has made an extraordinary statement; the deaths of three of his colleagues
might be a series of organized assassinations. Prof. Peter Wadhams is well known
for his work on sea ice dynamics and therefore does not fit the usual profile
of a conspiracy theorist; he's certainly not a "non-violent
extremist" like your devoted author. In speaking out he is definitely well
aware that he could be labelled a "loony" by his peers, and he has;
but has decided to do so anyway. The three scientists all died in early 2013. This
string of bereavements began on New Year's Day when Prof. Seymour Laxton
supposedly fell down a flight of stairs and died from head injuries. This story
is supported by his wife who was there at the time; she angrily rejects Prof.
Wadham's assertion that it was anything other than a tragic accident. Dr Katherine Giles, a friend of Laxton and his partner, was
killed when she collided with a lorry while riding her bicycle through the
streets of London; and Dr Tim Boyd
was struck by lightning while out walking during a thunderstorm near his home
Amazingly there was a fourth victim
associated with climate science that Prof. Wadhams does not mention.
Christopher Bell, a PhD student who worked with Dr Boyd at the Scottish
Association of Marine Sciences, was killed on January the 19th after he was hit
by an avalanche while skiing at Glencoe in the Argyll, Scotland Cairngorm Mountains.
All these deaths occurred within a space of just over three months. What made
Wadhams more suspicious is that in the weeks following Laxton's death he
himself had an attempt made on his own life. He was driving along minding his
own business when a lorry tried to force him off the road, see: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11762680/Three-scientists-investigating-melting-Arctic-ice-may-have-been-assassinated-professor-claims.html.
If this is a coincidence then it's an incredible one. For example, if Dr Boyd
was really struck by lightning then he is one of only three people in Britain
annually on average who expire thus. Fatalities from avalanches in Scotland
are also very rare because of the careful monitoring of snow accumulation at
the ski resorts. In fact Mr Bell was the only person to lose his life to one
for over two years hence, see: http://www.sais.gov.uk/.
Skeptics will argue "So what?" They'll say, correctly, that the form
of Dr Giles' demise was not uncommon at all; after all riding a bike in modern London
is not the safest way of getting around. And all the rest were "just a
coincidence", but this then earns them an unfalsifiable get-out-of-jail-free
card in any debate, as I've discussed before, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/pan-pareidolia.html.
Mysterious synchronistic deaths of scientists are not without precedent. For a
long period of time, eight years in fact, twenty-five experts working for
Marconi died. Of course Marconi is a big company and statistically over that
period of time a number of their staff are bound to shuffle off this mortal
coil due to old age, illness and misfortune. However these deaths were
different; their circumstances were highly unusual and startling. One man was
found dead in a particularly gruesome suicide. He tied a chain round his neck
and secured the other to a tree on a stretch of road near Beer, Dorset;
he then got into his car and drove off at high speed, decapitating himself.
Another man had been behaving completely normally; then for no apparent reason
he drove to Bristol and jumped off
the into the Avon Gorge. The list goes on; see
this interview with David Griffin for more details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCJSKhtTtC0.
Also we have the brutal murder of biochemistry students Gabriel Ferez and
Laurent Bonomo at New Cross, Clifton Suspension
in 2008. There's a connection here to the Swine Flu outbreak, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2009/04/emergency-swine-flu-meeting-with-ian.html.
And who can forget the Iraq
weapons inspector Dr David Kelly who "committed suicide" while
rambling near Southmoor, Oxfordshire, see (scroll down): http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2009/11/alternative-view-3-part-2.html?
Prof. Wadhams brings up Kelly in his interview above.
If what happened to Prof. Wadhams' colleagues really is a spate of organized hits then what motive could there be? Wadhams thinks it might be the oil industry. Skeptics have their own conspiracy theories too and one of those is that oil companies are secretly funding and supporting "climate change deniers" because they don't want governments putting a stranglehold on the flow of petroleum with its EEEEEEEvil Carbon™ emissions; and they're too greedy to care that it's flame-grilling the Earth. The only attempt to prove this conspiracy theory took place when a website published a number of documents which it claimed had been leaked from the Heartland Institute, an American conservative think-tank which has as affiliates a number of scientists who question man-made climate change. The authenticity of these documents was later called into question and the journalist James Delingpole went on to dub it "fakergate" and accused the revealing website of simply wanting payback for Climategate. No hard evidence has ever been produced that oil companies are covertly propping up doubters of the establishment man-made global warming theory. If the boot were on the other foot, which indeed it has been many times, the Skeptics wouldn't hesitate to make that very same criticism of us. Personally I think the oil industry has far more to fear from other emerging threats, like free energy and anti-gravity technology. There's far more reason to think that they have targeted and harassed inventors in that field of study, see here for details see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/energy-politics-and-ufos-2015.html. (By the way, if the oil companies really are paying off "climate change deniers" then I want in!... Cash not cheques please.) In the last few years there have been burgeoning doubts among the people towards the official line that human Carbon™ emissions are the cause of climate change. Supporters of the partly line have tried to suppress those doubts, sometimes through open debate, but usually via dirty tricks and demonization, see background links below. In order to maintain the required narrative the keepers of the secret might need to "reshuffle" the personnel occasionally. I'm not sure what area of study Prof. Laxton and Drs. Boyd and Giles were working on, but it might have had an impact on the official position in the mainstream if published. None of their names appear on this explosive disclosure here, but I wonder how closely connected they were to it, see: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/12/23/noaagate-how-ocean-acidification-could-turn-out-to-be-the-biggest-con-since-michael-manns-hockey-stick/. The possibility of scientific fraud in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ought to rumble as loudly as Climategate or the Hockey Stick Hoax. Was it possible that a new scandal was about to break out and that the individuals who were eliminated in early 2013, for reasons best known to internal experts, might have played a crucial role in the publicity thereof? Their discipline, oceanography, makes this more likely. If that is the case why would the Carbonistas not arrange an assassination run? Conscience? Their respect for the sanctity of human life perhaps? Another news story has emerged that has a humourous side to it, at least for those not involved and so can then appreciate the irony. In the southern summer of 2013-14 the MV Academik Shokalskiy headed for
The Russian icebreaker had been chartered by scientists to study how global
warming was affecting the retreat of sea ice that surrounds the frozen
continent. However the ship became trapped in the aforementioned sea ice and
was unable to escape. Several other icebreakers attempted to rescue the
passengers and crew, but had to turn back because of the risk of getting stuck
themselves. One of them, the Chinese ship Xue
Long, was for a while, but luckily not as badly. Eventually the ship's
compliment was evacuated in small groups by helicopter. Was the cause of the
disaster human error when judging the sea ice density? Did the ship's personnel
believe in the official climate change narrative so strongly that they denied
their own observations, and so sailed the vessel into an icepack that they
believed simply should not have been there? I'll see if I can get hold of a
passenger manifest for that voyage, because it will be a good idea to monitor
the health and safety of those aboard during that expedition. Let's hope none
of these folk inexplicably fall down the stairs or get struck by lightning.
See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/2015-and-climate-change.html.