David Young has produced yet another video in his series of
supposedly groundbreaking bombshells that prove Larry Warren was not involved
with the Rendlesham Forest Incident. Most of the first few minutes of this
thirteen minute video are him recapping his previous ones which I have already comprehensively
discredited, see here for the previous one: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/03/larry-warren-and-m203.html.
In this segment David quotes another witness, Adrian Bustinza. It seems that
everybody is currently claiming Bustinza as their own when the man himself has
been through talkative and cagey moods, and has said many different things over
the last few years, for example: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/10/sacha-christie-woodbridge-presentation.html.
David has repeated statements Bustinza made allegedly disproving Larry's involvement,
but at other times the same witness has made statements indicating Larry was
definitely present. Who knows what he might say next if he chooses to speak out
again...? The issue of Left At East Gate
is covered here: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/10/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-25.html.
David claims Larry's defenders put all this down to a conspiracy involving all
the other witnesses. No, we do not. Some people close to the RFI act suspiciously
in my view, but most of them are either mistaken or they are biased against
Larry because of a personal dislike of him.
In this video Donald and David focus on Larry Warren's discharge
papers. Larry left the United States Air Force in May of 1981 just nine months
after joining. Despite several years of claiming that Larry was dishonourably
discharged from the service, in other words being sacked, or that he never was
on active service at all and was dropped during phase one training; the trolls
now admit that Larry did serve and that his discharge was honourable, but that
it was on medical grounds. The code number on the form is "4M". This means
that Larry was not eligible to reenlist. In Left
At East Gate, Larry says that he did not understand what the letter
"M" in the code meant and that it didn't exist in regulations to his
knowledge. Donald and David explain how it does. However, this is a minor
discrepancy and I would say has little bearing on the book's principle theme.
Perhaps at the time Larry was in the recruiting office the codes were
different. I don't think this can be used to claim Larry deliberately tried to
mislead his readers; and the same goes for the next point. The document reads
that Larry's medical discharge was because of a problem with his right arm; in Left At East Gate Larry talks about it
being a burns on his eyes. Donald and David say that for this reason Larry
would not have been issued a weapon, however he was on active duty and was
passed as fit during training. What use would he be in the security police if
he couldn't handle a gun? The covering letter of his discharge papers was
written by a Col. Gordon Williams, but it has a mark on it that looks slightly
like a fingerprint and no actual signature. However, it could be something
other than a fingerprint; the quality is not good enough to tell. This is odd,
but is it really anomalous with the practices of the USAF at that time? Is the
signature hidden by the low resolution of the document's copying? As with all
these accusations by the trolls, they are made by the analysis of copies, not
original documents. Also, if Larry is supposedly so good at faking signatures
why did he not do so this time? The trolls' case against Larry is loaded with
contradictions like this. This reminds me of the storm in a teacup generated
over Dr Paul Echols. It turns out that it had a perfectly obvious explanation
and there was no need for Larry to fake anything, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-16.html.
Indeed David and Donald bring this up again in the video when their point was
thoroughly debunked back in 2017. Apparently nobody knows who Gordon Williams
was; or to be precise, David and Donald don't know. Perhaps if they checked
with the DoD Bureau of Personnel they would find out. Either way, it seems very
far-fetched that Larry would make up an imaginary officer to authorize his
papers without a signature. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwklMQewECQ.
Another contradiction the trolls commit is that at one point they will talk
about Larry as if he is some kind of criminal mastermind and at others that he
is an incompetent dullard. Which is it, because you can't have it both ways? I
maintain that it is neither. The solution to the irregularities in Larry's
paperwork might lie in the Rendlesham Forest Incident cover-up itself. A few
years ago a court ruled in favour of John Burroughs when his medical records
were classified, putting his life in danger when he fell ill, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2014/09/programme-102-podcast-john-burroughs.html.
Perhaps Burroughs was not the only one affected.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/12/is-larry-warren-fraud.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment