The problem is that such a slippery definition could be expanded and contracted as far as those behind the database want. There are those on the political left who think conspiracy theorists are a part of the far right... people like me! There has definitely been a concerted effort by Canadian socialists and so-called "anti-racists" to brand David Icke with this label, see: http://www.publiceye.org/Icke/IckeBackgrounder.htm. I've explained numerous times that this accusation is palpable nonsense, for example see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/its-jooooozzz.html, but some people just can't seem to hear the obvious. So I and others like me could be considered for an entry if the idea spreads to other countries, as these ideas tend to. And once you've got one kind of potentially dangerous person on a database why not add others on? Muslims? BNP-voters? Gypsies? Irish people? The homeless? The long-term unemployed? Sadly much of the public will support such a scheme, being sure that it's only "those people" who will be targeted, not "respectable citizens" like them. But once different databases have been established for all those different underclasses then they may well include the majority of the population, at which point the organizers of the whole scheme will throw up their hands in mock-exasperation and say: "Oh well, we might as well just put everybody on a single database and be done with it!" The only solution is to expose these scams before we've reached that point and refuse to be registered on any Big Brother databases, especially if they involve fingerprinting or microchips inserted into the body, as they will eventually. As with drugs, we "Just say no!"