For those who follow QAnon updates, this month has been very
bleak because the mysterious online entity known as "QAnon" has gone
silent. This is not unusual; Q has been known to vanish for several weeks at a
time since its posts began in 2017, however this time his/her/their silence
might be more significant because it was caused directly by 8-Chan closing
down. The host has dropped the board after several of its regular contributors
were involved in the horrific crimes. Brenton Tarrant, the mosque shooter in
New
Zealand and others in the United States of
America
all used 8-Chan. However, Q has not returned to their old stomping ground on
4-Chan even though that site is currently active and it was where they made
their debut. The QAnon aggregators like this one:
https://qanon.pub/,
remain frozen. Why has this happened? There are many theories. My good friend
and fellow radio broadcaster Kev Baker is absolutely convinced that QAnon is a
massive hoax. He has made several programmes about it, for example see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFLZp5XNabI.
I've watched this, but I've also watched debates between the two sides, for
example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQAo-eIC_Qw
and I think the Q-supporters get the upper hand. I've also discussed the issue with
Duncan Campbell and Mark Cocking on HPANWO Radio, see:
https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2018/07/programme-292-podcast-duncan-campbell.html
and:
https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2018/08/programme-297-podcast-mark-cocking.html,
and I think there is some reality to Q. Now, a new document has appeared with a
brand new take on the issue. It claims Q is indeed real, but that it is in fact
not a liberator and beacon of hope that we've been told it is; but that it is really
a sinister psychological warfare operation conducted by the very globalist
government it claims to oppose. The article is by somebody called Bernard
Grover who is quite well-known and sometimes appears on Jeff Rense's current
radio show. He has written a whole series of posts about QAnon on his blog and
his latest is called "The Quiller Q". He begins with the statement:
"My father, who was both an historian
and a politician, taught me one important lesson that has followed me for life:
Never trust a government anytime, anywhere, for any reason. To that, I would
add: most especially when the military gets involved in civilian affairs."
It is quite a fashionable idea at the moment to believe that absolutely
everything is fixed, everything is bent; and whenever anything happens that
makes you think some truth is coming out; then it is not really truth, it is
just a deeper level of the deception. On the surface, and before 2016, that
makes sense seeing as we have lived in what George Orwell called "an age
of universal deceit". The problem with this worldview is that it means the
age of deceit can never be seen to end short of some overt and obvious revolution that itself is generally regarded as impossible. This means that the lying government would have to be eternal and invincible.
Well, I don't believe that is the case; and I give more details in the
background links at the bottom. The problem is that the "everything is
fixed!" mentality has literally become part of the identity of certain
people in the Truth movement, and even in a strange way their sense of
self-esteem. When I read Grover's article I suspect that he is one of them. For
instance he has invented some new words such as:
Qnuverse,
Qvians and
Qult. This indicates that he has a very low
personal opinion of anybody who disagrees with him over QAnon. This is
confirmed by some of the derogatory remarks he makes such as:
"... Qvians may be able to dismiss this
interpretation because it does not fit with their myopic loyalty to an
invisible entity..." and:
"...hundreds
of thousands of people not only trust Q, but spread its pronouncements like a
surreal gospel..." and:
"...Just
what the Deep State means in the Qnuverse is undefined by Q, though Qvians all
'know' what it is when they see it..." He also calls Q commentators
"Acolytes".
This all too frequent
writing style indicates that Mr Grover is not being entirely rational. He is
giving away clues that he might be a bit of a typical "I can see through
the disinfo but you can't!" poser. However, we should still examine his logical
points.
Bernard Grover claims that the multiple mass-shootings that
are occurring across the world, especially in the
United
States, are not isolated events, but are in
fact being perpetrated deliberately in sequence by an organized conspiracy for
the objective of generating a mass psychosis of fear. Those responsible are
also controlling the QAnon phenomenon. Q's final post before going to ground
was:
"The month of AUGUST is
traditionally very HOT". "Hot" in military parlance means a
high possibility of violence. Within four days there had been two
mass-shootings in the
USA;
in
El Paso, Texas
and
Dayton, Ohio.
Thirty-two people were killed and dozens more injured. Two days before the last
drop, on the 30th of July, Q posted this:
"_Hot8_Hot9_Red_Red_y__FREEDOM_mark1-99_yPc_sigDConf_net[w1]"
This makes no sense at all in normal language. To me it resembles a line from a
computer program; but it could be some kind of code. Grover thinks that it
might be a form of mind control activation for a targeted individual or a
secret signal to an agent, like the old numbers stations, see:
https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/03/twitter-voicemail-update.html.
As I said, it is known that some of the gunmen over the last couple of years
regularly contributed to the Chans. Q also posted:
"[24hr Warning] Be vigilant. See something. Say something. Know
your surroundings at all times." which Grover interprets as a
certainty that they had full knowledge of what was to come. He cites a previous
situation in which QAnon seemed to know exactly when Senator John McCain would
die, even though McCain supposedly died of natural causes. The long silences of
a few weeks every so often are apparently the Q entity going into
"listening mode" to gauge what internet users are seeing the material
they already have and how they are sharing it. The current deletion of 8-Chan
is a useful excuse for the latest of these periods. Source:
https://augenguy.blogspot.com/2019/08/the-qiller-q.html.
The problem with QAnon analysis is that it is open to all kinds of interpretations.
Q usually writes in a very abstract manner, specifically to encourage discussion
and education among their readers. Drawing exact meaning from Q-drops is
similar to doing so from Nostradamus who also used symbolic and sometimes
surreal dialogue to deliver messages. Q also sometimes admittedly disseminates
false information for strategic purposes; all to further the Plan. I don't
think Bernard Grover's theory about Q is conclusive at all. Perhaps if more
actions happen in this "HOT" month of August, or none at all, before
it ends in just over a week, at the time of writing, it will add or subtract credibility
to his idea. QAnon is a highly complex subject and I've had to think long and
hard about where I stand on it, but I do maintain, without apology, Q is both
real and benevolent. People have accused me of wishful thinking, and of course
I am guilty as charged. Who wouldn't want Q's vision of an end to the New World
Order to be true? However, nobody is without bias. I get very suspicious of
those who claim that they are totally unbiased; they tend to be some of the
most biased people imaginable. Just because an idea is one we would desire does
not automatically make it is false. As I said, the "I can see through the
disinfo but you can't!" poser is a familiar type. The atmosphere of
pessimism in the Truth movement has partly been cultivated by those whose
pessimism for them is a back-slapping badge of bravery. I once had a long
conversation with somebody at paranormal event about who was a shill or wasn't
a shill, what was disinfo and what wasn't disinfo. I grew tired of their
attitude because for them the latter factors in both subjects were a tiny
minority... with themselves in the heroic vanguard of course, and it was pretty
clear that they were revelling in their self-superiority over others. I am
perfectly aware that disinformation exists, and I also know that we have to be
on the lookout for it. However, this does not mean that we should automatically
dismiss absolutely everything as disinformation
a priori, unless it immediately proves itself to be one hundred
percent legitimate, especially if our motives are just personal and not part of
the Truth movement's mission. Yes, if we switched on the Ten O'Clock News and
saw Dr Judy Wood being interviewed, we could be pretty confident that the New
World Order was on shaky ground, but I don't believe such an occasion would
happen spontaneously; it would have to have a cause. I think it would be the
end result of a process. Perhaps we are seeing the beginning of that process
now. If so, then it behoves us to give it a chance. We should proceed warily,
but hopefully. I think QAnon might well be a sign of that very beginning.
