go ahead. However, right now I would say that free energy is certainly not being used in everyday air travel right under our noses.