David Icke has had to pay £117,000 in damages to the lawyer and political activist Richard Warman in an out of court settlement. Warman launched a lawsuit against David over supposedly libellous statements made in David's book Children of the Matrix (Bridge of Love Books 2001). The report says: "Icke included false allegations... that Warman was seeking to suppress Icke’s purported exposure of Satanic child abuse and murder.", see: http://yournewswire.com/david-icke-defeat-conspiracy-author-made-to-pay-117000-for-lies/. (This article was written by Sean Adl-Tabatabai, a former friend of David's who used to help run his business. But by the tone of it, you can clearly see that Sean has turned vehemently against David and now deeply dislikes him.) Obviously I don't know all the details of the case, but I do know a few things not mentioned in Sean's report. Richard Warman has been fighting David Icke for almost twenty years; he's been attempting to have David banned from
and having his books burned under Canadian "hate crime" laws. He's
also been contacting all the venues where David does live shows or media spots
and trying to persuade them to cancel the events. In 2000 he organized a gang
to commit a violent assault on David. Sure, the weapons they used were just
lemon meringue pies, but the intention was definitely to humiliate him. They
also did damage to a bookshop's stock, see here from 39.00: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2ypYcZ7qfw.
The question I'd like to ask the court is that if this doesn't constitute a suppression of David's exposure of
Satanic child abuse, then what would?
Why is this happening? What has David ever done to deserve this? According to Richard Warman David is "anti-Semitic" he's against Jews, that when David talks about the New World Order he believes Jews are behind it. This makes him the equivalent of Adolf Hitler. This is despite the fact that David specifically states that Jews are not behind the New World Order, the Illuminati are. The obsessive and fallacious accusation of anti-Semitism is a trick commonly used by pro-Israel groups, like the Anti-Defamation League, and Warman often campaigns with them. Richard Warman describes himself as a "human rights" lawyer, which is ironic because most of his work consists of trying to remove rights from a number of humans; the right to free speech, the right to publish literature, the right to assembly, the right to a public platform, the right to free access of the internet. He claims to be motivated by a desire to prevent the spread of "hate propaganda"; he goes on to say: "This work has predominantly focused on the white supremacist and neo-Nazi movements..." and this apparently includes David Icke's material. Anybody who takes the tiniest glance at David will immediately realize what an absurd proposition that is. Warman is a part of "antifa", the generic anti-fascist tendency. This is a subject I've written about before because I myself was falsely labelled a "fascist" in the same way David was, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/marine-le-pen-at-oxford-union.html. Some of the other people Warman targets are also innocent in my view. A lot of them do not "hate!" anybody; they are simply concerned about the mistreatment of white, straight males in society, and they oppose cultural Marxism. I agree with them, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/discrimination-against-christians-2.html. Actually even if they are "haters!" then the way to handle them is to discuss and debate with them, not try to censor their words. One thing for sure is that this situation is not what Sean says it is, a "defeat" for David Icke. It's a setback, that's all. David will not be stopped by this injustice; in fact he will not be stopped by anything!
See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/david-icke-is-human.html.