Tuesday, 1 October 2013

White Chemtrails

A recent Channel 4 News programme featured a story on climate change that made me sit up big time:
http://www.channel4.com/news/can-we-beat-climate-change-with-geoengineering-ipcc-report-global-warming. The segment discusses a new report issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change about the feasibility of geoengineering. There are currently no published plans for any geoengineering project, however the idea is being discussed theoretically by the IPCC. What's interesting is that at the one minute mark, the newsreader brings up subjects that are "a bit out there!" He then goes on to describe the very same thing I saw as a child on Tomorrow's World, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2007/10/chemtrails-and-tomorrows-world.html. Just because the IPCC hasn't published any plans on geoengineering doesn't mean such plans have never been made. I think they have indeed been made, a long time ago now. What's more I think those plans have been put into action; this is what chemtrails are. If climate change is such a huge threat, or even if enough very effectual people think that it's a threat, they may well have chosen to launch the aircraft-based part of the project in secret. Surely when the safety of our planet is concerned they're not obliged to observe liberal piety! Personally I suspect that chemtrails may serve another purpose altogether and do not have anything to do with stopping climate change, (In fact the IPCC has finally admitted that global warming has stopped, "paused" in their words: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24173504, after people have lost their careers for suggesting it) but even the personnel involved with the project need not know that; the pilots and other individuals carrying out chemtrailing may well be compartmentalized out of full initiation and therefore have no idea what the substance is they are spraying. They may well believe they're doing something that is secret but good; saving the Earth from destruction. There are several theories relating to the true nature of chemtrails; they may be connected with HAARP or perhaps Morgellons Disease and transhumanism, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzW5Kb8u0Og. Either way one thing is certain, they are bad news for us. Incidentally, the idea of putting mirrors up in space between the Earth and the sun also sounds very hazardous, and I can't help speculating what covert purpose that idea might serve.

The Channel 4 News report continues with a debate between two climatologists which Richard D Hall would call a "phoney bone of contention". The interesting part is just the first two minutes. If chemtrails are real, and I'm convinced that they are, then they're a black budget programme, completely undisclosed with no democratic oversight at all. What we could be seeing in the next few months or years is an attempt to lift chemtrails out of the black world into the grey world and eventually the white; white being a project that is largely open, approved by parliamentary politics and publicly acknowledged. An analogy would be the F117 Stealth Fighter which began as a black project and slowly became grey, semi secret, and then white, not secret at all. From the point of view of the manipulators, the problem with making chemtrails public is firstly that a "decadent population" might not agree to them; most of the world's countries will have to allow their airspace to be used for them. Secondly, when chemtrails are sprayed publicly for all the world to see and we detect no difference at all in the sky between what is looks like then and what it's looked like for the last thirty years, we may start wondering if they really did begin doing it long before they came clean about it; and you can be sure we "conspiracy nuts" and "chemtards" will make a point of reminding them. How will they respond to that? My friend and fellow researcher Jackie Noise has made a video about this subject too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2VB39bRQhU

No comments: