See here for essential background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/paris-attacks-2-symptoms.html.
It is now the fourth day since the atrocity and the hunt goes on... supposedly... for the suspect in the attacks, Salah Abdeslam, who is still at large. His brother, Mohamed Abdeslam, has been released without charge and denies all involvement. President Hollande has vowed to destroy
ISIS and the French forces in the Middle East have
carried out retaliatory air strikes in Syria against Islamic State positions. The state has mobilized
115,000 police officers into the operation to track down the missing suspect
and maintain security in the continued state of emergency, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34840699.
Another thing I predicted before has come true; the published image of the
leader of the attack conspiracy does indeed have a black beard, a scowling
expression and evil eyes. He also has a sinister-sounding name, "Abdelhamid
Abaaoud", see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-europe-34840858.
Another development that was no surprise to me was that the prolonged new
security measures have started to solidify, in France and also in other countries. In Britain, where I live, Lord Carlisle of the Liberal Democrats has
warned that the draft Investigatory Powers bill should be fast-tracked into
law. He called the bill "absolutely
vital... the current holes in the government's ability to spy on citizens
allows terrorists a 'safe space' to communicate!", see: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paris-terror-attacks-calls-snoopers-6835963.
I've written about this matter myself; it seems that the Talk Talk hacker was
not the real bait in the trap, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/internet-surveillance-and-talk-talk.html.
A Facebook user from West Yorkshire has been arrested for praising the Paris attackers on his timeline. He said: "My brothers did well in . Now we have
proved that there's a bit of intelligence, planning and synchronization going
into our killings. You people are starting to realize that we are a force to be
reckoned with. We are Paris ISIS, this is our
time now!... Keep your eyes on , Allahu Akbar! RIP, Jihadi John!" Obviously this is a horrible thing to say and it sounds
like this person was inciting violence and hatred, but the government is
deliberately blurring the lines between legitimate cause to take action on real
criminals and simply the expression of opinion. Individuals glorifying
terrorism are being conflated with those analyzing the true nature of terrorism.
we are described as "non-violent extremists" and are categorized in
the same group as those who are
violent... people like me. Other conspiratorial researchers have
got involving with this issue since Nick Kollerstrom and myself. The American
activist and former colleague of mine on The
People's Voice, Ken O'Keefe, has given a brilliant assessment of the
situation on Press TV, see: https://www.facebook.com/MPACUK1Ummah/videos/1478473405754889/.
Here are two other gems, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7GAbVhjTSw
Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot has done a live hangout with Ole Dammegard,
see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvWwglFRwaQ. Manchester
Along with the brave, controlled and methodical stance the Truth movement have made over
Paris has been some more dubious evidence. This I strongly
suspect is fake, see: http://www.inspiretochangeworld.com/2015/11/paris-attack-reported-on-wikipedia-and-twitter-before-it-happened/.
Another article was posted online that accuses the French authorities of killing
the people said to be in the Bataclan Theatre outside and then planted the
bodies in the auditorium. The article itself is not very coherent or
comprehensive, but the photograph looks genuine and one can clearly see that
bodies have been manhandled. I apologize for the graphic image in this link,
but it could be an essential piece of evidence even if it is very gruesome, like
the Zapruder film, see: http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/?p=5452.
Of course the image could be Photoshopped, but then what couldn't these days?
In the course of discussing this point I have lost a few more friends. There is
now a small but vocal tendency within the Truth movement which refuses to
accept that Paris was a false flag. Some of them have become quite verbally
aggressive. The comments box beneath the post I made on Facebook quickly became very
heated and soon it crossed over that line in which a chain reaction of meaningless
insult and rhetoric begins. After that happens, the comments become a
self-sustaining downward spiral of ego-battling abuse and all rational
discourse becomes impossible. This is all too common in debates, especially
online, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/debating.html.
The good thing about a Facebook feed though is that if you just log out for a
few hours, anything troublesome soon disappears over the horizon. Just as an
aside: another good example of this kind of thing occurred a few months ago
when an accusation emerged of a child abuse ring based in Hampstead, London. A counter claim followed denouncing it as a hoax. What
followed can only be described as the Facebook equivalent of nuclear war. I joined
some of the groups related to Hampstead to try and gain some information, but I
very quickly gave up. It was like walking in on a bar room brawl... I just hope
for the children's sake that the hoax factions are right. Back on the subject
of Paris: I have made a HPANWO TV emergency programme on the
subject, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/paris-attacks.html. I have also broadcast a special HPANWO
Radio show on the issue, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/programme-162-podcast-paris-attacks.html.